The Good Lie

When a grief-stricken single mother secretly alters her son’s SAT score to give him hope, his meteoric rise is threatened by a jealous rival — forcing the family to choose between shame and the belief that created success.

See other logline suggestions

Overview

Poster
Unique Selling Point

The screenplay's unique selling proposition is its exploration of academic deception as an act of maternal love rather than selfish ambition, creating a morally complex narrative that challenges conventional views on achievement and self-worth while addressing socioeconomic barriers to education.

AI Verdict & Suggestions

Ratings are subjective. So you get different engines' ratings to compare.

Hover over verdict cards for Executive Summaries

GPT5
 Recommend
Gemini
 Recommend
Grok
 Recommend
Claude
 Recommend
DeepSeek
 Consider
Average Score: 7.9
Key Takeaways
For the Writer:
Tighten the script’s central mechanism: the forged SAT score. Right now the emotional reveal works, but the mechanics feel inconsistent and implausible, which undercuts the payoff. Pick one believable method (e.g., a falsified school-issued score letter or a doctored college scholarship notice rather than hacking an official testing agency), make score numbers consistent, and foreshadow the action earlier so the confession reads as earned. While you’re fixing the device, add two kinds of small scenes: quiet, visual beats that show Brandon studying/working to earn his role (so his rise doesn’t feel telegraphed), and a few moments that develop Lewis’ motivations (access to records, resentment) so his escalation to blackmail is earned. Finally, trim or recalibrate a couple of the big time-jumps—replace some jumps with short montages or additional micro-scenes to let key emotional transitions breathe and avoid rushed resolution.
For Executives:
This is a festival-ready, character-driven short with a clear USP: a maternal ‘good lie’ that sparks a son’s rise—an emotionally provocative hook that can attract audiences and talent interested in social-issue dramas. The script’s strengths (strong mother-son core, cathartic climax) make it marketable to shorts programs, limited-run festivals, and specialty distributors. The primary risk is credibility: the inconsistent, underexplained SAT-forgery is a red flag for critics and savvy viewers and could harm word-of-mouth. Secondary risks include underwritten supporting roles that limit broader audience engagement. Recommended investment: commission a focused rewrite (one to two drafts) to fix the central contrivance, tighten pacing, and deepen Lewis/Mia—low production cost but higher creative upside if these fixes are made before festival submissions.
Story Facts
Genres:
Drama 65% Romance 25% Thriller 30% Comedy 10%

Setting: Contemporary, Suburban America, primarily in a family home, high school, law office, and various public spaces

Themes: The Power of Self-Belief and Perseverance, Mother's Love and Sacrifice, Socioeconomic Struggle vs. Ambition, Deception and Redemption, Rivalry and Jealousy

Conflict & Stakes: The main conflict revolves around Brandon's struggle to prove himself academically and professionally while dealing with the pressures of his mother's financial struggles and Lewis's jealousy, culminating in a threat to his career and reputation.

Mood: Dramatic and inspirational, with moments of tension and emotional depth.

Standout Features:

  • Unique Hook: The emotional journey of a mother and son navigating financial struggles and academic pressures, highlighting the bond between them.
  • Plot Twist: The revelation that Mrs. Cantu altered Brandon's SAT score to boost his confidence, leading to a dramatic confrontation.
  • Character Development: Brandon's transformation from a carefree gamer to a responsible young adult facing real-world challenges.
  • Social Commentary: The screenplay addresses issues of socioeconomic status and the pressures of academic achievement in contemporary society.

Comparable Scripts: The Pursuit of Happyness, A Beautiful Mind, Good Will Hunting, The Blind Side, Dead Poets Society, The Florida Project, Little Miss Sunshine, The Hate U Give, The Help

Data Says…
Feature in Alpha - Could have inaccuracies

Our stats model looked at how your scores work together and ranked the changes most likely to move your overall rating next draft. Ordered by the most reliable gains first.

1. Visual Impact (Script Level)
Big Impact Script Level
Your current Visual Impact (Script Level) score: 7.8
Typical rewrite gain: +0.45 in Visual Impact (Script Level)
Gets you ~4% closer to an "all Highly Recommends" score
Confidence: High (based on ~2,813 similar revisions)
  • This is currently your highest-impact lever. Improving Visual Impact (Script Level) is most likely to move the overall rating next.
  • What writers at your level usually do: Writers at a similar level usually raise Visual Impact (Script Level) by about +0.45 in one rewrite.
  • Why it matters: At your level, improving this one area alone can cover a meaningful slice of the climb toward an "all Highly Recommends" script.
2. Dialogue
Big Impact Scene Level
Your current Dialogue score: 8.0
Typical rewrite gain: +0.35 in Dialogue
Gets you ~3% closer to an "all Highly Recommends" score
Confidence: High (based on ~2,727 similar revisions)
  • This is another meaningful lever. After you work on the higher-impact areas, this can still create a noticeable lift.
  • What writers at your level usually do: Writers at a similar level usually raise Dialogue by about +0.35 in one rewrite.
  • Why it matters: After you address the top item, gains here are still one of the levers that move you toward that "all Highly Recommends" zone.
3. Theme (Script Level)
Moderate Impact Script Level
Your current Theme (Script Level) score: 8.2
Typical rewrite gain: +0.5 in Theme (Script Level)
Gets you ~2% closer to an "all Highly Recommends" score
Confidence: High (based on ~1,521 similar revisions)
  • This is another meaningful lever. After you work on the higher-impact areas, this can still create a noticeable lift.
  • What writers at your level usually do: Writers at a similar level usually raise Theme (Script Level) by about +0.5 in one rewrite.
  • Why it matters: After you address the top item, gains here are still one of the levers that move you toward that "all Highly Recommends" zone.

Script Level Analysis

Writer Exec

This section delivers a top-level assessment of the screenplay’s strengths and weaknesses — covering overall quality (P/C/R/HR), character development, emotional impact, thematic depth, narrative inconsistencies, and the story’s core philosophical conflict. It helps identify what’s resonating, what needs refinement, and how the script aligns with professional standards.

Screenplay Insights

Breaks down your script along various categories.

Overall Score: 7.73
Key Suggestions:
The script's emotional core — the bond between Brandon and Mrs. Cantu and the 'good lie' premise — is strong. To lift the whole piece, focus first on humanizing the antagonist. Lewis currently reads as a flat jealous foil; giving him a concise, specific backstory and moments of vulnerability (shown, not told) will make the conflict feel earned and raise dramatic stakes without lengthening the script significantly. Tighten a few pacing jumps and trim expository lines so emotional beats (the eviction, the SAT reveal, the confession) have space to land.
Story Critique

Big-picture feedback on the story’s clarity, stakes, cohesion, and engagement.

Key Suggestions:
Strengthen the emotional logic by making Brandon’s growth feel earned and internal. Right now the screenplay hinges on a single deceptive act (the altered SAT score) that risks undermining his agency and the audience’s investment. Add beats that show Brandon’s latent intelligence, moments where he chooses to work or study, and a clearer, more conflicted internal response when the truth emerges. At the same time, deepen Mrs. Cantu’s and Lewis’s motivations — give Mrs. Cantu a moment of regret and ethical awareness, and make Lewis’s resentment rooted in a specific past wound. These changes will preserve the powerful mother/son theme while avoiding a contrived climax and preserving stakes and credibility.
Characters

Explores the depth, clarity, and arc of the main and supporting characters.

Key Suggestions:
The character analyses show a strong emotional core—Brandon's underdog arc and Mrs. Cantu's sacrificial love—but the script relies too heavily on an external contrivance (the mother's SAT falsification) to trigger Brandon's turn. To strengthen the screenplay, give Brandon more internal agency and foreshadowed skills (small wins, strategic thinking, private moments of study/problem solving) so his rise feels earned. Simultaneously, deepen Lewis and Mia: humanize Lewis with a believable pressure/backstory and give Mia a clearer stake or mini-arc so supporting characters do more than react. Finally, show more of Mrs. Cantu's interior life (brief flashback or quiet reflection) so her desperate choice reads as fully grounded in character, not plot convenience.
Emotional Analysis

Breaks down the emotional journey of the audience across the script.

Key Suggestions:
The screenplay’s emotional core (Mrs. Cantu’s sacrifice and Brandon’s arc) is strong, but pacing and transitions dilute the payoff. Tighten emotional pacing by adding short bridging beats — moments of levity in the early, somber stretch and moments of doubt or private reckoning in the triumphant middle — and replace some smash cuts with connective scenes that let reactions land. Also give the antagonist and protagonist small, humanizing beats (a glimpse of Lewis’s pressures; a private moment of Brandon’s insecurity) so their clashes feel earned and the final confession/catharsis hits with greater weight.
Goals and Philosophical Conflict

Evaluates character motivations, obstacles, and sources of tension throughout the plot.

Key Suggestions:
The analysis shows the screenplay’s emotional core is Brandon’s movement from seeking external validation to owning his competence — framed by his mother’s protective intervention and a public challenge from Lewis. To strengthen the story, deepen and dramatize Brandon’s internal struggle across scenes (show, don’t tell), seed the mother’s sacrificial choice earlier with believable motives and clues, and sharpen Lewis’s antagonism so the climax feels earned rather than resolved by a convenient confession. Tighten cause-and-effect: every emotional beat (eviction, SAT, job, romance, blackmail) should escalate Brandon’s agency and stakes so the final reconciliation lands with maximum emotional payoff.
Themes

Analysis of the themes of the screenplay and how well they’re expressed.

Key Suggestions:
The script’s emotional core — a mother’s sacrificial love pushing a son toward his potential — is strong and marketable, but the central twist (Mrs. Cantu altering SAT results) risks undercutting Brandon’s agency and the audience’s emotional payoff. Tighten the moral logic: seed Mrs. Cantu’s motivations and the consequences earlier, strengthen Brandon’s internal work so his ultimate success feels earned even after the revelation, and use the reveal to deepen character rather than as a late plot convenience. Focus on tightening pacing around the discovery and its fallout so the deception leads naturally to a believable, cathartic redemption.
Logic & Inconsistencies

Highlights any contradictions, plot holes, or logic gaps that may confuse viewers.

Key Suggestions:
To enhance the script's emotional depth and character development, focus on creating a more organic transition for Brandon's academic motivation and ensure that Lewis's antagonism is justified through a clearer psychological arc. Additionally, streamline repetitive themes and actions to maintain narrative efficiency and avoid redundancy, allowing for a more impactful storytelling experience.

Scene Analysis

All of your scenes analyzed individually and compared, so you can zero in on what to improve.

Scene-Level Percentile Chart
Hover over the graph to see more details about each score.
Go to Scene Analysis

Other Analyses

Writer Exec

This section looks at the extra spark — your story’s voice, style, world, and the moments that really stick. These insights might not change the bones of the script, but they can make it more original, more immersive, and way more memorable. It’s where things get fun, weird, and wonderfully you.

Unique Voice

Assesses the distinctiveness and personality of the writer's voice.

Key Suggestions:
Your voice—rooted in poignant realism, naturalistic dialogue, and keen observation of family dynamics—is the screenplay's greatest asset. To strengthen the script, preserve that emotional honesty while tightening structure around the central dramatic turn: make the pivotal choice (Mrs. Cantu altering Brandon's score) feel earned, believable, and inevitable by planting earlier, specific seeds (moments of desperation, concrete motivations, small compulsions) and sharpening the antagonist's arc so his vendetta reads as plausible rather than mechanical. Trim repetitive exposition, amplify showing over telling (use gestures, props, small rituals), and tighten pacing so every scene escalates stakes toward the climax without undercutting credibility.
Writer's Craft

Analyzes the writing to help the writer be aware of their skill and improve.

Key Suggestions:
The script's emotional core is strong, but it needs sharper, more distinct voice work and richer subtext to avoid tipping into melodrama. Focus on making each principal character speak and react in a way that's unmistakably theirs (patterns, gaps, interruptions, avoidance). Use targeted exercises: write pivotal scenes without dialogue, then reintroduce lines that complicate rather than explain; produce short internal monologues for key beats; and rewrite important conversations in multiple styles to discover the best tone. Supplement these drills with focused reading (Story by McKee; The Screenwriter's Bible) and close script study of writers who excel at layered, everyday dialogue (e.g., Baumbach, Gerwig).
Memorable Lines
Spotlights standout dialogue lines with emotional or thematic power.
Tropes
Highlights common or genre-specific tropes found in the script.
World Building

Evaluates the depth, consistency, and immersion of the story's world.

Key Suggestions:
The world is emotionally resonant and grounded — strong through the lived-in details of the Cantu home and clear stakes around education and class mobility — but the script relies on a contrived, late-arriving plot device (the fake SAT score and Lewis’s easy access to records) that risks undermining audience investment. Tighten plausibility around the central conflict: make Mrs. Cantu’s choice and Lewis’s attack feel inevitable and earned by layering foreshadowing, tightening timeline beats, and deepening Lewis’s motive so the climax feels cathartic rather than convenient. Also sharpen smaller world details (specific cultural markers, sensory cues in the apartment and offices) to increase authenticity and emotional payoff.
Correlations

Identifies patterns in scene scores.

Key Suggestions:
Your screenplay’s emotional core — the mother/son bond and Brandon’s underdog rise — works strongly and culminates in a powerful climax. To sharpen the script, focus on sustaining and escalating stakes through the middle act: inject more concrete consequences into quieter, hopeful scenes (e.g., job/dorm/delivery scenes) so the audience never lets go of the tension. Use the strong dialogue beats you already have to show character change rather than tell it, and let the antagonist’s campaign (Lewis) escalate earlier and more visibly so the final revelation feels earned rather than abrupt. Tighten pacing (trim or clarify montages), and make the practical costs of Mrs. Cantu’s sacrifice clearer to heighten emotional payoff.
Loglines
Presents logline variations based on theme, genre, and hook.