7 tides

When global 'tides' of accelerated evolution begin reshaping life on Earth, an emotionally scarred FBI agent (Taylor) must protect a young tribal woman, Lucy, who can listen to and calm the mutating natural world — but the government's plan to contain 'the tide' threatens to turn salvation into genocide.

See other logline suggestions

Overview

Poster
Unique Selling Point

7 Tides offers a fresh take on the evolution genre by framing mutation not as random chance but as Earth's deliberate response to human destruction, blending environmental thriller with character-driven drama through the unique bond between a hardened FBI agent and an evolved tribal girl who represents humanity's potential future.

AI Verdict & Suggestions

Ratings are subjective. So you get different engines' ratings to compare.

Hover over verdict cards for Executive Summaries

GPT5
 Recommend
Gemini
 Recommend
Grok
 Recommend
Claude
 Recommend
DeepSeek
 Consider
Average Score: 7.9
Key Takeaways
For the Writer:
Tighten the pilot around fewer, clearer storytelling pillars: cut long lecture scenes and instead reveal the 'tides' and mutational stakes through character-led discoveries and set pieces; define a small set of concrete, repeatable rules for mutations (triggers, limits, costs) early so every future escalation feels earned; and deepen the antagonists by giving Merrick and Bartot concrete strategic goals (political pressure, a plan to weaponize Lucy, or a credible short-term objective). Practically: convert Dr. Coggins' monologue into three earned beats across the episode, give one tight scene showing a public consequence of the tides, and write a one-page rule-sheet for powers that you then enforce on-page to preserve suspense and stakes.
For Executives:
7 Tides is commercially viable: a cinematic, eco-centered sci-fi pilot with a strong female lead and an original supernatural hook that will attract fans of Fringe/Annihilation/Station Eleven and streaming audiences who like serialized high-concept drama. Key risks: the current draft leans on heavy exposition, under-develops antagonist motives, and leaves the rules of the world fuzzy — all of which can hurt audience buy-in and franchise clarity. Mitigation is straightforward and cost-efficient: a focused rewrite to scatter exposition, codify powers, and give Merrick/Bartot tangible agendas will preserve the pilot’s visual set pieces and emotional core while making it far more marketable to networks and international buyers.
Story Facts
Genres:
Action 35% Drama 45% Fantasy 25% Science Fiction 40% Thriller 30% War 15% Horror 10% Crime 5%

Setting: Contemporary, primarily set in the present day with flashbacks to past events., Various locations including a school, urban environments in New York City, a jungle, and a tribal camp.

Themes: Adaptation and Evolution, Humanity vs. Nature (and the blurring lines), Control vs. Acceptance, Loss, Sacrifice, and Trauma, Identity and Belonging, The Nature of Power and Responsibility, The Future of Humanity and the Planet

Conflict & Stakes: The main conflict revolves around the struggle between the evolving characters, particularly Lucy, and the external threats posed by the Bartot tribe and the FBI's containment policies, with the stakes being the survival of Lucy and the potential for a new evolutionary path for humanity.

Mood: Intense and introspective, with moments of hope and urgency.

Standout Features:

  • Unique Hook: The concept of evolution being driven by a mutagenic force that affects both humans and nature.
  • Major Twist: The revelation of Lucy's true nature and her connection to the Earth's evolutionary changes.
  • Innovative Ideas: The integration of supernatural abilities with environmental themes, showcasing a new perspective on humanity's relationship with nature.
  • Distinctive Settings: The contrast between urban environments and lush jungles, highlighting the clash between civilization and nature.
  • Genre Blends: A mix of action, science fiction, and environmental drama, appealing to a wide range of viewers.

Comparable Scripts: The X-Files, Stranger Things, Annihilation, The Hunger Games, The Mortal Instruments: City of Bones, Divergent, The Girl with All the Gifts, The OA, The Power

Data Says…
Feature in Alpha - Could have inaccuracies

Our stats model looked at how your scores work together and ranked the changes most likely to move your overall rating next draft. Ordered by the most reliable gains first.

1. Visual Impact (Script Level)
Big Impact Script Level
Your current Visual Impact (Script Level) score: 7.9
Typical rewrite gain: +0.48 in Visual Impact (Script Level)
Gets you ~3% closer to an "all Highly Recommends" score
Confidence: High (based on ~2,041 similar revisions)
  • This is currently your highest-impact lever. Improving Visual Impact (Script Level) is most likely to move the overall rating next.
  • What writers at your level usually do: Writers at a similar level usually raise Visual Impact (Script Level) by about +0.48 in one rewrite.
  • Why it matters: At your level, improving this one area alone can cover a meaningful slice of the climb toward an "all Highly Recommends" script.
2. Character Development (Script Level)
Big Impact Script Level
Your current Character Development (Script Level) score: 7.6
Typical rewrite gain: +0.43 in Character Development (Script Level)
Gets you ~3% closer to an "all Highly Recommends" score
Confidence: High (based on ~4,567 similar revisions)
  • This is another meaningful lever. After you work on the higher-impact areas, this can still create a noticeable lift.
  • What writers at your level usually do: Writers at a similar level usually raise Character Development (Script Level) by about +0.43 in one rewrite.
  • Why it matters: After you address the top item, gains here are still one of the levers that move you toward that "all Highly Recommends" zone.
3. Theme (Script Level)
Big Impact Script Level
Your current Theme (Script Level) score: 8.0
Typical rewrite gain: +0.45 in Theme (Script Level)
Gets you ~3% closer to an "all Highly Recommends" score
Confidence: High (based on ~3,490 similar revisions)
  • This is another meaningful lever. After you work on the higher-impact areas, this can still create a noticeable lift.
  • What writers at your level usually do: Writers at a similar level usually raise Theme (Script Level) by about +0.45 in one rewrite.
  • Why it matters: After you address the top item, gains here are still one of the levers that move you toward that "all Highly Recommends" zone.

Script Level Analysis

Writer Exec

This section delivers a top-level assessment of the screenplay’s strengths and weaknesses — covering overall quality (P/C/R/HR), character development, emotional impact, thematic depth, narrative inconsistencies, and the story’s core philosophical conflict. It helps identify what’s resonating, what needs refinement, and how the script aligns with professional standards.

Screenplay Insights

Breaks down your script along various categories.

Overall Score: 7.88
Key Suggestions:
Lean into personal, human conflict by deepening the antagonists and clarifying the mutagen’s role. Right now the pilot’s heart — Taylor, Forbes and Lucy — is strong, but many antagonists (the Bartot, Alejandro/Dario, even Calom) read as plot obstacles rather than characters with believable motives. Give the antagonists short, grounded scenes that reveal history, stakes and contradiction (fear, grief, survival logic). At the same time tighten a few worldbuilding beats early — a single clean line or visual about how the mutagen spreads and what it costs — and fix a handful of small continuity issues (action-driving swaps, who’s driving) to preserve immersion. These surgical changes will lift emotional stakes, reduce exposition, and make the world feel lived-in without rewriting the whole script.
Story Critique

Big-picture feedback on the story’s clarity, stakes, cohesion, and engagement.

Key Suggestions:
Tighten the pilot by naming and clarifying who (or what) is actively opposing your protagonists beyond the abstract mutagen. Decide whether the threat is primarily a force of nature, a human faction exploiting the tide, or an ancient intelligence (e.g., Calom) with specific goals — then thread that through character motivations, the tribes' aims, and Merrick/Project Deoxy's choices. At the same time, keep Taylor and Forbes’ emotional journeys central: all worldbuilding and spectacle should serve their arcs (Taylor’s protective guilt/fertility fear; Forbes’s need for redemption). Finally, make the rules and visual language of “evolutionary tides” consistent so the audience can emotionally and visually follow stakes and escalation.
Characters

Explores the depth, clarity, and arc of the main and supporting characters.

Key Suggestions:
Tighten and deepen the character cores so the action carries emotional weight. Right now the pilot has vivid set pieces and a strong thematic hook (forced evolution), but many of the most dramatic moments land as spectacle because the protagonist’s internal stakes are under-anchored and secondary characters sometimes feel reactive. The most effective fix is to anchor Taylor’s arc earlier and more concretely — show a visceral, specific reminder of her sister’s death (or the failure that drove her to the Bureau) in an early scene and let that memory explicitly trigger her hesitation in key moments (e.g., the warehouse raid). Do the same for Forbes and Lucy: give Forbes one clear moment where grief shapes a tactical decision, and give Lucy a brief demonstration of agency during her capture. Use recurring motifs (Taylor’s sketches, the ultrasound photo, a broken necklace) to link action beats to emotional beats and make the audience care about survival beyond spectacle.
Emotional Analysis

Breaks down the emotional journey of the audience across the script.

Key Suggestions:
The script's core is compelling — a high-concept, emotional sci‑fi with strong lead stakes — but its emotional pacing is top-heavy. The audience is exposed to too many consecutive high-intensity beats, which dulls the impact of major moments and leaves little room for character breathing and relational payoff. Rework the middle to insert meaningful quiet scenes (extend the train conversation, expand Taylor/Lucy domestic bonding, add a real 'oasis' in the Reza camp) and move or soften the earliest emotional peak (bridge sequence) so climaxes land later and feel earned. Also bring Forbes' vulnerability earlier and humanize Lucy more consistently (small, mundane needs and moments of wonder) so the audience stays invested through the action.
Goals and Philosophical Conflict

Evaluates character motivations, obstacles, and sources of tension throughout the plot.

Key Suggestions:
The analysis shows the screenplay’s emotional core is Taylor’s journey from trauma-driven isolation to embracing responsibility through connection with Lucy. To strengthen the script, tighten and foreground that internal arc: seed emotional beats earlier, make Taylor’s reasons for staying vs leaving concrete and visible in scenes (not just in monologues), and ensure each external action (missions, fights, rescue) is explicitly tied to her evolving values. Clarify the philosophical clash (empathy vs containment) by staging sharper confrontations and moments of choice so the thematic payoff (Taylor rips up the resignation) feels inevitable rather than convenient.
Themes

Analysis of the themes of the screenplay and how well they’re expressed.

Key Suggestions:
This is a high-concept, emotionally rich take on forced evolution with strong visual and mythic moments, but it needs a tighter throughline. Anchor the spectacle to one clear emotional arc (suggestion: Taylor’s redemption/choice about whether to protect or weaponize the new world) and clarify Lucy’s role as both catalyst and moral compass. Trim or merge competing antagonists and side-threads that dilute focus (multiple tribes, Merrick, Calom, Bartot, global clusters) and define hard, consistent rules for the mutagen and Lucy’s abilities so emotional beats aren’t undermined by loose mechanics. Fix small clarity lapses (who’s driving, the ultrasound thread, whether Taylor’s fertility plot is resolved) and ensure tribal portrayals are respectful and purposeful, not only worldbuilding window-dressing. Do this and the script’s intimate stakes will lift the big visual set-pieces rather than being eclipsed by them.
Logic & Inconsistencies

Highlights any contradictions, plot holes, or logic gaps that may confuse viewers.

Key Suggestions:
The script's biggest weakness is inconsistent worldbuilding around the mutagen and how powers manifest, which in turn forces uneven character behavior and contrived plot beats. Fixing this requires a concise 'rulebook' for the mutagen (origin, progression, limits, timeline) and then retrofitting scenes so character reactions and action sequences follow those rules. While tightening exposition (combine repetitive 'tide/evolution' dialogue) and reducing similar chase/fight scenes will improve pacing, the priority is making the science-magic consistent so emotional beats (Taylor's panic, Forbes' vulnerabilities, Lucy's learning curve) feel earned rather than plot-driven.

Scene Analysis

All of your scenes analyzed individually and compared, so you can zero in on what to improve.

Scene-Level Percentile Chart
Hover over the graph to see more details about each score.
Go to Scene Analysis

Other Analyses

Writer Exec

This section looks at the extra spark — your story’s voice, style, world, and the moments that really stick. These insights might not change the bones of the script, but they can make it more original, more immersive, and way more memorable. It’s where things get fun, weird, and wonderfully you.

Unique Voice

Assesses the distinctiveness and personality of the writer's voice.

Key Suggestions:
You have a distinct, compelling voice — spare, sensory, and tense — that gives the material real cinematic pulse. To elevate the script, preserve that tone while tightening logistics, clarifying character POVs, and sharpening the emotional spine. Cut or streamline scenes that function mainly as exposition; fix small descriptive inconsistencies (e.g., who’s driving during chase beats) and double down on a single, clear arc for Taylor (her motivation, threshold, and change). Lean into quieter character moments to let the spectacle land emotionally rather than compensating with more set pieces.
Writer's Craft

Analyzes the writing to help the writer be aware of their skill and improve.

Key Suggestions:
You have a strong foundation in atmosphere, action and visual storytelling; to elevate the script from compelling to memorable, focus first on tightening dialogue subtext and deepening character arcs. Reduce on-the-nose exposition, let conflicts and motivations live in what characters don't say (their beats, small physical choices and silences), and push quieter, dialogue-light scenes that reveal internal change. Practical next steps: rewrite key emotional beats with less dialogue, run the recommended subtext exercises, and study exemplar scripts (and McKee) to sharpen motivation-driven beats so your actors and editors can mine richer emotion from the material.
Memorable Lines
Spotlights standout dialogue lines with emotional or thematic power.
Tropes
Highlights common or genre-specific tropes found in the script.
World Building

Evaluates the depth, consistency, and immersion of the story's world.

Key Suggestions:
Lean into one clear through-line: make the emotional core (Taylor’s grief and choice to protect vs. control Lucy) drive every beat of the world-building and action. Right now the script offers rich set-pieces and mythology but sometimes sacrifices clarity for spectacle. Tighten the rules of the ‘tide’ and Lucy’s abilities, trim or rework expository scenes so that discoveries come through character decisions and consequences, and use the jungle/tribal material to reveal stakes and character, not just wonder. This will sharpen pacing, heighten empathy for Taylor, and make the stakes feel earned rather than diffuse.
Correlations

Identifies patterns in scene scores.

Key Suggestions:
The analysis shows your core strength: ‘Tense’ and ‘Mysterious’ tonal moments reliably produce the screenplay’s highest stakes, emotional peaks, and plot propulsion. Lean into those instincts — keep and sharpen the sequences that generate suspense and mystery (battle/escape, tribal confrontations, Lucy’s awakenings). At the same time, rework or compress the more philosophical/reflective scenes that currently deflate conflict and emotional impact (they’re honest and useful for theme, but they often slow the plot). Integrate important introspective beats into scenes that still carry urgency or give them a stronger visual/behavioral hook so they contribute to momentum rather than pause it.
Loglines
Presents logline variations based on theme, genre, and hook.