The Social Network

In a tale of tech ambition and betrayal, Mark Zuckerberg builds Facebook from a dorm room idea into a billion-dollar empire, facing lawsuits from those he double-crossed along the way.

See other logline suggestions

Overview

Poster
Unique Selling Point

The script's unique selling proposition is its ability to transform the technical creation of a social media platform into a timeless human drama about friendship, betrayal, and the corrupting nature of ambition, using innovative dual-timeline structure and Sorkin's signature rapid-fire dialogue to create intellectual and emotional engagement simultaneously.

AI Verdict & Suggestions

Ratings are subjective. So you get different engines' ratings to compare.

Hover over verdict cards for Executive Summaries

GPT5
 Recommend
Grok
 Highly Recommend
Gemini
 Highly Recommend
Claude
 Recommend
DeepSeek
 Highly Recommend
Average Score: 9.3
Key Takeaways
For the Writer:
The script is dramatically rigorous and theatrically lean, but it shortchanges emotional breadth in two places that most critically weaken audience empathy: the female perspectives (especially Erica) are largely instrumental, and Eduardo’s fall from co‑founder to marginalized shareholder happens as a high-impact beat without enough connective interior work. Triage these issues with small, specific scenes rather than wholesale restructuring: give Erica one or two compact moments that reclaim agency and voice (a scene that reframes her breakup aftermath or a final, definitive exchange that isn’t just reactive), and add connective beats for Eduardo that show counsel, hesitation, and emotional processing (a scene with his lawyer or a private phone call, a quieter aftermath after the dilution). Also trim/variate deposition montages where exposition becomes repetitive—use visual beats or distinct interrogation styles to preserve momentum while clarifying facts.
For Executives:
This is a near‑ready prestige screenplay with strong commercial and awards upside: a topical origin story told with a propulsive legal frame, razor dialogue and memorable set pieces. The chief risks are perceptual: critics and parts of the audience may call out underdeveloped female perspectives and the emotional compression of co‑founder betrayal, which could damage awards narratives around nuance and fairness. These are relatively low‑cost, high‑impact rewrites that will broaden critical goodwill and defend against negative press. Keep the structure and tone intact—targeted character beats and a tightened middle act will protect marketability while preserving the script’s pace and voice.
Story Facts
Genres:
Drama 60% Thriller 25% Comedy 15% Romance 10%

Setting: Early 2000s, primarily 2003-2004, Harvard University, Palo Alto, California, and various locations in the U.S.

Themes: Ambition and Innovation, Betrayal and Legal Conflicts, Social Isolation and Disconnect, The Nature of Genius and Morality, Exclusivity vs. Inclusivity, The Power of Information and Online Permanence, The Nature of Friendship and Loyalty

Conflict & Stakes: The primary conflict revolves around Mark's ambition to create Facebook, leading to strained relationships with friends and partners, particularly Eduardo, and legal battles with the Winklevoss twins over intellectual property theft.

Mood: Tense and introspective, with moments of humor and drama.

Standout Features:

  • Unique Hook: The story of Facebook's creation, a cultural touchstone, told through the lens of personal relationships and legal battles.
  • Major Twist: The revelation of Eduardo's diminishing role and the betrayal he feels as Mark aligns more with Sean Parker.
  • Innovative Ideas: The screenplay explores the ethical implications of social media and the personal costs of ambition.
  • Distinctive Settings: The contrast between the prestigious environment of Harvard and the chaotic, youthful atmosphere of Silicon Valley.

Comparable Scripts: The Social Network, Steve Jobs, The Imitation Game, Silicon Valley (TV Series), Moneyball, The Founder, The Great Gatsby, The Devil Wears Prada, A Beautiful Mind

Data Says…
Feature in Alpha - Could have inaccuracies

Our stats model looked at how your scores work together and ranked the changes most likely to move your overall rating next draft. Ordered by the most reliable gains first.

1. Theme (Script Level)
Big Impact Script Level
Your current Theme (Script Level) score: 8.0
Typical rewrite gain: +0.45 in Theme (Script Level)
Gets you ~4% closer to an "all Highly Recommends" score
Confidence: High (based on ~3,490 similar revisions)
  • This is currently your highest-impact lever. Improving Theme (Script Level) is most likely to move the overall rating next.
  • What writers at your level usually do: Writers at a similar level usually raise Theme (Script Level) by about +0.45 in one rewrite.
  • Why it matters: At your level, improving this one area alone can cover a meaningful slice of the climb toward an "all Highly Recommends" script.
2. Visual Impact (Script Level)
Big Impact Script Level
Your current Visual Impact (Script Level) score: 7.5
Typical rewrite gain: +0.4 in Visual Impact (Script Level)
Gets you ~3% closer to an "all Highly Recommends" score
Confidence: High (based on ~4,245 similar revisions)
  • This is another meaningful lever. After you work on the higher-impact areas, this can still create a noticeable lift.
  • What writers at your level usually do: Writers at a similar level usually raise Visual Impact (Script Level) by about +0.4 in one rewrite.
  • Why it matters: After you address the top item, gains here are still one of the levers that move you toward that "all Highly Recommends" zone.
3. Concept
Moderate Impact Scene Level
Your current Concept score: 8.2
Typical rewrite gain: +0.3 in Concept
Gets you ~2% closer to an "all Highly Recommends" score
Confidence: High (based on ~4,676 similar revisions)
  • This is another meaningful lever. After you work on the higher-impact areas, this can still create a noticeable lift.
  • What writers at your level usually do: Writers at a similar level usually raise Concept by about +0.3 in one rewrite.
  • Why it matters: After you address the top item, gains here are still one of the levers that move you toward that "all Highly Recommends" zone.

Script Level Analysis

Writer Exec

This section delivers a top-level assessment of the screenplay’s strengths and weaknesses — covering overall quality (P/C/R/HR), character development, emotional impact, thematic depth, narrative inconsistencies, and the story’s core philosophical conflict. It helps identify what’s resonating, what needs refinement, and how the script aligns with professional standards.

Screenplay Insights

Breaks down your script along various categories.

Overall Score: 8.08
Key Suggestions:
Lean into the people who currently feel like plot devices. The script’s emotional power rests on Mark and Eduardo, but the Winklevosses, Divya, and the film’s women are underwritten — which flattens conflict and reduces audience investment in the lawsuits and betrayals. Prioritize a short rewrite that gives at least two supporting characters distinct interiority (a clear want/fear), one private scene that humanizes each of them, and a couple of reflective beats for Mark so his choices land as tragic rather than merely transactional. Focus these changes on a handful of scenes (e.g., 9, 22, 33 for the Winklevosses/Divya; 5, 28, 56 for Eduardo and the fallout; 1 and 51 for added Mark introspection) rather than a wholesale overhaul — targeted depth will sharpen stakes and make the legal confrontations emotionally satisfying.
Story Critique

Big-picture feedback on the story’s clarity, stakes, cohesion, and engagement.

Key Suggestions:
The script is strong—smart dialogue, a propulsive structure, and a compelling central performance—but it needs more emotional breadth. Prioritize deepening the POV and inner lives of supporting players (Eduardo, the Winklevosses, Divya) with a few well-placed scenes that show their motivations, vulnerabilities, and stakes. Trim or smooth expository stretches (especially early dialogue), tighten pacing where scenes linger, and allow moments where Mark faces ethical introspection. These changes will make conflicts feel earned rather than one-sided and increase the audience’s emotional investment.
Characters

Explores the depth, clarity, and arc of the main and supporting characters.

Key Suggestions:
The character work is strong on ideas and behavior but risks leaving audiences unmoved because Mark is portrayed more as a brilliant engine than a person. The script will hit harder if you deepen Mark's inner life: show the formative moments behind his need for validation, give him real, vulnerable beats (not just snark), and let the consequences of his choices land emotionally — especially in scenes with Eduardo and Erica. Small changes to dialogue, added micro-scenes of regret or memory, and clearer causal moments where ambition costs him a relationship will turn the film from a chronicle of invention into a compelling human drama.
Emotional Analysis

Breaks down the emotional journey of the audience across the script.

Key Suggestions:
The emotional core needs clearer connective tissue: strengthen the human bond and small, private wins between Mark and Eduardo early on, and give Mark moments of quiet vulnerability scattered through the deposition/legal beats. These changes will make Eduardo's betrayal land harder, reduce the feel of a long legal slog, and raise the emotional payoff of the final scene. Trim or punctuate deposition intensity with brief, character-driven breaths (flashbacks, micro-expressions, or short scenes showing Facebook's positive effects on students) so audiences stay engaged rather than fatigued.
Goals and Philosophical Conflict

Evaluates character motivations, obstacles, and sources of tension throughout the plot.

Key Suggestions:
The analysis shows the screenplay's strongest asset is a clear throughline: Mark's ambition versus ethics, but the emotional payoff needs sharpening. Focus on making key moral choices more explicit and consequential on-screen (moments where Mark actively chooses growth over people), deepen the intimacy of his relationships with Erica and Eduardo so their betrayals land harder, and tighten the arc so the deposition scenes read as the earned culmination of earlier, smaller decisions rather than a distant reckoning.
Themes

Analysis of the themes of the screenplay and how well they’re expressed.

Key Suggestions:
The script’s strength is its clear, compelling central engine — Mark’s ruthless ambition driving Facebook’s creation — and the layered themes (betrayal, isolation, genius vs. morality). To improve craft, sharpen the emotional through-line: make Mark’s internal stakes and vulnerability more visible so audiences can feel why his choices matter beyond headline-making events. Trim or re-shape repetitive deposition/legal exposition so it serves character revelation rather than only delivering plot facts. Lean into visual, economical scenes that contrast Mark’s technical fluency with his social failures (use fewer talking-head depositions, more showing moments that earn empathy). Finally, tighten pacing around key betrayals (Eduardo, the Winklevosses, Erica) so each feels inevitable and consequential.
Logic & Inconsistencies

Highlights any contradictions, plot holes, or logic gaps that may confuse viewers.

Key Suggestions:
The script has a strong, compelling throughline but it weakens because the protagonist’s emotional arc and a few key plot mechanics feel under‑developed. Prioritize clarifying Mark’s internal journey from awkward loner to ruthless builder with concrete, credible beats (moments of learning, small wins, mentorship influence, moral compromises) so the transformation feels earned. Simultaneously, tighten the business/legal turning points — show the mechanics of the re‑incorporation and share dilution on screen so audience empathy for Eduardo and the stakes of the conflict remain believable. Remove repetitive beats (final‑club riffs, repeated growth proclamations) and replace them with scenes that show cause-and-effect, not just commentary.

Scene Analysis

All of your scenes analyzed individually and compared, so you can zero in on what to improve.

Scene-Level Percentile Chart
Hover over the graph to see more details about each score.
Go to Scene Analysis

Other Analyses

Writer Exec

This section looks at the extra spark — your story’s voice, style, world, and the moments that really stick. These insights might not change the bones of the script, but they can make it more original, more immersive, and way more memorable. It’s where things get fun, weird, and wonderfully you.

Unique Voice

Assesses the distinctiveness and personality of the writer's voice.

Key Suggestions:
Your script’s voice — razor-sharp, wry, and confrontational — is a major strength: it creates immediate energy and a distinct point of view on ambition, privilege, and moral ambiguity. To sharpen the screenplay further, preserve that edge while carving more emotional access to Mark and key supporting characters. Small, well-placed moments of vulnerability and clearer stakes will turn clever detachment into dramatic propulsion. Also vary the deposition framing so it reads as a purposeful structural device rather than a repeated shorthand for ‘this is important.’ Finally, ensure secondary characters (especially women) feel fully realized and not solely foil or plot accelerants; that will deepen theme and broaden audience empathy without dulling the script’s bite.
Writer's Craft

Analyzes the writing to help the writer be aware of their skill and improve.

Key Suggestions:
You have a compelling, well-voiced screenplay with razor-sharp scenes and memorable dialogue. To elevate it, prioritize deepening character arcs—especially Mark and Eduardo—so their choices feel inevitable and emotionally resonant. Tighten pacing by cutting or compressing scenes that repeat information or stall momentum, and layer subtext into key exchanges so dialogue reveals internal stakes rather than only plot. Practical next steps: map each principal character's arc beat-by-beat, trim scenes that don't move those arcs forward, and revise pivotal conversations to carry both surface conflict and hidden motives.
Memorable Lines
Spotlights standout dialogue lines with emotional or thematic power.
Tropes
Highlights common or genre-specific tropes found in the script.
World Building

Evaluates the depth, consistency, and immersion of the story's world.

Key Suggestions:
The script's world is rich and specific — Harvard elitism, hacker culture, and Silicon Valley excess — but it sometimes overwhelms the emotional core. Tighten the world details to serve character arcs: make Mark's isolation and ambition feel inevitable and personal (not just procedural), and deepen the humanity of Eduardo, Erica and even the Winklevosses so the betrayals and legal battles land emotionally. Trim or re-shape scenes that exist primarily to demonstrate tech or status, and use the environments (dorm, club, courtroom, startup house) to reveal choices and consequences rather than only atmosphere.
Correlations

Identifies patterns in scene scores.

Key Suggestions:
Your script’s strongest engine is interpersonal conflict — confrontational and sarcastic scenes consistently deliver high emotional engagement. However, you lean on these tones so heavily that quieter scenes and moments of humor often fail to advance stakes or character growth. To tighten the screenplay, make sure every scene (including comedic or atmospheric ones) either raises the stakes or deepens character change; and deliberately intersperse quieter, emotionally honest beats to let the audience bond with characters beyond witty barbs and legal sparring.
Loglines
Presents logline variations based on theme, genre, and hook.