The big short

Executive Summary





Pass/Consider/Recommend/Highly Recommend
Engine: Gemini

Highly Recommend

Explanation: The Big Short screenplay is a highly effective blend of comedic and dramatic storytelling that successfully translates a complex financial crisis into an engaging and accessible narrative. The script's strengths lie in its clever use of narrative devices, memorable characters, and insightful exploration of greed and human fallibility. While some areas could benefit from minor tightening, the overall quality, originality, and compelling narrative make it a highly recommendable project.

Engine: GPT4

Highly Recommend

Explanation: The screenplay for 'The Big Short' effectively captures the complexity and chaos of the 2008 financial crisis through a blend of sharp dialogue, innovative narrative techniques, and compelling character arcs. It successfully balances humor and gravity, making a complex subject accessible and engaging for audiences. The character development is particularly strong, showcasing the moral dilemmas faced by those who profited from the crisis while also highlighting the human cost of financial greed.

See Full Analysis
Promo


USP: What sets 'The Big Short' apart is its unique narrative structure that combines real-life events with a satirical tone, making complex financial concepts understandable to a general audience. The use of celebrity cameos to explain financial jargon adds a layer of entertainment while maintaining the film's educational value. This screenplay not only tells a story of financial collapse but also critiques the systemic failures that allowed it to happen, resonating with audiences concerned about economic justice.
Overview

Genres: Drama, Thriller, Finance, Comedy, Biography, Satire

Setting: 1979-2008, New York City and various locations across the United States

Overview: The overall score of 8.43 reflects a strong screenplay that excels in character development, thematic depth, and dialogue effectiveness. The screenplay's unique perspective on the financial crisis and its engaging narrative structure contribute positively to its marketability. However, areas such as pacing and emotional depth in certain scenes present opportunities for improvement.

Themes: Moral Corruption and Systemic Failure in Finance, The Human Cost of Greed and Recklessness, The Power of Individual Insight and Conscience, The Failure of Regulation and Oversight

Conflict and Stakes: The main conflict revolves around the characters' struggle to navigate the corrupt financial system and profit from the impending housing market collapse, with significant financial and ethical stakes involved.

Overall Mood: Tense and urgent, with moments of dark humor.

Mood/Tone at Key Scenes:

  • Scene 1: The mood is initially dull and stable, reflecting the banking environment of the late 1970s.
  • Scene 2: The mood shifts to hedonistic revelry mixed with ominous foreboding as the characters celebrate their financial success.
  • Scene 3: The mood is tense and introspective as Michael Burry reflects on his childhood and current financial concerns.
  • Scene 4: The mood is urgent and focused as Michael investigates mortgage fraud, highlighting his anxiety about the housing market.

Standout Features:

  • Unique Hook: The film's focus on the real-life events leading to the 2008 financial crisis, told through the eyes of unconventional characters.
  • Plot Twist : The realization that the financial system is built on a house of cards, leading to the eventual collapse.
  • Innovative Ideas : The use of humor and unconventional storytelling techniques to explain complex financial concepts.
  • Distinctive Settings : The contrast between the high-stakes world of finance and the personal lives of the characters.

Comparable Scripts:

  • The Big Short
  • Margin Call
  • Too Big to Fail
  • Inside Job
  • Wall Street
  • Billions
  • The Wolf of Wall Street
  • Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room
  • The Smartest Guys in the Room
Market Analysis

Budget Estimate:$20-30 million

Target Audience Demographics: Adults aged 25-54, particularly those interested in finance, drama, and social commentary.

Marketability: The screenplay's exploration of real events surrounding the financial crisis, combined with strong character arcs, makes it appealing to a broad audience.

The unique blend of humor and drama, along with a star-studded cast, enhances its marketability.

The film's relevance to contemporary issues in finance and economics can attract viewers interested in social themes.

Profit Potential: High, due to its potential for critical acclaim, award nominations, and a strong box office performance driven by its timely subject matter.

Scene Level Percentiles
Script Level Percentiles
Emotions Elicited Percentiles
Writer's Voice

Summary:The writer's voice is characterized by a sharp, witty, and often cynical tone, blending dark humor with serious subject matter. The narrative is fast-paced and engaging, utilizing vivid imagery and detailed descriptions, particularly regarding the financial world. Dialogue is realistic yet insightful, conveying complex financial concepts in an accessible manner while revealing the characters' personalities and internal conflicts. The directorial choices suggest a dynamic and intense style, incorporating elements like freeze-frames and quick cuts to enhance the tension and urgency.

Best representation: Scene 16 - Trusting the Unknown. This scene is the best representation because it most effectively encapsulates the writer's unique blend of dark humor, sharp dialogue, and vivid imagery. The analogy of the seafood stew to the manipulation of CDOs is both clever and darkly funny, highlighting the absurdity of the financial situation. The use of the Jenga game to visually represent the instability of the CDOs enhances the dramatic tension and foreshadows the impending crisis. The scene masterfully balances lightheartedness with a sense of impending doom, mirroring the writer's overall stylistic approach.

Memorable Lines:

  • Lewis Ranieri: Risk? What risk? The only risk is that you get paid back too soon! (Scene 1)
  • Jared Vennett: Basically I'm standing in front of a burning house and offering you fire insurance on it. (Scene 15)
  • Ben: You just bet against the American economy. If we’re right it means people lose homes, jobs, retirement savings, pensions. These aren’t just numbers. For every point unemployment goes up, 40 thousand people die. Did you know that? (Scene 41)
  • Mark: Wall Street took a good idea, Lewis Ranieri’s Mortgage Bond and turned it into an atomic bomb of fraud and stupidity that is on its way to decimating the world economy. (Scene 55)
  • Mark: Zero! There is a zero percent chance your subprime losses stop at 5%! (Scene 39)

Writing Style:

The screenplay predominantly employs a dialogue-driven style characterized by sharp, witty, and fast-paced exchanges. It focuses on high-stakes situations, often within the financial world, exploring complex moral dilemmas and power dynamics between characters. There's a consistent blend of humor and serious subject matter, with a focus on intense character interactions and intellectual conflict.

Style Similarities:

  • Aaron Sorkin
  • David Mamet
Other Similarities: While Aaron Sorkin and David Mamet are the most prominent influences, other writers like Adam McKay (with his satirical and socially conscious approach) and Quentin Tarantino (with his unique blend of wit, drama, and action) are mentioned in several analyses, suggesting a potential eclectic mix of influences. The consistent presence of financial themes suggests a specific genre focus. The occasional mention of writers like Noah Baumbach, Diablo Cody, and the Coen Brothers indicates potential stylistic shifts or subplots that deviate from the core Sorkin/Mamet style.
Story Shape
Emotions Elicited