1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Scene Map 30
# PG SLUGLINE
1 1
DOWNWIND
2 2
INT BUILDING 771 - GLOVE BOX ROOM NIGHT
3 4
EXT ROCKY FLATS PLANT MORNING
4 6
INT PERIMETER ROAD - SEDAN MORNING
5 8
EXT SECURITY CHECKPOINT CONTINUOUS
6 11
INT CONFERENCE ROOM MORNING
7 14
EXT PERIMETER ROAD CONTINUOUS
8 14
EXT ADMIN BUILDING CONTINUOUS
9 15
EXT COURTYARD CONTINUOUS
10 17
INT TOM HASKELL'S OFFICE DAY
11 19
EXT SOLAR EVAPORATION PONDS DAY
12 22
EXT STANDLEY LAKE DAY
13 23
INT EXAM ROOM DAY
14 24
INT BUILDING 771 - GLOVE BOX ROOM DAY
15 26
INT WOMEN’S RESTROOM DAY
16 27
INT BUILDING 771 - PLENUM ACCESS DAY
17 28
INT CONTROL ROOM CONTINUOUS
18 30
INT COMMAND ROOM DAY
19 32
INT HALLWAY DAY
20 33
EXT PARKING LOT — DAY
21 35
INT HALLWAY DAY
22 36
EXT DOWNWIND GREENBELT DAY
23 38
INT BUILDING 771 - SUBLEVEL CORRIDOR NIGHT
24 39
INT HOSPITAL - OFFICE NIGHT
25 43
EXT OFFICE PARK NIGHT
26 45
INT BAR NIGHT
27 49
EXT SECURITY CHECKPOINT NIGHT
28 50
EXT SERVICE ENTRANCE MOMENTS LATER
29 51
INT BUILDING 771 - LOWER SUBLEVEL NIGHT
30 53
INT ROOM 141 CONTINUOUS
Scene Map
30
# PG SLUGLINE
1 1
DOWNWIND
DOWNWIND
DOWNWIND Episode 101 "The Raid" Written by Dane Hooks
2 2
INT BUILDING 771 - GLOVE BOX ROOM NIGHT
INT. BUILDING 771 - GLOVE BOX ROOM - NIGHT
INT. BUILDING 771 - GLOVE BOX ROOM - NIGHT Fluorescent lights BUZZ overhead. A corridor of interconnected glove boxes stretches into darkness. Plexiglass windows. Rubber gloves hang limp.
3 4
EXT ROCKY FLATS PLANT MORNING
EXT. ROCKY FLATS PLANT - MORNING
EXT. ROCKY FLATS PLANT - MORNING First light creeps over the Front Range. A vast, immaculate nuclear weapons facility rises from the dark -- low buildings, clean lines, wide security perimeters. SUPER: JUNE 6, 1989
4 6
INT PERIMETER ROAD - SEDAN MORNING
INT. PERIMETER ROAD - SEDAN - MORNING
INT. PERIMETER ROAD - SEDAN - MORNING A sedan rolls toward the security gate. The driver -- JACK MORROW (40s) -- wears khakis, a windbreaker, and an expression that never gives anything away.
5 8
EXT SECURITY CHECKPOINT CONTINUOUS
EXT. SECURITY CHECKPOINT - CONTINUOUS
EXT. SECURITY CHECKPOINT - CONTINUOUS A SECURITY GUARD (30s), sharp-eyed, steps forward. Jack doesn’t look at the guard. Past him -- cameras. Overlapping. No blind spot. He files it away.
6 11
INT CONFERENCE ROOM MORNING
INT. CONFERENCE ROOM - MORNING
INT. CONFERENCE ROOM - MORNING Spotless. Corporate immaculate. Three coffees sit waiting. Untouched. Jack stands at the table. Legal pad out. Government pen.
7 14
EXT PERIMETER ROAD CONTINUOUS
EXT. PERIMETER ROAD - CONTINUOUS
EXT. PERIMETER ROAD - CONTINUOUS UNMARKED VEHICLES arrive one by one. They park calmly. EXT. ADMINISTRATION BUILDING - MOMENTS LATER A postcard Colorado morning.
8 14
EXT ADMIN BUILDING CONTINUOUS
EXT. ADMIN BUILDING - CONTINUOUS
EXT. ADMIN BUILDING - CONTINUOUS Tom’s jaw tightens. JACK We lied. Sorry, Tom.
9 15
EXT COURTYARD CONTINUOUS
EXT. COURTYARD - CONTINUOUS
EXT. COURTYARD - CONTINUOUS Vehicles flood in. Doors open -- in unison. FBI AGENTS step out -- armed, surgical. Linda watches Tom now. He’s running calculations. Losing ground.
10 17
INT TOM HASKELL'S OFFICE DAY
INT. TOM HASKELL'S OFFICE - DAY
INT. TOM HASKELL'S OFFICE - DAY A corner office. Corporate beige. Wood paneling. Light slices the room into neat, controlled lines. Tom Haskell sits behind the desk. Jacket off. Sleeves crisp. He coughs. Small. Contained.
11 19
EXT SOLAR EVAPORATION PONDS DAY
EXT. SOLAR EVAPORATION PONDS - DAY
EXT. SOLAR EVAPORATION PONDS - DAY A shallow grid of ponds stretches to the horizon. Chemical blue. Flat as glass. Perfect rectangles. At the far edge -- Concrete blocks are stacked in long, uneven rows.
12 22
EXT STANDLEY LAKE DAY
EXT. STANDLEY LAKE - DAY
EXT. STANDLEY LAKE - DAY Still water. Glass-smooth. Quiet. It reflects low clouds and distant foothills. A thin drainage channel snakes through the dry grass -- barely noticeable -- just a meandering scar in the landscape.
13 23
INT EXAM ROOM DAY
INT. EXAM ROOM - DAY
INT. EXAM ROOM - DAY A small, clean exam room. Fluorescent lights. Neutral walls. JESSICA REYNOLDS (30s) sits on the exam table. Athletic build. No visible illness. Running shoes at her feet. DR. AMY BRADEN (50s), pulmonary specialist, reviews a chart.
14 24
INT BUILDING 771 - GLOVE BOX ROOM DAY
INT. BUILDING 771 - GLOVE BOX ROOM - DAY
INT. BUILDING 771 - GLOVE BOX ROOM - DAY The HUM never stops. Linda, wearing a respirator with a clipboard tucked under her arm, walks the glove-box corridor. Focused. Methodical. Ahead of her --
15 26
INT WOMEN’S RESTROOM DAY
INT. WOMEN’S RESTROOM - DAY
INT. WOMEN’S RESTROOM - DAY Fluorescent lights HUM. Bright. Clean. Linda slips inside alone. Locks the door. Sets her clipboard down with careful precision -- aligned with the tile grout.
16 27
INT BUILDING 771 - PLENUM ACCESS DAY
INT. BUILDING 771 - PLENUM ACCESS - DAY
INT. BUILDING 771 - PLENUM ACCESS - DAY A massive industrial chamber. Rows of HEPA FILTER HOUSINGS line the space like tombs. Each one sealed. The DOE TECHNICIAN opens the first housing.
17 28
INT CONTROL ROOM CONTINUOUS
INT. CONTROL ROOM - CONTINUOUS
INT. CONTROL ROOM - CONTINUOUS Monitors glow green. All systems read NORMAL. A lie in real time. INT. SERVICE CORRIDOR - DAY
18 30
INT COMMAND ROOM DAY
INT. COMMAND ROOM - DAY
INT. COMMAND ROOM - DAY A windowless room, repurposed in a hurry. Fold-out tables are pushed close together. Jack stands at the table with a legal pad. Linda sits beside a sealed portable case -- sampling gear
19 32
INT HALLWAY DAY
INT. HALLWAY - DAY
INT. HALLWAY - DAY A quiet corridor. Fluorescent lights BUZZ overhead. Jack steps away from the command room. The door shuts behind him with a soft click. Muffled voices vanish.
20 33
EXT PARKING LOT — DAY
EXT. PARKING LOT — DAY
EXT. PARKING LOT — DAY Wind skims low across the asphalt. The facility HUMS behind Jack as he walks alone across the lot. Every step feels exposed.
21 35
INT HALLWAY DAY
INT. HALLWAY - DAY
INT. HALLWAY - DAY Tom Haskell -- composed, immaculate -- moves with purpose down a fluorescent corridor. He turns a corner -- A lone pay phone, wedged beside a vending machine.
22 36
EXT DOWNWIND GREENBELT DAY
EXT. DOWNWIND GREENBELT - DAY
EXT. DOWNWIND GREENBELT - DAY A strip of open land caught between worlds. Dry grass. Cottonwoods. A narrow bike path cuts through. Beyond it -- subdivisions. Rooftops. Back fences. Swing sets. The Rocky Flats perimeter sits in the distance.
23 38
INT BUILDING 771 - SUBLEVEL CORRIDOR NIGHT
INT. BUILDING 771 - SUBLEVEL CORRIDOR - NIGHT
INT. BUILDING 771 - SUBLEVEL CORRIDOR - NIGHT Concrete walls. Low ceiling. The HUM is loud. An FBI AGENT (30s) kneels beside a stack of BLUEPRINTS.
24 39
INT HOSPITAL - OFFICE NIGHT
INT. HOSPITAL - OFFICE - NIGHT
INT. HOSPITAL - OFFICE - NIGHT The hospital has quieted. Dr. Braden sits alone at her desk, sleeves rolled up -- her glasses perched low on her nose. A red pen rests between her fingers.
25 43
EXT OFFICE PARK NIGHT
EXT. OFFICE PARK - NIGHT
771 -- MAINT. IRREGULARITIES Inside: Typed reports. Carbon copies. Handwritten notes. Old paper. Yellowed edges. He flips one open.
26 45
INT BAR NIGHT
INT. BAR - NIGHT
INT. BAR - NIGHT A narrow, dim bar tucked into an old brick building. A neon beer sign BUZZES -- not loud, just present. A few LOCALS nurse drinks. Jack and Linda sit side by side at the bar.
27 49
EXT SECURITY CHECKPOINT NIGHT
EXT. SECURITY CHECKPOINT - NIGHT
EXT. SECURITY CHECKPOINT - NIGHT The entrance looks like a county fair. News vans. Camera lights blast the fence. Two REPORTERS rehearse their lines in front of mirrors. A HELICOPTER idles overhead, its spotlight skating across the
28 50
EXT SERVICE ENTRANCE MOMENTS LATER
EXT. SERVICE ENTRANCE - MOMENTS LATER
EXT. SERVICE ENTRANCE - MOMENTS LATER They slip the sedan through. The gate closes behind them. Far away -- The helicopters thud.
29 51
INT BUILDING 771 - LOWER SUBLEVEL NIGHT
INT. BUILDING 771 - LOWER SUBLEVEL - NIGHT
INT. BUILDING 771 - LOWER SUBLEVEL - NIGHT The HUM down here isn’t background anymore. It presses against the chest. Jack and Linda stand outside a STEEL AIRLOCK DOOR. Stenciled lettering, faded but legible:
30 53
INT ROOM 141 CONTINUOUS
INT. ROOM 141 - CONTINUOUS
INT. ROOM 141 - CONTINUOUS The door opens. Light floods out. Cold. White. Endless. They freeze. The Geiger counter ERUPTS.

The Raid

In 1989, an FBI agent and EPA investigator infiltrate the Rocky Flats nuclear plant under false pretenses, uncovering decades of radioactive cover-ups that threaten downwind communities and force them to confront personal ghosts from America's atomic legacy.

See other logline suggestions

Overview

Poster
Unique Selling Point

The script for "The Raid" blends elements of a thriller with a deeper exploration of the ethical and environmental consequences of the nuclear industry, making it a compelling and relevant story for a contemporary audience. The narrative's ability to balance suspense and character development, while tackling complex and timely themes, sets it apart from other scripts in the genre.

AI Verdict & Suggestions

Ratings are subjective. So you get different engines' ratings to compare.

Hover over verdict cards for Executive Summaries

GPT5
 Recommend
Gemini
 Recommend
Grok
 Recommend
DeepSeek
 Recommend
Claude
 Recommend
Average Score: 8.3
Key Takeaways
For the Writer:
To improve your script from a creative and craft perspective, focus on deepening the emotional stakes for your protagonists by integrating their personal backstories more explicitly into the narrative, such as tying Jack's family history and Linda's trauma to key decision points. This will enhance audience connection and make the story more resonant. Additionally, clarify the antagonist's motivations and escalate their actions to create a more dynamic conflict, while tightening pacing in repetitive investigative scenes to avoid mid-act drag and ensure a sharper build to the climactic reveal. These adjustments will strengthen character arcs and overall narrative tension, making the pilot more engaging and series-ready.
For Executives:
The script offers solid value as a prestige drama with a timely, true-event-based environmental thriller angle that could attract viewers interested in shows like Chernobyl, boasting strong atmospheric elements and procedural authenticity. However, risks include underdeveloped character emotional depth, which may fail to hook audiences emotionally, leading to potential drop-off, and pacing issues that could weaken tension in a series format. Market perception is moderately positive for its thematic relevance, but it needs significant revisions to avoid being seen as derivative or lacking in commercial polish, as current flaws might limit appeal to top-tier streaming platforms.
Story Facts
Genres:
Thriller 50% Drama 30% Crime 40% Horror 20% Action 15%

Setting: 1957 and 1989, Rocky Flats Plant, Colorado

Themes: Deliberate Concealment and Cover-Up, Human Cost and Health Impacts, Environmental Degradation and Neglect, Institutional Accountability and Negligence, The Struggle for Truth and Justice, Power Dynamics and Institutional Control, Personal Sacrifice and Courage

Conflict & Stakes: The main conflict revolves around the investigation into environmental contamination at the Rocky Flats Plant, with high stakes involving public health, corporate secrecy, and potential legal ramifications.

Mood: Tense and ominous

Standout Features:

  • Unique Hook: The story is based on true events surrounding the Rocky Flats Plant, adding authenticity and urgency.
  • Plot Twist: The discovery of Room 141, containing unaccounted radioactive materials, reveals systemic negligence.
  • Innovative Ideas: The screenplay intertwines personal stories with broader environmental themes, highlighting the human impact of corporate decisions.
  • Distinctive Settings: The contrast between the serene Colorado landscape and the ominous, secretive atmosphere of the Rocky Flats Plant.

Comparable Scripts: Silkwood, The China Syndrome, A Civil Action, The Constant Gardener, Chernobyl (TV Mini-Series), Dark Waters, The Insider, Erin Brockovich, The Report

🎯 Your Top Priorities

Our stats model looked at how your scores work together and ranked the changes most likely to move your overall rating next draft. Ordered by the most reliable gains first.

You have more than one meaningful lever.

Improving Visual Impact (Script Level) and Theme (Script Level) will have the biggest impact on your overall score next draft.

1. Visual Impact (Script Level)
Big Impact Script Level
Your current Visual Impact (Script Level) score: 7.6
Expected gain: ~6% closer to an "all Highly Recommends" score
Typical rewrite gain: +0.4 in Visual Impact (Script Level)
Confidence: High (based on ~3,782 similar revisions)
  • This is your top opportunity right now. Focusing your rewrite energy here gives you the best realistic shot at raising the overall rating.
  • What writers at your level usually do: Writers at a similar level usually raise Visual Impact (Script Level) by about +0.4 in one rewrite.
2. Theme (Script Level)
Big Impact Script Level
Your current Theme (Script Level) score: 7.8
Expected gain: ~5% closer to an "all Highly Recommends" score
Typical rewrite gain: +0.5 in Theme (Script Level)
Confidence: High (based on ~3,464 similar revisions)
  • This is another strong option. If the top item doesn't fit your rewrite plan, this is a solid alternative.
  • What writers at your level usually do: Writers at a similar level usually raise Theme (Script Level) by about +0.5 in one rewrite.
3. Emotional Impact (Script Level)
Big Impact Script Level
Your current Emotional Impact (Script Level) score: 7.2
Expected gain: ~4% closer to an "all Highly Recommends" score
Typical rewrite gain: +0.7 in Emotional Impact (Script Level)
Confidence: High (based on ~2,672 similar revisions)
  • This is another strong option. If the top item doesn't fit your rewrite plan, this is a solid alternative.
  • What writers at your level usually do: Writers at a similar level usually raise Emotional Impact (Script Level) by about +0.7 in one rewrite.

Script Level Analysis

Writer Exec

This section delivers a top-level assessment of the screenplay’s strengths and weaknesses — covering overall quality (P/C/R/HR), character development, emotional impact, thematic depth, narrative inconsistencies, and the story’s core philosophical conflict. It helps identify what’s resonating, what needs refinement, and how the script aligns with professional standards.

Screenplay Insights

Breaks down your script along various categories.

Overall Score: 7.70
Key Suggestions:
To strengthen the script's creative impact, prioritize deepening the antagonist Tom Haskell's character by exploring his internal conflicts and motivations through additional scenes or dialogue, which will create a more balanced dynamic with the protagonists. Additionally, incorporate flashbacks or subtle backstory revelations for Jack and Linda to enhance their emotional arcs, making their personal stakes more resonant and the overall narrative more engaging from a craft perspective.
Story Critique

Big-picture feedback on the story’s clarity, stakes, cohesion, and engagement.

Key Suggestions:
To elevate the script's creative potential, focus on deepening character backstories and motivations, particularly for figures like Tom Haskell, to heighten emotional stakes and audience investment. Streamline repetitive scenes to maintain tension and pacing, and incorporate more dynamic dialogue and visual elements, such as flashbacks, to enrich the narrative without relying on exposition. These refinements will enhance the story's depth, making the exploration of environmental and corporate themes more compelling and resonant.
Characters

Explores the depth, clarity, and arc of the main and supporting characters.

Key Suggestions:
The character analysis reveals strong foundations for Jack, Linda, and Tom, with high scores in key areas like dialogue and behavior, but opportunities exist to deepen emotional complexity and arcs. To enhance the script's craft, focus on integrating backstories and internal conflicts more seamlessly, such as through flashbacks or subtle dialogue, to make characters more relatable and drive thematic depth. This will elevate emotional resonance, particularly in scenes involving environmental hazards, ensuring the narrative feels more personal and impactful without overwhelming the pace.
Emotional Analysis

Breaks down the emotional journey of the audience across the script.

Key Suggestions:
The script excels in building tension and empathy but risks emotional fatigue due to its relentless focus on negative emotions and high intensity. To improve, incorporate more varied emotional beats, such as moments of hope or human connection, and refine pacing by adding subtle emotional valleys for relief. Enhancing character depth through personal backstories and nuanced reactions will create a more engaging, resonant narrative that balances intensity with emotional complexity, ultimately strengthening audience investment.
Goals and Philosophical Conflict

Evaluates character motivations, obstacles, and sources of tension throughout the plot.

Key Suggestions:
The goals_pc analysis reveals a compelling arc where the protagonist's internal and external goals drive a transformation from caution to moral conviction, centered on the Safety vs. Transparency conflict. To strengthen the script creatively, focus on amplifying subtle moments of internal struggle, such as in scenes with contamination anxiety, to build emotional depth and ensure the philosophical payoff in the climax feels organic and impactful, enhancing character relatability and thematic resonance.
Themes

Analysis of the themes of the screenplay and how well they’re expressed.

Key Suggestions:
The script effectively captures the tension and gravity of a real-world cover-up through its thematic depth, but to enhance creative impact, focus on integrating more emotional depth into character development. For instance, expanding on personal backstories, like Jack's father's death or Linda's anxiety, could make the human cost theme more visceral and relatable, improving audience engagement and pacing by balancing procedural elements with intimate moments. This would strengthen the overall narrative cohesion and amplify the script's emotional resonance without altering its core structure.
Logic & Inconsistencies

Highlights any contradictions, plot holes, or logic gaps that may confuse viewers.

Key Suggestions:
The script's analysis reveals inconsistencies and redundancies that could undermine its emotional depth and pacing. By addressing plot holes, such as the implausible security breaches, and streamlining repetitive elements like contamination discoveries, the writer can create a more cohesive and engaging narrative, allowing characters to develop naturally and the story's tension to build effectively without relying on contrived devices.

Scene Analysis

All of your scenes analyzed individually and compared, so you can zero in on what to improve.

Scene-Level Percentile Chart
Hover over the graph to see more details about each score.
Go to Scene Analysis

Other Analyses

Writer Exec

This section looks at the extra spark — your story’s voice, style, world, and the moments that really stick. These insights might not change the bones of the script, but they can make it more original, more immersive, and way more memorable. It’s where things get fun, weird, and wonderfully you.

Unique Voice

Assesses the distinctiveness and personality of the writer's voice.

Key Suggestions:
The script's voice excels in building suspense through concise, evocative descriptions and dialogue, but to elevate it further, consider incorporating more varied pacing and deeper character introspection to prevent the tension from feeling repetitive. This would enhance emotional resonance and make the understated style even more powerful, drawing viewers deeper into the characters' psyches while maintaining the script's core strengths in realism and urgency.
Writer's Craft

Analyzes the writing to help the writer be aware of their skill and improve.

Key Suggestions:
To improve your screenplay from a creative standpoint, focus on deepening character motivations and internal conflicts to make them more relatable, refine pacing to sustain tension and engagement across scenes, and incorporate subtext in dialogue to reveal unspoken emotions and complexities. This will enhance the emotional depth and narrative impact, transforming your strong atmospheric elements into a more compelling and immersive story.
Memorable Lines
Spotlights standout dialogue lines with emotional or thematic power.
Tropes
Highlights common or genre-specific tropes found in the script.
World Building

Evaluates the depth, consistency, and immersion of the story's world.

Key Suggestions:
The script's world-building masterfully establishes a tense, immersive environment that drives suspense and thematic depth, but to elevate the craft, focus on integrating more nuanced character development with the physical and cultural elements. For instance, deepen the portrayal of how the hazardous setting influences personal behaviors and backstories, ensuring that obsessive actions like hand-washing feel organically tied to emotional arcs, which could amplify audience empathy and make the story's critique of secrecy more impactful.
Correlations

Identifies patterns in scene scores.

Key Suggestions:
The scene pattern analysis highlights strengths in suspenseful and investigative elements, but suggests key improvements in dialogue during mysterious scenes and earlier character development to enhance engagement. By refining dialogue to reveal more character depth in tense, enigmatic moments and introducing character changes sooner, the writer can create a more compelling narrative flow, ensuring the story captivates from the outset and maintains emotional resonance.
Loglines
Presents logline variations based on theme, genre, and hook.

Comparison with Previous Draft

See how your script has evolved from the previous version. This section highlights improvements, regressions, and changes across all major categories, helping you understand what revisions are working and what may need more attention.

Version Comparison Analysis
Summary of Changes
Improvements (5)
  • Character Complexity - antagonistDevelopment: 6.0 → 7.0 +1.0
  • Character Complexity - characterConsistency: 8.0 → 9.0 +1.0
  • Originality - audienceEngagement: 7.6 → 8.5 +0.9
  • Character Complexity - characterRelatability: 7.3 → 8.0 +0.7
  • Character Complexity - characterComplexity: 7.3 → 8.0 +0.7
Areas to Review (0)

No regressions detected