Spotlight
A tenacious team of Boston Globe reporters unravels a decades-long cover-up of child sexual abuse within the Catholic Church, exposing a systemic crisis that shakes the city to its core.
See other logline suggestionsOverview
Unique Selling Point
What sets 'Spotlight' apart is its unflinching portrayal of real-life events through the lens of investigative journalism, emphasizing the moral responsibility of the press. The screenplay's focus on the human stories behind the headlines, combined with its exploration of institutional power dynamics, makes it a compelling piece of storytelling that resonates with audiences concerned about accountability and justice.
AI Verdict & Suggestions
Ratings are subjective. So you get different engines' ratings to compare.
Hover over verdict cards for Executive Summaries
Highly Recommend
Recommend
Highly Recommend
Story Facts
Genres: Drama, Investigative Journalism, Thriller, Investigative, Legal, Crime, Journalism
Setting: 1976 and 2001, Boston, Massachusetts
Themes: Journalistic Integrity and Investigative Reporting, Institutional Cover-up and Systemic Abuse, Faith vs. Doubt, Personal Sacrifice and Perseverance, Psychological Trauma of Abuse
Conflict & Stakes: The Spotlight team's struggle to uncover the truth about widespread abuse within the Catholic Church, facing resistance from powerful figures and the church's influence.
Mood: Tense and somber, reflecting the gravity of the subject matter.
Standout Features:
- Unique Hook: The investigation into the Catholic Church's cover-up of sexual abuse, a topic that resonates with contemporary societal issues.
- Plot Twist: The revelation of the extent of the abuse and the church's systematic efforts to silence victims and protect abusers.
- Distinctive Setting: The juxtaposition of the bustling Boston Globe newsroom with the somber realities of the abuse victims.
- Innovative Ideas: The use of investigative journalism as a means to confront powerful institutions and seek justice.
- Unique Characters: A diverse cast of journalists and survivors, each with their own motivations and backgrounds, adding depth to the narrative.
Comparable Scripts: Spotlight, The Boston Globe's Coverage of the Catholic Church Scandal, All the President's Men, The Insider, The Wire, A Few Good Men, The Post, The Crucible, The Silence of the Lambs
Screenplay Video
The video is a bit crude as the tool is still Alpha code. Contact us if there's a problem or with suggestions.
Share Your Analysis
Sharing
Share URL:
Script Level Analysis
This section delivers a top-level assessment of the screenplay’s strengths and weaknesses — covering overall quality (P/C/R/HR), character development, emotional impact, thematic depth, narrative inconsistencies, and the story’s core philosophical conflict. It helps identify what’s resonating, what needs refinement, and how the script aligns with professional standards.
Screenplay Insights
Breaks down your script along various categories.
Story Critique
Characters
Explores the depth, clarity, and arc of the main and supporting characters.
Emotional Analysis
Breaks down the emotional journey of the audience across the script.
Goals and Philosophical Conflict
Logic & Inconsistencies
Scene Analysis
All of your scenes analyzed individually and compared, so you can zero in on what to improve.
Analysis of the Scene Percentiles
- High dialogue rating (94.91) indicates strong, engaging conversations that likely enhance character interactions.
- Strong plot rating (88.32) suggests a well-structured and compelling storyline that captures audience interest.
- Excellent story forward score (92.12) shows effective pacing and progression of the narrative.
- Originality score (25.85) is low; the writer should explore unique concepts or twists to differentiate their screenplay.
- Structure score (29.93) indicates potential issues with the overall framework; focusing on traditional three-act structure could help.
- Engagement score (37.07) suggests that the screenplay may not fully captivate the audience; enhancing emotional stakes could improve this.
The writer appears to be more intuitive, with strengths in dialogue and character development but lower scores in concept and originality.
Balancing Elements- Enhance originality and structure to complement the strong dialogue and plot, creating a more cohesive narrative.
- Focus on developing character arcs and emotional impact to balance the high plot-driven elements.
Intuitive
Overall AssessmentThe screenplay shows strong potential with engaging dialogue and a solid plot, but it requires improvements in originality and structure to elevate its overall impact.
How scenes compare to the Scripts in our Library
| Percentile | Before | After | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scene Overall | 8.5 | 57 | Knives Out : 8.4 | face/off : 8.6 |
| Scene Concept | 8.3 | 66 | face/off : 8.2 | fight Club : 8.4 |
| Scene Plot | 8.4 | 83 | the boys (TV) : 8.3 | the dark knight rises : 8.5 |
| Scene Characters | 8.3 | 38 | face/off : 8.2 | True Blood : 8.4 |
| Scene Emotional Impact | 7.9 | 45 | Blade Runner : 7.8 | the dark knight rises : 8.0 |
| Scene Conflict Level | 7.8 | 58 | Erin Brokovich : 7.7 | True Blood : 7.9 |
| Scene Dialogue | 8.5 | 93 | a few good men : 8.4 | Easy A : 8.6 |
| Scene Story Forward | 8.7 | 88 | the 5th element : 8.6 | the dark knight rises : 8.8 |
| Scene Character Changes | 7.5 | 68 | Terminator 2 : 7.4 | Dr. Jekyll and Mr Hyde : 7.6 |
| Scene High Stakes | 8.1 | 67 | Thor : 8.0 | Titanic : 8.2 |
| Scene Unpredictability | 7.22 | 25 | Joker : 7.21 | Nickel Boys : 7.23 |
| Scene Internal Goal | 8.08 | 57 | The Wizard of oz : 8.07 | Blade Runner : 8.09 |
| Scene External Goal | 7.29 | 57 | Casablanca : 7.28 | House of cards pilot : 7.30 |
| Scene Originality | 8.46 | 25 | Silence of the lambs : 8.45 | Fargo Pilot : 8.48 |
| Scene Engagement | 8.93 | 40 | There's something about Mary : 8.92 | the boys (TV) : 8.94 |
| Scene Pacing | 8.24 | 47 | Mr. Smith goes to Washington : 8.23 | Fargo Pilot : 8.25 |
| Scene Formatting | 8.08 | 31 | The whale : 8.07 | Deadpool : 8.09 |
| Script Structure | 8.07 | 28 | severance (TV) : 8.06 | Her : 8.08 |
| Script Characters | 8.40 | 83 | the black list (TV) : 8.30 | Knives Out : 8.50 |
| Script Premise | 8.60 | 74 | Erin Brokovich : 8.50 | the black list (TV) : 8.70 |
| Script Structure | 8.40 | 91 | Casablanca : 8.30 | Blade Runner : 8.50 |
| Script Theme | 8.90 | 89 | Pan's Labyrinth : 8.80 | Silence of the lambs : 9.00 |
| Script Visual Impact | 7.70 | 48 | the 5th element : 7.60 | the dark knight rises : 7.80 |
| Script Emotional Impact | 8.60 | 94 | Casablanca : 8.50 | Breaking bad : 8.70 |
| Script Conflict | 7.20 | 28 | Mr Robot : 7.10 | Rick and Morty : 7.30 |
| Script Originality | 7.90 | 39 | face/off : 7.80 | groundhog day : 8.00 |
| Overall Script | 8.54 | 96 | Silence of the lambs : 8.51 | Jojo rabbit : 8.55 |
Other Analyses
This section looks at the extra spark — your story’s voice, style, world, and the moments that really stick. These insights might not change the bones of the script, but they can make it more original, more immersive, and way more memorable. It’s where things get fun, weird, and wonderfully you.
Unique Voice
Writer's Craft
Memorable Lines
World Building
Unique Voice
Writer's Craft
Memorable Lines
World Building
Script•o•Scope
Pass / Consider / Recommend Analysis
Gemini
Executive Summary
- The screenplay expertly integrates Sacha Pfeiffer's personal life and faith, creating a nuanced portrayal of her internal conflict and the ethical challenges she faces in covering the story. This adds depth and realism to the narrative. high ( Scene 20 Scene 21 Scene 22 )
- The interactions between Mike Rezendes and Mitchell Garabedian are electric, showcasing a compelling dynamic between a driven journalist and a complex, abrasive lawyer. This relationship drives the narrative forward and provides key plot points. high ( Scene 30 Scene 52 Scene 76 )
- The investigative process is depicted with incredible detail and visual clarity, effectively showcasing the painstaking work involved in uncovering the truth. The use of visual metaphors, like the scanning of directories, adds to the film's tension and suspense. high ( Scene 70 Scene 82 )
- The climax of Robby Robinson’s character arc, the confrontation with Jim Sullivan, is masterfully written. It reveals the full weight of the story's impact on those involved in the cover-up and shows Robby's own moral reckoning. high ( Scene 163 )
- The writing montage is powerful and effectively conveys the relentless pressure and emotional toll on the journalists without resorting to melodramatic clichés. This shows the dedication of the team in realistic fashion. medium ( Scene 157 )
- The Springfield courtroom scenes, while necessary for plot progression, could benefit from increased tension and visual dynamism to better engage the audience. low ( Scene 105 )
- While effective in conveying the passage of time and the intensity of the investigation, the montage could benefit from a slightly more varied visual approach to avoid monotony. low ( Scene 157 )
- The ending could be more emotionally resonant. The final scenes, while showing the overwhelming response, could benefit from a more focused depiction of the emotional impact on the team, allowing for a more cathartic conclusion. medium ( Scene 177 Scene 178 Scene 179 )
- The screenplay could benefit from a more in-depth exploration of the lasting psychological impact of the investigation on the Spotlight team. medium
- The screenplay effectively uses the contrast between the cramped Spotlight office and the opulent settings of the Catholic Church to highlight the power imbalance at the heart of the story. high
- The screenplay’s understated tone and realistic dialogue create a powerful sense of authenticity and immersion. high
- The screenplay effectively utilizes foreshadowing, setting up the story's central conflict early on in the police station sequence (Sequence 1). medium
- Lack of exploration of the systemic issues beyond Boston While the screenplay focuses intensely on the Boston Archdiocese, it mentions similar scandals worldwide. A deeper exploration of how these issues connect and the broader implications of the systemic issues would have added more thematic weight and complexity. medium
GPT4
Executive Summary
- The screenplay features authentic and engaging dialogue that captures the nuances of journalistic conversations and personal interactions. high ( Scene 1 (1) Scene 2 (6) Scene 3 (19) )
- Strong character development is evident, particularly in the arcs of the main journalists, who evolve as they confront the moral complexities of their investigation. high ( Scene 2 (6) Scene 3 (19) Scene 4 (34) )
- The screenplay maintains a consistent tone that balances seriousness with moments of levity, reflecting the real-life dynamics of a newsroom. medium ( Scene 1 (1) Scene 2 (6) Scene 3 (19) )
- The pacing is generally effective, with a steady build-up of tension as the investigation unfolds, keeping the audience engaged. high ( Scene 2 (6) Scene 3 (19) Scene 4 (34) )
- The narrative strength is compelling, with a clear moral imperative that drives the story forward and resonates with audiences. high ( Scene 2 (6) Scene 3 (19) Scene 4 (34) )
- Some scenes could benefit from tighter editing to enhance pacing, particularly in the middle sections where the narrative slows down. medium ( Scene 2 (6) Scene 3 (19) )
- While character development is strong, some supporting characters could be fleshed out further to enhance their impact on the story. medium ( Scene 2 (6) Scene 3 (19) )
- There are moments where exposition could be more subtly integrated into the dialogue rather than being overtly stated. medium ( Scene 2 (6) Scene 3 (19) )
- The screenplay could benefit from a more varied emotional range in certain scenes to deepen audience connection. medium ( Scene 2 (6) Scene 3 (19) )
- Some scenes could use more visual storytelling elements to enhance the narrative beyond dialogue. medium ( Scene 2 (6) Scene 3 (19) )
- There is a lack of deeper exploration into the personal lives of the journalists, which could add layers to their motivations. medium ( Scene 2 (6) Scene 3 (19) )
- The screenplay could include more scenes that depict the community's reaction to the investigation, providing a broader context. medium ( Scene 2 (6) Scene 3 (19) )
- There is a missed opportunity to delve into the psychological impact of the investigation on the journalists themselves. medium ( Scene 2 (6) Scene 3 (19) )
- The screenplay lacks a more pronounced antagonist, which could heighten the stakes and tension. medium ( Scene 2 (6) Scene 3 (19) )
- There could be more emphasis on the ethical dilemmas faced by the journalists, adding complexity to their decisions. medium ( Scene 2 (6) Scene 3 (19) )
- The use of real-life events and characters adds authenticity and weight to the narrative, making it resonate more with audiences. high ( Scene 2 (6) Scene 3 (19) )
- The screenplay's structure effectively builds suspense, leading to a powerful climax that delivers a strong emotional impact. high ( Scene 2 (6) Scene 3 (19) )
- The moral complexity of the story is well-articulated, prompting audiences to reflect on issues of power, accountability, and justice. high ( Scene 2 (6) Scene 3 (19) )
- The screenplay's ending is impactful, leaving audiences with a sense of urgency and the need for continued vigilance against institutional abuse. high ( Scene 2 (6) Scene 3 (19) )
- The balance between personal and professional stakes is well-maintained, enhancing the overall narrative depth. high ( Scene 2 (6) Scene 3 (19) )
- Character Depth The screenplay occasionally overlooks the deeper emotional struggles of its characters, particularly the journalists, which could enhance audience connection. For example, while the main characters are well-developed, supporting characters lack sufficient backstory and emotional arcs. medium
- Exposition Some scenes rely heavily on exposition rather than showing through action or dialogue, which can feel clunky. For instance, certain character motivations are explicitly stated rather than demonstrated through their actions. medium
Claude
Executive Summary
- The screenplay effectively establishes the high-stakes, fast-paced environment of the newsroom and the sense of urgency that drives the journalists to uncover the truth. high ( Scene 2 (6) Scene 5 (16) )
- The interviews with the victims provide powerful, emotional moments that humanize the story and underline the devastating impact of the abuse. high ( Scene 9 (25) Scene 10 (28) )
- The screenplay effectively portrays the institutional resistance and the power dynamics at play, highlighting the challenges the journalists face in their pursuit of the truth. high ( Scene 17 (50) Scene 25 (94) )
- The detailed process of the journalists' investigation, including the use of church directories and cross-referencing of information, adds authenticity and depth to the storytelling. medium ( Scene 22 (84) Scene 23 (90) )
- The screenplay effectively transitions to the aftermath of 9/11 and how it affects the team's ability to focus on the investigation, adding further complexity to the narrative. medium ( Scene 30 (114) Scene 31 (115) )
- The exposition of the Geoghan case in the team meeting could be more concise and impactful, with less repetition of information that the audience is likely already aware of. low ( Scene 13 (44) )
- The scenes with Eric MacLeish could be tightened and streamlined to maintain the narrative momentum, as they tend to get bogged down in exposition at times. medium ( Scene 20 (72) Scene 21 (76) )
- While the screenplay effectively portrays the emotional toll of the investigation on the journalists, there could be more exploration of the personal lives and relationships of the main characters, providing additional depth and context. medium ( Scene 27 (100) Scene 37 (149) )
- The opening sequence effectively sets the tone and introduces the central conflict, drawing the audience into the story immediately. high ( Scene 1 (1) )
- The screenplay skillfully navigates the complex power dynamics and institutional resistance, with the journalists facing both internal and external challenges in their pursuit of the truth. high ( Scene 28 (107) Scene 45 (165) )
- The final sequence, with the journalists returning to the office to face the overwhelming response, provides a powerful and impactful conclusion to the story. high ( Scene 59 (175) Scene 60 (177) )
- Character Depth While the screenplay does a strong job of developing the main journalists and their personal motivations, there could be opportunities to further explore the depth and complexity of the other characters, such as the victims, the Church officials, and the lawyers involved. Providing more insight into their backstories, internal struggles, and the nuances of their perspectives could add additional layers of depth to the narrative. medium
- Pacing There are a few instances where the pacing of the screenplay feels slightly uneven, with certain scenes either feeling too rushed or overly drawn out. For example, the exposition in the team meeting about the Geoghan case (scene 44) could be tightened, and the scenes with Eric MacLeish (scenes 72 and 76) could be streamlined to maintain the narrative momentum. Ensuring consistent pacing throughout the screenplay would help to create a more immersive and engaging reading experience. low
Summary
High-level overview
Title: Spotlight
Genre: Drama/Thriller
Summary: Set against the backdrop of Boston in 1976, Spotlight chronicles the intense investigation by the Spotlight team of the Boston Globe into systemic child abuse by Catholic priests and the Church's cover-up. The screenplay unfolds with a harrowing encounter at a Boston police station involving a distressed mother and church officials, setting the tone for the scrutiny that the team will later place on the Church's actions.
As the Globe's newsroom buzzes with both humor and tension regarding a potential staffing cut, new editor Marty Baron joins the existing team, advocating for a focus on the Church's inaction about priest abuse scandals. Ben Bradlee Jr. and Robby Robinson navigate the apprehension surrounding the investigation's risks, especially when Marty proposes pursuing legal documents connected to Cardinal Law and the abuse claims. Initial skepticism turns into determination when the team, led by reporters Mike Rezendes, Sacha Pfeiffer, and Matt Carroll, decide to dig deeper into the Geoghan case, despite tensions arising in the atmosphere.
Throughout the screenplay, the characters engage with survivors, legal professionals, and church officials, unraveling a complex web of secrecy and silence. The team faces various obstacles, including evasive attorneys, community backlash, and personal hesitations about exploring a delicate subject deeply intertwined with their own Catholic backgrounds. Massive pressure mounts as they discover shocking revelations, including that potentially 90 priests were involved in misconduct, emanating from subtle clues in old documents and directories the team meticulously investigates.
As the team collectively grapples with the emotional weight of their findings, they are driven by a commitment to uncover the truth. The stakes heighten as they prepare to publish their investigation amid fierce resistance from the Church and fears of retaliation. The emotional toll is felt across the newsroom, highlighting the struggles of journalists tasked with exposing painful truths while dealing with their own discomforts and trauma. Ultimately, as stories of survivors come to light, the film culminates in the powerful release of a sweeping exposé, igniting a public outcry and sparking widespread dialogues about accountability and justice within the Church.
Spotlight is a gripping portrayal of journalism's role in uncovering the truth and the systemic failures that allowed abuse to thrive, intimately focusing on the journalists' personal journeys through this harrowing investigation.
Spotlight
Synopsis
In the early 2000s, the Boston Globe's investigative journalism team, known as Spotlight, embarks on a groundbreaking investigation into the Catholic Church's cover-up of sexual abuse by priests. The story begins with the arrival of MARTY BARON, the new editor of the Globe, who challenges the Spotlight team, led by WALTER 'ROBBY' ROBINSON, to dig deeper into the allegations surrounding Father John Geoghan, a priest accused of molesting children. As the team delves into the archives, they uncover a pattern of abuse that spans decades, revealing that the Church has systematically protected its priests at the expense of countless victims.
The investigation intensifies as reporters MIKE REZENDES, SACHA PFEIFFER, and MATT CARROLL interview survivors and legal experts, piecing together a harrowing narrative of betrayal and silence. They discover that the Church not only failed to protect the children but actively moved abusive priests from parish to parish, allowing the cycle of abuse to continue. The team faces resistance from the Church and the community, as many are reluctant to confront the powerful institution that has long been a pillar of Boston society.
As the Spotlight team gathers evidence, including sealed court documents and testimonies from victims, they confront the moral complexities of their work. They grapple with their own connections to the Church and the implications of exposing such a deeply rooted scandal. The pressure mounts as they race against time to publish their findings before the Church can suppress the story.
In a climactic moment, the team finally obtains crucial documents that reveal the extent of the cover-up, including letters from Church officials acknowledging the abuse. The Globe's article, published in January 2002, sends shockwaves through the community and leads to a broader reckoning with the Church's practices, resulting in the resignation of Cardinal Law and a national conversation about sexual abuse in religious institutions. The film concludes with a powerful reminder of the importance of investigative journalism in holding powerful institutions accountable and giving a voice to the voiceless.
Scene by Scene Summaries
Scene by Scene Summaries
- On a cold December night in 1976, a Boston police station becomes the backdrop for a tense encounter involving a distressed mother, Sheila, and church officials. As an older cop discusses the emotional turmoil surrounding Sheila's situation with a young cop, Burke, an assistant DA, arrives to assess the unfolding drama. Inside the interview room, the bishop reassures Sheila about taking action against Father Geoghan, who is implicated in her distress. The scene captures the gravity of the situation, with the young cop observing the departure of the bishop and Father Geoghan, leaving unresolved tensions in the air.
- In the Boston Globe newsroom, Deputy Managing Editor Ben Bradlee Jr. humorously bids farewell to departing reporter Stewart, while Robby Robinson shares a light-hearted speech about Stewart's poker habits. After the farewell, reporters Sacha Pfeiffer and Matt Carroll discuss cake and Washington's numbers before entering Mike Rezendes' cramped office, where Mike expresses skepticism about the significance of a police department story. Robby enters, leading to a discussion about the new editor and potential cuts at the paper, highlighting the tension between pursuing stories and the newsroom's uncertain future.
- In the upscale setting of the Four Seasons Hotel restaurant, Marty engages in a tense conversation with Robby, an editor from the Spotlight team. As Marty reads 'The Curse of the Bambino,' he expresses concerns about the declining readership of the newspaper and the challenges it faces. Robby shares insights about the Spotlight team's commitment to investigative journalism, highlighting their pride in their work. The dialogue reveals Marty's intent to improve the paper's standing, but the scene ends without a resolution, leaving the future of the newspaper uncertain.
- Marty Baron arrives at the Boston Globe, introducing himself to the editors in a conference room where they discuss various news topics. Tension arises as Marty seeks to establish his authority among the seasoned staff, while Robby observes with uncertainty. The scene captures the bustling atmosphere of the newsroom, highlighting the dynamics between the characters, including casual exchanges about a recent game. The meeting ends with lingering curiosity and nervous energy.
- In a large conference room at the Globe newspaper office, a light-hearted meeting among staff takes a serious turn when Marty raises concerns about Eileen McNamara's column on a priest's alleged abuse of children. He advocates for investigating the church's inaction and suggests pursuing legal documents to uncover the Cardinal's knowledge of the situation. This prompts a debate among colleagues, with some expressing skepticism about the attorney's credibility and the risks of suing the church. The scene concludes with Robby intrigued by Marty's bold proposal.
- In a tense meeting at the Globe, Ben and Robby discuss the implications of a lawsuit from Baron regarding sealed documents in the Geoghan case. Joined by Mike, they contemplate the potential outcomes while receiving a call from Baron requesting a meeting. Transitioning to Marty's office, they face scrutiny over their investigation's thoroughness. Marty challenges Ben to delve deeper into Cardinal Law's knowledge of the abuse, suggesting the Spotlight team take on this critical project, leaving Ben and Robby to weigh the gravity of the request.
- In the Spotlight office, Mike, Sacha, and Matt receive urgent news from Robby about the need to scrub the Geoghan case due to allegations against Cardinal Law. Sacha shares her prior experience with lawyer Mitch Garabedian, prompting Mike to volunteer for the interview. The team decides to focus on the Geoghan case and set aside the Boston PD investigation, with Robby emphasizing the importance of discretion given the sensitive nature of the story. The scene captures the tense atmosphere of investigative journalism as the team prepares to delve deeper into the case.
- Sacha and Hansi visit Sacha's grandmother in South Boston, sharing a warm dinner where they discuss her upcoming church trip. Hansi encourages Sacha to share a potential story about the church, but Sacha hesitates. The scene shifts to Marty at the Globe, where he seeks Richard Gilman's support to challenge a protective order in the Geoghan case, aiming to sue the Catholic Church. Despite Gilman's concerns about backlash from the church community, he ultimately agrees to back Marty's initiative.
- In a tense sequence of events, Matt requests Lisa to gather clips for the Spotlight investigation at the Boston Globe, highlighting the urgency of their work. Meanwhile, Mike waits in Mitchell Garabedian's chaotic office, hearing the commotion of a phone call, which sets a serious tone for the challenges ahead. The scene shifts to a polished conference room where Robby and Sacha meet with Eric MacLeish, who articulates the complexities of the Geoghan case and the societal and legal barriers that prevent victims from coming forward. The emotional weight of the discussion underscores the unresolved conflicts surrounding abuse and the legal system's shortcomings.
- Mike Rezendes arrives at Mitchell Garabedian's office seeking information about the church-related lawsuits, particularly the Geoghan case. Despite his persistence, Garabedian remains evasive and defensive, expressing concerns about the church's influence and his own legal troubles. The conversation is tense, with Mike growing frustrated as Garabedian refuses to fully cooperate, only agreeing to consider Mike's request to speak with victims. The scene ends with uncertainty as Garabedian's reluctance leaves Mike's inquiries unresolved.
- In the Globe's library, a control panel activates, retrieving old newspaper articles related to a file marked 'Porter.' Intern Wanda brings a cart of clips to the Spotlight office, where Matt and Sacha are investigating a potential story about Phil Saviano and the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAP). As they review the clips, Matt uncovers troubling information about a priest, Liam Barrett, who has a history of molestation and was shuffled by the Church, leading to a deeper investigation. Tension arises as Wanda inquires about their story, but Matt dismisses her, keeping the focus on their serious investigation.
- At Fenway Park during a night game, Mike, Matt, Ben, and Steve Kurkjian discuss their investigation into the Church amidst the lively atmosphere. As the crowd reacts to a called third strike, the conversation turns tense when Ben expresses skepticism about their findings, particularly regarding a priest named Liam Barrett. While Matt steps away for food, Ben pressures Mike for solid evidence, leaving the investigation's future uncertain as Mike defends the importance of their leads.
- During a casual round of golf at Wollaston Golf Club, Jim Sullivan engages in lighthearted banter with his friends Robby and Paul. As they walk down the fairway, the conversation shifts from golf to more serious topics, including Robby's new editor and a sensitive case involving a priest named Father Barrett. Jim becomes reluctant to discuss the case, indicating a conflict between his professional obligations and personal concerns. The scene ends with Jim walking away, leaving Robby to contemplate the implications of their conversation.
- After a round of golf, Robby gets into Barbara's car, where they discuss his performance and his conversation with Jimmy about a suit. While Barbara expresses her belief in the Church's positive influence on the community, Robby reveals discomfort with her views, hinting at deeper issues. The scene captures the tension between their differing perspectives, ending with Robby nodding in response to Barbara, reflecting his mixed feelings.
- In Robby's office, he reviews clips on Saviano while Mike enters, joking about Robby's absence from golfing. They discuss the skepticism of their colleagues, Ben and Steve, who believe pursuing Saviano is futile. Despite this, Robby is resolute in his decision to bring Saviano in, and Mike supports him, questioning whether Baron is aware of the situation. The scene blends light humor with professional determination, ending with uncertainty about Baron's stance.
- Marty visits Cardinal Law's mansion and engages in a tense conversation about the independence of the newspaper, surprising Cardinal Law with his stance. Cardinal Law shares his past experiences in journalism and civil rights, but their differing views create an underlying conflict. A secretary delivers a wrapped gift, revealing a book titled 'The Catechism of the Catholic Church,' symbolizing Cardinal Law's influence. The scene shifts focus as Saviano arrives at the Globe to see Sacha Pfeiffer.
- In Robby's office, the team meets Phil Saviano, a survivor of priest abuse and a member of SNAP. Phil shares his traumatic experiences and the grooming tactics used by priests, expressing frustration over the Globe's previous disinterest in his information. As he discusses the spiritual and physical abuse he endured, the team reflects on their own Catholic backgrounds. Tension rises when Phil leaves for the bathroom, prompting the team to debate his credibility and the implications of his claims.
- In a tense encounter on State Street in Boston, journalist Mike Rezendes confronts attorney Mitch Garabedian, urging him to allow interviews with abuse victims for a larger investigation. Garabedian, protective of his clients' anonymity, initially resists but becomes intrigued when Mike mentions the Spotlight investigation. After a heated discussion in the lobby and elevator, Garabedian reluctantly agrees to meet Mike the following day, marking a small victory for the journalist.
- Sacha arrives at Cafe Francesca to meet Joe Crowley, who is visibly anxious and fidgeting with his coffee. They exchange pleasantries, with Joe apologizing for the mess and revealing his habit of eating muffins to cope with his nerves. Sacha asks to take notes during their conversation, indicating the importance of their meeting. The scene captures Joe's clumsiness and anxiety, contrasted with Sacha's calm demeanor, as they establish a rapport before delving into a more serious discussion.
- In a tense scene at Cafe Francesca, Joe Crowley shares his painful past with Father Shanley, a priest who introduced him to a world of sexuality before later molesting him. As Joe struggles to articulate his trauma, Sacha pushes for clarity, emphasizing the need for explicit language to address the gravity of the abuse. The emotional weight of the conversation leads Joe to suggest they take their coffees to go, reflecting his desire to escape the discomfort of the topic.
- In Peter's Park, Sacha and Crowley engage in a heartfelt conversation about Crowley's past sexual experiences with a priest. As Crowley shares his emotional turmoil and confusion regarding his sexuality, he grapples with the irony of being near a church and playground. Sacha offers support, encouraging Crowley to express his feelings, but the scene ends with Crowley questioning whether he could have confided in anyone about his struggles, leaving his internal conflict unresolved.
- In her grandmother's kitchen, Sacha reviews her notes and steps outside to call Joe Crowley about legal options for abuse victims. During the tense conversation, Joe shares his overwhelming experience with SNAP meetings and mentions a lawyer named Eric MacLeish, whom he found attractive. Sacha diligently takes notes, determined to gather crucial information despite Joe's hesitance, as the scene captures the serious atmosphere of her investigation.
- In the Globe's canteen, Robby learns from Matt about a hearing date set by Judge Sweeney and a betting pool initiated by Canellos. After a phone call with Sacha regarding Father Shanley and MacLeish's past cases, Robby meets Ben to discuss the investigation into Geoghan and the potential for more victims. Despite Ben's skepticism, Robby remains determined to follow his instincts about the case's significance, highlighting the tension and seriousness surrounding their investigation.
- In a serious and investigative phone call at his East Boston apartment, Mike speaks with Richard Sipe, a seasoned expert on the issue of abusive priests. Sipe shares his extensive background and reveals that the problem is far more widespread than isolated incidents, highlighting the systemic nature of abuse within the church. As Mike takes notes, the gravity of Sipe's revelations deepens his commitment to uncovering the truth, setting the stage for further investigation.
- In the Globe's cafeteria, Eileen reads the paper while Kurkjian works on a story. Matt approaches them, seeking historical data on a priest, hinting at a secretive investigation. Eileen directs him to Lisa for the information. Later, in the library, Lisa provides Matt with the 2001 Catholic Church Directory and mentions older directories at the Boston Public Library. Meanwhile, Robby and Mike discuss predator targeting patterns, emphasizing the need for more evidence against the church's discrediting tactics. The scene is marked by tension and urgency as Matt deflects questions and Mike feels pressured to gather information.
- In a dimly lit basement, Robby, Mike, and Matt sift through old church directories, uncovering troubling records of priests John Geoghan and Liam Barrett, who were on 'sick leave' during critical years, hinting at potential cover-ups. As they piece together the timeline, Robby receives a call from Sacha at the courthouse, who reports missing records related to their investigation, intensifying their urgency to uncover the truth.
- In a tense meeting at Greenberg Traurig, Robby and Sacha confront attorney Eric MacLeish about undisclosed settlements involving priests Paul Shanley and Ronald Paquin. MacLeish, defensive and evasive, refuses to divulge details due to confidentiality concerns, revealing that the settlements were handled privately with the Church and lack formal documentation. The scene highlights the conflict between the pursuit of justice for abuse victims and the legal protections for the accused, leaving Robby and Sacha frustrated and with more questions than answers.
- At a charity event in the lavish Copley Square Ballroom, Marty struggles to gain entry until powerful figure Pete Conley vouches for him. Once inside, Marty feels out of place but finds comfort in a conversation with Robby, who shares insights and humorous anecdotes about the Cardinal and the charity's connections. The scene captures the awkwardness and light humor of navigating social dynamics, culminating in a moment of camaraderie over shrimp toast.
- In a dimly lit Armenian diner in downtown Boston, Mike and Garabedian engage in a deep conversation over dinner. Mike reviews notes on a sealed criminal case linked to the Church, while Garabedian sheds light on the Church's influence and the complicity of figures like Eric MacLeish. Their discussion shifts to personal matters, revealing Mike's struggles with his marriage and Garabedian's choice to remain single for his work. As they reflect on societal issues surrounding child abuse, the tension between the Church's power and the pursuit of truth becomes evident. The scene concludes with Mike contemplating Garabedian's poignant insights, feeling a mix of frustration and connection.
- At a lively ballroom event, Robby confronts Jim Sullivan about the Church's handling of abuse cases, leading to a tense exchange. While Robby presses for transparency, Jim defends the Church's contributions and refuses to share details, citing ethical concerns. The conversation escalates, leaving Robby feeling isolated as Jim ultimately walks away, highlighting the unresolved conflict and moral urgency surrounding the issue.
- In Robby's office, Matt briefs Sacha and Mike on the church's tactics to conceal priests from scrutiny, revealing a pattern of frequent relocations. During a call with Sipe, they learn that only 50% of clergy adhere to celibacy, fostering a culture that protects abusers. Sipe cites a 1985 report warning about the financial risks posed by pedophile priests and estimates that six percent of priests in Boston could be offenders, potentially totaling ninety. The team is left in stunned disbelief as they grapple with the shocking implications of this information.
- In Ben's office at the Globe, Ben is taken aback when Robby and Mike reveal a source's claim of ninety priests involved in misconduct in Boston. Skeptical of such a staggering number going unnoticed, Ben questions the credibility of the source, Sipe. Robby suggests a new investigative strategy using directories to identify potentially problematic priests, which Mike supports. The scene captures the tension and urgency of their discussion as they resolve to pursue this new lead collaboratively.
- In a tense scene set across various locations in Boston, characters Sacha, Mike, and Matt are deeply engaged in researching directories for priests, revealing unsettling designations like 'Sick Leave' and 'Unassigned.' As Matt uncovers a troubling entry that leads him to a Victorian house, he is visibly shocked by what he finds. The scene culminates with Matt taking precautionary measures by taping a warning note on his refrigerator, highlighting his protective instincts for his children amidst the foreboding atmosphere.
- In a tense scene set in the Globe's Spotlight office and later in the lobby of One International Place, journalists Mike, Sacha, and Matt analyze an Excel spreadsheet revealing allegations against eighty-seven priests in Boston. Robby joins them and contacts MacLeish for more information. After a fraught phone call with Jim Sullivan, Robby discovers the number may rise to ninety. He confronts MacLeish, demanding details about the priests and a hidden list of names, but MacLeish remains evasive. The scene culminates in frustration as Robby and Sacha walk away, unresolved and determined to uncover the truth.
- In Mike's cluttered East Boston apartment, he engages in a serious phone conversation with Richard Sipe about faith and the Church's suppression of dissent. The call is abruptly cut off, leading to a visit from Ben, who brings pizza. As they discuss their investigation, Mike's probing questions about past leads concerning Phil Saviano spark frustration in Ben, resulting in a heated exchange. The scene ends with Ben leaving upset, highlighting the strain in their partnership amidst the weighty subject matter.
- In Marty's office at the Globe, the Spotlight team reviews a list of priests and victims, revealing that MacLeish settled cases against forty-five priests. Marty emphasizes the need to investigate systemic issues within the Church, prompting a discussion about Cardinal Law's potential knowledge of the abuse. The team agrees to focus on the larger institutional narrative rather than individual cases. Robby and Sacha are assigned to reach out to victims, while Matt expresses personal concerns about the implications of their investigation on his neighborhood. The scene ends with the team preparing for the next steps in their inquiry.
- In this tense scene, Sacha interviews a middle-aged man who recounts a bishop's visit urging silence about a troubling incident, while his mother copes by baking cookies, underscoring the absurdity of the situation. Maryetta Dussourd reveals the societal pressure to remain silent about the church's actions. Meanwhile, Sacha and Matt compile victim stories and discuss the psychological state of priests, with a cop confirming the police's reluctance to act against them. The scene culminates in Matt facing hostility from a local man, highlighting the community's defensiveness and the ongoing conflict surrounding the investigation.
- In a tense encounter at Ronald Paquin's home, reporter Sacha Pfeiffer confronts the priest about allegations of molestation. Paquin admits to inappropriate behavior but complicates the narrative by revealing he was raped. The interview takes a turn when his sister, Jane, fiercely defends him, demanding Sacha leave. The confrontation ends abruptly with Jane slamming the door, leaving Sacha visibly shaken and questioning the complexities of the situation.
- In the Hampden Superior Court, Jon Albano argues for the public release of documents related to the Archdiocese, facing scrutiny from Judge Constance Sweeney and opposition from the Church's lawyer, Wilson D. Rogers Jr. The atmosphere is charged as Garabedian, representing the victims, objects to accusations of sensationalism. Meanwhile, Mike observes the proceedings and engages with reporter Joe Quimby about the Globe's chances in the case. The scene highlights the escalating conflict over accountability and justice, culminating in a tense courtroom dynamic.
- On the steps of Hampden Superior Court, Mitch Garabedian expresses frustration over the Catholic Church's legal maneuvers while discussing a past encounter with ex-priest Anthony Benzevich, who reported misconduct but was ignored. Garabedian reveals his attempts to depose Benzevich, who now has a foggy memory, and his discovery of sealed documents containing incriminating evidence against the Church. Despite opposition from lawyer Wilson Rogers, Garabedian files a motion to depose Benzevich again, but warns Mike that the Church likely removed the documents. The scene concludes with Mike feeling uneasy about the Church's influence over the legal proceedings.
- In a tense scene at the Suffolk County Courthouse, Mike rushes into the records room searching for crucial documents related to the Geoghan case. He is shocked to find a key folder empty, heightening the urgency of his investigation. Meanwhile, Robby discovers a photo of Father James Talbot while looking through a yearbook at home. Mike calls Robby to share a tip about sealed documents that have become public, discussing their next steps to obtain them despite the setback. The scene concludes with Robby agreeing to contact Ben to pursue the necessary documents.
- On a September morning, Marty arrives at the Globe newsroom to find a TV broadcasting the World Trade Center on fire. He quickly calls for all reporters as the team, led by Ben, strategizes on how to cover the unfolding crisis. Amidst the chaos, reporters express concerns about the story's magnitude and the need to cancel prior commitments. The scene captures the urgency and tension in the newsroom as they scramble to respond to the breaking news, with ringing phones indicating the high demand for information.
- In this tense scene, Garabedian receives a frantic call from Mike, who is desperate to delay the refiled documents related to a sensitive Church case. Garabedian, bound by a judicial order, cannot comply, leading to a heated exchange before he hangs up. Meanwhile, Sacha meets Phil Saviano in a bar, where Phil expresses his frustration over the stalled progress on their abuse story. Despite Sacha's reassurances, Phil feels abandoned and leaves in anger, highlighting the emotional strain and urgency surrounding their investigation.
- In this scene, Marty expresses gratitude to Ben for his leadership on the 9/11 coverage, surprising Ben with his praise. Meanwhile, Mike, in a messy hotel room in Miami, receives an urgent call from Robby about refiled documents, prompting a need for immediate action. The scene contrasts the tidy office environment with Mike's chaotic surroundings, highlighting the emotional tones of gratitude and urgency.
- In this scene, Robby is on the phone urging Mike to rush to the courthouse while Sacha enters, determined to update Phil Saviano on their renewed efforts. She presents Robby with a 1993 news clip about priest accusations, but his abrupt dismissal leaves her feeling confused and hurt. The scene shifts to Matt Carroll, who struggles with insomnia and reflects on his past with the church, before transitioning to Robby meeting Kevin at a restaurant to discuss Father Talbot, where the mood shifts as the topic arises.
- In a tense scene at the Suffolk County Courthouse, Mike rushes to access sealed records related to the Geoghan case but faces bureaucratic obstacles. Initially denied entry by Clerk O'Brian, he eventually gains access to the Records Room, only to be informed that the records are sealed and he must seek a judge's approval. After learning that Judge Volterra is unavailable, Mike is left frustrated and anxious, waiting for his chance to proceed.
- In President Kemeza's office, Robby and Sacha confront Kemeza, Jack Dunn, and Pete Conley about the school's alleged ignorance regarding Father Talbot's misconduct. Tensions escalate as Robby reveals a personal connection to one of Talbot's victims, challenging Dunn's defense of the administration's lack of awareness. The discussion highlights conflicting views on accountability and the emotional weight of the allegations, ultimately leaving the matter unresolved.
- Robby and Sacha walk from BC High to the Globe, feeling out of the loop about a story involving Jack Dunn and Pete Conley. Meanwhile, Mike Rezendes confronts Judge Volterra at the Suffolk County Courthouse, seeking access to sensitive public records. The judge questions the ethics of publishing such information, while Mike argues for journalistic transparency. The scene captures the tension and ethical dilemmas faced by the characters, ending with uncertainty about Mike's request.
- In the Suffolk County Courthouse's records room, Mike discovers shocking files about the Church's knowledge of abuse cases involving Father Geoghan. After a tense exchange with Clerk O’Brian, who initially prevents him from taking the files, Mike negotiates to use the copier and rushes out to share his findings with Robby over the phone. As he reads a damning letter during a cab ride through Boston, the urgency of his investigation intensifies, revealing the Church's complicity in the cover-up.
- In a tense scene at the Boston Globe, Mike arrives after reading a letter detailing Father John Geoghan's misconduct and urges his team to publish the story immediately. The team is shocked to learn that auxiliary bishop John M. D'Arcy had warned about Geoghan, but Cardinal Law ignored the warnings. Mike's insistence on swift action clashes with Robby's call for a more thorough investigation, leading to a heated argument. The scene culminates in Mike storming out in frustration, highlighting the internal conflict over how to address the Church's cover-up.
- After dinner, Sacha struggles with the dishwasher, leading to a moment of frustration that catches Hansi's attention. A knock at the door introduces Mike, who engages in a heartfelt conversation with Sacha on the back porch. They delve into their feelings about a recent conflict involving Robby and church, revealing their emotional struggles and reflections on the past. The scene captures a tense yet introspective atmosphere, culminating in a shared sense of vulnerability and confusion between Sacha and Mike.
- In the Oak Room of the Fairmont Hotel, Robby and Peter Conley engage in a tense discussion about the Church's influence and the implications of their reporting. Conley expresses skepticism about Marty Baron's agenda, while Robby reflects on the culture of complicity surrounding powerful figures. The conversation highlights their differing views on the Church's leadership and ends with Robby requesting a comment from the Cardinal, leaving him contemplative as Conley departs.
- Robby receives shocking news that Judge Sweeney has ruled to unseal documents related to a case involving the Church, leading to a tense meeting with his team. As they discuss the implications and timeline for the documents, Canellos pushes for a story, but Robby insists on caution, resulting in a conflict that culminates in Canellos being ordered to leave the meeting, highlighting a division in their approach.
- In Marty's office at the Globe, Marty and Ben are taken aback by letters revealing negligence by Law. Robby, who discovered the letters weeks ago, argues for more time to investigate, believing the story is larger than just the letters. Ben, frustrated by the urgency of the situation, pushes for immediate publication to prevent competitors from breaking the story. Despite the tension, Marty ultimately gives Robby a six-week deadline to gather more evidence before they proceed with publication.
- In a bustling newsroom, Ben and Robby discuss the urgency of drafting a report before Christmas and the new PR contact, Donna Morrisey. After Ben's assertive instructions, Robby reflects on the criticism he received. The scene transitions into a montage showcasing various characters, including Mike and Sacha, as they work on the investigation, accompanied by a children's choir singing 'Silent Night.' The tension escalates when Robby confronts Jim about cover-up stories involving priests, leading to a heated exchange where Jim refuses to cooperate, ultimately asking Robby to leave his home.
- Robby leaves the Sullivan house and is confronted by Jim, who is frustrated with Robby's delayed response to a serious situation. Jim demands a list from Robby, marking significant pages before walking away, leaving Robby to ponder the implications. The scene shifts to the Globe building, where Mike and Matt are racing against a press deadline, discussing the urgency of gathering quotes and information amidst the tension.
- In Marty's office at the Globe, the team confronts the repercussions of their investigation into the Church. With Cardinal Law refusing to answer questions, they strategize on how to present their findings, including launching a tip line. Tensions rise as Robby critiques their past reporting and the missed opportunities to connect the dots on the abuse scandal. Marty attempts to unify the team, acknowledging their hard work while preparing them for the backlash they may face from the Church. The scene captures a tense and reflective atmosphere as the team grapples with the gravity of their findings.
- In a dimly lit newspaper building, Ben prepares to leave his office when Marty informs him that the Cardinal has chosen not to comment on an upcoming story. Despite this, Ben supports Marty's decision to proceed with publication, highlighting their commitment to journalistic integrity. Meanwhile, Sacha's grandmother is distressed by the early edition of the paper, while Sacha remains emotionally detached. The scene captures the tension between authority and the press, culminating in the urgency of the story's release as bundles of papers are loaded into trucks.
- In a somber scene, Mike grapples with the emotional toll of child abuse cases as he encounters a distraught mother and her children in a waiting room. Garabedian urges him to persist in his work, leaving Mike feeling overwhelmed. Meanwhile, Matt and Sacha share a moment of connection over their sleeplessness and Matt's new horror writing project, highlighting their internal struggles. The scene captures the stark contrast between the innocence of children playing and the gravity of the abuse being discussed, culminating in Matt answering a tip line call that signals the continuation of their investigative efforts.
- On a quiet Sunday morning, Mike and Robby arrive at the Globe, noting the absence of picketers. They find the newsroom dull, but upon entering the Spotlight office, they are met with chaos as the team is inundated with calls from victims of a scandal. The scene shifts from light-hearted banter to urgent action as Mike and Robby join their colleagues in managing the overwhelming situation, highlighting the gravity of the crisis.
📊 Script Snapshot
What's Working
Where to Focus
📊 Understanding Your Percentile Rankings
Your scores are compared against professional produced screenplays in our vault (The Matrix, Breaking Bad, etc.). The percentile shows where you rank compared to these films.
Example: A score of 8.5 in Originality might be 85th percentile (strong!), while the same 8.5 in Conflict might only be 50th percentile (needs work). The percentile tells you what your raw scores actually mean.
Hover over each axis on the radar chart to see what that category measures and why it matters.
Analysis: The screenplay 'Spotlight' effectively develops its characters, showcasing their depth, complexity, and transformation throughout the narrative. The characters are relatable and their arcs contribute significantly to the emotional impact of the story. However, there are opportunities to enhance certain character developments to deepen audience engagement.
Key Strengths
- The depth of character arcs, particularly Robby's transformation from a humorous editor to a principled leader, effectively engages the audience.
Analysis: The screenplay effectively establishes a compelling premise centered around the investigation of systemic abuse within the Catholic Church, showcasing strong character arcs and a clear narrative direction. However, enhancing the emotional stakes and refining certain character interactions could further engage the audience.
Key Strengths
- The premise addresses a critical societal issue, providing a strong foundation for character development and thematic exploration.
Areas to Improve
- Some character interactions lack emotional resonance, which could diminish audience engagement.
Analysis: The screenplay 'Spotlight' effectively utilizes a strong narrative structure and character arcs to engage the audience in a complex and sensitive investigation into systemic abuse within the Church. The interwoven character developments and escalating conflicts contribute to a compelling story. However, there are areas for improvement in pacing and the resolution of certain plot points to enhance clarity and emotional impact.
Key Strengths
- The interwoven character arcs effectively enhance the emotional weight of the investigation, particularly through the personal stories of survivors.
Analysis: The screenplay 'Spotlight' effectively conveys its themes of systemic abuse, accountability, and the moral responsibilities of journalism. It excels in character development and emotional resonance, though there are opportunities to enhance the clarity and integration of its themes throughout the narrative.
Key Strengths
- The screenplay's exploration of systemic abuse and the moral responsibilities of journalists is compelling, providing a strong emotional and intellectual depth that engages the audience.
Analysis: The screenplay 'Spotlight' effectively utilizes visual imagery to convey the gravity of its subject matter, with strong character interactions and settings that enhance the emotional weight of the narrative. The vivid descriptions of locations and character dynamics create a compelling atmosphere, though there are opportunities for greater creativity and symbolism to deepen the visual storytelling.
Key Strengths
- The vivid descriptions of settings, such as the Boston police station and the Globe newsroom, effectively establish the tone and atmosphere of the story. The contrast between the somber police station and the bustling newsroom enhances the emotional stakes of the investigation.
Analysis: The screenplay 'Spotlight' effectively elicits strong emotional responses through its exploration of systemic abuse and the personal stories of survivors. The depth of character development and the gravity of the subject matter contribute to its emotional resonance. However, there are opportunities to enhance emotional depth by further exploring the internal struggles of characters and the impact of their investigations on their personal lives.
Key Strengths
- The screenplay's exploration of survivor stories is powerful, particularly in scenes where characters recount their experiences, creating a deep emotional connection with the audience.
Analysis: The screenplay effectively presents conflict and stakes through the Spotlight team's investigation into systemic abuse within the Catholic Church. However, there are opportunities to enhance narrative tension by deepening character motivations and escalating stakes throughout the investigation.
Key Strengths
- The screenplay excels in portraying the moral dilemmas faced by the journalists, particularly in scenes where they confront powerful figures like Cardinal Law.
Analysis: The screenplay 'Spotlight' excels in originality and creativity through its compelling narrative centered on investigative journalism, nuanced character arcs, and the exploration of systemic abuse within the Church. The unique blend of personal and professional conflicts faced by the characters enhances the emotional depth of the story, making it a powerful commentary on truth and accountability.
Expand to see detailed analysis
View Complete AnalysisScreenplay Story Analysis
Note: This is the overall critique. For scene by scene critique click here
-
Character Robby Robinson
Description Robby's casual demeanor and playful banter during golf contrasts sharply with his intense focus and drive during investigative work. This shift feels jarring and could benefit from more subtle transitions to reflect the different contexts.
( Scene 38 Scene 46 ) -
Character Mitch Garabedian
Description Garabedian's abrasive and unpredictable nature is consistently portrayed, but there are moments where his sudden shifts in demeanor, such as his surprising vulnerability when revealing the manipulation of the Church documents, feel slightly out of character despite ultimately making sense within his complexity.
( Scene 29 (30) Scene 109 ) -
Character Matt Carroll
Description The sudden shift from Matt's overtly devout family man persona in the church scene to his later frantic investigation of the treatment center near his house feels a tad abrupt. A more gradual integration of his personal feelings into his work could strengthen his character arc.
( Scene 40 Scene 87 )
-
Description The sudden shift in Robby's behavior after receiving the 1993 clip feels abrupt and under-explained. More exploration of his emotional response to this discovery and its implications could enhance the narrative's emotional weight.
( Scene 123 ) -
Description The plot point that documents have been mysteriously removed from a public court filing is quite implausible and introduces a major inconsistency that is not fully addressed. The explanation offered by Garabedian feels insufficient to address such a critical plot device.
( Scene 111 )
-
Description The disappearance of the crucial documents from the court file is a significant plot hole. The narrative doesn't adequately explain how such a blatant act of manipulation could occur without leaving a traceable record or facing immediate consequences.
( Scene 111 ) -
Description The revelation that Robby and the Globe received a list of 20 priests implicated in abuse years prior, and then failed to follow up, is a major plot hole. It significantly undermines the narrative's portrayal of the Spotlight team's diligence and raises questions about their prior journalistic practices that are never properly addressed. This feels more like a plot device than a genuinely credible event.
( Scene 91 Scene 155 )
-
Description While the celebratory cake scene is realistic in its depiction of workplace camaraderie, some of the dialogue, especially Robby's jokes about Stewart's poker losses, feels somewhat forced and less organically conversational.
( Scene 6 ) -
Description Garabedian's aggressive and erratic dialogue, while consistent with his character, occasionally borders on caricature. While his intensity is believable, some lines could be refined to feel more natural within the flow of conversation.
( Scene 29 (30) )
-
Element Repeated emphasis on the Church's power and influence
( Scene 109 Scene 133 Scene 151 )
Suggestion The film effectively establishes the Church's power early on. Subsequent reiterations of this point could be streamlined to avoid redundancy and allow for a more concise focus on the investigative aspects of the story. -
Element Repetitive scenes of investigation and data gathering
( Scene 31 Scene 82 Scene 84 )
Suggestion The montage showing the team's painstaking research could be more effectively condensed. Focusing on key discoveries rather than the repetitive process of data collection would maintain the story's pace and impact.
Robby - Score: 84/100
Role
Protagonist
Character Analysis Overview
Mike - Score: 88/100
Role
Protagonist
Character Analysis Overview
Sacha - Score: 78/100
Role
Protagonist
Character Analysis Overview
Matt - Score: 79/100
Role
Protagonist
Character Analysis Overview
Marty - Score: 83/100
Role
Protagonist
Character Analysis Overview
Ben - Score: 74/100
Role
Supporting Character
Character Analysis Overview
Theme Analysis Overview
Identified Themes
| Theme | Theme Details | Theme Explanation | Primary Theme Support | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Journalistic Integrity and Investigative Reporting
40%
|
The entire narrative revolves around the Spotlight team's investigation, their dedication to uncovering the truth, and the obstacles they encounter. This includes their persistence in the face of skepticism, the challenges of accessing information, and the ethical considerations they face.
|
This theme explores the importance of holding powerful institutions accountable, the role of journalism in a democratic society, and the personal sacrifices involved in investigative reporting. It highlights the potential for journalism to expose injustice and bring about positive change. |
This is the central theme, driving the plot and motivating the characters' actions.
|
||||||||||||
Strengthening Journalistic Integrity and Investigative Reporting
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Institutional Cover-up and Systemic Abuse
30%
|
The film centers on the systematic cover-up of widespread child sexual abuse within the Catholic Church. The theme is shown through the actions of church officials, the legal system, and even members of the community who remain silent or actively protect those who committed the crimes.
|
This theme highlights the dangers of power imbalances, the consequences of secrecy and silence, and the way institutions can protect themselves at the expense of vulnerable individuals. It shows how systemic abuse can go undetected and unpunished for decades. |
This theme provides the central conflict and the subject matter of the investigation, fueling the Spotlight team's work and showcasing the necessity of their journalistic pursuit.
|
||||||||||||
|
Faith vs. Doubt
15%
|
The film explores the complexities of faith and belief, particularly within the context of the scandal. Several characters grapple with their faith in the church and in God, questioning the institutions and their leaders.
|
The conflict between faith and doubt adds a layer of emotional and spiritual depth to the story, highlighting the personal struggles of both victims and those grappling with the revelation of the scandal. |
This adds a moral and philosophical dimension, enhancing the overall weight and impact of the story by demonstrating the wide-ranging effects of the institutional cover-up.
|
||||||||||||
|
Personal Sacrifice and Perseverance
10%
|
The Spotlight team members dedicate themselves to the investigation, foregoing personal time and facing immense pressure. Their perseverance and determination in the face of adversity are crucial to their success.
|
This theme underscores the human cost of investigative journalism and the sacrifices reporters often make in their pursuit of truth. It highlights their commitment and passion for uncovering and exposing the truth. |
This reinforces the central theme by showcasing the dedication required for successful investigative reporting, emphasizing the human element behind the journalistic process.
|
||||||||||||
|
Psychological Trauma of Abuse
5%
|
The film depicts the lasting psychological impact of child sexual abuse on victims. The trauma is evident in the survivors' testimonies, their reluctance to come forward, and their ongoing struggle to cope with the consequences of the abuse.
|
This theme adds emotional depth and realism to the narrative, emphasizing the human cost of the scandal and demonstrating the lasting effects of abuse on individuals and their communities. |
This theme underscores the magnitude of the problem the Spotlight team investigates, providing powerful emotional resonance and adding to the gravity of the injustice being uncovered.
|
||||||||||||
Screenwriting Resources on Themes
Articles
| Site | Description |
|---|---|
| Studio Binder | Movie Themes: Examples of Common Themes for Screenwriters |
| Coverfly | Improving your Screenplay's theme |
| John August | Writing from Theme |
YouTube Videos
| Title | Description |
|---|---|
| Story, Plot, Genre, Theme - Screenwriting Basics | Screenwriting basics - beginner video |
| What is theme | Discussion on ways to layer theme into a screenplay. |
| Thematic Mistakes You're Making in Your Script | Common Theme mistakes and Philosophical Conflicts |
Emotional Analysis
Emotional Variety
Critique
- The screenplay exhibits a range of emotions, but certain scenes feel repetitive in their emotional tone, particularly those focused on the gravity of the abuse without introducing lighter moments or contrasting emotions.
- Scenes such as 1, 5, and 17 heavily lean on sadness and empathy, which can lead to emotional fatigue for the audience if not balanced with moments of levity or different emotional experiences.
- While the screenplay effectively conveys the seriousness of the subject matter, it could benefit from a broader emotional palette to maintain audience engagement throughout.
Suggestions
- Introduce moments of humor or camaraderie in scenes like 2 and 12 to provide relief from the heavier emotional tones, allowing the audience to breathe amidst the tension.
- Incorporate scenes that explore the characters' personal lives outside of the investigation, such as family interactions or lighter moments, to create emotional contrast and depth.
Emotional Intensity Distribution
Critique
- The emotional intensity is unevenly distributed, with peaks in scenes like 17 and 34, where significant revelations occur, contrasted by quieter moments that may lack emotional engagement.
- Scenes such as 6 and 10 maintain a moderate intensity but could benefit from heightened stakes to match the gravity of the subject matter.
- The climax of the investigation feels rushed in scenes like 50, where the emotional buildup does not align with the intensity of the revelations.
Suggestions
- Balance the emotional intensity by strategically placing quieter, reflective scenes between high-stakes moments, such as following the intense revelations in scenes 34 and 50 with a more subdued character interaction.
- Enhance climactic scenes by increasing the stakes and emotional weight, perhaps through character backstories or personal stakes that resonate with the audience.
Empathy For Characters
Critique
- Empathy for characters is strong in scenes like 17 and 38, where personal stories of abuse are shared, but it wanes in scenes focused on procedural aspects of the investigation.
- Characters like Robby and Mike sometimes come off as overly focused on the investigation, which can detract from the audience's emotional connection to their personal struggles.
- The emotional journeys of secondary characters, such as victims, could be further developed to enhance empathy throughout the screenplay.
Suggestions
- Incorporate more backstory and emotional depth for characters like Robby and Mike, particularly in scenes where they confront the realities of their investigation, to foster a deeper connection with the audience.
- Highlight the emotional experiences of victims in scenes like 17 and 38 by allowing them to express their feelings more fully, creating a stronger empathetic bond with the audience.
Emotional Impact Of Key Scenes
Critique
- Key scenes such as 50 and 54 deliver impactful emotional moments, but some climactic scenes feel underwhelming due to a lack of buildup or resolution.
- The emotional punch in scenes like 36 and 57 could be heightened by emphasizing the stakes involved and the personal toll on the characters.
- Certain pivotal moments, such as the courtroom scenes, lack the emotional resonance that could make them more memorable and impactful.
Suggestions
- Enhance the emotional impact of key scenes by restructuring dialogue to emphasize the stakes and personal connections, particularly in scenes like 50 and 54 where revelations occur.
- Incorporate visual and auditory elements, such as music or close-up shots, to amplify the emotional weight of climactic moments, particularly in courtroom scenes.
Complex Emotional Layers
Critique
- Many scenes present emotions in a straightforward manner, lacking the complexity that could deepen the audience's emotional experience.
- Scenes like 21 and 22 could benefit from exploring sub-emotions such as guilt or regret, which would add layers to the characters' experiences.
- The emotional layers in scenes focused on procedural elements often feel one-dimensional, missing opportunities to explore the characters' internal conflicts.
Suggestions
- Introduce sub-emotions in key scenes, such as guilt or regret, particularly in moments where characters reflect on their past decisions or the impact of their work on victims.
- Encourage characters to express conflicting emotions in scenes like 21 and 22, allowing for a richer emotional landscape that resonates with the audience.
Additional Critique
Balancing Seriousness with Light Moments
Critiques
- The screenplay often leans heavily on serious themes, which can lead to emotional fatigue for the audience.
- Scenes that focus solely on the gravity of the abuse without any contrasting emotions can feel monotonous.
- The lack of lighter moments can detract from the overall emotional engagement of the audience.
Suggestions
- Incorporate lighter, humorous moments in scenes like 2 and 12 to provide emotional relief and balance the heavier themes.
- Explore the characters' personal lives outside of the investigation to create emotional contrast and depth.
Enhancing Emotional Connections
Critiques
- While empathy for characters is strong in certain scenes, it can wane in others, particularly during procedural discussions.
- The emotional journeys of secondary characters, such as victims, are often underdeveloped, limiting the audience's connection to their struggles.
- Characters like Robby and Mike sometimes appear overly focused on the investigation, detracting from their emotional depth.
Suggestions
- Incorporate more backstory and emotional depth for characters like Robby and Mike, particularly in scenes where they confront the realities of their investigation.
- Highlight the emotional experiences of victims in scenes like 17 and 38 by allowing them to express their feelings more fully.
Strengthening Key Emotional Moments
Critiques
- Key scenes often lack the emotional buildup necessary to deliver a strong impact.
- Certain pivotal moments, such as courtroom scenes, do not resonate emotionally as strongly as they could.
- The emotional punch in climactic scenes can feel underwhelming due to a lack of resolution or buildup.
Suggestions
- Enhance the emotional impact of key scenes by restructuring dialogue to emphasize the stakes and personal connections.
- Incorporate visual and auditory elements to amplify the emotional weight of climactic moments.
| Goals and Philosophical Conflict | |
|---|---|
| internal Goals | The protagonist's internal goals evolve from a desire for control and justice in navigating the sensitive dynamics of the church abuse scandal to a deeper pursuit of truth and integrity in journalism. Throughout the script, he grapples with balancing professional responsibilities and personal beliefs while confronting the emotional toll of the abuse cases he investigates. |
| External Goals | The protagonist's external goals shift from discreetly handling the abuse scandal to rigorously investigating and ultimately exposing the systemic corruption within the Church through investigative journalism. He seeks to mobilize his team to uncover the stories of victims and hold powerful institutions accountable. |
| Philosophical Conflict | The overarching philosophical conflict revolves around the tension between preserving the Church's reputation versus prioritizing justice for abuse victims. This conflict is embodied in the protagonist's journey, where he grapples with loyalty to a powerful institution and the ethical obligation to speak out against its wrongdoing. |
Character Development Contribution: The protagonist undergoes significant character development as he evolves from someone overwhelmed by external pressures into a decisive leader who thrives in the face of moral dilemmas. His internal conflicts drive him to deepen his commitment to truth and protect the vulnerabilities of survivors.
Narrative Structure Contribution: The goals and conflicts create a structured narrative arc that escalates tension and works towards a climactic resolution, culminating in the publication of their investigative findings—a pivotal moment in the story that serves as the turning point for both the characters and the broader community.
Thematic Depth Contribution: The interplay of goals and conflict amplifies the screenplay’s thematic depth, engaging with complex issues such as moral obligation, institutional power, and the responsibilities of the press. It explores the impact of systemic abuse and the quest for truth, making it a poignant reflection on the pursuit of justice in the face of overwhelming opposition.
Screenwriting Resources on Goals and Philosophical Conflict
Articles
| Site | Description |
|---|---|
| Creative Screenwriting | How Important Is A Character’s Goal? |
| Studio Binder | What is Conflict in a Story? A Quick Reminder of the Purpose of Conflict |
YouTube Videos
| Title | Description |
|---|---|
| How I Build a Story's Philosophical Conflict | How do you build philosophical conflict into your story? Where do you start? And how do you develop it into your characters and their external actions. Today I’m going to break this all down and make it fully clear in this episode. |
| Endings: The Good, the Bad, and the Insanely Great | By Michael Arndt: I put this lecture together in 2006, when I started work at Pixar on Toy Story 3. It looks at how to write an "insanely great" ending, using Star Wars, The Graduate, and Little Miss Sunshine as examples. 90 minutes |
| Tips for Writing Effective Character Goals | By Jessica Brody (Save the Cat!): Writing character goals is one of the most important jobs of any novelist. But are your character's goals...mushy? |
Scene Analysis
📊 Understanding Your Percentile Rankings
Your scene scores are compared against professional produced screenplays in our vault (The Matrix, Breaking Bad, etc.). The percentile shows where you rank compared to these films.
Example: A score of 8.5 in Dialogue might be 85th percentile (strong!), while the same 8.5 in Conflict might only be 50th percentile (needs work). The percentile tells you what your raw scores actually mean.
Hover over each axis on the radar chart to see what that category measures and why it matters.
Scenes are rated on many criteria. The goal isn't to try to maximize every number; it's to make you aware of what's happening in your scenes. You might have very good reasons to have character development but not advance the story, or have a scene without conflict. Obviously if your dialogue is really bad, you should probably look into that.
| Story Content | Character Development | Scene Elements | Audience Engagement | Technical Aspects | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Click for Full Analysis | Tone | Overall | Concept | Plot | Originality | Characters | Character Changes | Internal Goal | External Goal | Conflict | Opposition | High stakes | Story forward | Twist | Emotional Impact | Dialogue | Engagement | Pacing | Formatting | Structure | |
| 1 - Shadows of Trust | Tense, Serious, Mysterious | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 2 - Farewell and Frustration in the Newsroom | Humorous, Serious, Sarcastic | 8.5 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 3 - A Conversation on the Future of Journalism | Informative, Reflective, Serious | 8.2 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 4 - New Beginnings in the Newsroom | Professional, Serious, Informative | 7.5 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | |
| 5 - From Banter to Burden: The Church's Shadow | Serious, Inquisitive, Concerned | 8.5 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 6 - Investigating the Shadows | Serious, Intriguing, Professional | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7.5 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | |
| 7 - Prioritizing the Geoghan Case | Serious, Professional, Intriguing, Informative | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 8 - Dinner Conversations and Legal Challenges | Serious, Tense, Intriguing | 8.5 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | |
| 9 - Uncovering the Truth | Serious, Informative, Professional | 8.5 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 10 - The Reluctant Advocate | Serious, Abrasive, Inquisitive | 8.2 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 11 - Uncovering the Past | Serious, Inquisitive, Informative | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 12 - Tensions at Fenway: The Investigation Debate | Serious, Inquisitive, Skeptical | 7.5 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 13 - Teeing Off Tensions | Serious, Light-hearted, Informative | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 6 | 8 | 7.5 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 8.5 | 8 | 8 | |
| 14 - Uneasy Conversations | Serious, Reflective, Contemplative | 8.2 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 15 - Determined Pursuit | Serious, Skeptical, Resolute, Casual | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 16 - A Tense Exchange at the Mansion | Serious, Reflective, Informative | 8.5 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 17 - Confronting the Past | Serious, Emotional, Informative | 9.2 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 18 - A Tenuous Agreement | Serious, Tense, Confrontational | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 19 - Nervous Beginnings at Cafe Francesca | Nervous, Informative, Intense | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 20 - Unveiling Shadows | Intense, Serious, Emotional | 8.5 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | |
| 21 - Reflections in the Park | Intense, Emotional, Serious | 8.5 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | |
| 22 - A Call for Justice | Serious, Reflective, Informative | 8.5 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | |
| 23 - Uncovering Truths | Serious, Intense, Intriguing | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | |
| 24 - Uncovering the Truth | Serious, Intense, Informative | 8.5 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 25 - Secrets and Investigations | Serious, Intense, Inquisitive | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7.5 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8.5 | 8 | 8 | |
| 26 - Unearthing Secrets | Serious, Intense, Intriguing | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 27 - Uncovering Secrecy | Serious, Confrontational, Inquisitive | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 28 - A Night at the Copley Square | Formal, Informative, Light-hearted | 7.5 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 7.5 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 29 - Dinner of Reflection | Serious, Reflective, Intense | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7.5 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 30 - Confrontation at the Copley | Serious, Intense, Confrontational | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 31 - Unveiling the Truth | Shocking, Serious, Informative | 9.2 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | |
| 32 - Uncovering the Truth | Shocking, Intense, Serious | 8.5 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7.5 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 33 - Uncovering Shadows | Intense, Suspenseful, Serious | 9.2 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 34 - Confronting the Silence | Intense, Confrontational, Serious | 9.2 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 35 - Tensions Over Truth | Tense, Skeptical, Reflective | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 36 - Uncovering the Truth: Systemic Issues in the Church | Serious, Intense, Intriguing | 8.5 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7.5 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8.5 | 8 | 8 | |
| 37 - Silent Struggles: Unveiling the Church's Shadows | Intense, Serious, Confrontational | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 38 - Confronting Shadows | Tense, Shocking, Awkward, Stunned | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 39 - Tensions in the Courtroom | Tense, Serious, Professional | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 40 - Uncovering the Truth | Tense, Revealing, Conspiratorial | 9.2 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | |
| 41 - The Empty Folder | Tense, Excited, Frustrated | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | |
| 42 - Breaking News: The World Trade Center Attack | Tense, Serious, Urgent | 8.5 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | |
| 43 - Tensions Rise: A Race Against Time | Tense, Serious, Confrontational | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7.5 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8.5 | 8 | 8 | |
| 44 - Urgency and Gratitude | Tense, Serious, Urgent | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 45 - Tensions and Revelations | Serious, Intense, Tense | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 46 - Frustration at the Courthouse | Anxious, Frustrated, Tense | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | |
| 47 - Confronting the Past | Tense, Confrontational, Emotional | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 48 - The Weight of Knowledge | Serious, Tense, Inquisitive | 8.5 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 49 - Uncovering the Truth | Intense, Shocking, Urgent | 9.2 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 7 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | |
| 50 - Urgency and Conflict at the Boston Globe | Intense, Urgent, Emotional | 9.2 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | |
| 51 - Fractured Reflections | Reflective, Emotional, Intimate | 8.5 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7.5 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8.5 | 8 | 8 | |
| 52 - Complicity in Elegance | Tense, Reflective, Confrontational | 8.5 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 53 - Tensions Rise Over Church Case Ruling | Serious, Tense, Stunned | 8.2 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 54 - The Urgency of Truth | Tense, Serious, Urgent | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 55 - Tensions Rise Before Christmas | Tense, Emotional, Serious | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7.5 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8.5 | 8 | 8 | |
| 56 - Confrontation and Urgency | Tense, Frustrated, Serious | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 57 - Facing the Fallout | Serious, Reflective, Tense | 9.2 | 9 | 9 | 8.5 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 7.5 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8.5 | 8 | 8 | |
| 58 - The Weight of Truth | Tense, Serious, Confrontational | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 59 - Echoes of Innocence | Serious, Intense, Reflective | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 60 - From Calm to Chaos | Serious, Intense, Chaotic | 9.2 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
Summary of Scene Level Analysis
Here are insights from the scene-level analysis, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and actionable suggestions.
Some points may appear in both strengths and weaknesses due to scene variety.
Tip: Click on criteria in the top row for detailed summaries.
Scene Strengths
- Engaging dialogue that effectively captures character dynamics and emotional depth
- Strong character introductions that establish motivations and set up future conflicts
- Tension-filled situations that maintain a sense of urgency and high stakes
- Effective depiction of investigative journalism, enhancing realism and audience engagement
- Exploration of ethical dilemmas that adds depth to character arcs and plot progression
Scene Weaknesses
- Limited character development in certain scenes, hindering emotional connections
- Lack of visual action and reliance on dialogue may lead to pacing issues
- Repetitive dialogue in places, which could detract from impact and engagement
- Limited exploration of individual character arcs, affecting overall depth of the narrative
- Abrupt character interactions or lack of resolution may leave audiences wanting more
Suggestions
- Focus on developing character arcs consistently throughout the screenplay to enhance emotional engagement
- Incorporate more visual elements or action to complement dialogue-heavy segments and maintain pacing
- Revise dialogue to reduce repetition and increase impact, ensuring each line serves a distinct purpose
- Strengthen supporting characters and their stories to enrich the narrative and maintain audience interest
- Ensure character interactions have clear resolutions to improve audience satisfaction and narrative coherence
Scene 1 - Shadows of Trust
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 2 - Farewell and Frustration in the Newsroom
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 3 - A Conversation on the Future of Journalism
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 4 - New Beginnings in the Newsroom
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 5 - From Banter to Burden: The Church's Shadow
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 6 - Investigating the Shadows
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 7 - Prioritizing the Geoghan Case
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 8 - Dinner Conversations and Legal Challenges
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 9 - Uncovering the Truth
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 10 - The Reluctant Advocate
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 11 - Uncovering the Past
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 12 - Tensions at Fenway: The Investigation Debate
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 13 - Teeing Off Tensions
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 14 - Uneasy Conversations
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 15 - Determined Pursuit
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 16 - A Tense Exchange at the Mansion
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 17 - Confronting the Past
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 18 - A Tenuous Agreement
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 19 - Nervous Beginnings at Cafe Francesca
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 20 - Unveiling Shadows
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 21 - Reflections in the Park
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 22 - A Call for Justice
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 23 - Uncovering Truths
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 24 - Uncovering the Truth
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 25 - Secrets and Investigations
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 26 - Unearthing Secrets
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 27 - Uncovering Secrecy
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 28 - A Night at the Copley Square
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 29 - Dinner of Reflection
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 30 - Confrontation at the Copley
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 31 - Unveiling the Truth
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 32 - Uncovering the Truth
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 33 - Uncovering Shadows
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 34 - Confronting the Silence
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 35 - Tensions Over Truth
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 36 - Uncovering the Truth: Systemic Issues in the Church
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 37 - Silent Struggles: Unveiling the Church's Shadows
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 38 - Confronting Shadows
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 39 - Tensions in the Courtroom
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 40 - Uncovering the Truth
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 41 - The Empty Folder
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 42 - Breaking News: The World Trade Center Attack
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 43 - Tensions Rise: A Race Against Time
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 44 - Urgency and Gratitude
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 45 - Tensions and Revelations
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 46 - Frustration at the Courthouse
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 47 - Confronting the Past
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 48 - The Weight of Knowledge
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 49 - Uncovering the Truth
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 50 - Urgency and Conflict at the Boston Globe
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 51 - Fractured Reflections
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 52 - Complicity in Elegance
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 53 - Tensions Rise Over Church Case Ruling
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 54 - The Urgency of Truth
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 55 - Tensions Rise Before Christmas
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 56 - Confrontation and Urgency
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 57 - Facing the Fallout
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 58 - The Weight of Truth
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 59 - Echoes of Innocence
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 60 - From Calm to Chaos
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Sequence Analysis
📊 Understanding Your Percentile Rankings
Your sequence scores are compared against professional produced screenplays in our vault (The Matrix, Breaking Bad, etc.). The percentile shows where you rank compared to these films.
Example: A score of 8.5 in Plot Progress might be 85th percentile (strong!), while the same 8.5 in Stakes might only be 50th percentile (needs work). The percentile tells you what your raw scores actually mean.
Hover over each axis on the radar chart to see what that category measures and why it matters.
Sequences are analyzed as Hero Goal Sequences as defined by Eric Edson—structural units where your protagonist pursues a specific goal. These are rated on multiple criteria including momentum, pressure, character development, and narrative cohesion. The goal isn't to maximize every number; it's to make you aware of what's happening in each sequence. You might have very good reasons for a sequence to focus on character leverage rather than plot escalation, or to build emotional impact without heavy conflict. Use these metrics to understand your story's rhythm and identify where adjustments might strengthen your narrative.
| Sequence | Scenes | Overall | Momentum | Pressure | Emotion/Tone | Shape/Cohesion | Character/Arc | Novelty | Craft | Momentum | Pressure | Emotion/Tone | Shape/Cohesion | Character/Arc | Novelty | Craft | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plot Progress | Pacing | Keep Reading | Escalation | Stakes | Emotional | Tone/Visual | Narrative Shape | Impact | Memorable | Char Leverage | Int Goal | Ext Goal | Originality | Readability | Plot Progress | Pacing | Keep Reading | Escalation | Stakes | Reveal Rhythm | Emotional | Tone/Visual | Narrative Shape | Impact | Memorable | Char Leverage | Int Goal | Ext Goal | Subplots | Originality | Readability | |||
| Act One Overall: 8.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 - Seeds of Scandal | 1 | 7.5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 8 |
| 2 - Newsroom in Transition | 2 – 4 | 7.5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| 3 - The Cardinal Gambit | 5 – 7 | 8.5 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 9 |
| Act Two A Overall: 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 - Legal Gambit and Initial Source Pursuit | 8 – 10 | 7.5 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | — | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 6 | — | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | — | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 | — |
| 2 - Archival Breakthrough and Internal Doubts | 11 – 15 | 8.5 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | — | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | — | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 9 |
| 3 - Survivor Testimony and Church Power Play | 16 – 18 | 8.5 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| 4 - Victim Interviews and Hidden Settlement System | 19 – 23 | 8.5 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| 5 - Cover-Up Blueprint and Institutional Pushback | 24 – 28 | 8.5 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 8 |
| 6 - Human Cost and Scale Revelation | 29 – 31 | 8.5 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| Act Two B Overall: 8.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 - Directory Deep Dive | 32 – 33 | 8.5 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 2 - Confronting the Cover-Up | 34 – 36 | 8.5 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 3 - Voices of the Victims | 37 – 38 | 8.5 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| 4 - Document Pursuit | 39 – 41 | 8.5 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 5 - 9/11 Interruption | 42 – 43 | 8.5 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 8 |
| Act Three Overall: 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 - Courthouse Evidence Rush | 44 – 49 | 8.5 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 2 - Team Fracture & Moral Reckoning | 50 – 51 | 8.5 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 3 - Institutional Maneuvers | 52 – 54 | 8.5 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 4 - Priest List Breakthrough | 55 – 56 | 8.5 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 8 |
| 5 - Publication & Unseen Fallout | 57 – 60 | 9.5 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
Act One — Seq 1: Seeds of Scandal
In a 1976 Boston police station, authorities and Church officials quietly manage allegations against Father Geoghan, showcasing institutional protection tactics. The bishop reassures a victim's mother while ensuring press silence, and officials depart unchallenged – demonstrating the entrenched system the protagonists will later uncover.
Dramatic Question
- (1, 3) The dialogue effectively establishes the tension and stakes surrounding the investigation.high
- (1, 4) The setting in a police station during a cold night creates a somber and serious atmosphere.high
- (3) The introduction of the Bishop and the interaction with Sheila hints at the Church's influence and the cover-up.high
- (1, 3) The emotional stakes for the characters involved in the investigation could be more pronounced to engage the audience.high
- (1, 4) The pacing could be tightened to maintain tension and urgency throughout the sequence.medium
- More visual descriptions could enhance the cinematic quality of the scenes.medium
- (3) Clarifying the motivations of the characters, especially Burke, would add depth to their actions.medium
- Adding a stronger hook at the end of the sequence could better compel the audience to continue.high
- A clearer sense of urgency or a ticking clock could heighten the stakes of the investigation.high
- More background on the victims or the emotional impact of the abuse could deepen the narrative.medium
- A stronger thematic statement about the role of journalism in society could enhance the narrative's depth.medium
{
"impact": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence establishes a strong emotional tone but lacks a climactic moment that would elevate its impact.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Add a moment of revelation or conflict that heightens emotional stakes."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The pacing is generally steady but could be tightened for better flow.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim unnecessary dialogue or exposition to maintain momentum."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "Stakes are introduced but not fully developed, leaving the audience wanting more.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the consequences of failure for the characters involved."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "Tension builds but could be enhanced with more immediate stakes or conflicts.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce obstacles that challenge the characters' progress in the investigation."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The sequence follows familiar tropes but has potential for unique angles.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Explore unconventional narrative techniques to enhance originality."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is clear and well-formatted, making it easy to follow.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Maintain clarity in dialogue and action descriptions."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "While the sequence is solid, it lacks standout moments that would make it memorable.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate a powerful visual or emotional moment that resonates with the audience."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Reveals are present but could be spaced for greater impact.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Adjust the timing of reveals to build suspense."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure but could benefit from a more defined climax.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure each scene builds toward a more impactful conclusion."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "Emotional stakes are present but not fully realized.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen the emotional connections between characters and their struggles."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The sequence introduces key characters and sets the stage for the investigation but does not significantly advance the plot.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Include a clear turning point that propels the investigation forward."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "Subplots are not yet fully integrated into the main narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Weave in subplots that enhance the main investigation."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, but visual motifs could be stronger.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate recurring visual elements that reinforce the themes."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The external goal of the investigation is established but lacks urgency.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce immediate obstacles that threaten the investigation's progress."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 4,
"explanation": "The internal struggles of characters are hinted at but not fully explored.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Highlight characters' internal conflicts more explicitly."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "Characters are introduced but lack significant development or challenges.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen character motivations and conflicts to enhance their arcs."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The sequence engages but lacks a strong hook to propel the reader forward.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"End with a cliffhanger or unresolved question to increase urgency."
]
}
}
Act One — Seq 2: Newsroom in Transition
The Globe newsroom bids farewell to a reporter while revealing team dynamics (Robby's humor, Mike's hustle). Marty meets Robby to discuss Spotlight's role and newspaper challenges, then enters the Globe for staff introductions. Editors review routine stories in a conference meeting, establishing Marty's observant presence amid institutional skepticism about change.
Dramatic Question
- (6, 8) The camaraderie and humor among the reporters create a relatable and engaging atmosphere.high
- (10, 12) The dialogue effectively conveys the stakes of journalism and the pressure of the new editor's arrival.high
- (10) Marty's character is introduced with a sense of authority and purpose, setting up future conflicts.high
- (7, 8) The depiction of the newsroom environment is vivid and immersive, grounding the audience in the setting.medium
- The sequence maintains a clear structure, moving smoothly from one scene to the next.medium
- (6, 8) The humor, while engaging, could be balanced with more serious undertones to reflect the gravity of the investigation.high
- (10, 12) Marty's introduction lacks a sense of urgency or conflict that would heighten the stakes of his leadership.high
- (10, 12) The dialogue could be tightened to enhance clarity and impact, reducing any redundancy.medium
- (12, 14) The transition between scenes could be smoother to maintain narrative momentum.medium
- More visual descriptions could enhance the cinematic quality of the sequence.low
- A clearer sense of the stakes involved in the investigation is needed to engage the audience more deeply.high
- Emotional stakes for the characters could be more pronounced to create a stronger connection with the audience.medium
- A more defined conflict or challenge for the characters would enhance the narrative drive.medium
- The internal struggles of the characters, particularly regarding their relationship with the Church, could be explored further.medium
- A stronger thematic thread connecting the characters' personal lives to the investigation would deepen the narrative.low
{
"impact": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The sequence establishes character dynamics but lacks a strong emotional or visual impact.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate more visual storytelling elements to enhance engagement.",
"Deepen emotional connections through character backstories or conflicts."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The pacing is generally smooth, but some scenes could be tightened for better flow.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim redundant dialogue or exposition to maintain momentum.",
"Ensure each scene contributes meaningfully to the overall narrative."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "Stakes are introduced but not fully developed, leading to a lack of urgency.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the consequences of failure for the characters and the investigation.",
"Introduce external pressures that heighten the stakes."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 4,
"explanation": "Tension and stakes are not clearly escalated throughout the sequence.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Add moments of conflict or disagreement among the characters to build tension.",
"Introduce a ticking clock or external pressure to heighten stakes."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "The sequence follows familiar tropes of newsroom dramas without significant innovation.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce unique character traits or conflicts that set the story apart.",
"Experiment with narrative structure or perspective to enhance originality."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence is generally clear and well-structured, though some dialogue could be more concise.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Edit dialogue for brevity and impact.",
"Ensure scene transitions are smooth and logical."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "While the sequence is solid, it lacks standout moments that would make it memorable.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate a memorable line or moment that encapsulates the themes of the story.",
"Create a visual motif or recurring element that resonates throughout the sequence."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "Revelations are present but lack a strong rhythm or pacing.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Space out key revelations to maintain suspense and engagement.",
"Introduce twists or surprises that keep the audience guessing."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure but could benefit from a more defined climax.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Identify a key moment that serves as a climax for the sequence.",
"Ensure each scene builds toward a clear narrative peak."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "Emotional stakes are present but not fully realized, leading to a muted impact.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen character backstories to enhance emotional resonance.",
"Create moments of vulnerability that allow characters to connect with the audience."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "The sequence sets up the investigation but does not significantly advance the plot.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce a specific plot point that propels the investigation forward.",
"Create a sense of urgency or stakes that necessitate immediate action."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "Subplots are hinted at but not fully integrated into the main narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Weave subplots more tightly into the main storyline to enhance cohesion.",
"Ensure secondary characters contribute to the main arc meaningfully."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, but visual elements could be more purposeful.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate visual motifs that reflect the themes of the story.",
"Ensure that the tone aligns with the emotional stakes of the narrative."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "The external goal of the investigation is established but lacks urgency.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce a specific deadline or external pressure that drives the investigation.",
"Create obstacles that challenge the team's progress toward their goal."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 4,
"explanation": "Characters' internal goals are not clearly articulated or advanced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify each character's internal conflict and how it relates to the investigation.",
"Show moments of reflection or decision-making that reveal character growth."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "Characters are introduced but do not experience significant shifts or challenges.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce a conflict that forces characters to confront their beliefs or relationships.",
"Highlight internal struggles that lead to character growth."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "The sequence engages the reader but lacks a strong hook to compel immediate continuation.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"End the sequence with a cliffhanger or unresolved question to drive curiosity.",
"Introduce a moment of conflict that leaves the audience wanting more."
]
}
}
Act One — Seq 3: The Cardinal Gambit
Marty pivots a staff meeting to Eileen McNamara's column about abusive priests, proposing to sue for sealed documents proving Cardinal Law's involvement. After debate, he tasks Spotlight with investigating Church systemic failures. The team mobilizes: Mike volunteers to interview lawyer Garabedian, Sacha identifies key contacts, and they deprioritize the police story for this high-risk probe.
Dramatic Question
- (16, 19) The dialogue is sharp and reveals character motivations and conflicts effectively.high
- (16) Marty's challenge to the team sets a clear narrative direction and raises the stakes.high
- (17) The interactions among the Spotlight team members establish camaraderie and tension, enhancing engagement.high
- (18) The introduction of legal complexities adds depth to the investigation's stakes.medium
- The sequence effectively transitions from a general meeting to a focused investigation, maintaining narrative momentum.high
- (16, 19) The emotional stakes for the characters could be heightened to create a stronger connection with the audience.high
- (17) Clarify the implications of the investigation on the characters' personal beliefs and backgrounds.medium
- (18) Introduce more tension in the dialogue to reflect the gravity of the situation and the risks involved.medium
- Ensure that the stakes of the investigation are clearly articulated to enhance audience investment.high
- Consider adding a moment of doubt or conflict among the team to deepen character dynamics.medium
- A clearer emotional arc for the characters is needed to enhance audience connection.high
- More background on the Church's influence in Boston could provide context for the stakes involved.medium
- A stronger sense of urgency or ticking clock could heighten tension throughout the sequence.medium
- Additional personal stakes for the characters could enhance the narrative depth.medium
- A moment of reflection or doubt from the characters could add emotional weight to their decisions.medium
{
"impact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence effectively engages the audience with its sharp dialogue and rising stakes.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Increase emotional resonance by deepening character backstories.",
"Add visual elements that enhance the narrative's tension."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence flows well, maintaining momentum throughout.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim any redundant dialogue to enhance pacing."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The stakes are clear and rising, particularly regarding the Church's influence.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Tie the stakes more closely to character motivations for greater emotional impact."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Tension builds as the team confronts the Church's power, but could be heightened further.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more immediate conflicts or obstacles to escalate tension."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence follows familiar tropes but presents them effectively.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce unique elements that differentiate the investigation from typical narratives."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence is well-formatted and easy to follow, with clear dialogue and action.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Maintain clarity in transitions to ensure smooth reading."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "While engaging, the sequence lacks standout moments that would make it truly memorable.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate a key emotional beat that resonates with the audience."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Revelations are spaced well but could be more impactful.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Increase the stakes of each revelation to enhance tension."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure, moving from setup to conflict effectively.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Consider adding a climax within the sequence to enhance its arc."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Emotional highs are present but could be amplified for greater resonance.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate moments of vulnerability or conflict among characters."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence significantly advances the plot by establishing the investigation's focus.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure that each scene clearly contributes to the overarching narrative goal."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Subplots are present but not fully integrated into the main narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Weave in subplot elements that enhance the main investigation."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, aligning well with the serious subject matter.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Consider visual motifs that reinforce the themes of secrecy and power."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The team makes clear progress toward their investigative goal.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the specific external obstacles they face to enhance tension."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Characters' internal struggles are present but could be more pronounced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Highlight internal conflicts through dialogue or actions."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Characters are tested through their responses to the investigation's challenges.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen character reactions to the moral implications of their work."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The rising stakes and engaging dialogue create a strong pull to continue.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"End the sequence with a cliffhanger or unresolved question to heighten anticipation."
]
}
}
Act two a — Seq 1: Legal Gambit and Initial Source Pursuit
Marty pressures the Globe's legal counsel to sue the Church for sealed Geoghan documents while the team splits efforts: Matt initiates archival research, Mike confronts reluctant attorney Garabedian, and Robby/Sacha probe MacLeish about victim challenges. The sequence ends with Garabedian tentatively agreeing to consider cooperation.
Dramatic Question
- (24A, 24B, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30) The sequence effectively establishes the contrasting environments of the Globe's resources versus Garabedian's cramped office, visually reinforcing the power imbalance the team is up against.medium
- (29, 30) The confrontational exchange between Mike and the abrasive Garabedian provides a memorable character introduction and foreshadows the team's challenges in accessing information.medium
- () Introduce a clearer narrative driver or emotional throughline to make the sequence feel more like a self-contained dramatic unit rather than just a series of information-gathering scenes.high
- (28) The conversation with Eric MacLeish, while informative, feels a bit too expository. Consider ways to deliver this critical information in a more natural, character-driven way.medium
- () Strengthen the thematic or visual cohesion of the sequence, either through recurring motifs, a tighter tonal palette, or a more unified sense of forward momentum.medium
- () A clear emotional or psychological turning point for one of the main characters is lacking. The sequence is more informational than transformative.medium
- () A sense of rising stakes or escalating jeopardy is not as present as it could be. The sequence feels a bit static in its forward progress.medium
{
"impact": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence effectively establishes the obstacles the Spotlight team faces and the power dynamics at play, but it lacks a clear dramatic arc or emotional payoff to make it truly stand out.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate a more pronounced narrative or emotional turning point to heighten the sequence's cinematic and thematic impact.",
"Explore ways to make the individual scenes feel more visually or tonally cohesive, creating a stronger sense of a unified dramatic unit."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence maintains a reasonably steady pace, with each scene flowing into the next, but there are moments where the momentum feels a bit uneven or stagnant.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Identify opportunities to trim or tighten any redundant or extraneous information, creating a more streamlined and propulsive narrative flow.",
"Ensure that the sequence builds to a clear climactic moment or point of heightened tension to maintain the audience's engagement and forward momentum."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The sequence gradually increases the sense of resistance and difficulty the Spotlight team faces, but the tension and stakes don't build in a consistently compelling way throughout the sequence.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Identify opportunities to create more pronounced moments of conflict, revelation, or emotional impact that raise the stakes and propel the sequence forward.",
"Ensure that each scene ends on a note of increased jeopardy, uncertainty, or unresolved tension to maintain a sense of forward momentum."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "While the sequence introduces some memorable characters and moments, the overall structure and narrative beats feel somewhat familiar, drawing from common investigative journalism tropes.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Identify opportunities to subvert audience expectations or introduce more unique storytelling approaches that set this sequence apart.",
"Explore ways to infuse the sequence with a more distinctive visual style, thematic focus, or character-driven emotional resonance."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "While the sequence establishes important information and introduces memorable characters like Garabedian, it lacks a standout dramatic moment or emotional resonance that would make it particularly memorable on its own.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate a more pronounced narrative or character-driven turning point that leaves a lasting impression on the audience.",
"Strengthen the thematic or visual coherence of the sequence to create a more distinct and memorable dramatic unit."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence introduces new information and revelations at a reasonably effective pace, but the spacing and pacing of these moments could be refined to create a more consistent sense of narrative tension and suspense.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Identify opportunities to withhold or delay certain pieces of information, creating a more pronounced sense of mystery and anticipation.",
"Ensure that each new reveal or twist builds upon the previous one in a clear, escalating manner, rather than feeling like a series of isolated discoveries."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear beginning, middle, and end, but the internal structure and flow could be tightened to create a more propulsive and cohesive narrative arc.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure each scene builds upon the previous one in a clear, escalating manner, rather than feeling like a series of disconnected information-gathering beats.",
"Identify opportunities to introduce a more pronounced midpoint or climactic moment that raises the stakes and propels the story forward."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The sequence establishes the personal stakes and internal conflicts for characters like Sacha and Mike, but it doesn't quite land a strong emotional payoff or resonance, feeling more informational than transformative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate a more pronounced emotional turning point or revelation that forces the characters to confront their values, fears, or desires in a meaningful way.",
"Ensure that the sequence builds to a climactic moment or resolution that leaves a lasting emotional impression on the audience."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence advances the main investigation, establishing new obstacles and sources of information, but it doesn't significantly alter the Spotlight team's overall trajectory or create a major shift in their situation.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Consider introducing a more impactful development or revelation that changes the team's approach or raises the stakes of the investigation.",
"Ensure each scene builds upon the previous one in a clear, escalating manner, rather than feeling like a series of disconnected information-gathering beats."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The secondary characters and subplots, such as Sacha's personal connection to the Church and Garabedian's conflicts, are reasonably well-integrated into the main investigative narrative, but could be more seamlessly woven throughout.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Explore opportunities to more directly connect the secondary storylines to the central investigation, creating a stronger sense of thematic and dramatic unity.",
"Ensure that the subplots and character arcs feel like they are progressing in parallel with the main plot, rather than feeling isolated or disconnected."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence effectively establishes a contrast between the Globe's resources and Garabedian's cramped office, but the overall visual and tonal palette could be more consistently reinforced throughout the individual scenes.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate more deliberate visual motifs or atmospheric elements that tie the sequence together, creating a stronger sense of thematic and cinematic unity.",
"Ensure that the tone and mood of each scene, from the dialogue to the camerawork, feels aligned with the overall investigative and suspenseful nature of the sequence."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence effectively advances the Spotlight team's external goal of investigating the Church's cover-up, introducing new obstacles and sources of information that push the investigation forward.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Find ways to raise the stakes or consequences of the team's external goal, creating a greater sense of urgency or jeopardy.",
"Ensure that each scene ends on a note of increased progress, setback, or unresolved tension to maintain a sense of forward momentum."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The sequence hints at the internal conflicts and motivations of characters like Sacha and Mike, but their internal journeys are not yet fully developed or integrated into the overarching narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Identify opportunities to more clearly externalize the characters' internal struggles, either through dialogue, behavior, or symbolic moments.",
"Consider ways to tie the characters' internal goals and emotional needs more directly to the obstacles they face in the investigation."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The sequence does a decent job of establishing the personal stakes and internal struggles for characters like Sacha and Mike, but their arcs feel more like setup than a clear turning point or transformation.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Explore ways to deepen the emotional and psychological impact of the investigation on the main characters, creating a more pronounced shift in their mindsets or goals.",
"Ensure that each character's response to the obstacles they face reveals something meaningful about their values, fears, or desires."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence does a decent job of establishing new obstacles and raising questions about the Spotlight team's investigation, but it lacks a truly compelling cliffhanger or unresolved tension that would make the audience immediately eager to continue reading.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate a more pronounced narrative hook or emotional twist at the end of the sequence that leaves the audience with a strong sense of anticipation for what's to come.",
"Ensure that each scene ends on a note of heightened uncertainty, conflict, or unresolved tension to maintain the audience's forward momentum and curiosity."
]
}
}
Act two a — Seq 2: Archival Breakthrough and Internal Doubts
Matt/Sacha discover church directories revealing priest transfers like Barrett's 'sick leave' cover-up. At Fenway Park, Ben pressures Mike for concrete evidence amid Saviano skepticism. Robby fails to extract info from church-connected Sullivan, then overrules doubters to pursue Saviano. Sequence culminates in Robby's decision to bring Saviano in.
Dramatic Question
- (11-13) The efficient and immersive research process, with the journalists piecing together clues from various sources, grounds the investigation in compelling procedural detail.high
- (34-36) The character moments and dialogue between the journalists and their sources/contacts add welcome texture and thematic depth, hinting at the personal and community-wide implications of this story.medium
- (37-39) Robby's conversation with Jim Sullivan crystallizes the moral and institutional complexities at play, raising the stakes and foreshadowing potential obstacles ahead.high
- (34-36) The interaction with Kurkjian and Ben feels a bit on-the-nose in its skepticism toward the Spotlight team's leads. More nuanced pushback or ambiguous reactions would raise the dramatic stakes.medium
- () Consider adding a more explicit, visceral glimpse of the victims' trauma or pain to heighten the emotional stakes and underline the moral imperative driving the Spotlight team's investigation.high
- () Strengthen the thematic through-lines and contrasts (e.g., faith vs. corruption, community loyalty vs. moral reckoning) to give the sequence a more cohesive dramatic and tonal identity.medium
- () A clearer sense of the Spotlight team's personal stakes or internal conflicts could heighten the emotional investment. How are they wrestling with their own beliefs, loyalties, or sense of purpose?medium
- () An unexpected or ironic twist that complicates the team's progress or sense of momentum could increase dramatic tension and narrative unpredictability.medium
{
"impact": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "This sequence lands with a strong sense of cinematic and emotional cohesion, building on the investigative procedural with compelling character moments and thematic undercurrents. The revelations and obstacles feel impactful and meaningful, rather than just serving plot progression.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Consider adding a more visually striking or stylized sequence \u2014 perhaps a montage or a specific stylistic approach \u2014 to heighten the cinematic impact and distinctions between this and other investigation-driven beats."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence maintains a steady, compelling rhythm, with a clear sense of forward momentum. However, there may be opportunities to tighten or restructure certain beats to create an even more propulsive and cinematic flow.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Evaluate the pacing and structure of individual scenes to identify any potential lulls or redundancies that could be streamlined or reordered for greater narrative drive.",
"Consider incorporating more pronounced turning points, reversals, or cliffhangers at strategic moments to heighten the sense of escalating tension and keep the audience compelled to continue reading."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence builds a steady sense of tension and complexity as the journalists uncover more evidence of the Church's systemic cover-up. However, the escalation could be heightened with more overt obstacles, reverses, or personal stakes for the characters.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce a more pronounced ticking clock or sense of imminent jeopardy to raise the dramatic stakes and create a stronger feeling of momentum and uncertainty.",
"Explore ways to more directly connect the team's professional risks to their personal lives or core beliefs, increasing the emotional cost of their investigation."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "While the sequence effectively executes the investigative thriller genre, some of the narrative beats and character dynamics feel slightly familiar or conventional. There may be opportunities to introduce more distinctive or subversive elements to heighten the sense of originality.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Identify opportunities to reframe or recontextualize common genre tropes in unexpected ways, either through the characters, the structure, or the thematic framing.",
"Explore unique visual or stylistic approaches that could lend a more distinctive identity to this sequence and its role within the overall screenplay."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence reads smoothly and efficiently, with clear scene descriptions, crisp dialogue, and a strong sense of cinematic pacing. The formatting and flow enhance the narrative drive rather than impeding it.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Consider opportunities to incorporate more evocative, sensory-driven language in certain moments to heighten the visceral impact, without compromising the overall clarity and momentum."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "This sequence stands out as a distinct and impactful chapter in the overall narrative, balancing procedural details with thematic depth and character development. The revelations, obstacles, and moral quandaries feel fresh and resonant.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Consider adding a more pronounced visual or stylistic flourish to this sequence to further distinguish it and cement its memorability, such as a striking opening, a montage, or a climactic moment shot in a unique way."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence paces its revelations and twists well, maintaining a steady sense of forward momentum and intrigue. However, a slightly more pronounced beat or turning point at the midway or climactic moment could heighten the dramatic impact.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Consider introducing a more significant revelation, obstacle, or reversal at a strategic point in the sequence to create a stronger sense of narrative punctuation and emotional resonance.",
"Evaluate the spacing and build-up of key discoveries or character moments to ensure they land with maximum impact, neither feeling rushed nor drawn out."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear beginning, middle, and end, with a strong sense of forward momentum and a climactic turning point. However, the pacing and structure could be slightly tightened in places to enhance the narrative flow.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Evaluate opportunities to condense or reorder certain beats to create a more streamlined, propulsive narrative arc."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence effectively cultivates a sense of moral gravity and personal investment, as the journalists grapple with the implications of their investigation. However, there may be opportunities to amplify the emotional resonance through more pronounced character moments or visceral representations of the victims' experiences.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Consider incorporating a more explicit, harrowing depiction of the abuse or its aftermath to heighten the audience's empathetic response and underscore the moral imperative driving the Spotlight team.",
"Explore ways to more directly connect the journalists' professional mission to their personal beliefs, relationships, or sense of identity, creating a stronger emotional through-line."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence advances the Spotlight team's investigation in significant ways, uncovering new leads and patterns that deepen the scope of the scandal. However, it stops short of a major breakthrough or shift in the overall trajectory.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Explore ways to end the sequence on a more pronounced story turning point or cliffhanger that propels the team into the next phase of the investigation with heightened momentum and urgency."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The secondary characters and subplots (e.g., Saviano, the victims' organization) are woven into the sequence effectively, but their presence and relevance could be more consistently highlighted and integrated throughout.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure that all supporting elements and storylines feel like integral, fully realized components of the central investigation, rather than peripheral or underutilized.",
"Explore ways to more directly connect the subplots and secondary characters to the main journalists' internal and external goals, creating a stronger sense of narrative cohesion."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence maintains a consistent tone and visual style that aligns with the investigative thriller genre and the serious subject matter. However, there may be opportunities to further accentuate or subvert certain stylistic elements to heighten the dramatic impact.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Explore ways to incorporate more distinctive visual motifs, lighting choices, or editing techniques to heighten the cinematic identity of this specific sequence within the broader script.",
"Consider juxtaposing moments of visual restraint with more stylized or visceral sequences to create a stronger sense of tonal and emotional contrast."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence moves the Spotlight team's external investigation forward in meaningful ways, uncovering new leads and obstacles that raise the narrative stakes. However, a more pronounced sense of forward momentum or a clearer path toward the next milestone could heighten the dramatic tension.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Consider ending the sequence on a more pronounced cliffhanger or turning point that propels the team toward their next major objective with a renewed sense of purpose and urgency.",
"Explore ways to more directly connect the team's external obstacles to their internal conflicts, creating a stronger symbiosis between the plot and character development."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence does touch on the journalists' growing determination and the moral quandaries they face, but the internal journey could be more clearly defined and developed. The sense of the characters wrestling with their own beliefs and loyalties is present but somewhat muted.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate more overt moments of self-reflection, internal conflict, or philosophical questioning to deepen the characters' emotional and thematic arcs.",
"Explore ways to externalize the journalists' internal struggles through dialogue, behavior, or visual motifs to make their personal stakes more tangible."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "This sequence represents a meaningful turning point for both Robby and Mike, as they grapple with the moral complexities of their investigation and confront institutional and personal obstacles. However, the character journeys could be further developed and emphasized.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Explore ways to more directly tie the team's professional challenges to their personal beliefs, relationships, or sense of identity, heightening the emotional stakes and creating a stronger sense of character transformation.",
"Consider adding a more pronounced moment of realization, reckoning, or internal shift for one or more of the central journalists to amplify the sequence's narrative and thematic impact."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "This sequence ends on a strong note of narrative momentum and thematic intrigue, leaving the audience eager to see how the Spotlight team's investigation will unfold and the moral/institutional consequences that may arise. The combination of procedural discoveries, character development, and looming obstacles creates a powerful forward pull.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Explore ways to amplify the sense of imminent jeopardy or uncertainty regarding the team's next steps, heightening the audience's curiosity and investment in the outcome."
]
}
}
Act two a — Seq 3: Survivor Testimony and Church Power Play
Marty's tense meeting with Cardinal Law (who gifts a catechism) contrasts with Saviano's arrival. Saviano details grooming tactics and church complicity, moving the team. Concurrently, Mike corners Garabedian on the street, leveraging Spotlight's involvement to secure a meeting. Sequence ends with Garabedian's agreement.
Dramatic Question
- (17) Phil Saviano's testimony is raw and powerful, effectively conveying the emotional trauma of abuse.high
- (16) The interaction between Marty and Cardinal Law sets a tone of tension and moral conflict.high
- (17) The dialogue is sharp and reveals character motivations, particularly the team's skepticism and determination.high
- (17) The sequence effectively builds suspense as the team begins to grasp the magnitude of the scandal.high
- The overall pacing maintains engagement, moving swiftly through critical revelations.medium
- (16) Clarify the stakes of Marty's meeting with Cardinal Law to enhance tension and urgency.high
- (17) Deepen the emotional impact of Saviano's testimony by including more personal anecdotes or reflections.high
- (17) Streamline dialogue to avoid redundancy and maintain momentum, particularly in the team's discussions.medium
- (18) Enhance the confrontation with Garabedian to raise the stakes and illustrate the challenges the team faces.medium
- Ensure smoother transitions between scenes to maintain narrative flow and coherence.low
- A clearer depiction of the community's reaction to the investigation could enhance the stakes.medium
- More background on the Church's influence in Boston would provide context for the team's challenges.medium
- A stronger emotional arc for Marty could deepen audience connection to his character.medium
- Increased tension in the team's internal dynamics could heighten the drama of their investigation.low
- More visual motifs or recurring themes could enhance the cinematic quality of the sequence.low
{
"impact": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence is emotionally engaging, particularly through Saviano's testimony, which resonates powerfully with the audience.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate more visceral imagery or emotional beats to heighten impact.",
"Ensure that each character's emotional journey is clearly articulated."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The pacing is generally strong, maintaining engagement throughout the sequence.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim any redundant dialogue or exposition to enhance flow.",
"Consider varying the pacing to create more dramatic tension."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The stakes are clear, particularly in terms of the investigation's impact on the community and the survivors.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the specific consequences of failure to enhance urgency.",
"Ensure that emotional stakes are tied to external risks for greater resonance."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Tension builds effectively as the team uncovers more about the abuse scandal, particularly through Saviano's revelations.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more obstacles or conflicts to heighten stakes.",
"Ensure that each revelation adds complexity to the investigation."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "While the subject matter is compelling, some elements feel familiar within the genre.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce unique narrative twists or character dynamics to enhance originality.",
"Consider unconventional storytelling techniques to elevate the sequence."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is generally clear and well-structured, though some dialogue could be tightened for clarity.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Streamline dialogue to enhance clarity and flow.",
"Ensure that scene transitions are smooth and coherent."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "Saviano's testimony is a standout moment that leaves a lasting impression on the audience.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Strengthen the emotional arc to ensure it resonates even more.",
"Create a more pronounced climax within the sequence."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Revelations are spaced effectively, maintaining audience engagement.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Consider varying the pacing of reveals to enhance suspense.",
"Ensure that each revelation builds on the previous one."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure, moving from introduction to conflict and revelation.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance the transitions between scenes to improve flow.",
"Ensure that each scene builds toward a clear climax."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The emotional weight of Saviano's testimony is profound, resonating deeply with the audience.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen the emotional arcs of other characters to enhance overall impact.",
"Ensure that emotional beats are clearly articulated and resonate throughout the sequence."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence significantly advances the investigation's narrative, introducing key evidence and characters.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the stakes for the team to enhance urgency.",
"Ensure that each scene contributes to the overall narrative arc."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Subplots are present but could be more tightly woven into the main narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Integrate subplots more seamlessly to enhance overall cohesion.",
"Ensure that secondary characters contribute meaningfully to the main arc."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, effectively conveying the gravity of the subject matter.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance visual motifs to reinforce thematic elements.",
"Ensure that the tone aligns with the emotional stakes throughout the sequence."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The team's investigation progresses significantly, with new leads and evidence introduced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the external obstacles they face to enhance tension.",
"Ensure that each scene contributes to the overall goal of the investigation."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The characters' internal struggles are evident, particularly in their reactions to Saviano's testimony.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Highlight the emotional stakes more clearly to deepen audience connection.",
"Ensure that internal conflicts are resolved or escalated by the end of the sequence."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence effectively challenges the characters' beliefs and motivations, particularly through their interactions with Saviano.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen the internal conflicts of the characters to enhance emotional stakes.",
"Ensure that character arcs are clearly defined throughout the sequence."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence effectively builds suspense and raises questions that compel the audience to continue.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce cliffhangers or unresolved tensions to heighten anticipation.",
"Ensure that each scene leaves the audience wanting more."
]
}
}
Act two a — Seq 4: Victim Interviews and Hidden Settlement System
Sacha records Joe Crowley's abuse by Shanley, emphasizing explicit language to convey gravity. Follow-up calls reveal MacLeish's role in buried settlements. Robby learns of a hearing date for sealed documents while Sacha identifies Shanley as the fourth abusive priest. Mike consults expert Sipe, who suggests 6% of priests are offenders.
Dramatic Question
- (56, 58, 60) The dialogue captures the raw emotions of the characters, making their experiences relatable and impactful.high
- (59, 61) The pacing of the interviews builds tension and urgency, effectively engaging the audience.high
- (60, 61) The juxtaposition of personal stories against the backdrop of the Church's power adds depth to the narrative.high
- (62AA, 62B) The connection between Sacha and Joe highlights the personal stakes involved in the investigation.medium
- The sequence maintains a consistent tone that aligns with the film's overall themes of truth and accountability.high
- (58, 60) Some dialogue feels overly expository; tightening it could enhance emotional impact.high
- (61) The pacing slows in certain areas; consider trimming redundant dialogue to maintain momentum.high
- (62AA) The transition between scenes could be smoother to enhance flow and coherence.medium
- (59) Clarifying the stakes for Patrick could heighten emotional engagement and urgency.medium
- (60) Adding more visual cues or actions could enhance the emotional resonance of the dialogue.medium
- A clearer emotional arc for Joe Crowley could deepen audience connection.high
- More background on the Church's influence in the community would provide context for the characters' fears.medium
- A stronger sense of urgency in the investigation could heighten tension throughout the sequence.medium
- More varied emotional responses from the characters could enhance the depth of their experiences.medium
- A clearer connection between the characters' pasts and their current struggles would enrich the narrative.medium
{
"impact": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence is emotionally striking, with survivor testimonies that resonate deeply with the audience.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate more visual storytelling elements to enhance emotional engagement.",
"Use music or sound design to amplify the emotional weight of key moments."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The pacing is generally effective, but some scenes could be tightened for better flow.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim redundant dialogue to maintain momentum.",
"Ensure that transitions between scenes are smooth to enhance pacing."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The stakes are high, with emotional and societal consequences tied to the investigation's success.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the specific losses that will occur if the investigation fails.",
"Tie emotional stakes to external risks to enhance resonance."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Tension builds as the team uncovers more disturbing details, heightening the stakes of their investigation.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more immediate obstacles or conflicts to increase tension.",
"Create a sense of urgency by incorporating time constraints or external pressures."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "While the themes are powerful, the structure follows familiar patterns in investigative dramas.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce unique narrative devices or perspectives to enhance originality.",
"Consider unexpected twists that challenge audience expectations."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is generally clear and well-structured, though some dialogue could be more concise.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Edit for clarity and brevity in dialogue.",
"Ensure that scene transitions are clear and logical."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The emotional weight of survivor stories makes this sequence memorable and impactful.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Highlight key moments with visual or auditory motifs to enhance memorability.",
"Ensure that each character's story has a distinct emotional arc that resonates with the audience."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Revelations are spaced effectively, maintaining audience engagement throughout.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Consider varying the pacing of reveals to create more dramatic tension.",
"Ensure that each revelation builds on the last to maintain momentum."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure, moving from introductions to deeper revelations.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Consider adding a more defined climax to heighten emotional impact.",
"Ensure that transitions between scenes are smooth to maintain narrative flow."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence delivers strong emotional highs through survivor testimonies, resonating deeply with the audience.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Amplify emotional moments with visual or auditory cues.",
"Ensure that each character's story has a clear emotional arc that resonates."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence significantly advances the investigation by uncovering critical testimonies and connections.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the implications of each testimony on the overall investigation to enhance narrative momentum.",
"Ensure that each scene builds toward a clear turning point in the investigation."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Subplots are present but could be more tightly woven into the main narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure that subplots enhance the main arc rather than feeling disconnected.",
"Create crossover moments where subplots directly impact the main investigation."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, aligning with the film's themes of truth and accountability.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance visual motifs that reflect the emotional weight of the narrative.",
"Ensure that the visual style supports the emotional tone of the sequence."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The investigation moves forward as new testimonies are uncovered, increasing the urgency.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the stakes of the investigation to enhance external conflict.",
"Introduce more direct opposition to the team's efforts to heighten tension."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Characters show progress in confronting their pasts, but could benefit from clearer emotional arcs.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Make internal struggles more visible through dialogue and action.",
"Create moments of reflection that allow characters to process their experiences."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Characters are tested through their willingness to confront painful memories, leading to growth.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen the internal conflict for each character to enhance emotional stakes.",
"Highlight moments of vulnerability to amplify character development."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The emotional weight of the testimonies and the urgency of the investigation create a strong pull to continue.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce cliffhangers or unresolved questions to heighten suspense.",
"Ensure that each scene ends with a sense of anticipation for what comes next."
]
}
}
Act two a — Seq 5: Cover-Up Blueprint and Institutional Pushback
The team cross-references directories, confirming 'sick leave' as a cover-up tactic. Robby/Sacha confront MacLeish about off-record settlements, exposing church-legal collusion. Marty navigates a church charity event where Conley and Robby underscore the Cardinal's influence. Sequence peaks with MacLeish admitting settlements lacked court oversight.
Dramatic Question
- (24, 25, 26) The dialogue-driven scenes effectively convey the gravity of the investigation and the emotional weight of the subject matter.high
- (27) The confrontation with MacLeish highlights the ethical dilemmas and challenges faced by the journalists, adding depth to the narrative.high
- (28) The interactions at the Copley Square Ballroom provide a contrast to the investigative work, showcasing the societal implications of the Church's actions.medium
- (25, 27) Some scenes feel slightly disjointed; tightening the dialogue and transitions could enhance flow and coherence.high
- (24, 26) The stakes of the investigation could be made clearer to heighten tension and urgency throughout the sequence.high
- (28) The pacing slows down during the ballroom scene; consider trimming dialogue to maintain momentum.medium
- A clearer emotional arc for the characters could enhance audience connection and investment in their journey.medium
- More visual motifs or recurring themes could strengthen the narrative cohesion and emotional resonance.low
{
"impact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is emotionally engaging, with strong dialogue that resonates with the audience, particularly in scenes of confrontation and revelation.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Increase the emotional stakes in character interactions to enhance impact."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The pacing is generally strong, though some scenes could be tightened for better flow.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim dialogue in slower scenes to maintain momentum."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The stakes are clear, with significant emotional and societal consequences tied to the investigation's success.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Heighten the urgency of the stakes to increase tension."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Tension builds effectively as the journalists face resistance and uncover deeper layers of the scandal.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more immediate obstacles to heighten urgency."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "While the subject matter is compelling, the execution follows familiar tropes of investigative journalism.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Explore unique narrative angles or character perspectives."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is clear and well-structured, with effective dialogue and scene transitions.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure consistent formatting for clarity."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "While impactful, some scenes could be more distinctive to leave a lasting impression.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Highlight key moments with stronger visual or emotional cues."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Revelations are spaced effectively, maintaining audience engagement.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Consider varying the pacing of reveals to enhance suspense."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure, moving from investigation to confrontation, but could benefit from a more defined climax.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Add a more pronounced turning point to enhance narrative flow."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence effectively elicits emotional responses, particularly through survivor testimonies and ethical dilemmas.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen emotional connections through character backstories."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence significantly advances the plot by revealing critical information about the Church's cover-up and the journalists' growing determination.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure each scene builds on the previous one to maintain momentum."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Subplots are present but could be more tightly woven into the main narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Integrate subplots more seamlessly into the main investigation."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, but visual motifs could be more pronounced to enhance thematic depth.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce recurring visual elements that reflect the narrative's themes."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The journalists make significant strides in their investigation, uncovering crucial evidence.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the external goals to enhance narrative clarity."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The internal struggles of the characters are present but could be more explicitly tied to their external actions.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Make internal conflicts more visible through dialogue and action."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Characters are tested through their interactions and revelations, but deeper emotional shifts could be explored.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Focus on internal conflicts to amplify character development."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence creates a strong desire to see how the investigation unfolds, driven by tension and unresolved questions.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"End with a cliffhanger or unresolved tension to enhance drive."
]
}
}
Act two a — Seq 6: Human Cost and Scale Revelation
Mike bonds with Garabedian over outsider status and church corruption. Robby's final appeal to Sullivan fails, emphasizing community denial. The team consolidates evidence: Matt explains priest-hiding designations while Sipe confirms 90 abusive priests in Boston, staggering the team. Sequence ends with the horrific scale fully revealed.
Dramatic Question
- (29, 30, 31) The dialogue is sharp and reveals character motivations and moral dilemmas effectively.high
- (29) Garabedian's insights provide a powerful commentary on the societal complicity in abuse, enhancing thematic depth.high
- (31) The phone call with Sipe introduces critical information that escalates the stakes of the investigation.high
- (30) The tension between Robby and Jim highlights the conflict between personal loyalty and professional ethics.high
- The pacing of the sequence maintains engagement and builds suspense effectively.medium
- (30) The conversation between Robby and Jim could be more confrontational to heighten the tension and stakes.high
- (31) The transition from the phone call to the team's reaction could be smoother to maintain narrative flow.medium
- (29) Garabedian's character could be developed further to enhance emotional resonance with the audience.medium
- Some scenes could benefit from more visual descriptions to enhance cinematic quality.medium
- The stakes could be made clearer in terms of the consequences of the investigation's success or failure.high
- A clearer emotional arc for Robby could enhance audience connection and investment.high
- More background on the victims could deepen the emotional impact of the investigation.medium
- A stronger sense of urgency could be established to heighten the tension as the investigation progresses.high
- A more explicit connection between the characters' personal lives and the investigation's stakes could enhance thematic depth.medium
- The moral implications of the investigation could be explored more deeply to enrich character motivations.medium
{
"impact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is emotionally engaging and visually striking, particularly in the dialogue-driven scenes.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance visual descriptions to create a more immersive experience.",
"Increase emotional stakes through character backstories."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The pacing is generally strong, maintaining engagement throughout.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim any redundant dialogue to enhance momentum."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The stakes are high and clearly articulated, driving the narrative forward.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the specific consequences of failure to enhance urgency."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Tension builds effectively through character interactions and revelations.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more conflict in character dialogues to heighten stakes."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence feels fresh, though some elements are familiar within the genre.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce unique structural elements to enhance originality."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is clear and well-structured, though some transitions could be smoother.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Refine transitions for better flow."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence contains strong moments but could benefit from a more pronounced climax.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the turning point to enhance memorability."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Revelations are spaced effectively, maintaining suspense throughout the sequence.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Consider varying the pacing of reveals for greater impact."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure but could benefit from stronger transitions.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance transitions between scenes for smoother flow."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence delivers strong emotional beats, particularly in character interactions.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen emotional stakes through character backstories."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence significantly advances the investigation and raises the stakes for the characters.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure each scene clearly contributes to the overall narrative arc."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Subplots are present but could be more tightly woven into the main narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Integrate subplots more seamlessly with the main investigation."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, but visual motifs could be more pronounced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce recurring visual elements to enhance cohesion."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The investigation progresses significantly, with new revelations driving the plot forward.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure each scene contributes to the external goal."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Characters show some growth, but their internal conflicts could be more pronounced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Externalize internal struggles through dialogue and action."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Characters are tested through moral dilemmas, but deeper emotional shifts could be explored.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Amplify emotional stakes in character interactions."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence effectively builds suspense and raises questions that compel the audience to continue.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"End with a stronger cliffhanger to enhance narrative drive."
]
}
}
Act two b — Seq 1: Directory Deep Dive
After learning of approximately 90 abusive priests in Boston, the Spotlight team devises a strategy to scan church directories for suspicious priest designations like 'Sick Leave' and 'Unassigned'. They work across multiple locations—offices, homes, and public spaces—with Sacha and Mike diligently marking entries. Matt discovers a treatment center near his home, leading to a personal realization that prompts him to warn his children, heightening the personal stakes of their investigation.
Dramatic Question
- (32, 33) The dialogue effectively conveys the shock and disbelief of the characters as they uncover the extent of the abuse.high
- (32) The brainstorming session showcases the team's collaborative spirit and determination to pursue the truth.high
- (33) The visual representation of the directories and data entry emphasizes the meticulous nature of investigative journalism.medium
- (86) Matt's discovery adds a personal stake to the investigation, heightening emotional engagement.high
- The overall pacing of the sequence maintains a sense of urgency and tension.medium
- (32) Some dialogue feels overly expository; tightening it could enhance natural flow.high
- (84, 84) Scenes could be condensed to maintain momentum and avoid redundancy in the investigative process.medium
- (86) Matt's emotional reaction could be expanded to deepen the impact of his discovery.medium
- (84) The transition between scenes could be smoother to enhance the overall flow.medium
- Clarifying the stakes of their investigation earlier in the sequence would heighten tension.high
- A clearer sense of urgency regarding the timeline for publishing the findings is needed.high
- More emotional depth in the characters' personal stakes could enhance audience connection.medium
- A stronger visual motif could tie the investigative process together thematically.low
- A more pronounced conflict with external forces (e.g., the Church) could heighten tension.medium
- A clearer resolution or cliffhanger at the end of the sequence would enhance engagement.medium
{
"impact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence effectively conveys the gravity of the investigation and the emotional weight of the characters' discoveries.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance emotional beats to deepen audience connection.",
"Incorporate more visual storytelling to elevate impact."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The pacing is generally strong, but some scenes could be tightened for better flow.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim redundant dialogue or scenes to maintain momentum."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The stakes are present but could be more clearly defined to enhance tension.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the consequences of failure to raise emotional stakes."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Tension builds as the team uncovers more evidence, but could be heightened with clearer stakes.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more external conflict to raise stakes.",
"Create a sense of urgency in the investigation's timeline."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence follows a familiar investigative structure but has unique elements.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce unexpected twists or perspectives to enhance originality."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is clear and well-structured, though some dialogue could be more concise.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Refine dialogue for clarity and brevity."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence contains strong moments but lacks a standout climax that would make it more memorable.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Identify a key emotional turning point to anchor the sequence.",
"Enhance visual or thematic elements to create a lasting impression."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Revelations come at a steady pace, but could be spaced for greater impact.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Adjust the timing of reveals to enhance suspense."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure, moving from brainstorming to action, but could benefit from a more defined climax.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the sequence's climax to enhance narrative flow."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The emotional stakes are present, particularly in Matt's discovery, but could be deepened.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Expand on emotional reactions to enhance audience connection."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence significantly advances the plot by revealing new information and strategies for the investigation.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure each scene clearly contributes to the overarching narrative arc."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Subplots are present but could be more tightly woven into the main narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Integrate subplots more seamlessly with the main investigation."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, but visual motifs could be more pronounced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate recurring visual elements to strengthen cohesion."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The team makes significant progress in their investigation, moving closer to uncovering the truth.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure that each scene contributes to the external goal's advancement."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The characters' internal journeys are present but could be more pronounced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Highlight internal conflicts and resolutions more clearly."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The characters are tested through their investigation, but deeper emotional stakes could enhance their arcs.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Explore characters' personal connections to the story more deeply."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence maintains interest through tension and revelations, but could benefit from a stronger cliffhanger.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"End with a more pronounced cliffhanger or unresolved question."
]
}
}
Act two b — Seq 2: Confronting the Cover-Up
The team confirms 87 abusive priests via spreadsheet analysis and confronts lawyer Eric MacLeish about his knowledge of victims and settlements. After MacLeish's evasion, they review his list of 45 settled cases, leading Marty to question Cardinal Law's involvement. This culminates in a strategic pivot: instead of focusing on individual priests, they commit to exposing the church's systemic cover-up, assigning tasks to interview victims while Matt grapples with the proximity of abuse to his family.
Dramatic Question
- (90, 91, 94) The dialogue is sharp and realistic, effectively conveying the urgency and gravity of the investigation.high
- (92, 93) The interactions between characters reveal personal stakes and relationships, adding depth to the narrative.high
- (94) The sequence effectively builds tension as the team uncovers more names and faces resistance, keeping the audience engaged.high
- (93, 94) The montage of the team reaching out to victims is visually dynamic and emphasizes the challenges they face.medium
- The moral complexity of the investigation is well-articulated, prompting the audience to reflect on the implications of the story.high
- (93) The emotional impact of Mike's conversation with Sipe could be deepened to better illustrate the personal stakes involved.high
- (94) Clarify the connection between the names being uncovered and the broader implications for the Church to enhance narrative cohesion.medium
- (94) The pacing could be tightened in the montage to maintain momentum and avoid any potential lulls in engagement.medium
- (92) Add more visual or auditory motifs to enhance the thematic resonance of the investigation's urgency.low
- Ensure that the stakes are consistently highlighted throughout the sequence to maintain tension.high
- A clearer emotional arc for Mike could enhance the audience's connection to his journey.medium
- More exploration of the community's reaction to the investigation could add depth to the narrative.medium
- A stronger climax within the sequence could heighten the tension and emotional stakes.high
- Additional context on the Church's historical influence in Boston could enrich the narrative backdrop.low
- More internal conflict among the team members could enhance the emotional stakes of their investigation.medium
{
"impact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence effectively conveys the gravity of the investigation, with strong character interactions and escalating tension.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Increase the emotional stakes in key scenes to enhance impact.",
"Add visual elements that reinforce the themes of the investigation."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The pacing is generally strong, though some moments could be tightened.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim any redundant dialogue or scenes to maintain momentum."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The stakes are high, with clear emotional and tangible consequences for the characters and the community.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the specific losses that will occur if the investigation fails."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Tension builds as the team faces resistance and uncovers more names, keeping the audience engaged.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more obstacles to heighten the stakes and urgency."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "While the sequence is compelling, it follows familiar narrative patterns.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce unique structural elements or twists to enhance originality."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is clear and well-structured, with effective dialogue and pacing.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure that transitions between scenes are smooth to enhance flow."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "While impactful, the sequence could benefit from a stronger climax to make it more memorable.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the turning point within the sequence to enhance memorability."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Revelations are spaced effectively, maintaining tension and engagement.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure that key reveals are impactful and resonate with the audience."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure, with a beginning that sets up the investigation, a middle that builds tension, and an end that raises stakes.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure that each scene flows smoothly into the next to enhance narrative cohesion."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The emotional stakes are present but could be deepened for greater resonance.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Highlight the personal stakes for the characters more clearly."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence significantly advances the plot by uncovering more names and highlighting the systemic issues within the Church.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure that each revelation is clearly tied to the overarching narrative to maintain clarity."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Subplots are present but could be more tightly woven into the main narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Integrate subplots more effectively to enhance overall cohesion."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, but visual motifs could be strengthened to enhance thematic resonance.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce recurring visual elements that symbolize the investigation's urgency."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The team makes significant progress in uncovering the truth, advancing the external narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the connections between the names uncovered and the broader implications for the Church."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The characters' internal struggles are present but could be more pronounced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Highlight the emotional stakes more clearly in key scenes."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence challenges the characters' beliefs and commitment, contributing to their development.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen the internal conflicts among the team members to enhance character arcs."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The escalating tension and unresolved questions drive the audience to continue reading.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce a cliffhanger or unresolved question at the end of the sequence to enhance drive."
]
}
}
Act two b — Seq 3: Voices of the Victims
Sacha interviews survivors who recount church intimidation tactics, including a bishop's manipulative visit and community pressure to stay silent. Simultaneously, Matt faces hostility while investigating neighborhoods. The sequence peaks with Sacha's tense interview of accused priest Ronald Paquin, who admits to inappropriate behavior but justifies his actions before his sister forcibly ends the encounter, leaving Sacha shaken but armed with critical admissions.
Dramatic Question
- (100, 103, 101) The interviews with survivors and Church figures provide raw emotional weight and authenticity to the narrative.high
- (103) Sacha's confrontation with the cop highlights the systemic complicity and adds tension to the investigation.high
- (104) Father Paquin's admission of guilt is a pivotal moment that encapsulates the moral complexities of the narrative.high
- (100, 103, 104) The dialogue is sharp and impactful, effectively conveying the gravity of the situation.medium
- The sequence maintains a strong sense of urgency and purpose, driving the narrative forward.high
- (100, 103) Some scenes feel slightly disjointed; tightening transitions between interviews could enhance flow.medium
- (104) Clarifying the stakes of Father Paquin's admission could heighten the emotional impact of the scene.high
- (103) The cop's dialogue could be more revealing about the systemic issues, adding depth to his character.medium
- (100) The emotional reactions of the reporters could be more pronounced to reflect the weight of the testimonies.medium
- Adding more visual motifs or recurring themes could enhance the sequence's cohesion.low
- A clearer emotional arc for Sacha throughout the interviews could deepen audience connection.high
- More background on the Church's influence in the community could provide context for the resistance faced.medium
- A stronger sense of urgency or ticking clock could heighten tension as the investigation progresses.high
- More exploration of the reporters' personal stakes in the story could enhance emotional engagement.medium
- A clearer thematic statement about the role of journalism could unify the sequence's purpose.low
{
"impact": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence is emotionally striking, with powerful testimonies that resonate deeply with the audience.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Increase the emotional stakes by showing more of the reporters' reactions to the testimonies.",
"Incorporate more visual storytelling to enhance the emotional impact."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The pacing is generally strong, but some transitions could be tightened to maintain momentum.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim any redundant dialogue or scenes to enhance pacing.",
"Ensure each scene flows smoothly into the next."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The stakes are clear, with emotional and societal consequences tied to the investigation's success.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the specific losses at stake for the characters and community.",
"Heighten the urgency of the investigation to amplify stakes."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Tension builds effectively through the interviews, with each revelation adding complexity to the investigation.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more conflict or resistance from the Church to heighten stakes.",
"Create a sense of urgency as the team races against time to publish their findings."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "While the subject matter is compelling, some elements feel familiar; fresh perspectives could enhance originality.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce unique narrative techniques or visual storytelling to elevate the sequence.",
"Explore unconventional angles on the subject matter."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is clear and well-structured, though some dialogue could be more concise.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Streamline dialogue for clarity and impact.",
"Ensure formatting is consistent throughout the sequence."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The emotional weight of the survivors' stories makes this sequence memorable and impactful.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Highlight key moments with stronger visual or thematic elements to enhance memorability.",
"Ensure each scene contributes to a cohesive emotional arc."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Revelations are spaced effectively, with each new piece of information building on the last.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Consider varying the pacing of reveals to maintain suspense.",
"Ensure emotional beats are spaced for maximum impact."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure, with a beginning that sets up the interviews, a middle that reveals critical information, and an end that leaves the audience with lingering questions.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the climax of the sequence to enhance narrative shape.",
"Ensure each scene transitions smoothly to maintain flow."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The emotional weight of the survivors' stories resonates deeply, leaving a lasting impression.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen the emotional stakes for the reporters to enhance overall impact.",
"Highlight key moments with stronger visual storytelling."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence significantly advances the investigation, revealing crucial information about the Church's cover-up.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the consequences of the revelations to enhance narrative momentum.",
"Ensure each scene builds on the last to maintain forward motion."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Subplots related to the reporters' personal lives could be better integrated to enhance emotional depth.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Weave in personal stakes for the reporters to deepen audience connection.",
"Ensure subplots align with the main narrative theme."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, with a serious and somber atmosphere that aligns with the subject matter.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance visual motifs to reinforce the tone throughout the sequence.",
"Ensure all scenes maintain a cohesive visual style."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The team makes significant progress in uncovering the Church's abuses, moving closer to their goal of publishing the story.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the obstacles they face to enhance the sense of urgency.",
"Ensure each scene contributes to their external goal."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Sacha's internal conflict is present but could be more pronounced as she grapples with the emotional toll of the investigation.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Externalize Sacha's internal journey through her interactions with survivors.",
"Highlight her emotional responses to the revelations."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Sacha's confrontation with Father Paquin serves as a pivotal moment for her character, challenging her beliefs and emotional state.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen the emotional stakes for Sacha to enhance her character arc.",
"Show more of her internal struggle throughout the sequence."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The emotional stakes and unresolved questions drive the audience to continue, though some scenes could be more gripping.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce cliffhangers or unresolved tensions to heighten narrative drive.",
"Ensure each scene ends with a compelling question or emotional beat."
]
}
}
Act two b — Seq 4: Document Pursuit
In court, the Globe's lawyer argues for document release while facing resistance from church attorneys. Mike then learns from lawyer Mitch Garabedian about damning 1962 evidence buried by the church, including a memo predicting future abuse. When Garabedian reveals the church likely removed documents, Mike races to the courthouse only to find a crucial folder empty. A tip about newly public documents reignites hope, prompting urgent coordination with Robby to secure them.
Dramatic Question
- (105, 108) The courtroom scenes effectively convey the tension and stakes involved in the legal battle for the documents.high
- (110, 111) Mike's determination and urgency in pursuing the documents create a strong narrative drive.high
- (109, 110) The dialogue is sharp and realistic, enhancing character development and engagement.high
- (40) Garabedian's backstory adds depth to the narrative and highlights the systemic issues within the Church.high
- The sequence maintains a strong sense of urgency and tension throughout, keeping the audience engaged.high
- (108) The legal jargon could be simplified or clarified to ensure the audience fully understands the stakes.medium
- (110, 111) The transition between scenes could be smoother to maintain narrative flow and pacing.medium
- (39) Adding more visual descriptions could enhance the cinematic quality of the courtroom scenes.medium
- (40) Garabedian's emotional state could be more explicitly conveyed to deepen audience connection.medium
- Some dialogue feels expository; tightening it could improve pacing and engagement.medium
- A clearer emotional arc for Mike could enhance audience investment in his journey.high
- More background on the victims could provide a stronger emotional anchor for the investigation.medium
- A stronger sense of community reaction to the investigation could heighten the stakes.medium
- A more pronounced conflict with the Church could add tension and urgency to the narrative.medium
- A clearer resolution or cliffhanger at the end of the sequence could enhance narrative drive.medium
{
"impact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence effectively engages the audience with its tension and character dynamics.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Increase visual storytelling elements to enhance emotional resonance.",
"Add more character reactions to heighten stakes."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The pacing is generally strong but could be tightened in some areas.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim redundant dialogue to maintain momentum."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The stakes are high and clearly articulated, driving the narrative forward.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Tie emotional stakes more closely to external consequences."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Tension builds as the journalists face legal challenges and uncover new information.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more conflict to heighten stakes."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence feels fresh but follows familiar tropes.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce unique elements to differentiate the narrative."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is clear and well-structured, with minor areas for improvement.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure consistent formatting for clarity."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence contains strong moments but could benefit from a more pronounced climax.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the turning point to enhance memorability."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Revelations are spaced well but could benefit from more impactful moments.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Increase the frequency of significant reveals to maintain tension."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure but could benefit from a stronger climax.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure each scene builds toward a clear narrative peak."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence effectively conveys emotional stakes, particularly through character interactions.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen emotional moments to enhance audience connection."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence significantly advances the investigation and raises the stakes for the characters.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure each scene clearly contributes to the overarching narrative."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Subplots are present but could be more tightly woven into the main narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Integrate subplots more seamlessly into the main arc."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, but visual motifs could be more pronounced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce recurring visual elements to enhance cohesion."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The investigation progresses significantly, with clear obstacles and advancements.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the external stakes to enhance narrative drive."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Characters are moving toward their goals, but internal conflicts could be more pronounced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Highlight internal struggles to deepen character arcs."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Characters are tested through their pursuit of the truth, but emotional stakes could be clearer.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen character motivations to enhance emotional impact."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence creates a strong desire to see how the investigation unfolds.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"End with a cliffhanger or unresolved question to heighten suspense."
]
}
}
Act two b — Seq 5: 9/11 Interruption
The team's work halts abruptly when 9/11 unfolds, forcing them to cover the breaking news and watch Cardinal Law's public address. In the aftermath, Mike desperately implores Garabedian to delay refiling documents to prevent competitors from scooping their story, while Sacha meets Phil Saviano—who feels abandoned after the investigation pause. Phil's angry departure underscores the erosion of trust, leaving the team racing to reclaim control of the narrative.
Dramatic Question
- (114, 115) The opening scenes establish a strong sense of urgency and context, effectively setting the stage for the unfolding drama.high
- (118) The phone conversation between Mike and Garabedian highlights the tension and stakes involved in the investigation, showcasing the challenges faced by the team.high
- (120) Sacha's interaction with Phil Saviano emphasizes the emotional weight of the story and the personal stakes for the victims, enhancing audience engagement.high
- (115, 116) The transition between scenes could be smoother to maintain narrative flow and coherence, especially as the focus shifts from the newsroom to external events.high
- (118) The urgency in Mike's conversation could be heightened to better reflect the stakes of the investigation and the pressure from the Church.medium
- (120) Sacha's dialogue could be more concise to enhance emotional impact and clarity, avoiding repetition of sentiments already expressed.medium
- () A clearer depiction of the emotional toll on the reporters could deepen audience connection and understanding of their struggles.high
- () More visual motifs or recurring themes could enhance the cohesion of the sequence and reinforce its emotional weight.medium
{
"impact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence resonates emotionally, particularly through the characters' struggles and the gravity of the investigation.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Increase visual storytelling elements to enhance emotional resonance.",
"Add more dynamic interactions to elevate the stakes."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The pacing is generally effective, but some scenes could be tightened.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim redundant dialogue to maintain momentum."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The stakes are clear and high, particularly regarding the investigation's implications for the victims.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Further clarify the personal stakes for the reporters to enhance emotional resonance."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Tension builds as the team faces external pressures, but could be heightened further.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more immediate conflicts or obstacles to escalate tension."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "While the sequence is engaging, it follows familiar tropes of investigative journalism.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce unique narrative devices or perspectives to enhance originality."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is clear and well-structured, though some dialogue could be more concise.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Edit dialogue for brevity and impact."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence has strong emotional beats but could benefit from a more distinct climax.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Identify a key moment that serves as a turning point for the characters."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Revelations are spaced effectively, but could be more impactful.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Increase the stakes of each revelation to enhance suspense."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure, but transitions could be smoother.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Refine scene transitions to enhance narrative flow."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The emotional stakes are high, particularly in the interactions with victims.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen emotional connections through character backstories."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence advances the plot by showcasing the team's challenges and the urgency of their investigation.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the stakes and consequences of the investigation to heighten narrative momentum."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Subplots are present but could be more tightly woven into the main narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure subplots enhance the main arc rather than feeling disconnected."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, but visual motifs could be more pronounced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate recurring visual elements to strengthen thematic cohesion."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The team is actively pursuing their investigation, but external obstacles could be more pronounced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more direct opposition to their efforts to heighten tension."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Characters are moving toward their goals, but the internal stakes could be clearer.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Make internal conflicts more visible through dialogue and action."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Characters are tested by external pressures, but deeper internal conflicts could be explored.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Highlight internal struggles more explicitly to enhance character arcs."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence creates a strong pull to continue, driven by unresolved tensions and character stakes.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"End with a more pronounced cliffhanger or unresolved question to heighten anticipation."
]
}
}
Act Three — Seq 1: Courthouse Evidence Rush
After Marty greenlights renewed focus on the church story, Mike races to the Suffolk County Courthouse to access sealed records on Father Geoghan. He faces bureaucratic hurdles with Clerk O'Brian and Judge Volterra but ultimately secures damning documents—including Bishop D'Arcy's letter acknowledging abuse—and rushes back to the Globe. The sequence climaxes with Mike's triumphant return, physically holding the evidence.
Dramatic Question
- (121, 123) The dialogue effectively conveys the urgency and stakes of the investigation, showcasing the characters' commitment.high
- (129, 133) The interactions with key figures like the judge and school president reveal the institutional resistance faced by the journalists.high
- (137, 138) The pacing and tension build as Mike uncovers crucial documents, heightening the stakes of the investigation.high
- (122, 124) Some scenes feel disjointed and could benefit from smoother transitions to maintain narrative flow.high
- (126, 127) The emotional impact of Robby's confrontation with Kevin could be heightened to better reflect the gravity of the situation.medium
- (130, 131) Mike's frustration in the courthouse could be more vividly portrayed to enhance audience empathy.medium
- (133, 134) Clarifying the stakes during the meeting with the school president could strengthen the tension.medium
- (137, 138) The urgency of Mike's discovery could be amplified to create a more gripping climax to the sequence.high
- () A clearer emotional arc for Sacha could enhance her character development and connection to the story.medium
- () More background on the victims could deepen the emotional stakes and audience investment.medium
{
"impact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence effectively engages the audience with its emotional weight and tension.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Increase visual storytelling elements to enhance emotional resonance."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The pacing is generally good, but some scenes could be tightened for better flow.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim redundant dialogue to maintain momentum."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The stakes are high, both for the characters and the broader implications of their investigation.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the personal stakes for each character to deepen engagement."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Tension builds as the characters face increasing obstacles in their investigation.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more direct conflict with the Church to escalate stakes."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "While the themes are compelling, the execution could benefit from more unique storytelling choices.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Explore unconventional narrative techniques to enhance originality."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is clear and well-structured, with minor areas for improvement in flow.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance scene transitions for smoother reading."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence contains strong moments but could benefit from a more impactful climax.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure the climax delivers a strong emotional payoff."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Revelations are spaced effectively, maintaining audience engagement.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Consider varying the pacing of reveals to enhance suspense."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure, with rising tension and a strong climax.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Refine transitions between scenes for smoother flow."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence delivers strong emotional moments, particularly in character interactions.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Amplify emotional stakes through character backstories."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence significantly advances the investigation and raises the stakes for the characters.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the consequences of failure to heighten tension."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Subplots are present but could be more tightly woven into the main narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Integrate subplot elements more seamlessly into the main investigation."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, but visual motifs could be more pronounced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce recurring visual elements to strengthen thematic cohesion."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The investigation progresses significantly, with key discoveries made.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the timeline of discoveries to enhance urgency."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Characters show growth in their commitment to the investigation.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Highlight internal conflicts more clearly to deepen character arcs."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Characters are tested through their interactions and the challenges they face.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen character backstories to enhance emotional stakes."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The escalating stakes and emotional tension create a strong desire to continue.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"End the sequence with a cliffhanger to heighten anticipation."
]
}
}
Act Three — Seq 2: Team Fracture & Moral Reckoning
The team reviews the explosive D'Arcy letter revealing Church knowledge of abuse. Mike demands immediate publication, clashing with Robby's insistence on systemic exposure. Their argument peaks with Mike storming out. Later, Mike visits Sacha's home where they process guilt, anger, and personal ties to the Church, exposing emotional tolls beneath professional disagreements.
Dramatic Question
- (144, 147) The dialogue effectively conveys the urgency and moral weight of the investigation, enhancing the dramatic tension.high
- (149, 150) The personal conversations between Mike and Sacha provide emotional depth and relatability, grounding the larger narrative.high
- (142A, 144) The use of voiceover to convey critical information from the letters adds a layer of suspense and intrigue.medium
- (147) The team's collective reaction to the letters showcases their camaraderie and shared purpose, reinforcing their commitment to the story.high
- (150) The moment of vulnerability between Mike and Sacha highlights the emotional toll of their investigation, making it relatable.medium
- (147) The pacing feels rushed during the team's discussion; slowing down to explore their emotional reactions could enhance impact.high
- (149, 150) Sacha's emotional outburst could be better foreshadowed to enhance its impact and clarity.medium
- (144, 147) The transition between scenes could be smoother to maintain narrative flow and coherence.medium
- (150) More explicit connections between the characters' personal struggles and the investigation's stakes would deepen emotional resonance.high
- The sequence could benefit from a clearer thematic statement that ties the characters' internal conflicts to the external investigation.medium
- A clearer sense of the stakes for the characters personally could enhance the emotional weight of their decisions.high
- More visual motifs or recurring themes could strengthen the narrative cohesion throughout the sequence.medium
- A stronger climax or turning point within the sequence could elevate its memorability and impact.high
- Additional context about the Church's power dynamics could heighten the tension and urgency of the investigation.medium
- More exploration of the characters' backgrounds with the Church could deepen their motivations and conflicts.medium
{
"impact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is emotionally engaging and visually striking, particularly in the team's reactions to the letters.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance the emotional stakes by deepening character backstories and connections to the Church.",
"Incorporate more visual storytelling to complement the dialogue."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The pacing is generally good but feels rushed in parts, particularly during discussions.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Slow down key moments to allow for emotional reflection."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The stakes are high, with significant emotional and narrative consequences if the investigation fails.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the specific losses at stake to enhance urgency."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Tension escalates as the team confronts the implications of their findings, but could benefit from more urgency.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce time constraints or external pressures to heighten the stakes."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence feels fresh but could push boundaries further in its presentation.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Experiment with narrative structure or visual storytelling to enhance originality."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is clear and well-structured, though some transitions could be smoother.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Refine transitions between scenes for better flow."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence has strong moments but lacks a clear climax that would make it more memorable.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Identify a key turning point that can serve as a climax for the sequence."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Revelations are spaced effectively, but could benefit from more dramatic tension.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more suspenseful moments leading up to key revelations."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure but could benefit from a more defined climax.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the beginning, middle, and end of the sequence to enhance flow."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The emotional stakes are high, but could be deepened through character exploration.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Focus on the characters' personal stakes to amplify emotional resonance."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence significantly advances the investigation, revealing critical evidence that propels the narrative forward.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure that each scene builds on the last to maintain momentum and clarity in the investigation's progression."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Subplots are present but could be better integrated into the main narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Weave in character backstories that relate to the investigation."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, but visual motifs could enhance the emotional impact.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate recurring visual elements that reflect the themes of the investigation."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The team makes significant progress in their investigation, uncovering crucial evidence.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure that each scene contributes to the external goal of exposing the Church."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The characters' internal struggles are present but could be more pronounced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Highlight the emotional toll of the investigation on the characters."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence tests the characters' beliefs and motivations, but could deepen their emotional arcs.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Explore the characters' internal conflicts more explicitly to enhance their arcs."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence maintains tension and curiosity, driving the reader to continue.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce cliffhangers or unresolved questions to heighten suspense."
]
}
}
Act Three — Seq 3: Institutional Maneuvers
Robby meets Church insider Peter Conley to gauge reactions and signal intent. The team then wins a court ruling to unseal documents but faces appeal delays. When Marty/Ben push for immediate publication after discovering Law's negligence letters, Robby negotiates six weeks to expose systemic abuse, leveraging potential insider sources. The sequence ends with Marty granting the extension.
Dramatic Question
- (52, 53, 54) The dialogue effectively conveys the moral dilemmas and pressures faced by the characters, enhancing the emotional weight of the investigation.high
- (53) The moment of receiving the court ruling serves as a significant plot advancement, creating a sense of urgency and excitement.high
- (54) The tension between Robby and his colleagues illustrates the stakes involved in their investigation, adding depth to character relationships.high
- (54) The pacing could be tightened in the discussion about the letters to maintain tension and urgency.high
- (52) Peter Conley's dialogue could be more concise to avoid dragging the scene and to sharpen the focus on the main conflict.medium
- (53) More visual cues or actions could enhance the emotional stakes during the phone call scene, making it more dynamic.medium
- (54) Clarifying the stakes of the investigation in Robby's internal conflict would deepen the emotional impact.medium
- Adding more background on the Church's influence in Boston could provide context and heighten the stakes.low
- A clearer emotional arc for Robby throughout the sequence could enhance audience connection.high
- More exploration of the victims' perspectives could deepen the emotional resonance of the investigation.medium
{
"impact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is emotionally engaging, with strong character interactions that resonate with the audience.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Add visual elements that reflect the emotional stakes, such as close-ups during tense conversations."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The pacing is generally good, but some scenes could be tightened for better flow.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim unnecessary dialogue to maintain momentum."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The stakes are clearly defined, with significant consequences for the characters and the community.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Further emphasize the personal stakes for the characters involved."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Tension builds effectively as the team grapples with the implications of their findings.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more conflict between characters to heighten the stakes."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "While the sequence is compelling, it follows familiar narrative patterns.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce unique twists or perspectives to enhance originality."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is clear and well-structured, with minor areas for improvement in dialogue flow.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Refine dialogue for clarity and impact."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "While impactful, the sequence could benefit from a more distinct climax or turning point.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the emotional high point to make it more memorable."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Revelations are spaced effectively, maintaining audience engagement.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Consider varying the pacing of reveals to create more suspense."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure, moving from setup to conflict and resolution.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure that each scene transitions smoothly to maintain narrative flow."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The emotional stakes are high, but could be deepened through character exploration.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Add moments that reflect the emotional toll on the characters involved."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence significantly advances the plot by revealing critical documents and escalating the investigation.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure that each scene clearly connects to the overarching narrative to maintain momentum."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Subplots are present but could be better integrated into the main narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Weave in subplot elements more seamlessly to enhance overall cohesion."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, but visual motifs could be more pronounced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate recurring visual elements to strengthen thematic cohesion."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The team makes significant strides in their investigation, moving closer to exposing the truth.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the external obstacles they face to heighten tension."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Robby's internal struggle is present but lacks depth in this sequence.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Highlight Robby's emotional stakes more clearly to enhance audience engagement."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Robby's internal conflict is evident, but could be more pronounced to enhance character development.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen Robby's emotional journey to create a stronger connection with the audience."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence effectively builds suspense and curiosity about the outcome of the investigation.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"End with a stronger cliffhanger to enhance the pull into the next sequence."
]
}
}
Act Three — Seq 4: Priest List Breakthrough
Under deadline pressure, the team works frantically—Mike drafts stories, Sacha conducts interviews. Robby confronts reluctant source Jim Sullivan, demanding a list of abusive priests. After initial refusal, Sullivan returns a marked-up list confirming widespread abuse. The sequence closes with Mike/Matt accelerating writing using the list.
Dramatic Question
- (162) Robby's confrontation with Jim is emotionally charged and highlights the moral dilemmas faced by those involved in the cover-up.high
- (157) The montage effectively conveys the urgency of the investigation and the passage of time, enhancing the narrative's tension.high
- (164) The dialogue between Mike and Matt captures the frustration and urgency of the situation, making the stakes feel real.medium
- (162) Some dialogue feels overly expository and could be tightened to enhance emotional impact.high
- (157) The montage could benefit from more varied visuals to maintain engagement and avoid monotony.medium
- (164) Clarifying the stakes in Mike and Matt's conversation could heighten tension and urgency.medium
- () A clearer sense of the emotional toll on the characters could deepen audience connection.medium
- () More visual motifs could enhance thematic cohesion throughout the sequence.low
{
"impact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence effectively conveys the emotional weight of the investigation, particularly through character interactions.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Increase visual storytelling to enhance emotional resonance."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence flows well, maintaining tension throughout.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim any redundant dialogue to keep the pace brisk."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The stakes are clear and rising, particularly in the context of the investigation's urgency.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Tie emotional stakes more closely to external consequences."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Tension builds effectively through character confrontations and the ticking clock of the investigation.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more immediate obstacles to heighten stakes."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "While the themes are compelling, the execution could benefit from more unique storytelling techniques.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Experiment with narrative structure or visual storytelling."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is clear and well-structured, though some dialogue could be more concise.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Edit dialogue for brevity and impact."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The emotional confrontation between Robby and Jim stands out, but some scenes could be more visually striking.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance visual storytelling to create memorable moments."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Revelations come at effective intervals, but could be spaced for greater impact.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Adjust pacing to allow for more dramatic pauses."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure, with rising tension and a climax in the confrontation.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure each scene builds on the previous one to maintain momentum."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The emotional stakes are high, particularly in character confrontations, but could be deepened.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance character backstories to amplify emotional resonance."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence significantly advances the investigation and deepens character arcs.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the stakes in dialogue to heighten urgency."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Subplots are present but could be more tightly woven into the main narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Integrate subplots more seamlessly into character interactions."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, but visual motifs could enhance thematic depth.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce recurring visual elements to strengthen cohesion."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Robby makes significant progress in securing confirmation for the story, but faces resistance.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the obstacles he faces to enhance tension."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Robby's journey toward understanding his complicity is evident, but could be more pronounced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Show more of Robby's internal struggle through visual cues."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Robby's confrontation with Jim serves as a pivotal moment for both characters, revealing their internal conflicts.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen the emotional stakes in their exchange."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The escalating tension and unresolved conflicts drive the reader to continue.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"End with a stronger cliffhanger or unresolved question."
]
}
}
Act Three — Seq 5: Publication & Unseen Fallout
The team finalizes publication plans—setting up tip lines and online documents—while grappling with guilt over past oversights. The story prints overnight, triggering reactions: Sacha's grandmother's distress, Mitch's quiet validation. As papers distribute, Garabedian shows Mike new victims, underscoring urgency. The sequence climaxes with the Spotlight office overwhelmed by victim calls.
Dramatic Question
- (57, 58, 59, 60) The dialogue effectively conveys the tension and urgency of the investigation, showcasing the team's dedication and moral dilemmas.high
- (57, 60) The emotional weight of the characters' realizations about their past failures adds depth to their arcs and enhances audience engagement.high
- (58, 59) The pacing and structure of the sequence maintain a strong narrative momentum, keeping the audience invested in the outcome.high
- (59, 60) The use of visual motifs, such as the darkened Globe building contrasted with the running presses, reinforces the themes of revelation and accountability.medium
- (60) The impactful closing cards provide a powerful summary of the investigation's consequences, leaving a lasting impression on the audience.high
- (57) Some dialogue could be tightened to enhance clarity and impact, particularly in moments of tension.medium
- (58) The transition between scenes could be smoother to maintain narrative flow and avoid abrupt shifts.medium
- (59) Adding more visual descriptions could enhance the emotional resonance of key moments, particularly during the phone calls.medium
- (60) The pacing could be adjusted to allow for more emotional reflection after the article's publication, deepening the impact.medium
- (60) Consider integrating more character reactions to the published article to showcase its immediate effects on the community.high
- () A deeper exploration of the personal lives of the journalists could enhance emotional stakes and audience connection.medium
- () More explicit consequences for the Church's response could heighten tension and stakes in the narrative.high
- () A clearer depiction of the community's reaction to the article could provide a fuller picture of its impact.medium
{
"impact": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence delivers a powerful emotional punch, effectively engaging the audience with its themes of truth and accountability.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance visual storytelling to amplify emotional moments.",
"Consider pacing adjustments to allow for deeper emotional reflection."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The pacing is generally strong, though some moments could benefit from more breathing room for emotional reflection.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Adjust pacing to allow for deeper emotional engagement."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The stakes are high, both for the characters and the community, creating a palpable sense of urgency and importance.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the specific consequences of failure to enhance emotional stakes."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Tension builds effectively as the team confronts resistance and moral dilemmas, culminating in the article's release.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Increase the stakes leading up to the publication to heighten tension."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "While the themes are familiar, the execution feels fresh and engaging, particularly in its character development.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Explore unique narrative angles to further enhance originality."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence is well-structured and clear, with effective dialogue and pacing that facilitate easy reading.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Maintain clarity in dialogue and scene transitions for optimal readability."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence stands out due to its emotional depth and impactful revelations, leaving a lasting impression.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Strengthen character reactions to enhance emotional resonance."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Revelations are spaced effectively, maintaining audience engagement throughout the sequence.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Consider varying the pacing of reveals to enhance suspense."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear beginning, middle, and end, effectively guiding the audience through the climax of the investigation.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Refine transitions between scenes for smoother narrative flow."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence effectively elicits strong emotional responses from the audience, particularly through character arcs and revelations.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen emotional moments to amplify audience connection."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence significantly advances the plot by culminating in the publication of the article, which has far-reaching consequences.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the immediate aftermath of the article's publication to enhance narrative momentum."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Subplots are present but could be more tightly woven into the main narrative for greater impact.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Integrate subplots more seamlessly into the main storyline."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent and aligns well with the themes of the narrative, enhancing the overall impact.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Strengthen visual motifs to reinforce thematic elements."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The team makes significant progress in their investigation, culminating in the publication of their findings.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the obstacles faced during the investigation to enhance narrative tension."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Characters grapple with their internal conflicts, but more explicit reflection could deepen their arcs.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Highlight internal struggles through dialogue or action."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence challenges the characters to confront their past and the implications of their work, leading to significant growth.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen character introspection to enhance emotional stakes."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence creates a strong desire to see the outcome of the investigation and its impact on the characters and community.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance cliffhangers or unresolved tensions to further compel the audience."
]
}
}
- Physical environment: The screenplay is set primarily in Boston, Massachusetts, in the years 1976 and 2001. Locations range from the gritty urban environments of South Boston and East Boston (including rundown apartments and diners) to the affluent settings of the Four Seasons Hotel and a wealthy Brookline neighborhood. Institutional settings like police stations, courtrooms, the Boston Globe newsroom (depicted in various states of bustle and quiet), a Catholic high school, and even a dank basement filled with old church directories are crucial. The physical environment is often used to reflect the social standing and power dynamics at play.
- Culture: The dominant cultural elements are the deeply ingrained Catholicism of Boston, the city's strong sense of community and tradition (especially in Southie), and the culture of investigative journalism. Baseball, a quintessential American pastime, also features prominently. The interactions between these elements, particularly the clash between the traditional Catholic culture and the investigative journalism that exposes its dark underbelly, is central to the narrative.
- Society: The societal structure is hierarchical and reveals significant power dynamics. The Catholic Church holds immense power and influence, often using it to suppress information and protect itself. Law enforcement and the legal system are depicted as sometimes complicit in the Church's cover-up, showing a complex network of power that resists accountability. The newsroom of the Boston Globe operates with its own hierarchy but acts as an opposing force, striving to uncover the truth and expose the Church's abuses. The broader societal pressures to maintain silence around sensitive issues are emphasized.
- Technology: Technology plays a relatively minor role, although its presence is felt in the transition from 1976 to 2001. The contrast is noticeable – the 1976 scene uses no specific technology beyond a town car while 2001 scenes feature computers (Nexis, Micro Fiche), telephones, and recording devices. The use of technology in investigative journalism reflects a modern approach to uncovering the truth, highlighting the changing investigative capabilities. Cell phones and the internet are only lightly utilized and function primarily as tools for communication and research.
- Characters influence: The world elements directly shape the characters' actions and experiences. The deeply entrenched Catholic culture influences the characters' personal histories, moral compasses, and relationships. The hierarchical societal structures create obstacles and challenges for the journalists, who must navigate powerful institutions and individuals to uncover the truth. The physical environments often contribute to the emotional tension and atmosphere of specific scenes, shaping how characters interact and react. The scarcity of technology in the earlier setting contrasts with the greater ease of research and communication available in the 2001 storyline.
- Narrative contribution: The various settings and societal structures drive the narrative forward. The contrast between the quiet, cold police station in 1976 and the bustling newsroom in 2001 establishes the time frame and sets the stage for the investigation. The different locations where the journalists conduct their research and interviews directly propel the plot, uncovering key evidence and leading to confrontations with powerful figures within the Church and legal system.
- Thematic depth contribution: The screenplay's thematic depth stems from the interplay of these world elements. The conflict between the powerful Catholic Church and the independent investigative journalists highlights themes of truth versus power, faith versus doubt, and the struggle for justice. The depiction of the societal pressures to maintain silence reveals themes of complicity, institutional cover-ups, and the long-term consequences of abuse and its suppression. The contrasting physical environments and cultural elements emphasize the diverse experiences and perspectives of the characters, adding layers to the exploration of these themes.
| Voice Analysis | |
|---|---|
| Summary: | The writer's voice is characterized by a masterful blend of realism and subtle tension. Dialogue is sharp, witty, and authentic, capturing the nuances of everyday conversation while revealing underlying conflicts and power dynamics. The narrative is driven by meticulously detailed scenes that immerse the reader in the world of investigative journalism, building suspense and gradually revealing information. A strong emphasis on character interactions and realistic portrayals, especially the emotional toll on those involved, creates a compelling and deeply human story. |
| Voice Contribution | The writer's voice contributes to the script by enhancing its realism, emotional depth, and thematic complexity. The authentic dialogue creates believable characters and relationships, while the detailed scene descriptions build tension and immerse the audience in the setting. The focus on ethical dilemmas and the emotional toll of the investigation adds layers of moral ambiguity and humanizes the characters, making the themes of justice, accountability, and the fight against institutional power even more resonant. |
| Best Representation Scene | 19 - Nervous Beginnings at Cafe Francesca |
| Best Scene Explanation | Scene 19 best encapsulates the writer's unique voice because it perfectly balances realism with subtle tension. The casual, naturalistic dialogue between Sacha and Joe Crowley immediately establishes their characters and their relationship. The detailed description of Joe's nervous energy, contrasting with Sacha's calm, creates a palpable sense of anticipation and foreshadows the difficult conversation to come. This scene exemplifies the writer's ability to build tension through understated dialogue and character interaction, while also grounding the narrative in authentic human experience. It's a microcosm of the entire screenplay's approach: realistic portrayal of complex characters facing challenging circumstances, creating deep emotional resonance. |
Style and Similarities
The screenplay demonstrates a consistent style characterized by dialogue-driven scenes with sharp, witty, and often intense exchanges between characters. It frequently explores complex moral dilemmas, ethical conflicts, and power dynamics, particularly within high-stakes environments like investigative journalism, legal settings, and institutional structures. The narrative is largely character-driven, with a focus on realistic and nuanced portrayals of human interaction.
Style Similarities:
| Writer | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Aaron Sorkin | Aaron Sorkin is overwhelmingly the most dominant influence, appearing in the analysis of 46 out of 60 scenes. His signature style of rapid-fire, intelligent dialogue, complex character interactions, and exploration of ethical dilemmas is clearly the most prominent feature throughout the screenplay. |
| David Mamet | David Mamet's influence is also significant, appearing in 21 scene analyses. His contributions complement Sorkin's, adding layers of moral ambiguity, power struggles, and tense confrontations to the dialogue and character interactions. |
| Tom McCarthy | Tom McCarthy's style is a noticeable third influence, present in 18 analyses. He brings a grounded realism and focus on investigative journalism and nuanced storytelling that provides a counterpoint to the more overtly dramatic elements of Sorkin and Mamet. |
Other Similarities: While Aaron Sorkin's influence is dominant, the screenplay demonstrates a skillful blending of styles. The combination of Sorkin's witty and fast-paced dialogue, Mamet's morally ambiguous conflicts, and McCarthy's realistic character interactions creates a dynamic and engaging narrative. The occasional appearances of other writers like David Simon, Nora Ephron, Kenneth Lonergan, and Dustin Lance Black suggest a deliberate effort to incorporate diverse stylistic elements, although their influence is considerably less than the three dominant writers. The overall effect is a sophisticated and well-crafted screenplay with consistent stylistic through-lines.
Top Correlations and patterns found in the scenes:
| Pattern | Explanation |
|---|---|
| High Overall Grade Correlates with Strong Concept and Character Development | Scenes with an overall grade of 9 or 10 consistently score highly in 'Concept' and 'Characters'. This suggests a strong foundation in the core ideas and character arcs is crucial to achieving the highest scene ratings. Consider if scenes with lower overall grades could benefit from further development in these areas. |
| Dialogue Quality Impacts Emotional Impact | There's a noticeable correlation between 'Dialogue' scores and 'Emotional Impact'. Scenes with higher dialogue scores (7 or above) generally have higher emotional impact scores. Lower dialogue scores often correlate with lower emotional impact. This suggests that improving the quality and effectiveness of dialogue is key to enhancing the emotional resonance of your scenes. Examine scenes with lower scores in both categories – are there opportunities to make the dialogue more impactful? |
| Serious Tone Dominates, but Variation in Sub-tones Influences Other Elements | The overwhelming majority of scenes utilize a 'Serious' tone. While this establishes a consistent mood, the variation in secondary tones (e.g., Humorous, Tense, Inquisitive) impacts other aspects. Scenes incorporating secondary tones like 'Humorous' or 'Intense' tend to have higher scores in 'Plot', 'Conflict', or 'High Stakes'. Consider whether strategically injecting other tones could enhance pacing and engagement. |
| Conflict and High Stakes Drive the Narrative Forward | Scenes with high 'Conflict' and 'High Stakes' scores also tend to score well in 'Move Story Forward'. This indicates that crucial plot advancements are directly linked to moments of tension and significant risks for the characters. Scenes that lack this dynamic might benefit from increased conflict or raising the stakes. |
| Character Changes are Less Consistent but Significantly Impact Overall Grade in Certain Scenes | While 'Character Changes' scores aren't consistently high, there's a noteworthy correlation between higher 'Character Changes' scores and higher overall grades in specific scenes (e.g., scene 31). This indicates that pivotal character development moments substantially improve the overall scene quality. Focus on deliberately incorporating more significant character arcs or developments into future scenes to heighten impact. |
| Late-Stage Surge in Intensity and Emotional Impact | Scenes 31-40 demonstrate a noticeable spike in 'Intense', 'Shocking', 'Emotional', and 'High Stakes' scores. This suggests a well-executed escalation of tension towards a climax. However, this pattern also indicates the possibility of pacing issues before this point. The final act is very strong, while earlier sections may need more dramatic tension and conflict to keep up. |
| Potential Pacing Imbalance: Scenes 4-7 and 28 | Scenes 4, 28, show significantly lower scores across multiple categories, including 'Dialogue', 'Emotional Impact', and 'Conflict'. This could indicate a pacing issue or a section that needs re-evaluation. Consider if these scenes are sufficiently engaging or if their purpose within the overall narrative could be strengthened. |
| Informative Scenes Struggle with Emotional Engagement | Scenes categorized as 'Informative' often receive lower scores in 'Emotional Impact'. Strive to find creative ways to blend information delivery with emotional engagement. Consider using techniques like character reactions, internal monologues, or visual storytelling to make expository scenes more emotionally resonant. |
Writer's Craft Overall Analysis
The screenplay demonstrates a consistent strength in crafting dialogue-driven scenes with engaging character interactions and well-established tension. Many scenes effectively convey complex themes, particularly those related to investigative journalism, ethical dilemmas, and moral ambiguity. The writer shows promise in building suspense and driving the narrative forward through compelling conflicts. However, there's a recurring need to deepen character development beyond dialogue, explore subtext more effectively, and refine pacing for optimal impact.
Key Improvement Areas
Suggestions
| Type | Suggestion | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Screenplay | Read and analyze 'All the President's Men' (William Goldman), 'Spotlight' (Tom McCarthy and Josh Singer), and 'Chinatown' (Robert Towne). | These screenplays offer masterclasses in dialogue, character development, and suspense-building within investigative journalism and morally complex narratives, directly addressing the key improvement areas identified. |
| Screenplay | Read 'Screenplay: The Foundations of Screenwriting' (Syd Field) and 'Story: Substance, Structure, Style and the Principles of Screenwriting' (Robert McKee). | These books provide foundational knowledge in screenplay structure, character arcs, and storytelling techniques, addressing the need for improved pacing and narrative structure. |
| Book | Read 'Save the Cat' (Blake Snyder) | This book offers practical advice on plot structure and character development, providing a framework to improve the overall narrative flow and character depth. |
| Video | Watch 'All the President's Men' and 'Spotlight' and analyze their pacing, dialogue, and character portrayals. | Visual analysis will provide further insight into how these elements work together to create engaging investigative journalism narratives. |
| Course | Consider taking a screenwriting course focusing on character development and dialogue. | A structured course will provide valuable tools and techniques to address the recurring suggestions for enhancing character depth and dialogue effectiveness. |
Here are different Tropes found in the screenplay
| Trope | Trope Details | Trope Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Investigative Journalism | The Spotlight team at the Boston Globe conducts an in-depth investigation into the Catholic Church's cover-up of sexual abuse cases. | This trope involves journalists uncovering hidden truths and exposing corruption or wrongdoing. A classic example is 'All the President's Men,' where reporters investigate the Watergate scandal. |
| The Reluctant Hero | Characters like Mike Rezendes initially hesitate to pursue the investigation due to the potential backlash from powerful figures. | This trope features a character who is hesitant to take on a challenge but ultimately rises to the occasion. An example is Frodo Baggins in 'The Lord of the Rings,' who is reluctant to carry the One Ring. |
| Cover-Up | The Catholic Church's systematic concealment of abuse cases is a central theme. | This trope involves powerful entities hiding wrongdoing to protect their reputation. A notable example is 'The Insider,' which deals with the tobacco industry's cover-up of health risks. |
| Moral Dilemma | Characters face ethical decisions regarding their loyalty to the Church versus their duty to report the truth. | This trope highlights characters grappling with difficult choices that test their values. An example is 'A Few Good Men,' where military lawyers confront the ethics of their superiors' actions. |
| The Power of the Press | The screenplay emphasizes the role of journalism in holding powerful institutions accountable. | This trope showcases the media's influence in shaping public opinion and exposing corruption. 'Spotlight' itself serves as an example of this trope. |
| The Mentor | Characters like Marty Baron guide the younger reporters in their investigation. | This trope features a wise figure who provides guidance and support to the protagonist. An example is Mr. Miyagi in 'The Karate Kid.' |
| The Unlikely Team | The diverse group of reporters from different backgrounds comes together to tackle the investigation. | This trope involves a group of mismatched individuals who unite for a common goal. An example is 'The Avengers,' where heroes with different skills collaborate. |
| The Emotional Toll | Characters experience personal struggles and emotional distress due to the nature of their investigation. | This trope emphasizes the psychological impact of challenging situations. An example is 'The Pursuit of Happyness,' where the protagonist faces immense personal challenges. |
| The Big Reveal | The investigation culminates in shocking revelations about the extent of abuse within the Church. | This trope involves a climactic moment where hidden truths are exposed. An example is 'The Sixth Sense,' where the twist ending reveals the protagonist's true nature. |
| The Community's Silence | The screenplay illustrates how the community's fear and loyalty to the Church prevent victims from speaking out. | This trope highlights societal pressures that silence individuals. An example is '12 Angry Men,' where jurors grapple with their biases and the pressure to conform. |
Memorable lines in the script:
| Scene Number | Line |
|---|---|
| 29 | Garabedian: Mark my words, Mr. Rezendes, if it takes a village to raise a child, it takes a village to abuse one. |
| 50 | MIKE: This coulda been you, it coulda been me, it could have been any one of us. We gotta nail these scumbags, show people that no one can get away with this! Not a priest or a Cardinal or a fricking Pope! |
| 24 | Richard Sipe: Look, Mike, the church wants us to believe that it’s just a few bad apples, but it’s a much bigger problem than that. |
| 10 | Garabedian: The Church thinks in centuries, Mr. Rezendes. You think your paper has the resources to take that on? |
| 57 | Marty: Sometimes it’s easy to forget that we spend most of our time stumbling around in the dark. Suddenly a light gets turned on, and there’s fair share of blame to go around. |
Some Loglines to consider:
| A tenacious team of Boston Globe reporters unravels a decades-long cover-up of child sexual abuse within the Catholic Church, exposing a systemic crisis that shakes the city to its core. |
| When a new editor pushes the Boston Globe's Spotlight team to investigate allegations against a Catholic priest, they uncover a shocking conspiracy that reaches the highest levels of the Church. |
| Driven by an unwavering commitment to truth, four investigative journalists risk everything to expose a systemic cover-up of child sexual abuse, forcing a reckoning with faith, power, and justice. |
| In the face of powerful opposition and personal sacrifices, a team of reporters at the Boston Globe embarks on a grueling investigation that exposes the dark secrets of the Catholic Church and its complicity in a widespread abuse scandal. |
| Against the backdrop of a city grappling with faith and tradition, the Boston Globe's Spotlight team unearths a devastating truth about the Catholic Church, revealing a pattern of systemic abuse and the desperate fight for justice. |
| In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, a team of Boston Globe investigative journalists uncover a massive cover-up of child sexual abuse within the Catholic Church, leading all the way to the top. |
| A team of determined Boston Globe reporters race against time and institutional resistance to expose the systemic sexual abuse of children by Catholic priests and the Church's attempts to conceal it. |
| When a new editor at the Boston Globe challenges his reporters to investigate a decades-old case of child abuse by a Catholic priest, they uncover a shocking web of secrets and betrayal that reaches the highest levels of the Church. |
| In a city where the Catholic Church holds immense power, a team of Boston Globe journalists must overcome daunting obstacles to expose the truth about the systematic abuse of children by priests and the institution's efforts to cover it up. |
| After a new editor arrives at the Boston Globe, a team of investigative journalists are tasked with examining a decades-old case of child sexual abuse by a Catholic priest, leading them on a path to uncover a far-reaching conspiracy at the highest levels of the Church. |
| A team of investigative journalists uncovers a shocking scandal within the Catholic Church, revealing a history of abuse and cover-ups. |
| As they dig deeper, the Spotlight team faces moral dilemmas and institutional resistance in their quest for truth. |
| In a city where loyalty to the Church runs deep, a group of reporters risks everything to expose the dark secrets hidden behind closed doors. |
| The story of how a small team at the Boston Globe brought to light the systemic abuse within the Catholic Church, changing lives forever. |
| Spotlight follows the relentless pursuit of justice by journalists determined to hold powerful institutions accountable. |
Help & FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
After that, the high-level menu will offer insights into the story, themes, and characters.
The scene-by-scene analysis will demonstrate how each scene performs across various criteria, summarized in the column headings.
Click on any scene title to view the full analysis, including critiques and suggestions for improvement.
'Other Analyses' provides various insights into your writing and different perspectives, although it might not lead to significant rewrites of your script.
You can play it for free. If you have scripts analyzed, the AI might recommend exercises from SceneProv to help you improve your writing. Go to the craft tab to see what it recommended.
Let the AI take a turn when you're blocked or you want to riff on a scene. Each scene you create in SceneProv gets graded at the end.
- The email might have gone to your spam folder or is hidden in an email thread.
- The process might still be ongoing. Register/Login with the email you used during upload and look at the status. It sometimes takes as long as a couple hours. If it's been longer than that email us at [email protected]
Feature Request
Got an idea to improve our service? We'd love to hear it!
Scene by Scene Emotions
suspense Analysis
Executive Summary
Suspense is effectively woven throughout the screenplay, particularly in scenes involving the investigation into the Church's misconduct. The tension builds as characters like Mike and Robby navigate bureaucratic obstacles and confront powerful figures, leaving the audience on edge about the potential fallout from their actions. For instance, in scene 5, the discussion about pursuing legal action against the Church creates a palpable sense of urgency, while in scene 39, the courtroom dynamics heighten the stakes of the investigation.
Usage Analysis
Critique
Suggestions
Questions for AI
fear Analysis
Executive Summary
Fear is a recurring emotion in the screenplay, particularly as characters confront the potential repercussions of their investigation into the Church. The fear of backlash from powerful figures, such as Cardinal Law, looms large, creating an atmosphere of anxiety that permeates many scenes. For example, in scene 10, Mike's interaction with Garabedian highlights the fear surrounding the Church's influence and the risks involved in pursuing the truth.
Usage Analysis
Critique
Suggestions
Questions for AI
joy Analysis
Executive Summary
Joy is a rare emotion in the screenplay, primarily serving as a contrast to the heavier themes of abuse and institutional failure. Moments of joy, such as light-hearted banter among the characters, provide brief respites from the tension, allowing the audience to connect with the characters on a more personal level. For instance, in scene 2, the farewell speech elicits laughter and camaraderie, offering a moment of relief amidst the serious undertones of the narrative.
Usage Analysis
Critique
Suggestions
Questions for AI
sadness Analysis
Executive Summary
Sadness is a pervasive emotion throughout the screenplay, deeply intertwined with the themes of abuse and institutional failure. The emotional weight of the characters' experiences, particularly the victims, resonates strongly with the audience, evoking a profound sense of sorrow. For example, in scene 17, Phil Saviano's recounting of his trauma highlights the emotional toll of abuse, leaving viewers feeling the weight of his story.
Usage Analysis
Critique
Suggestions
Questions for AI
surprise Analysis
Executive Summary
Surprise plays a crucial role in the screenplay, often serving to heighten the emotional stakes and reveal unexpected truths about the Church's actions. The revelations about the extent of abuse and the Church's complicity catch both the characters and the audience off guard, adding layers of complexity to the narrative. For instance, in scene 34, the discovery of the staggering number of priests involved in misconduct leaves the team shocked and underscores the gravity of their investigation.
Usage Analysis
Critique
Suggestions
Questions for AI
empathy Analysis
Executive Summary
Empathy is a central emotion in the screenplay, allowing the audience to connect deeply with the characters and the victims of abuse. The emotional weight of the investigation resonates strongly, fostering a sense of compassion for those affected by the Church's actions. For instance, in scene 17, Phil Saviano's recounting of his trauma evokes a powerful empathetic response from the audience, highlighting the importance of their work.
Usage Analysis
Critique
Suggestions
Questions for AI