The whale

A severely overweight man battles physical and emotional pain in a squalid apartment, finding fleeting moments of relief through literature and reflection.

See other logline suggestions

Overview

Poster
Unique Selling Point

The Whale distinguishes itself through its unflinching portrayal of extreme obesity as both physical condition and emotional metaphor, combined with its exploration of how authentic human connection can transcend even the most profound physical and emotional isolation. The screenplay's unique blend of brutal honesty and profound compassion creates a viewing experience that is both uncomfortable and deeply moving.

AI Verdict & Suggestions

Ratings are subjective. So you get different engines' ratings to compare.

Hover over verdict cards for Executive Summaries

Claude
 Recommend
GPT5
 Recommend
Grok
 Highly Recommend
Gemini
 Highly Recommend
DeepSeek
 Recommend
Average Score: 8.9
Key Takeaways
For the Writer:
This is a powerful, actor-forward chamber piece with a vivid central role and strong thematic motifs (Moby Dick/Palouse/bird). To sharpen its impact, focus a revision pass on the middle act: cut or compress repetitive eating/medical beats and replace them with scenes that escalate stakes or reveal new information (e.g., clarify the money subplot, give Thomas a clearer trajectory, or add a concrete consequence to Charlie’s public outburst). Also tighten and humanize secondary-character moments (Mary, Liz, Thomas) so their choices feel earned, and run a sensitivity pass on the depiction of Charlie’s body/illness to avoid voyeurism—ground physical detail in interiority and relationship. Small structural clarifications (who controls the account, why the money wasn’t used, and a clearer payoff for Thomas) will make the emotional climax land with greater inevitability.
For Executives:
The Whale is high-value prestige material: a single-location, low-budget drama with an awards-caliber lead role and a clear USP (literary motif + anguished father-daughter reconciliation). Key risks: the middle act currently sags, several secondary arcs (Thomas, financial logistics, Mary/Liz resolution) feel underdeveloped, and the graphic depiction of obesity/illness may provoke negative press if handled insensitively. Those risks are fixable with a focused rewrite (4–8 weeks) to tighten pacing, clarify plot mechanics, and commission a sensitivity consultant. With those fixes the project is commercially attractive to prestige distributors and actors seeking meaty material; unaddressed, the script may alienate audiences and critics despite strong performances.
Story Facts
Genres:
Drama 80% Horror 15% Comedy 10%

Setting: Contemporary, A cluttered one-bedroom apartment in the Palouse region of northwestern Idaho

Themes: Redemption through Connection, Mortality and the Reckoning of Life, Familial Estrangement and Reconciliation, Regret and Self-Destruction, The Nature of Faith and Spiritual Manipulation, Truth and Authenticity in Expression, Isolation and Vulnerability

Conflict & Stakes: Charlie's struggle with his health and his desire to reconnect with his estranged daughter Ellie, who resents him for his past abandonment and current state.

Mood: Somber and introspective, with moments of tension and emotional vulnerability.

Standout Features:

  • Unique Hook: The story centers on a morbidly obese man trying to reconnect with his estranged daughter while facing imminent death.
  • Emotional Climax: The final scene where Charlie stands up to connect with Ellie while she reads her essay, symbolizing reconciliation and closure.
  • Character Depth: The complex relationships between Charlie, Ellie, and Mary, showcasing the struggles of forgiveness and understanding.
  • Setting: The Palouse region provides a unique and visually striking backdrop that contrasts with Charlie's internal struggles.

Comparable Scripts: The Whale (2022), The Hours (2002), The Elephant Man (1980), A Streetcar Named Desire (play by Tennessee Williams), The Pursuit of Happyness (2006), The Fault in Our Stars (2014), The King's Speech (2010), The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time (book by Mark Haddon), The Perks of Being a Wallflower (2012)

Data Says…
Feature in Alpha - Could have inaccuracies

Our stats model looked at how your scores work together and ranked the changes most likely to move your overall rating next draft. Ordered by the most reliable gains first.

1. Visual Impact (Script Level)
Big Impact Script Level
Your current Visual Impact (Script Level) score: 7.6
Typical rewrite gain: +0.4 in Visual Impact (Script Level)
Gets you ~5% closer to an "all Highly Recommends" score
Confidence: High (based on ~3,782 similar revisions)
  • This is currently your highest-impact lever. Improving Visual Impact (Script Level) is most likely to move the overall rating next.
  • What writers at your level usually do: Writers at a similar level usually raise Visual Impact (Script Level) by about +0.4 in one rewrite.
  • Why it matters: At your level, improving this one area alone can cover a meaningful slice of the climb toward an "all Highly Recommends" script.
2. Character Development (Script Level)
Big Impact Script Level
Your current Character Development (Script Level) score: 8.0
Typical rewrite gain: +0.5 in Character Development (Script Level)
Gets you ~4% closer to an "all Highly Recommends" score
Confidence: High (based on ~2,065 similar revisions)
  • This is another meaningful lever. After you work on the higher-impact areas, this can still create a noticeable lift.
  • What writers at your level usually do: Writers at a similar level usually raise Character Development (Script Level) by about +0.5 in one rewrite.
  • Why it matters: After you address the top item, gains here are still one of the levers that move you toward that "all Highly Recommends" zone.
3. Theme (Script Level)
Big Impact Script Level
Your current Theme (Script Level) score: 8.0
Typical rewrite gain: +0.45 in Theme (Script Level)
Gets you ~4% closer to an "all Highly Recommends" score
Confidence: High (based on ~3,490 similar revisions)
  • This is another meaningful lever. After you work on the higher-impact areas, this can still create a noticeable lift.
  • What writers at your level usually do: Writers at a similar level usually raise Theme (Script Level) by about +0.45 in one rewrite.
  • Why it matters: After you address the top item, gains here are still one of the levers that move you toward that "all Highly Recommends" zone.

Script Level Analysis

Writer Exec

This section delivers a top-level assessment of the screenplay’s strengths and weaknesses — covering overall quality (P/C/R/HR), character development, emotional impact, thematic depth, narrative inconsistencies, and the story’s core philosophical conflict. It helps identify what’s resonating, what needs refinement, and how the script aligns with professional standards.

Screenplay Insights

Breaks down your script along various categories.

Overall Score: 8.06
Key Suggestions:
The screenplay’s emotional core — Charlie’s longing for connection and his reconciliation with Ellie — is powerful and mostly earned. To strengthen the script craftwise, focus on two things: deepen key secondary characters (especially Thomas and Mary) so their choices feel motivated and thematically tied to Charlie’s arc, and tighten pacing by trimming exposition-heavy beats (condense or dramatize scenes 3 and 21). Consider selective, short flashbacks or sensory beats that reveal Charlie’s history with Alan and early fatherhood to raise the stakes of the present action without slowing the narrative. Also amplify a consistent visual motif (the wave/Palouse-as-ocean image) so the screenplay’s imagery echoes its emotional shifts.
Story Critique

Big-picture feedback on the story’s clarity, stakes, cohesion, and engagement.

Key Suggestions:
The script’s emotional core — Charlie’s regret, his fraught relationship with Ellie, and the Moby Dick metaphor — is strong and resonant. The single biggest craft fix is to tighten the pacing and reduce repetitive, expository beats so each scene advances character or theme. Condense or combine scenes that linger on the same emotional beat, convert telling dialogue (especially Thomas’s proselytizing) into subtler action or subtext, and use visual moments or brief flashbacks to give backstory instead of long explanations. Finally, let the final reconciliation breathe a little more (more incremental beats between them) so the ending lands with fuller emotional closure rather than feeling abrupt.
Characters

Explores the depth, clarity, and arc of the main and supporting characters.

Key Suggestions:
The character work is strong in places — Charlie is a compelling, tragic center and Ellie provides sharp counterpoint — but the script needs clearer emotional logic and specificity so its climactic reconciliation feels earned. Focus on deepening Charlie’s interior life (concrete memories of Alan, recurring triggers, and clearer turning points) and tighten the supporting arcs (especially Thomas and Mary) so each interaction escalates stakes rather than merely illustrating circumstance. Use a few well-placed flashbacks or private moments of reflection and sharpen the beats where Charlie moves from denial to intentional action; that will make the final scene resonate instead of rely on coincidence or melodrama.
Emotional Analysis

Breaks down the emotional journey of the audience across the script.

Key Suggestions:
The script's emotional engine is powerful—sadness and high-stakes confrontations create genuine moments of impact—but it currently runs too hot for too long. Prioritize rebalancing emotional pacing by adding deliberate 'valleys' (quiet, connective scenes and small joys) and deepening secondary arcs (Ellie, Thomas, Liz) so the major confrontations and the final reconciliation feel earned. Make Charlie more agentive in a few scenes (intellectual passion, small choices that reveal character) and give Ellie concrete vulnerabilities outside the apartment so her thaw in Scene 29 has weight.
Goals and Philosophical Conflict

Evaluates character motivations, obstacles, and sources of tension throughout the plot.

Key Suggestions:
The script's emotional core — Charlie's shift from stubborn autonomy to vulnerable reconciliation with Ellie — is powerful but needs clearer, earned beats earlier in the story. Tighten pacing by trimming repetitive domestic detail, and instead plant small, concrete moments that show Charlie relinquishing control (not just saying he will) and Ellie softening incrementally. Strengthen Ellie's arc so her final compassion feels earned (give her one or two private, vulnerable moments that explain why she can read for him). Preserve the script's rawness, but re-balance shock moments (sexual material, extremes of filth) so audiences stay empathetic rather than repelled.
Themes

Analysis of the themes of the screenplay and how well they’re expressed.

Key Suggestions:
The screenplay’s emotional core — Charlie’s bid for redemption through honest connection with Ellie — is powerful and resonant, but the payoff will land only if the reconciliation feels earned. Tighten the emotional throughline by pruning repetitive scenes, clarifying character motivations (especially Ellie’s), and inserting small, reciprocal moments of vulnerability earlier so the final scene reads as the culmination of real work rather than a last-minute miracle. Also balance the faith subplot (Thomas/Liz) to avoid cartoonish antagonists and sharpen recurring motifs (Palouse→ocean imagery) so they amplify rather than dilute the central arc.
Logic & Inconsistencies

Highlights any contradictions, plot holes, or logic gaps that may confuse viewers.

Key Suggestions:
To enhance the script's emotional impact and character authenticity, focus on refining Charlie's motivations for refusing medical help, ensuring they align with his desperate need for connection. Additionally, consider deepening the emotional transitions of Ellie to create a more believable character arc. Streamlining repetitive elements, such as Charlie's apologies and health issues, will also improve narrative efficiency and maintain tension throughout the story.

Scene Analysis

All of your scenes analyzed individually and compared, so you can zero in on what to improve.

Scene-Level Percentile Chart
Hover over the graph to see more details about each score.
Go to Scene Analysis

Other Analyses

Writer Exec

This section looks at the extra spark — your story’s voice, style, world, and the moments that really stick. These insights might not change the bones of the script, but they can make it more original, more immersive, and way more memorable. It’s where things get fun, weird, and wonderfully you.

Unique Voice

Assesses the distinctiveness and personality of the writer's voice.

Key Suggestions:
Your voice—raw, uncompromising, intellectually sharp and darkly funny—is the screenplay's primary asset. Strengthen its impact by tightening emotional pacing: prune repetitive bleak beats, sharpen dialogue for specificity, and deliberately alternate high-intensity confrontations with quieter, restorative moments so the audience can breathe and feel the characters’ interior lives. Use Scene 6 (and other strong emotional beats) as a template for balancing grit and vulnerability, and make sure Ellie’s emotional arc is earned earlier so the reconciliation lands credibly.
Writer's Craft

Analyzes the writing to help the writer be aware of their skill and improve.

Key Suggestions:
The script's emotional core and character relationships are strong, but the story will land far more powerfully if you deepen character backstories and sharpen motivations so each beat feels inevitable. Tighten dialogue to reveal subtext (show who people are through small choices, not just lines) and consider modest structural experiments—like shifting a scene or two non-linearly or reframing certain revelations—to heighten dramatic tension and clarify arcs. Practical steps: add a few compact scenes or lines that concretely explain why Ellie stayed away, what drove Charlie into self-destruction after Alan’s death, and why Liz is so reactive; then revise dialogue to let subtext do the work rather than explicit exposition.
Memorable Lines
Spotlights standout dialogue lines with emotional or thematic power.
Tropes
Highlights common or genre-specific tropes found in the script.
World Building

Evaluates the depth, consistency, and immersion of the story's world.

Key Suggestions:
Lean into the script's strongest cinematic asset—the contrast between the beautiful Palouse landscape (often rendered as oceanic waves) and the claustrophobic, squalid apartment—and make that visual metaphor do more narrative work. Tighten scenes that reiterate Charlie's decline without advancing character or plot, clarify the stakes around his refusal of care (financial, emotional, moral) earlier, and ensure each supporting character's actions either escalate conflict or reveal something new about Charlie. Use recurring motifs (birds, bread, waves, the notebook/essays) as emotional signposts so the audience can follow Charlie's inner arc without being weighed down by repetitious mise-en-scène.
Correlations

Identifies patterns in scene scores.

Key Suggestions:
The analysis shows your strengths: powerful emotional scenes and convincing character work, especially in quieter moments. But the script leans heavily on confrontational beats later in the story to carry momentum. To strengthen the overall narrative, tighten the opening act by raising stakes or inserting a sharper emotional hook early (without turning the piece into melodrama). Also polish dialogue in quieter, reflective scenes so they sustain engagement when external conflict is low. Small moves — a clearer early promise, a tightened inciting incident, and sharper reflective lines — will keep the audience invested until the mid-act escalation pays off.
Loglines
Presents logline variations based on theme, genre, and hook.