Absolution

After discovering that a serial killer stages victims with saint cards, Detective Sofia Alvarez follows the trail into a church besieged by corruption — and into a priest’s private war with trauma, guilt and a decision to stop predators by any means necessary.

See other logline suggestions

Overview

Poster
Unique Selling Point

Absolution distinguishes itself through its sophisticated moral ambiguity and unique protagonist - a priest who weaponizes his faith against predators within his own church. Unlike typical vigilante stories, it explores the theological implications of violence as penance, creating a compelling tension between divine mercy and human justice. The script's willingness to confront institutional corruption within the Catholic Church while maintaining respect for genuine faith makes it both provocative and spiritually resonant.

AI Verdict & Suggestions

Ratings are subjective. So you get different engines' ratings to compare.

Hover over verdict cards for Executive Summaries

GPT5
 Recommend
Claude
 Recommend
Grok
 Recommend
Gemini
 Recommend
DeepSeek
 Recommend
Average Score: 8.3
Key Takeaways
For the Writer:
Sharpen the script’s credibility and emotional payoff by tightening procedural beats and fully dramatizing key institutional turning points. Hone the middle act pacing (trim repetitive motif beats and tighten montages), deepen Sister Agnes’s and victims’ families’ arcs so their sacrifices land, and give Dalton’s whistleblowing and death clearer on‑page causality and motive. Also deepen one intimate, clinical scene that explores Michael’s PTSD (therapy or interrogation) to make his inner logic tragically persuasive rather than merely explanatory.
For Executives:
This is a high‑concept, awards‑friendly thriller with strong commercial hooks (moral dilemma, striking lead roles, viral visual motifs) and clear festival/arthouse crossover potential. The chief risk is credibility — procedural and institutional conveniences (off‑screen revelations, sloppy chain‑of‑custody, unexplained whistleblowing/death) could alienate critics and savvy audiences and invite controversy given subject matter. Fixes are surgical (add a few courtroom/IA/warrant scenes, dramatize Dalton’s leak on camera, resolve secondary arcs) and will materially reduce reputational and commercial risk while preserving the film’s emotional and market appeal.
Story Facts
Genres:
Drama 60% Crime 40% Thriller 40% War 10% Action 20%

Setting: Contemporary, spanning several months, Urban setting, primarily in a fictional city with significant scenes in St. Luke's Cathedral, police precincts, and various locations related to the church and crime scenes.

Themes: Justice vs. Mercy, Corruption within Institutions (Church and Law Enforcement), The Burden of Guilt and Trauma, Sin and Redemption, Faith and Doubt, The Nature of Innocence and Its Loss, Moral Ambiguity and Compromise, The Search for Truth

Conflict & Stakes: The primary conflict revolves around Father Michael's internal struggle with his vigilante actions to protect children against the backdrop of institutional corruption within the church, with high stakes involving moral redemption, justice, and the safety of the community.

Mood: Somber and introspective, with moments of tension and moral ambiguity.

Standout Features:

  • Unique Hook: A priest becomes a vigilante, challenging the moral boundaries of faith and justice.
  • Plot Twist: The revelation of the church's complicity in covering up abuse and the protagonist's struggle with his own violent actions.
  • Distinctive Setting: The juxtaposition of sacred spaces like the cathedral with the gritty realities of crime and moral decay.
  • Innovative Ideas: Exploration of the seal of confession and its implications in the context of crime and justice.
  • Unique Characters: Complex characters like Father Michael and Detective Alvarez who embody conflicting moralities.

Comparable Scripts: Prisoners, The Exorcist, Seven, The Night Of, Spotlight, The Killing of a Sacred Deer, The Green Mile, The Leftovers, The Road

Data Says…
Feature in Alpha - Could have inaccuracies

Our stats model looked at how your scores work together and ranked the changes most likely to move your overall rating next draft. Ordered by the most reliable gains first.

1. Premise (Script Level)
Big Impact Script Level
Your current Premise (Script Level) score: 8.5
Typical rewrite gain: +0.6 in Premise (Script Level)
Gets you ~4% closer to an "all Highly Recommends" score
Confidence: High (based on ~302 similar revisions)
  • This is currently your highest-impact lever. Improving Premise (Script Level) is most likely to move the overall rating next.
  • What writers at your level usually do: Writers at a similar level usually raise Premise (Script Level) by about +0.6 in one rewrite.
  • Why it matters: At your level, improving this one area alone can cover a meaningful slice of the climb toward an "all Highly Recommends" script.
2. Theme (Script Level)
Big Impact Script Level
Your current Theme (Script Level) score: 8.7
Typical rewrite gain: +0.6 in Theme (Script Level)
Gets you ~4% closer to an "all Highly Recommends" score
Confidence: High (based on ~329 similar revisions)
  • This is another meaningful lever. After you work on the higher-impact areas, this can still create a noticeable lift.
  • What writers at your level usually do: Writers at a similar level usually raise Theme (Script Level) by about +0.6 in one rewrite.
  • Why it matters: After you address the top item, gains here are still one of the levers that move you toward that "all Highly Recommends" zone.
3. Character Development (Script Level)
Big Impact Script Level
Your current Character Development (Script Level) score: 8.3
Typical rewrite gain: +0.6 in Character Development (Script Level)
Gets you ~3% closer to an "all Highly Recommends" score
Confidence: High (based on ~704 similar revisions)
  • This is another meaningful lever. After you work on the higher-impact areas, this can still create a noticeable lift.
  • What writers at your level usually do: Writers at a similar level usually raise Character Development (Script Level) by about +0.6 in one rewrite.
  • Why it matters: After you address the top item, gains here are still one of the levers that move you toward that "all Highly Recommends" zone.

Script Level Analysis

Writer Exec

This section delivers a top-level assessment of the screenplay’s strengths and weaknesses — covering overall quality (P/C/R/HR), character development, emotional impact, thematic depth, narrative inconsistencies, and the story’s core philosophical conflict. It helps identify what’s resonating, what needs refinement, and how the script aligns with professional standards.

Screenplay Insights

Breaks down your script along various categories.

Overall Score: 8.53
Key Suggestions:
The script's power lies in its moral complexity and the lives of Michael and Alvarez — but pacing and redundancy blunt that power. The single most effective rewrite move is to tighten and differentiate the confession/reflection beats: condense or merge repetitive confessional scenes so each one advances plot, reveals new information, or shifts emotional stakes. At the same time, use those saved pages to add small, specific human details to secondary characters (e.g., Russo, Sister Agnes, Dalton) so they carry weight without stealing focus. Prioritize showing over telling — silence, visual motifs, and altered pacing will make the script feel leaner and make every confession land harder.
Story Critique

Big-picture feedback on the story’s clarity, stakes, cohesion, and engagement.

Key Suggestions:
You have a powerful, morally complex thriller with a clear thematic spine: mercy vs. justice. To strengthen it, tighten the central character arc by clearly dramatizing Father Michael’s ‘point of no return’ — a specific, emotionally undeniable beat that transforms him from afflicted priest into vigilante. Deepen a few supporting voices (Sister Agnes, Russo, Dalton) so they provide distinct moral counterpoints and let theological debates about mercy and justice land through concrete, personal scenes rather than exposition. Finally, trim middle pacing by removing or combining scenes that reiterate the same information and use earlier, subtle foreshadowing of Michael’s military trauma to make later actions feel inevitable and earned.
Characters

Explores the depth, clarity, and arc of the main and supporting characters.

Key Suggestions:
The character work is strong but the script needs one structural clarification to unlock emotional buy-in: ground Michael's vigilante turn earlier and more viscerally. Right now his military trauma, guilt, and moral logic are present in scenes, but they often read as exposition or late-stage justification. Add a short, specific flashback or prologue beat (a single, brutal Iraq moment tied to a sensory trigger) and thread small, recurring artifacts (widow's ring, dog tag, military idioms) through early scenes. Also tighten supporting arcs (Agnes, Dalton, Alvarez) so their choices react to a clearly established Michael rather than simply responding to headline events. These changes will make his descent believable, keep the audience empathic rather than repulsed, and sharpen the mercy-versus-justice theme across the script.
Emotional Analysis

Breaks down the emotional journey of the audience across the script.

Key Suggestions:
The script powerfully sustains a somber mood, but its unrelenting high-intensity darkness risks numbing the audience and weakening the payoff of your peaks. Tighten the emotional architecture: insert deliberate emotional valleys (longer, quieter aftermaths after major beats), expand and lengthen genuine warmth or small victories (e.g., Michael with Joey; Alvarez & Russo camaraderie), and give secondary characters (Russo, Sister Agnes, Dalton) clearer vulnerability arcs. Modulate intensity across the middle and late acts so climaxes land harder and the central moral conflicts feel earned rather than constant.
Goals and Philosophical Conflict

Evaluates character motivations, obstacles, and sources of tension throughout the plot.

Key Suggestions:
The screenplay has a powerful central moral engine — a priest-turned-vigilante wrestling with trauma, mercy, and justice — but it needs sharper clarity around Michael’s internal threshold and the causal logic that turns his private guilt into public violence. Tighten the emotional through-line by marking two or three decisive turning points that make his choice to kill feel inevitable (not merely reactive), and strengthen Alvarez’s role as the ethical counterweight so the audience can hold both empathy and judgment. Trim or consolidate scenes that repeat the same emotional beat and reallocate that time to deepen the pivotal moments where Michael’s philosophy shifts from protection to execution.
Themes

Analysis of the themes of the screenplay and how well they’re expressed.

Key Suggestions:
The script's moral complexity and interwoven themes are its greatest strength, but it needs clearer emotional through-lines to avoid ambivalence that can feel indecisive rather than profound. Tighten the character arcs — especially Michael’s moral collapse and Alvarez’s ethical reckoning — so the audience understands why each choice is made (not just what is done). Lean into one guiding question (e.g., 'When systems fail, who gets to decide justice?') and let scenes consistently answer or complicate that question. Trim or consolidate peripheral institutional beats that dilute focus and deepen scenes that show consequences (victim-centered moments, Alvarez grappling with compromise) to make the thematic payoff feel earned rather than theatrical.
Logic & Inconsistencies

Highlights any contradictions, plot holes, or logic gaps that may confuse viewers.

Key Suggestions:
The script's central moral engine — Father Michael's vigilante crusade and Detective Alvarez's pursuit — is powerful, but key ambiguities and character choices undercut audience buy‑in. The highest priority is to close the big plot and continuity gaps: explicitly decide Michael's fate (does he die in the cathedral or not?) and make sure every subsequent scene logically follows that decision (flashback vs. aftermath vs. metaphor). Also tighten character behavior so actions (dropping a gun, letting suspects go, sudden institutional reversals) arise from clear motivations rather than plot convenience. Fix a few technical/logistical details (how Michael gains access to PA, how callers find him, why Alvarez hesitates) and trim repeated motifs/dialogue to sharpen pacing and emotional beats.

Scene Analysis

All of your scenes analyzed individually and compared, so you can zero in on what to improve.

Scene-Level Percentile Chart
Hover over the graph to see more details about each score.
Go to Scene Analysis

Other Analyses

Writer Exec

This section looks at the extra spark — your story’s voice, style, world, and the moments that really stick. These insights might not change the bones of the script, but they can make it more original, more immersive, and way more memorable. It’s where things get fun, weird, and wonderfully you.

Unique Voice

Assesses the distinctiveness and personality of the writer's voice.

Key Suggestions:
Your voice is powerful — atmospheric, morally complex, and cinematic — but it risks cloaking plot clarity and audience alignment beneath heavy symbolism and moral ambiguity. Tighten the through-line: make Michael’s internal logic and Alvarez’s investigative arc more concrete so viewers can emotionally track choices without losing the moral questions that make the piece compelling. Trim repetitive imagery where it stalls pacing, sharpen dialogue to differentiate characters (especially clergy vs. cops), and add a few anchoring scenes that show clear cause-and-effect consequences for vigilante acts so the script neither romanticizes nor muddles its ethical center.
Writer's Craft

Analyzes the writing to help the writer be aware of their skill and improve.

Key Suggestions:
You already have a powerful, atmospheric story that wrestles with moral ambiguity and creates memorable, tension-filled scenes. The highest payoff now is to deepen character psychology — especially Michael, Alvarez, and Dalton — by making their motives, internal conflicts, and thresholds for action more concrete and emotionally specific. Concretize their stakes in a few pivotal scenes (show not tell), tighten subtext in dialogue so every line pulls double duty, and experiment with pacing (one or two scenes re-cut slower or tighter) to sharpen suspense and emotional beats. These changes will turn evocative moments into a coherent, empathetic arc and make the moral questions land with the audience rather than drift as abstraction.
Memorable Lines
Spotlights standout dialogue lines with emotional or thematic power.
Tropes
Highlights common or genre-specific tropes found in the script.
World Building

Evaluates the depth, consistency, and immersion of the story's world.

Key Suggestions:
The world you’ve built is rich, atmospheric, and thematically potent — rain-soaked streets, liturgical ritual, and institutional rot give the story a powerful mood. The most important creative task now is to sharpen moral clarity and character arcs so the audience can navigate the ethical fog: make Michael’s psychological logic and the limits of his vigilante calculus explicit, give Alvarez a clear, active roadmap (not just investigation beats), and use Sister Agnes, Dalton and the Archdiocese as structural counterpoints rather than background texture. Tighten beats that show consequences (legal, spiritual, communal) so the film doesn’t feel like it glorifies vigilantism but instead interrogates it. Use the religious motifs you’ve established to echo emotional turning points rather than merely to decorate scenes.
Correlations

Identifies patterns in scene scores.

Key Suggestions:
Your script’s core is very strong: intense, confrontational set-pieces drive plot and character change effectively, and the narrative momentum rarely stalls. The main craft opportunity is to tighten quieter, reflective scenes so they carry emotional stakes equal to your high‑impact moments. Convert introspective beats into active choices (micro-conflicts, revealed secrets, or symbolic actions) so they don’t read as respiration between peaks. Keep the layered tone strategy (tense + investigative + emotional) that consistently delivers peak engagement, but ensure every scene — even the slow ones — forwards character transformation or raises the cost of choices.
Loglines
Presents logline variations based on theme, genre, and hook.