1 - The LSAT Heist
PursuitAll three lenses are solid — worth protecting as it stands.
The situation deepens as it goes Development
HoldingThe reader can follow what matters.
An unlikely team of a college dropout and high-powered lawyer take on a pro bono case against a powerful opponent, leading them on a journey of personal growth and redemption. Other loglines ›
The Unique Selling Proposition in this screenplay is its combination of legal drama and high-stakes crime, highlighting the inner workings of a law firm and the pressures of working in such an environment. It features complex characters with contrasting personalities and backstories, and a focus on the importance of pro bono cases in the legal field. The use of empathy, personal connections, and evidence to pursue justice and resolution in a harassment case adds to the unique voice of the script. Additionally, the story includes moments of humor and lightheartedness, providing a refreshing and engaging take on the legal drama genre.
How to read these: in industry coverage, Pass is the default outcome for the majority of professional scripts, and Consider means the reader stayed in the room. Industry-wide, the median professional evaluation sits at a 6 — scores of 8+ are rare everywhere, on purpose.
A championable series launch anchored by a highly distinctive mentor-protégé dynamic, and it requires targeted structural revision to align the midsection procedural tracks with the central partnership before it can clear the Highly Recommend band.
An elevated commercial legal drama pilot aiming for propulsive, voice-forward entertainment through a high-concept fraud premise and a repeatable mentor-protégé engine.
Readers split on lane: three read this as elevated commercial, two as mainstream commercial. The split traces to whether the procedural case material is viewed as secondary texture for character friction or as the primary structural driver of the pilot.
The pilot's clear premise launch, immediate lead chemistry, and episode-local resolution provide a solid floor that keeps it above the Consider band.
Midsection structural dilution and the absence of visible consequence mechanisms for the central fraud keep the pilot from fully capitalizing on its strongest material.
A pilot with a highly distinctive Harvey-Mike verbal engine that needs midsection structural work to tie the procedural and subplot tracks directly to the central partnership, alongside a pass to ground the fraud premise and sharpen dialogue subtext.
Readers read as Mainstream commercial2 Elevated commercial3 majority
Re-engineer the middle stretch so the procedural and subplot tracks actively pressure-test the Harvey-Mike dynamic rather than running parallel, which simultaneously addresses the causal breaks and grounds the fraud premise in visible stakes.
Compressing the procedural case or over-explaining the fraud premise risks crowding out the direct, competitive exchanges that establish the series engine.
When tightening the middle act, preserve the rehearsal and interview-style duels as self-contained units where Harvey and Mike test each other's methods, rather than trimming them to serve plot mechanics.
Accelerating the midsection to fix causal breaks may lead to cutting or compressing the personal scenes that ground Mike's stakes.
Do not trim the Grammy sequences to speed up the firm plot, since they are the only scenes that tie Mike's choice to a concrete personal cost and prevent him from reading as an unlikable superhero.
The reader loses forward pull as the procedural and personal subplot tracks resolve independently of the central partnership, draining the tension built in the opening.
The midsection plotlines are structured as parallel tracks rather than as direct pressure tests on the Harvey-Mike dynamic, so the causal chain between the setup and the back-half reversals is not shown in motion.
Re-engineer the middle stretch so the procedural case and drug subplot actively force Harvey and Mike into direct friction or shared risk, converting standalone beats into relationship pressure.
The reader experiences a low-grade skepticism about the central deception and Harvey's professional stakes, which makes late reversals feel convenient rather than earned.
The pilot establishes the fraud and partnership threats but does not show the specific mechanisms for maintaining the lie or the lasting costs of Harvey's ethical breaches, so the stakes rely on reader assumption rather than visible pressure.
Establish a concrete credential cover mechanism early and keep Harvey's professional consequences active after his threat to leave, so the central risks remain legible throughout the pilot.
The reader stops hearing distinct character voices and begins to register scenes as a single banter register, which reduces the sense that any particular exchange is costing a character something.
Reliance on explicit thematic statements, uniform quip rhythms, and interpretive action directions flattens character differentiation and bypasses the subtext that would make the sparring feel earned.
Differentiate each recurring voice by giving them distinct conversational tactics and strip explicit thematic statements from the dialogue, letting the friction and action lines carry the subtext.
Committing to the elevated commercial reading means treating the procedural case as secondary texture for character friction, so revision should prioritize preserving the witty banter and compressing the case to serve the relationship.
Committing to the mainstream commercial reading means treating the high-concept fraud premise and case-of-the-week structure as the primary driver, so revision should focus on tightening the legal mechanics and ensuring the procedural beats land cleanly.
Cut the on-the-nose confirmations where characters restate the script's themes and remove parentheticals or action-line asides that instruct the reader how to feel, letting the staging and subtext carry the direction.
The Harvey-Mike verbal sparring establishes a championable series engine that generates immediate reader investment and sustains the pilot's momentum.
The midsection procedural and subplot tracks run parallel to the central partnership, diluting forward pull and leaving the fraud premise without visible maintenance mechanisms.
On the score: The score sits between two verdicts — small changes in either direction could flip it.
Setting: Present day, New York City
Themes: Deception and Identity, Ethics and Morality, Career and Ambition, Friendship and Betrayal, Justice and Redemption
Conflict & Stakes: John's struggle to clear his name after being falsely accused of a crime, with his family's reputation at stake.
Mood: Dark and Suspenseful
Standout Features:
Comparable Scripts: Suits, Catch Me If You Can, The Firm, Limitless, Breaking Bad, White Collar, The Lincoln Lawyer, Good Will Hunting, American Hustle, The Social Network
This section delivers a top-level assessment of the screenplay’s strengths and weaknesses — covering overall quality (P/C/R/HR), character development, emotional impact, thematic depth, narrative inconsistencies, and the story’s core philosophical conflict. It helps identify what’s resonating, what needs refinement, and how the script aligns with professional standards.
Breaks down your script along various categories.
Breaks down the emotional journey of the audience across the script.
All of your scenes analyzed individually and compared, so you can zero in on what to improve.
This section looks at the extra spark — your story’s voice, style, world, and the moments that really stick. These insights might not change the bones of the script, but they can make it more original, more immersive, and way more memorable. It’s where things get fun, weird, and wonderfully you.
Your whole script read on three things — Design (is it built), Execution (does it play on the page), and Involvement (does it draw you in) — then mapped scene by scene. The rows go Script → Acts → Sequences → Scenes in story order, left to right; a unit’s width is its length in pages.
Colour depends on the mode. By default you’re on Triage — a recommendation for each part: Keep (green), Polish, Rework, or Two groups low (red). Switch Colour by (top) to a group (Design / Execution / Involvement) or one of the twelve axes and the colour becomes that signal’s score instead — red (needs work) through green (strong), with grey where a part isn’t owed that signal. Either way it’s a map of where to look.
To explore: click any cell for its detailed read — what’s working, what’s dragging, and your options — and 💬 Ask about it right there. To see an act’s scenes larger, hover the act and click Zoom in (the magnifier); Zoom out in the same spot, or Esc, goes back. While zoomed, the other acts stay as narrow strips you can click, and ← → move between them. Use Colour by (top) to recolour by a single craft signal, or the Findings / Axes / Patterns tabs to read it different ways.
High-level overview
The movie follows Mike Ross, a college dropout who takes the LSAT for money. After narrowly escaping a suspicious proctor, he impresses Harvey Specter and starts working for him at a law firm. They tackle a pro bono case against Devlin McGreggor, in which Mike struggles to convince a hesitant witness to testify, and Harvey confronts some personal and internal office issues. Meanwhile, Mike also deals with the drug business and his grandmother's illness. In the end, they win the case and reconcile. Harvey seeks redemption by taking on a criminal case and reflects on his mistakes.
Scene by Scene Summaries
Each axis shows your script's raw score (0–10) in that category. We recently upgraded the AI models behind these categories, so percentile rankings are temporarily unavailable while we re-score our reference library.
Hover over each axis on the radar chart to see what that category measures and why it matters.
Analysis: The pilot's character development is its strongest asset, especially in the electric mentor-protégé dynamic between Harvey and Mike. Mike's journey from unmotivated test cheat to committed lawyer provides immediate emotional stakes, while Harvey's carefully hidden vulnerability creates an intriguing arc that invites audience investment. The script's main weaknesses lie in underdeveloped supporting players, a diffuse set of antagonists, and a few character turns that feel more engineered than earned. Overall, this is a compelling character-driven legal drama with a strong foundation, though several arcs still need deeper shading to reach their full emotional potential.
Analysis: The screenplay establishes a highly engaging and clear premise: a brilliant but aimless college dropout with a photographic memory and a checkered past is hired by a top New York law firm on the false premise that he is a Harvard Law graduate. The setup is efficient, emotionally grounded, and commercially appealing, effectively balancing fast-paced legal maneuvering with character-driven stakes. The premise is immediately intriguing and lays strong foundations for both episodic cases and serialized identity-deception tension. Key areas for enhancement include deepening the plausibility of the initial hiring, clarifying the inherent risks of the deception earlier, and strengthening the emotional stakes around Mike's grandmother and his retreat from the drug world.
Analysis: The pilot efficiently establishes a strong central premise and a compelling mentor-protégé dynamic through a series of urgent, witty set pieces. The dual-track structure—Mike's secret identity and the pro bono harassment case—keeps the plot moving and generates genuine suspense, especially in the Ritz-Carlton sequence. The main storylines resolve satisfyingly, though the sheer velocity can strain credibility, and some subplots (Trevor, Rachel) remain underdeveloped in favor of the central case.
Analysis: The pilot establishes a strong thematic foundation built on identity, second chances, and the tension between winning and compassion. It effectively dramatizes the collision between institutional credentialing and raw ability, while weaving mentor-mentee dynamics into a high-stakes legal thriller. The themes are clear and consistently reinforced through character choices and plot turns, though the treatment occasionally leans on broad character contrasts, and the 'compassion' theme is sometimes delivered more through pronouncements than through dramatized behavior.
Analysis: The pilot establishes a strong visual identity in its set pieces—Mike's chameleon escape from the LSAT, the memory-driven Ritz-Carlton evasion, and the suit as a recurring status symbol—while its quieter legal scenes remain more dialogue-bound and less visually textured. With targeted production-design details and a few recurring motifs, the screenplay could turn its sharp premise into a fully cinematic world.
Analysis: The pilot lands its emotional core through the underdog journey of Mike Ross, the poignant presence of his grandmother, and the slow-burning mentor bond with Harvey Specter. It successfully mixes humor, legal tension, and sentiment, but emotional depth is uneven: several pivotal beats—especially Joanna's betrayal and Harvey's transformation—are resolved through plot mechanics rather than character interiority. The result is a highly watchable, emotionally satisfying pilot that could resonate even more deeply with a few well-placed character-driven moments.
Analysis: The pilot efficiently establishes multiple layers of conflict—Mike's false identity, Harvey's endangered partnership, and the sexual-harassment case—with strong individual set pieces and a compelling mentor-protégé bond. However, the screenplay's tension is uneven: the drug-dealer and internal-firm conflicts are under-integrated, and the pro bono resolution relies on offscreen discovery. Sharpening those threads would make the escalating stakes feel more organic and earned.
Analysis: Suits boasts a tantalizingly high-concept premise: a brilliant college dropout with a photographic memory impersonates a Harvard Law graduate and becomes a lawyer. The pilot executes this with caper-like energy, sharp dialogue, and a dynamic mentor-protégé relationship. Its most creative moments—the LSAT disguise, the Ritz-Carlton drug-drop evasion, and the pro bono case reversal—keep the familiar legal-drama bones feeling fresh and entertaining.
Expand to see detailed analysis
View Complete AnalysisProtagonist
Protagonist
Mentor
Antagonist
| Theme | Theme Details | Theme Explanation |
|---|---|---|
|
Deception and Identity
|
The screenplay explores the theme of deception and identity through Mike's double life as a fake lawyer and drug dealer, as well as Harvey's confrontation with Joanna, who turns out to be a fake employee.
|
Deception and identity play a significant role in the character development and plot twists in the screenplay. The theme highlights the consequences of living a double life and the importance of authenticity. |
|
Ethics and Morality
|
The screenplay touches on the theme of ethics and morality through Harvey's decision to take on a pro bono case and Mike's struggle to balance his illegal activities with his desire to do the right thing.
|
Ethics and morality are explored to showcase the characters' growth and development. The theme raises questions about the line between right and wrong and the choices individuals make when faced with moral dilemmas. |
|
Career and Ambition
|
The screenplay explores the theme of career and ambition through the characters' pursuit of success in the legal profession, showcased through Mike's journey from a lowly drug dealer to a lawyer and Harvey's desire to become a senior partner.
|
Career and ambition serve as driving forces for the characters' actions and decisions. The theme explores the sacrifices individuals make to achieve their goals and the challenges they face along the way. |
|
Friendship and Betrayal
|
The screenplay touches on the theme of friendship and betrayal through Mike's strained relationship with Trevor, who tries to involve him in the drug business, as well as Harvey's confrontation with Louis and his mentor.
|
Friendship and betrayal are explored to showcase the complexities of human relationships. The theme delves into the consequences of trust and the impact of betrayal on the characters' personal and professional lives. |
|
Justice and Redemption
|
The screenplay explores the theme of justice and redemption through Mike and Harvey's pursuit of justice for their clients and their own personal growth and redemption arcs.
|
Justice and redemption serve as motivators for the characters' actions and decisions. The theme examines the struggle for justice in a morally complex world and the potential for redemption and growth even in the face of adversity. |
| Site | Description |
|---|---|
| Studio Binder | Movie Themes: Examples of Common Themes for Screenwriters |
| Coverfly | Improving your Screenplay's theme |
| John August | Writing from Theme |
| Title | Description |
|---|---|
| Story, Plot, Genre, Theme - Screenwriting Basics | Screenwriting basics - beginner video |
| What is theme | Discussion on ways to layer theme into a screenplay. |
| Thematic Mistakes You're Making in Your Script | Common Theme mistakes and Philosophical Conflicts |
| Goals and Philosophical Conflict | |
|---|---|
| internal Goals | The protagonist's internal goal is to prove himself as a competent lawyer and succeed in his job |
| External Goals | The protagonist's external goal is to succeed in his job and navigate various legal cases |
| Philosophical Conflict | The overarching philosophical conflict in the screenplay is the tension between personal morals and professional ethics |
| Site | Description |
|---|---|
| Creative Screenwriting | How Important Is A Character’s Goal? |
| Studio Binder | What is Conflict in a Story? A Quick Reminder of the Purpose of Conflict |
| Title | Description |
|---|---|
| How I Build a Story's Philosophical Conflict | How do you build philosophical conflict into your story? Where do you start? And how do you develop it into your characters and their external actions. Today I’m going to break this all down and make it fully clear in this episode. |
| Endings: The Good, the Bad, and the Insanely Great | By Michael Arndt: I put this lecture together in 2006, when I started work at Pixar on Toy Story 3. It looks at how to write an "insanely great" ending, using Star Wars, The Graduate, and Little Miss Sunshine as examples. 90 minutes |
| Tips for Writing Effective Character Goals | By Jessica Brody (Save the Cat!): Writing character goals is one of the most important jobs of any novelist. But are your character's goals...mushy? |
Everything above was written for you before you arrived. These are the things you can set running yourself, on the whole script or on one scene at a time.
All three lenses are solid — worth protecting as it stands.
The situation deepens as it goes Development
HoldingThe reader can follow what matters.
All three lenses are solid — worth protecting as it stands.
The situation deepens as it goes Development
HoldingThe reader can follow what matters.
No lens is broken, but Design is soft — this reads as a polish pass.
It restates its note rather than deepening it Development
HoldingThe reader can follow what matters.
Design and Involvement are broken — this reads as a rebuild before polish.
It restates its note rather than deepening it Development
HoldingThe reader can follow what matters.
No lens is broken, but Design, Execution and Involvement are soft — this reads as a polish pass.
It isn’t clearly about one thing yet Contract
HoldingA real force keeps it pushing forward.
Design and Involvement are broken — this reads as a rebuild before polish.
It ends about where it started Movement
HoldingThe reader can follow what matters.
An orientation beat sets up the world. It isn’t expected to carry a big turn, so a lower Design read here is often the shape of the scene, not a fault.
All three lenses are solid — worth protecting as it stands.
The situation deepens as it goes Development
HoldingIt commits to one clear thing and holds it.
All three lenses are solid — worth protecting as it stands.
It plays close to the version we’ve seen before Freshness
HoldingThe reader can follow what matters.
No lens is broken, but Design, Execution and Involvement are soft — this reads as a polish pass.
It isn’t clearly about one thing yet Contract
HoldingThe reader can follow what matters.
A transition carries us between beats. It owes less structurally than a scene built to turn.
No lens is broken, but Design and Involvement are soft — this reads as a polish pass.
It plays close to the version we’ve seen before Freshness
HoldingThe reader can follow what matters.
An orientation beat sets up the world. It isn’t expected to carry a big turn, so a lower Design read here is often the shape of the scene, not a fault.
All three lenses are solid — worth protecting as it stands.
The situation deepens as it goes Development
HoldingIt turns — something is different by the end.
All three lenses are solid — worth protecting as it stands.
The situation deepens as it goes Development
HoldingThe reader can follow what matters.
All three lenses are solid — worth protecting as it stands.
A real force keeps it pushing forward Pressure
HoldingThe reader can follow what matters.
No lens is broken, but Involvement is soft — this reads as a polish pass.
The result doesn’t oblige what comes next Consequence
HoldingThe reader can follow what matters.
Design and Involvement are broken — this reads as a rebuild before polish.
It restates its note rather than deepening it Development
HoldingThe reader can follow what matters.
An orientation beat sets up the world. It isn’t expected to carry a big turn, so a lower Design read here is often the shape of the scene, not a fault.
No lens is broken, but Design, Execution and Involvement are soft — this reads as a polish pass.
It isn’t clearly about one thing yet Contract
HoldingThe reader can follow what matters.
No lens is broken, but Involvement is soft — this reads as a polish pass.
There’s avoidable waste on the page Economy
HoldingIt commits to one clear thing and holds it.
No lens is broken, but Design and Involvement are soft — this reads as a polish pass.
It isn’t clearly about one thing yet Contract
HoldingA real force keeps it pushing forward.
No lens is broken, but Design, Execution and Involvement are soft — this reads as a polish pass.
It restates its note rather than deepening it Development
HoldingThe reader can follow what matters.
No lens is broken, but Design, Execution and Involvement are soft — this reads as a polish pass.
It isn’t clearly about one thing yet Contract
HoldingA real force keeps it pushing forward.
No lens is broken, but Design, Execution and Involvement are soft — this reads as a polish pass.
It isn’t clearly about one thing yet Contract
HoldingA real force keeps it pushing forward.
All three lenses are solid — worth protecting as it stands.
The situation deepens as it goes Development
HoldingThe reader can follow what matters.
All three lenses are solid — worth protecting as it stands.
It commits to one clear thing and holds it Contract
HoldingA real force keeps it pushing forward.
No lens is broken, but Design, Execution and Involvement are soft — this reads as a polish pass.
It restates its note rather than deepening it Development
A montage compresses time. It isn’t built to turn on a single thread.
All three lenses are solid — worth protecting as it stands.
The situation deepens as it goes Development
HoldingIt turns — something is different by the end.
All three lenses are solid — worth protecting as it stands.
It restates its note rather than deepening it Development
HoldingThe reader can follow what matters.
All three lenses are solid — worth protecting as it stands.
A real force keeps it pushing forward Pressure
HoldingThe reader can follow what matters.
Your scene scores are compared against professional produced screenplays in our vault (The Matrix, Breaking Bad, etc.). The percentile shows where you rank compared to these films.
Example: A score of 8.5 in Dialogue might be 85th percentile (strong!), while the same 8.5 in Conflict might only be 50th percentile (needs work). The percentile tells you what your raw scores actually mean.
Hover over each axis on the radar chart to see what that category measures and why it matters.
“Functional” (5–6) is a solid, professional scene — that's where most scenes sit. The scale rides low on purpose, so it has room to point down (where to fix) and up (what's working).
Scenes now use the full 0–10 scale, so your numbers will look lower and more spread out than before. That's the new, smarter model being honest — not a verdict on your script.
The table below uses the same colors: warm = worth a look · neutral = fine · green = working. The point is awareness, not maxing every number — a scene can be light on plot or conflict for good reasons.
| Compelled to Read | Story Content | Character Development | Scene Elements | Audience Engagement | Technical Aspects | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Click for Full Analysis | Triage | Design | Overall | Clarity | Scene Impact | Concept | Plot | Originality | Characters | Character Changes | Internal Goal | External Goal | Conflict | Opposition | High stakes | Story forward | Twist | Emotional Impact | Dialogue | Engagement | Pacing | Formatting | Structure | |
| 1 - The LSAT Heist | KeepPursuitAll three lenses are solid — worth protecting as it stands. | SolidThe story machine is built and mostly working. | 7 | 8 / 8 | 8 / 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 7 | |
| 2 - Harvey Closes a Deal | KeepContestAll three lenses are solid — worth protecting as it stands. | SolidThe story machine is built and mostly working. | 7 | 9 / 9 | 8 / 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | |
| 3 - The Dealer Proposition | PolishDeliveryNo lens is broken, but Design is soft — this reads as a polish pass. | SoftThe structure works but is leaking power in places. | 6 | 8 / 7 | 6 / 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 6 | |
| 4 - Morning After | Low on its ownRelationship shiftDesign and Involvement are broken — this reads as a rebuild before polish. | BrokenThe underlying story machine isn’t holding — worth looking at before polish. | 6 | 8 / 7 | 5 / 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 5 | |
| 5 - Family Matters | PolishDeliveryNo lens is broken, but Design, Execution and Involvement are soft — this reads as a polish pass. | SoftThe structure works but is leaking power in places. | 7 | 8 / 8 | 8 / 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | |
| 6 - Interviews and Deals | Low on its ownOrientationDesign and Involvement are broken — this reads as a rebuild before polish. | BrokenThe underlying story machine isn’t holding — worth looking at before polish. | 7 | 8 / 7 | 7 / 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 | |
| 7 - Escape from the Ritz | KeepPursuitAll three lenses are solid — worth protecting as it stands. | SolidThe story machine is built and mostly working. | 8 | 8 / 9 | 9 / 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | |
| 8 - Mike Gets a Shot | KeepRelationship shiftAll three lenses are solid — worth protecting as it stands. | SolidThe story machine is built and mostly working. | 8 | 9 / 9 | 9 / 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 9 - Entering the Law School | PolishTransitionNo lens is broken, but Design, Execution and Involvement are soft — this reads as a polish pass. | SoftThe structure works but is leaking power in places. | 7 | 8 / 8 | 7 / 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | |
| 10 - First Day at Pearson, Hardman Law Firm | PolishOrientationNo lens is broken, but Design and Involvement are soft — this reads as a polish pass. | SoftThe structure works but is leaking power in places. | 7 | 8 / 7 | 6 / 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 | |
| 11 - The New Hire | KeepRelationship shiftAll three lenses are solid — worth protecting as it stands. | SolidThe story machine is built and mostly working. | 7 | 9 / 9 | 8 / 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | |
| 12 - The Partnership | KeepNegotiationAll three lenses are solid — worth protecting as it stands. | SolidThe story machine is built and mostly working. | 7 | 9 / 9 | 8 / 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | |
| 13 - Nancy's Story | KeepInvestigationAll three lenses are solid — worth protecting as it stands. | SolidThe story machine is built and mostly working. | 6 | 8 / 8 | 7 / 7 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | |
| 14 - The Suit and The Subpoena | PolishMentoring ritualNo lens is broken, but Involvement is soft — this reads as a polish pass. | SolidThe story machine is built and mostly working. | 7 | 8 / 8 | 7 / 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | |
| 15 - Pearson Hardman's Expectations | Low on its ownOrientationDesign and Involvement are broken — this reads as a rebuild before polish. | BrokenThe underlying story machine isn’t holding — worth looking at before polish. | 6 | 8 / 7 | 5 / 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 6 | |
| 16 - The Pro Bono Case | PolishInvestigationNo lens is broken, but Design, Execution and Involvement are soft — this reads as a polish pass. | SoftThe structure works but is leaking power in places. | 7 | 8 / 8 | 7 / 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | |
| 17 - Researching and Strategizing | PolishInvestigationNo lens is broken, but Involvement is soft — this reads as a polish pass. | SolidThe story machine is built and mostly working. | 6 | 8 / 8 | 7 / 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | |
| 18 - Courtroom Victory and Suit Shopping | PolishDeliveryNo lens is broken, but Design and Involvement are soft — this reads as a polish pass. | SoftThe structure works but is leaking power in places. | 7 | 8 / 8 | 7 / 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | |
| 19 - Negotiations and Revelations | PolishDeliveryNo lens is broken, but Design, Execution and Involvement are soft — this reads as a polish pass. | SoftThe structure works but is leaking power in places. | 7 | 8 / 8 | 7 / 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | |
| 20 - Investigating Devlin McGreggor | PolishInvestigationNo lens is broken, but Design, Execution and Involvement are soft — this reads as a polish pass. | SoftThe structure works but is leaking power in places. | 7 | 8 / 7 | 6 / 7 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 | |
| 21 - Betrayal and Testimony | PolishDeliveryNo lens is broken, but Design, Execution and Involvement are soft — this reads as a polish pass. | SoftThe structure works but is leaking power in places. | 7 | 8 / 8 | 8 / 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | |
| 22 - Deposition Disaster | KeepContestAll three lenses are solid — worth protecting as it stands. | SolidThe story machine is built and mostly working. | 7 | 7 / 7 | 7 / 7 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 | |
| 23 - Testimony Troubles | KeepPursuitAll three lenses are solid — worth protecting as it stands. | SolidThe story machine is built and mostly working. | 6 | 9 / 9 | 8 / 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | |
| 24 - Promises and Ultimatums | PolishMontageNo lens is broken, but Design, Execution and Involvement are soft — this reads as a polish pass. | SoftThe structure works but is leaking power in places. | 7 | 8 / 8 | 7 / 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 6 | |
| 25 - Convincing Joanna | KeepRelationship shiftAll three lenses are solid — worth protecting as it stands. | SolidThe story machine is built and mostly working. | 7 | 9 / 9 | 8 / 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 7 | |
| 26 - The Hunt for Justice | KeepDeliveryAll three lenses are solid — worth protecting as it stands. | SolidThe story machine is built and mostly working. | 7 | 9 / 9 | 8 / 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | |
| 27 - Redemption | KeepDeliveryAll three lenses are solid — worth protecting as it stands. | SolidThe story machine is built and mostly working. | 7 | 8 / 8 | 7 / 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 7 | |
| Pattern | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Emotional Impact vs. Conflict | This score shows that scenes with higher emotional impact tend to have higher conflict scores as well. This could suggest that the emotional stakes contribute to the conflict in the scene. |
| Character Changes vs. Overall Grade | There is a positive correlation between the character changes score and the overall grade of the scene. This indicates that scenes with more significant character changes tend to receive higher overall grades. |
| Dialogue vs. Plot | There is a slightly negative correlation between the dialogue score and the plot score. Scenes with more dialogue tend to have slightly lower plot scores, which may suggest that the dialogue is not always driving the plot forward effectively. |
| Tone vs. Move Story Forward | There is a positive correlation between scenes with a tense or serious tone and a score for moving the story forward effectively. This indicates that tense or serious scenes tend to drive the story forward more effectively than other types of scenes. |
| High Stakes vs. Emotional Impact | There is a positive correlation between the score for high stakes and emotional impact, indicating that scenes with higher stakes tend to have a stronger emotional impact on the audience. This suggests that it may be beneficial to focus on creating high stakes in scenes to increase their impact. |
| Concept vs. Plot | There is a positive correlation between the scores for concept and plot, suggesting that a strong concept can lead to a more compelling plot. |
| Character Changes vs. Conflict | There is a positive correlation between character changes and conflict scores. This may indicate that character changes often arise from conflicts within the story. |
| Humorous Tone vs. Emotional Impact | Scenes with a humorous tone tend to have slightly lower emotional impact scores, suggesting that humor may somewhat weaken the emotional impact of a scene. |
| Trope | Trope Details | Trope Explanation |
|---|
| Scene Number | Line |
|---|---|
| 2 | Harvey: I would say the ball’s in your court, but the truth is your balls are in my fist. |
| 4 | Harvey: The truth is... I do it for the children. |
| 16 | Rachel: Do me a favor, don’t poop on my laptop. |
| 14 | Harvey: I'm not about caring. I'm about winning. |
| 23 | Harvey: Being a success is about knowing the difference between having balls and having courage. |
| Array ( [0] => An unlikely team of a college dropout and high-powered lawyer take on a pro bono case against a powerful opponent, leading them on a journey of personal growth and redemption. [1] => Aspiring lawyer Mike Ross takes a risk to make a quick buck, only to find himself working for top lawyer Harvey Specter and fighting for justice in a high-stakes court case. [2] => Mike Ross faces his personal demons and a dangerous drug business while working on a critical pro bono case with Harvey Specter, leading to unexpected challenges and triumphs. [3] => Amidst office politics and personal struggles, Mike Ross and Harvey Specter team up to take on a powerful opponent in a fight for justice and redemption. [4] => A college dropout and a top lawyer join forces to fight for justice in a complex case, forcing them to confront their own fears and challenges in order to win. ) |
| When a brilliant, streetwise con man is hired by a top law firm as an associate, he must navigate the high-stakes world of corporate law while hiding his secret lack of a law degree from his colleagues and superiors. |
| A top corporate attorney takes an unlikely protégé under his wing, leading to a complex relationship filled with both professional and personal challenges as they work to win high-stakes legal battles. |
| A brilliant, photographic-memory con man scams his way into a prestigious law firm, where he must prove his worth to his jaded mentor while keeping his past a secret. |
Got an idea to improve our service? We'd love to hear it!
Scene by Scene Emotions