Robert Will Comply.
When a meticulous aerospace engineer in a crime-stricken California neighborhood rigs a 'non-lethal' ambush to protect his family, his act of defense turns him into the state’s newest example—forcing him to decide whether to comply with a justice system that ignores his fear.
See other logline suggestionsOverview
Unique Selling Point
This screenplay uniquely blends domestic drama with social commentary, creating a timely critique of systemic failure through the lens of a father's desperate protection of his family. It stands out by making the audience question where legitimate self-defense ends and vigilantism begins, while exposing the hypocrisy of a justice system that fails to protect ordinary citizens.
AI Verdict & Suggestions
Ratings are subjective. So you get different engines' ratings to compare.
Hover over verdict cards for Executive Summaries
Recommend
Recommend
Consider
Recommend
Recommend
Key Takeaways
For the Writer:
For Executives:
Story Facts
Genres:Setting: Contemporary, Los Angeles, California
Themes: Erosion of Safety and Trust in Systems, Vigilantism as a Response to Inaction, Disillusionment with California/Urban Decay, Family Vulnerability and Protection, The Irony of Justice and Compliance
Conflict & Stakes: Robert's struggle to protect his family and clear his name after being falsely accused of a crime, with his family's safety and reputation at stake.
Mood: Tense and dramatic
Standout Features:
- Unique Hook: The protagonist's transformation from a compliant citizen to a vigilante figure, building a defensive device to protect his family.
- Plot Twist: Robert's arrest for defending his home against a thief, flipping the narrative of victimhood.
- Distinctive Setting: The urban decay of Los Angeles serves as a backdrop, highlighting societal issues and the dangers of city life.
- Innovative Ideas: The use of a homemade security trap that escalates the conflict and raises questions about justice and morality.
Comparable Scripts: The Purge, Breaking Bad, A History of Violence, The Night Of, Unlawful Entry, The Strangers, The Gift, Law Abiding Citizen, The Road
Data Says…
Feature in Alpha - Could have inaccuraciesOur stats model looked at how your scores work together and ranked the changes most likely to move your overall rating next draft. Ordered by the most reliable gains first.
- This is currently your highest-impact lever. Improving Emotional Impact (Script Level) is most likely to move the overall rating next.
- What writers at your level usually do: Writers at a similar level usually raise Emotional Impact (Script Level) by about +0.5 in one rewrite.
- Why it matters: At your level, improving this one area alone can cover a meaningful slice of the climb toward an "all Highly Recommends" script.
- This is another meaningful lever. After you work on the higher-impact areas, this can still create a noticeable lift.
- What writers at your level usually do: Writers at a similar level usually raise Character Development (Script Level) by about +0.45 in one rewrite.
- Why it matters: After you address the top item, gains here are still one of the levers that move you toward that "all Highly Recommends" zone.
- This is another meaningful lever. After you work on the higher-impact areas, this can still create a noticeable lift.
- What writers at your level usually do: Writers at a similar level usually raise Scene Structure by about +0.15 in one rewrite.
- Why it matters: After you address the top item, gains here are still one of the levers that move you toward that "all Highly Recommends" zone.
🧬 Your Script's DNA Profile
This is your script's "fingerprint." The recommender uses this profile to understand the context of your writing.
Your Core Strengths
These factors measure overall quality. Higher is better.
Core Scene Quality
100th PercentileMain Ingredients: Plot, Concept, Story Forward, Character Changes, Unpredictability
Script-Level Polish
99th PercentileMain Ingredients: Structure (Script Level), Emotional Impact (Script Level), Theme (Script Level), Premise (Script Level), Visual Impact (Script Level)
Your Stylistic Profile
These factors are sliders, not scores. They show your script's unique style choices and trade-offs.
Style: Script-Level Originality vs. Scene-Level Execution
Style: Visuals/Conflict vs. Premise/Originality
Style: High-Conflict Premise vs. Structure/Theme
Style: Strong Structure/Concept vs. Emotion/Theme
Style: Plot-Driven vs. Character/Conflict
Format: Feature Film vs. TV Pilot
Style: Action/Conflict vs. Character/Dialogue
Style: Emotional Journey vs. Pacing/Originality
Style: Paced Character Study vs. Originality/Visuals
Style: Internal Emotion vs. External Conflict/Dialogue
Style: Talky Character Piece vs. Pacing/Structure
Style: High Concept/Visuals vs. Thematic Depth
Style: Thematic Depth vs. Originality/Structure
Screenplay Video
The video is a bit crude as the tool is still Alpha code. Contact us if there's a problem or with suggestions.
Share Your Analysis
Sharing
Share URL:
Script Level Analysis
This section delivers a top-level assessment of the screenplay’s strengths and weaknesses — covering overall quality (P/C/R/HR), character development, emotional impact, thematic depth, narrative inconsistencies, and the story’s core philosophical conflict. It helps identify what’s resonating, what needs refinement, and how the script aligns with professional standards.
Screenplay Insights
Breaks down your script along various categories.
Exec Summary:
Key Suggestions:
Story Critique
Big-picture feedback on the story’s clarity, stakes, cohesion, and engagement.
Exec Summary:
Key Suggestions:
Characters
Explores the depth, clarity, and arc of the main and supporting characters.
Exec Summary:
Key Suggestions:
Emotional Analysis
Breaks down the emotional journey of the audience across the script.
Exec Summary:
Key Suggestions:
Goals and Philosophical Conflict
Evaluates character motivations, obstacles, and sources of tension throughout the plot.
Exec Summary:
Key Suggestions:
Themes
Analysis of the themes of the screenplay and how well they’re expressed.
Exec Summary:
Key Suggestions:
Logic & Inconsistencies
Highlights any contradictions, plot holes, or logic gaps that may confuse viewers.
Exec Summary:
Key Suggestions:
Screenplay Insights
Breaks down your script along various categories.
Story Critique
Big-picture feedback on the story’s clarity, stakes, cohesion, and engagement.
Characters
Explores the depth, clarity, and arc of the main and supporting characters.
Emotional Analysis
Breaks down the emotional journey of the audience across the script.
Goals and Philosophical Conflict
Evaluates character motivations, obstacles, and sources of tension throughout the plot.
Themes
Analysis of the themes of the screenplay and how well they’re expressed.
Logic & Inconsistencies
Highlights any contradictions, plot holes, or logic gaps that may confuse viewers.
Scene Analysis
All of your scenes analyzed individually and compared, so you can zero in on what to improve.
Analysis of the Scene Percentiles
- High concept rating (96.48) indicates a strong and engaging premise that is likely to capture audience interest.
- Strong conflict level (91.31) suggests that the screenplay effectively builds tension and stakes, which is crucial for maintaining viewer engagement.
- Excellent character changes (92.89) imply that characters undergo significant development, enhancing the emotional depth of the story.
- Low originality score (13.92) suggests the need for more unique elements or fresh perspectives to differentiate the screenplay from existing works.
- Dialogue rating (56.10) indicates that the dialogue may not be as compelling or natural as it could be, warranting a review for authenticity and engagement.
- Engagement score (28.35) is notably low, suggesting that the screenplay may struggle to maintain audience interest throughout.
The writer appears to be more conceptual, with high scores in concept and plot elements but lower scores in dialogue and character development.
Balancing Elements- Enhance dialogue to match the strong concept and plot, ensuring characters' voices are distinct and engaging.
- Work on increasing the originality of the screenplay to complement the strong conflict and emotional impact, making the story feel fresh.
- Focus on pacing and engagement to ensure that the screenplay maintains audience interest from start to finish.
Conceptual
Overall AssessmentThe screenplay has a solid foundation with a compelling concept and strong conflict, but it requires improvements in originality, dialogue, and engagement to reach its full potential.
How scenes compare to the Scripts in our Library
Other Analyses
This section looks at the extra spark — your story’s voice, style, world, and the moments that really stick. These insights might not change the bones of the script, but they can make it more original, more immersive, and way more memorable. It’s where things get fun, weird, and wonderfully you.
Unique Voice
Assesses the distinctiveness and personality of the writer's voice.
Exec Summary:
Key Suggestions:
Writer's Craft
Analyzes the writing to help the writer be aware of their skill and improve.
Exec Summary:
Key Suggestions:
Memorable Lines
World Building
Evaluates the depth, consistency, and immersion of the story's world.
Exec Summary:
Key Suggestions:
Correlations
Identifies patterns in scene scores.
Exec Summary:
Key Suggestions:
Unique Voice
Assesses the distinctiveness and personality of the writer's voice.
Writer's Craft
Analyzes the writing to help the writer be aware of their skill and improve.
Memorable Lines
World Building
Evaluates the depth, consistency, and immersion of the story's world.
Correlations
Identifies patterns in scene scores.
Pass / Consider / Recommend Analysis
Top Takeaway from This Section
GPT5
Executive Summary
- Strong, cinematic opening: visually evocative imagery (freeway smog, tents, graffiti) and a montage that efficiently establishes relocation, disillusionment, and stakes. The world is shown, not told. high ( Scene 1 (EXT. LOS ANGELES FREEWAY – DUSK / TITLE MONTAGE) )
- Excellent visual and procedural construction of the device and its deployment: the blueprint-to-action sequence is specific, tactile and tension-filled; the ambush itself is cinematic and horrifying without relying on gore. high ( Scene 5 (INT. GARAGE – NIGHT) Scene 6 (EXT. HARRISON PORCH – LATE NIGHT) )
- Powerful thematic payoff in the courtroom. The opposition between Lopez's 'you will comply' and Robert's retort crystallizes the script's moral argument and gives the short a resonant final line and image. high ( Scene 8 (INT. COURTROOM – DAY) )
- The script handles everyday threats well—stalking, purse-snatching, predation—building a credible, accumulating pressure on the family, which feels timely and empathetic. medium ( Scene 2 (INT. HARRISON KITCHEN – MORNING) Scene 3 (EXT. SIDEWALK / DEAD-END STREET) )
- The motif/phrase 'Robert will comply' is used as an effective ironic leitmotif, giving the short thematic cohesion and a marketing-ready hook (which the end credit leverages). medium ( Scene 1 (TITLE SEQUENCE / Super: ROBERT WILL COMPLY) Scene 8 (Courtroom – Lopez line) )
- Robert's escalation feels under-motivated: the garage montage shows engineering skill but the emotional turning point—why he moves from frustrated calls to building a weaponized ambush—is diffuse. The script needs a clearer catalytic moment or a sequence that shows his internal decision-making. high ( Scene 5 (INT. GARAGE – NIGHT) )
- Lisa and Abby remain underwritten. Their emotional responses mainly register as fear or anger; we need a stronger sense of their interior stakes (what they fear losing, what compromise they'd accept) so Robert's choices carry more moral weight. medium ( Scene 2 (INT. HARRISON KITCHEN – MORNING) Scene 7 (INT. HOLDING CELL – NIGHT) )
- Legal and procedural compression weakens plausibility: the rapid arrest, immediate heavy response, and the civil filing mentioned in court need clearer setup or justification (press, prior complaints, victim narrative) to feel believable. medium ( Scene 7 (EXT. DEAD-END STREET – MINUTES LATER / HOLDING CELL) Scene 8 (INT. COURTROOM – DAY) )
- The device's effects and potential for lethal harm are ambiguous. The script repeatedly calls it 'non-lethal,' but visual cues (electrocution, blinding cayenne) could be interpreted as excessively dangerous; you should clarify design intent and legal risk to avoid unintended moral judgments. medium ( Scene 6 (EXT. HARRISON PORCH – LATE NIGHT) )
- Some dialogue is blunt and on-the-nose (e.g., 'Welcome to California', Lopez's 'you will comply'). Subtler, more specific lines would deepen characterization and raise the script's emotional intelligence. medium ( Scene 1 (INT. HARRISON LIVING ROOM – SAME) Scene 8 (INT. COURTROOM – DAY) )
- A clear, singular inciting incident that propels Robert from passive complaining to active construction is missing. Multiple small slights accumulate, but the script lacks a defining blow (or a personal humiliation/breakpoint) that justifies the leap credibly. high ( Scene 4 (EXT. GROCERY STORE PARKING LOT – EVENING) Scene 5 (INT. GARAGE – NIGHT) )
- The civil filing 'Robert Harrison vs. The State of California' is mentioned but undeveloped. If it’s intended as a feature hook, the short should either show its foundation or remove the line so it doesn't feel like an unresolved teaser. medium ( Scene 8 (INT. COURTROOM – DAY) )
- Information about the 'porch pirate' (criminal history, prior complaints) is absent. The courtroom’s persuasion relies on a credible victim narrative; without this, the prosecution's position feels thin and the outcome less convincing. medium ( Scene 6 (EXT. HARRISON PORCH – LATE NIGHT) Scene 7 (EXT. DEAD-END STREET – MINUTES LATER) )
- We lack detail about alternative avenues Robert might have tried (community meetings, neighborhood watch, management, employer support), which would make his choice to weaponize seem more tragic and deliberate instead of a sudden jump. medium ( Scene 2 (INT. HARRISON KITCHEN – MORNING) )
- Robert’s internal psychological state beyond sarcasm and 'war' is under-explored—no flashbacks, no private monologue, no close moments that reveal guilt, fear, or deeper belief. The short leans on exterior action over interior life. medium ( Scene 7 (INT. HOLDING CELL – NIGHT) )
- The opening creates an immediate socio-political frame—urban decay, migration, and the illusion of safety—that shapes the audience's reading of Robert's actions. It's a strong contextual hook. high ( Scene 1 (TITLE SEQUENCE / SUPER: LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA) )
- The ambush scene is staged to maximize social commentary: neighbors film, bystanders don't act, and the criminal instantly becomes a victim in public perception—this mirrors contemporary social-media/policing dynamics. high ( Scene 6 (EXT. HARRISON PORCH – LATE NIGHT) )
- Assistant DA Lopez functions as more than an antagonist; she embodies the state's rhetorical control ('you will comply'), which is a smart personification of the film's central conflict. medium ( Scene 8 (INT. COURTROOM – DAY) )
- The relocation montage is a compact character and world-builder—economical storytelling well-suited to a short format and effective in setting up motivation without long expository scenes. medium ( Scene Title Sequence (MONTAGE) )
- The script reads like a proof-of-concept/teaser for a feature (explicit 'coming soon' tag). That makes it useful as a pitching tool, but also requires tightness in its unresolved threads if left as a standalone short. medium ( Scene Final (SUPER: COMING SOON – THE FEATURE FILM) )
- Escalation logic / Moral calculus The writer assumes accumulation of minor crimes is sufficient to justify a sophisticated booby-trap, but the script doesn't convincingly show the internal deliberation or threshold event that turns frustration into premeditated action. Example: between the grocery theft (Seq 4) and the garage build (Seq 5) we need a clearer personal crisis (job loss, direct threat to Abby, or an institutional humiliation) to anchor his choice. high
- Legal and procedural realism The prosecution's case and the rapidity/weight of law enforcement response feel engineered to serve the theme rather than emerging organically from established facts. Example: the civil filing is announced in court with no prior foundation (Seq 8), which undermines plausibility. medium
- Supporting character depth Lisa and Abby function mostly as stakes (fear, victimhood) rather than full characters with their own arcs. Example: Lisa's 'Welcome to California' and her pursuit of police help lack follow-through scenes showing her agency or conflict with Robert's plan. medium
- On-the-nose dialogue & thematic statements Lines like 'Welcome to California' and Lopez's 'you will comply' are effective as tags but border on didactic, telling audiences the theme instead of dramatizing it. This can feel amateurish if overused (Seq 1, Seq 8). medium
- Teaser/feature-hook padding Including an explicit 'coming soon — the feature film' and an undeveloped civil suit signal the script is more of a proof-of-concept than a self-contained short; that can undercut the completeness expected of festival shorts (Final Super, Seq 8). medium
- Thin exposition via machinery Relying on a montage and a single garage sequence to explain both technical expertise and moral decision-making compresses character work; more small scenes showing incremental choice would read as more professional (Title Montage, Seq 5). low
Gemini
Executive Summary
- The screenplay immediately establishes a strong sense of place and mood, vividly portraying the harsh reality of Los Angeles freeway life juxtaposed with the sterile interior of Robert's home. This sets a compelling tone and introduces the central conflict of disillusionment. high ( Scene 1 )
- The escalating threats against the Harrison family (car break-in attempt, child followed, purse snatching) are masterfully crafted, creating a rising tide of fear and desperation that logically drives Robert's actions. high ( Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 4 )
- The creation and activation of Robert's defensive device are presented with chilling precision, showcasing his engineering background and transforming his fear into controlled, albeit extreme, action. high ( Scene 5 )
- The courtroom scene is a powerful climax where Robert directly confronts the system, articulating the screenplay's central theme of the law failing to protect its citizens. His defiant declaration is emotionally resonant and satisfying. high ( Scene 8 )
- The screenplay effectively uses recurring motifs and visual contrasts, such as the "California: Safer Communities Through Smart Justice" slogan versus the reality of crime, and the juxtaposition of news reports with actual events, to reinforce its thematic concerns about societal hypocrisy. medium ( Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 7 Scene 8 )
- While Robert is an aerospace engineer, the specifics of how he builds such a sophisticated, non-lethal defensive system in his garage with seemingly readily available parts could be further fleshed out to enhance the believability of his technical prowess. medium ( Scene 5 )
- Lisa's arc feels somewhat reactive. While her fear is palpable, giving her a more active role in addressing the escalating problems before Robert's act of vigilante justice could strengthen her character development and the family dynamic. medium ( Scene 2 Scene 3 Scene 4 )
- The introduction of the civil suit filed by Robert against the State of California is an intriguing element, but it's only briefly mentioned. A slightly more explicit acknowledgment of its purpose or implication, even in dialogue, could enhance its impact. low ( Scene 8 )
- The portrayal of law enforcement's response to the initial 911 calls highlights their limitations, but the immediate, overwhelming response to the porch pirate incident could be subtly contrasted to further emphasize the perceived injustice Robert faces. low ( Scene 1 Scene 7 )
- Given the short format, there are no major plot threads left dangling that detract from the overall narrative. The ending is conclusive for Robert's immediate legal situation, though it hints at future conflict. low
- The title sequence's montage is highly effective in quickly establishing Robert's past life in Nebraska and contrasting it with the harsh realities of California, visually reinforcing the screenplay's central theme of broken promises. high ( Scene 1 )
- The inclusion of the SUPER 'COMING SOON – THE FEATURE FILM' is a strong indicator of the screenplay's potential, suggesting that the short is a proof-of-concept for a larger narrative, and the ending is designed to entice further exploration. high ( Scene 8 )
- The use of on-screen text and voice-overs (911 Dispatcher, News Anchor) efficiently delivers exposition and commentary, enhancing the thematic depth without bogging down the narrative. medium ( Scene 1 Scene 7 Scene 8 )
- The courtroom dialogue between Robert and ADA Lopez is sharp and impactful, encapsulating the ideological clash between individual rights and state authority. Lopez's final 'Robert will comply' is a chilling echo of the film's initial premise. high ( Scene 8 )
- Underestimation of the Audience's Desire for Nuance in Vigilante Narratives While the screenplay effectively builds sympathy for Robert, the audience might benefit from a slightly deeper exploration of the moral implications of his actions, even within the short format. The film leans heavily into the catharsis of his defiance, which is powerful, but a subtle hint of the personal cost beyond the legal ramifications could add another layer. medium
- Slightly Obvious Thematic Reinforcement The use of 'SUPER: ROBERT WILL COMPLY' both at the beginning and end, while effective for branding and thematic reinforcement, can sometimes feel a touch too on-the-nose for a screenplay. However, in the context of a short film intended as a proof-of-concept, it serves its purpose well. low
Grok
Executive Summary
- The theme of compliance versus vigilantism is consistently and powerfully portrayed, building a cohesive narrative that critiques societal systems. high ( Scene 1 (Title Sequence) Scene 8 (Courtroom) )
- Robert's character arc is well-developed, showing a clear transformation from passive compliance to defiant action, making him a compelling protagonist. high ( Scene 5 (Garage) Scene 8 (Courtroom) )
- The screenplay maintains tight pacing that effectively builds tension and suspense across scenes, keeping the audience engaged. medium ( Scene 4 (Grocery Store Parking Lot) Scene 6 (Harrison Porch) )
- Dialogue is natural, revealing character motivations and emotions while advancing the plot without feeling expository. medium ( Scene 3 (Dead-End Street) Scene 8 (Courtroom) )
- Effective use of montages and supers enhances visual storytelling, quickly establishing setting and themes. low ( Scene 1 (Title Sequence) )
- The screenplay could benefit from deeper backstories for supporting characters like Lisa and Abby to make their emotional journeys more impactful. medium
- The resolution feels abrupt, particularly with the unresolved civil filing, leaving some plot threads hanging. high ( Scene 8 (Courtroom) )
- Transitions between scenes can feel rushed, potentially undermining emotional beats and character reactions. medium ( Scene 6 (Harrison Porch) Scene 7 (Dead-End Street) )
- Greater nuance in portraying social issues, such as the justice system, could avoid overly simplistic depictions and add depth. low
- The inciting incident could be more sharply defined to hook the audience earlier. low ( Scene 1 (Dead-End Street) )
- The civil filing against the state is mentioned but not resolved, leaving a key plot thread dangling. high ( Scene 8 (Courtroom) )
- Lack of contrast with the family's life before moving to California diminishes the impact of their current struggles. medium
- Abby's character lacks development, missing an opportunity to explore the story from a child's perspective. medium
- Antagonists, such as the shadow figures and criminals, are underdeveloped, reducing the depth of conflicts. low ( Scene 1 (Dead-End Street) Scene 3 (Dead-End Street) )
- A more explicit exploration of the emotional toll on the family unit could strengthen the narrative's interpersonal dynamics. low
- Repetition of the phrase 'Robert Will Comply' as a motif effectively reinforces the central theme and irony. high ( Scene 1 (Title Sequence) Scene 8 (End) )
- The ironic portrayal of the justice system highlights societal critiques, adding layers to the narrative. high ( Scene 7 (Dead-End Street) Scene 8 (Courtroom) )
- Intense action sequences build suspense through sound and visual elements, making the short format engaging. medium ( Scene 6 (Harrison Porch) )
- Subtle humor in dialogue, like Robert's sarcastic joke, provides relief and humanizes characters. low ( Scene 4 (Grocery Store Parking Lot) )
- The tease for a feature film expansion creates intrigue and extends the story's potential. medium ( Scene 8 (End) )
- Oversimplification of social issues The writer appears to have a blind spot in portraying complex topics like crime and justice with nuance; for example, California is depicted as uniformly crime-ridden and inefficient without exploring counterarguments or diverse perspectives, which could limit the story's depth and alienate viewers seeking balanced commentary, as seen in the exaggerated 911 responses and courtroom scenes. medium
- Lack of character diversity There is a blind spot in representing a broader range of ethnicities and backgrounds; most characters are implied to be white or not specified, and the setting relies on stereotypes (e.g., smoggy Los Angeles), missing opportunities for inclusive storytelling that could enrich the narrative, evident in the uniform portrayal of antagonists and family dynamics. low
- Repetitive thematic phrasing The repeated use of 'Robert Will Comply' feels heavy-handed and didactic, a common amateur trait that can make the script less subtle; for instance, it's used in the title sequence, dispatcher interactions, and courtroom, potentially signaling inexperience in weaving themes more organically into the narrative. low
- Abrupt tone shifts Sudden changes in tone, such as from tense drama to action in Sequence 6, or from sarcasm to seriousness in dialogue, can feel unpolished and disrupt immersion, indicating a need for smoother transitions that are often refined in more professional scripts, as seen in the quick escalation from Robert's device activation to arrest. low
DeepSeek
Executive Summary
- Strong visual storytelling and efficient world-building that immediately establishes the dystopian California setting and Robert's character transformation high ( Scene 1 (Opening sequence) Scene 5 (Garage construction scene) )
- Powerful thematic climax where Robert's defiance crystallizes the screenplay's central conflict between individual rights and systemic failure high ( Scene 8 (Courtroom confrontation) )
- Effective escalation of stakes through multiple incidents that build justification for Robert's eventual actions high ( Scene 2 (Multiple scenes) Scene 4 (Multiple scenes) )
- Visually compelling and tense sequence that delivers on the promised conflict with cinematic impact medium ( Scene 6 (Porch trap activation) )
- Creative use of montage to efficiently convey backstory and thematic contrast between official narratives and reality medium ( Scene 1 (Title sequence montage) )
- Lisa's character could benefit from more nuanced development beyond the worried wife archetype medium ( Scene 2 (Kitchen scene) Scene 3 (Living room aftermath) )
- The immediate and overwhelming police response feels somewhat unrealistic given the established systemic indifference medium ( Scene 7 (Police response scene) )
- Robert's technical expertise in building the trap could use more setup or explanation of his background low ( Scene 5 (Garage construction) )
- Lack of nuanced perspectives on the systemic issues - all authority figures are portrayed as uniformly incompetent or malicious medium ( Scene General (Throughout) )
- Missing exploration of Robert's internal moral conflict before crossing into vigilantism medium ( Scene 2-4 (Multiple scenes) )
- No counter-argument from the legal perspective that acknowledges the complexity of the situation low ( Scene 8 (Courtroom scene) )
- Effective use of bureaucratic dialogue to illustrate systemic failure and build audience frustration high ( Scene 1 (911 call scene) Scene 4 (Second 911 call) )
- Creative design of non-lethal defense system that maintains audience sympathy for Robert medium ( Scene 6 (Porch trap sequence) )
- Powerful visual irony with the 'Safer Communities' slogan in the jail cell medium ( Scene 7 (Holding cell) )
- Strong dialogue that crystallizes the central theme of compliance versus moral duty high ( Scene 8 (Final courtroom exchange) )
- Political nuance The screenplay presents a somewhat one-sided critique of California's justice system without acknowledging legitimate complexities or alternative perspectives on public safety approaches medium
- Character perspective Limited exploration of how other residents in this environment cope with the same challenges, making Robert's escalation feel somewhat isolated low
- Dialogue clichés Occasional reliance on familiar lines like 'Welcome to California' and the smirking antagonist archetype low
- Plot convenience The immediate and massive police response to the porch trap incident contradicts the established pattern of slow/no response to more serious crimes medium
Claude
Executive Summary
- The screenplay opens with a strong establishing shot that sets the tone and context for the story, and the sequence depicting the porch pirate's encounter with the trap is well-executed, creating a tense and visually compelling sequence. high ( Scene 1 (EXT. LOS ANGELES FREEWAY – DUSK) Scene 6 (EXT. HARRISON PORCH – LATE NIGHT) )
- The scenes depicting the threats to Abby and Lisa's safety are well-written, creating a sense of tension and urgency that drives the protagonist's actions. high ( Scene 3 (EXT. DEAD-END STREET – SAME) Scene 4 (EXT. GROCERY STORE PARKING LOT – EVENING) )
- The courtroom sequence and the protagonist's confrontation with the legal system are well-crafted, highlighting the central conflict and the protagonist's defiant stance against the system. high ( Scene 7 (EXT. DEAD-END STREET – MINUTES LATER) Scene 8 (INT. COURTHOUSE HALLWAY – DAY) )
- The pacing in the kitchen scene feels a bit slow, and the dialogue could be tightened to maintain the overall momentum of the screenplay. medium ( Scene 2 (INT. HARRISON KITCHEN – MORNING) )
- While the sequence in the garage is well-written, the protagonist's motivations and thought process could be explored in more depth to provide a more nuanced understanding of his actions. medium ( Scene 5 (INT. GARAGE – NIGHT) )
- The courtroom sequence could benefit from additional character development, particularly for the opposing counsel, to create a more balanced and compelling conflict. medium ( Scene 8 (INT. COURTROOM – DAY) )
- The visual storytelling and the use of contrasting environments (the freeway and the porch) effectively set the stage for the central conflict and the protagonist's struggle. high ( Scene 1 (EXT. LOS ANGELES FREEWAY – DUSK) Scene 6 (EXT. HARRISON PORCH – LATE NIGHT) )
- The portrayal of the legal system and the protagonist's confrontation with it is a strong thematic element that adds depth and complexity to the story. high ( Scene 7 (EXT. DEAD-END STREET – MINUTES LATER) Scene 8 (INT. COURTROOM – DAY) )
- Lack of nuance in character motivations While the protagonist's actions are understandable given the context, the screenplay could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of his motivations and internal struggle. The sequence in the garage (Sequence 5) could be expanded to provide a deeper understanding of the character's thought process and the factors that led him to take such drastic measures. medium
- Pacing issues in certain scenes The pacing in the kitchen scene (Sequence 2) feels a bit slow, and the dialogue could be tightened to maintain the overall momentum of the screenplay. Ensuring consistent pacing throughout the story will help to keep the audience engaged and invested in the narrative. medium
Summary
High-level overview
Title: Robert Will Comply
Summary: In a tense and deteriorating Los Angeles neighborhood, 40-year-old aerospace engineer Robert Harrison struggles to protect his family from the escalating dangers surrounding them. After reporting suspicious activity outside his home, his frustration with inadequate police response grows. An incident involving his daughter, Abby, being followed by a menacing stranger heightens his anxiety. Robert's sense of helplessness deepens when his wife, Lisa, is violently mugged in a grocery store parking lot, leading him to take matters into his own hands.
Driven by fear and a desire to defend his family, Robert ingeniously constructs a series of defensive devices. However, his vigilantism backfires when he inadvertently injures a porch pirate caught in one of his traps, resulting in his arrest despite his protests of innocence. As Robert navigates the legal system, the courtroom becomes a battleground for a larger conflict between his belief in personal justice and the state's demand for compliance. In a dramatic plea of "not guilty," he challenges the law's capability to distinguish between a father protecting his child and a criminal, leaving both the jury and his family in a state of tension.
As Robert faces the reality of the charges against him, the courtroom echoes with irony and frustration. With bail set and his family's future hanging in the balance, Robert's defiance illuminates the struggle against a failing system that seems to prioritize compliance over justice. The screenplay concludes on a haunting note, revealing the emotional and moral complexities of a man pushed to the brink, and signaling the thematic exploration of justice, protection, and helplessness in modern America.
Superimposed text reads: "ROBERT WILL COMPLY – COMING SOON – THE FEATURE FILM."
Robert Will Comply
Synopsis
Robert Will Comply is a tense, contemporary thriller that delves into the frustrations of urban life, personal security, and the clash between individual rights and state authority in modern-day Los Angeles. The story follows Robert Harrison, a dedicated aerospace engineer in his 40s, who moves his family from the relative safety of Nebraska to California in pursuit of better job opportunities and a fresh start. However, they are soon overwhelmed by the harsh realities of city living, including rampant crime, homelessness, and a overburdened police force that seems more interested in paperwork than protection.
The narrative begins with the Harrison family settling into their new home on a quiet, dead-end street overshadowed by the bustling Los Angeles freeway. Robert, his wife Lisa, and their 8-year-old daughter Abby quickly encounter a series of unsettling events that erode their sense of safety. A shadowy figure lurks outside, testing car doors, and despite Robert's desperate calls to 911, the response is dismissive, with officers delayed by hours due to higher-priority calls. This incident sets the tone for the family's growing anxiety, as Lisa and Abby become increasingly fearful. Abby, an innocent and energetic child, faces her own scare when a suspicious man follows her home from school, asking ominous questions, while Lisa is violently robbed in a grocery store parking lot, leaving her injured and humiliated. These events highlight the disconnect between official narratives of declining crime rates and the harsh truth of daily life, fueling Robert's simmering frustration.
As the story progresses, Robert's character arc shifts from compliant newcomer to defiant protector. Drawing on his professional expertise in engineering, he meticulously designs and builds a non-lethal defensive device for their home, intended to deter intruders without causing permanent harm. This decision marks a pivotal turning point, symbolizing his rejection of a system that fails to safeguard his loved ones. When the device is triggered by a porch pirate, the confrontation escalates dramatically, drawing neighbors and eventually law enforcement. Robert is arrested and thrust into the legal system, where he faces charges of assault and vigilantism. The court scenes are charged with tension, as ambitious prosecutors emphasize California's progressive justice policies, portraying Robert as a dangerous vigilante who undermines public safety.
Throughout the film, the emotional stakes are heightened by the family's internal dynamics. Lisa, a supportive but anxious wife, grapples with the consequences of Robert's actions, torn between her love for him and her fear for their future. Abby, the innocent victim of these events, represents the vulnerability at the heart of the story, her wide-eyed terror underscoring the personal cost of societal failures. The narrative builds to a powerful climax in the courtroom, where Robert, despite advice from his public defender, pleads not guilty and delivers a impassioned speech challenging the authorities. He questions the law's ability to distinguish between criminals and protectors, declaring his unwillingness to blindly comply with a system that prioritizes procedure over justice. This moment of defiance leaves the audience with a sense of unresolved tension, hinting at potential future conflicts as Robert's resolve hardens.
Overall, Robert Will Comply is a compelling exploration of themes like bureaucratic inertia, the erosion of community trust, and the moral ambiguities of self-defense. It captures the essence of a man pushed to his limits, transforming a personal story into a broader commentary on contemporary American society. With its realistic portrayal of everyday horrors and the psychological toll of urban decay, the film maintains a gripping pace, blending suspenseful action with poignant family drama. Ending on a note of quiet rebellion, it leaves viewers pondering the fine line between law and justice, making it a thought-provoking piece that resonates long after the credits roll.
Scene by Scene Summaries
Scene by Scene Summaries
- As dusk falls over Los Angeles, Robert Harrison anxiously watches a shadowy figure trying car doors outside his home. After calling 911, he learns that help will take over three hours, leaving him frustrated and his family on edge. Lisa sarcastically comments on their new life in California, while a montage reveals their move and the stark contrast between optimistic news reports and the grim reality of urban decay. The scene ends with the title 'ROBERT WILL COMPLY,' marking the conclusion of Act I.
- In the Harrison family kitchen, Robert struggles with a frustrating firearm registration issue while Lisa manages the morning routine and expresses stress about their move to California. Their daughter Abby, denied permission to bike to a friend's house, faces disappointment. Later, while walking home, Abby encounters a suspicious man who follows her, heightening the scene's tension. Meanwhile, at work, Robert receives troubling news about the lengthy registration process, and a coworker's sarcastic comment about safety in California adds to his internal worries. The scene captures the family's anxiety and the looming threats in their new environment.
- In a tense encounter on a dead-end street, a man aggressively follows Abby, accusing her of ignoring him. Lisa arrives just in time, urging Abby to get into her car and threatening to call the police, which prompts Abby to flee. The man defensively claims he was only asking for directions before driving away with a smirk. Later, in the Harrison living room, Lisa reports the incident to the police, expressing frustration at their inability to intervene without evidence. Meanwhile, Abby seeks comfort while Robert silently observes, visibly distressed by the situation.
- In a grocery store parking lot, Lisa is violently mugged by a hooded teen who escapes in a waiting car, while bystanders passively film the incident. Later, in the Harrison kitchen, Lisa tends to her injury as Robert makes a frustrated 911 call, revealing ongoing issues with local authorities. Abby, a child, watches fearfully from the hallway, highlighting the family's distress. The scene concludes with Robert experiencing a significant emotional shift after the call, underscoring themes of victimization and helplessness.
- In a dimly lit garage at night, Robert meticulously constructs a defensive device, showcasing his intense focus and emotional turmoil. As he sketches blueprints and assembles various components, he describes the device as 'Non-lethal. Targeted. Defensive' through voice-over narration. The scene captures his chilling calmness and methodical precision, culminating in him arming the device, signaling a significant internal shift. The scene concludes with the notation 'ACT II,' indicating a transition in the narrative.
- Late at night, a porch pirate approaches the Harrison home, only to trigger a series of brutal security traps set by Robert. The pirate is hit with a water blast, electrocuted, and sprayed with cayenne pepper, leading to his desperate screams for help. Neighbors emerge to film the chaos, while Lisa confronts Robert about his actions. The scene ends with the sound of approaching sirens, hinting at the impending consequences.
- In a tense scene, LAPD units arrive at a dead-end street where a porch pirate, wrapped in a blanket and crying for the cameras, falsely accuses Robert of trying to kill him. Despite Robert's attempts to explain that he is the victim of theft, he is arrested by the police, while Lisa passionately defends him. As Abby seeks comfort from Lisa, the porch pirate smirks, enjoying the chaos. The scene shifts to a cold holding cell where Robert, now alone, sarcastically laughs at a sign about 'Smart Justice,' highlighting the irony of his wrongful arrest.
- In a tense courthouse scene, Robert Harrison, handcuffed and facing charges, pleads 'not guilty' to accusations of vigilantism after defending his child. The courtroom is filled with reporters and onlookers as the prosecution demands compliance with the law, while Robert challenges the notion of justice. The judge sets bail and adjourns the hearing, leaving unresolved tension as Robert shares a poignant moment with his daughter Abby before being led away.
📊 Script Snapshot
What's Working
Where to Focus
📊 Understanding Your Percentile Rankings
Your scores are compared against professional produced screenplays in our vault (The Matrix, Breaking Bad, etc.). The percentile shows where you rank compared to these films.
Example: A score of 8.5 in Originality might be 85th percentile (strong!), while the same 8.5 in Conflict might only be 50th percentile (needs work). The percentile tells you what your raw scores actually mean.
Hover over each axis on the radar chart to see what that category measures and why it matters.
Analysis: The screenplay 'Robert Will Comply' effectively portrays character development through strong arcs for the protagonist, Robert Harrison, and his wife, Lisa, which drive the narrative's themes of compliance, vigilantism, and family protection. Strengths include relatable characters and consistent growth, but areas for enhancement exist in antagonist development and character diversity to deepen emotional resonance and audience engagement.
Key Strengths
- Robert's character arc is compelling and well-executed, showcasing his transformation from a compliant engineer to a defiant protector, which effectively drives the narrative and emotional core of the story.
Areas to Improve
- Antagonist development is weak, with figures like the porch pirate and the legal system lacking depth and motivations, which diminishes the narrative tension and the protagonist's conflicts.
- Abby's character remains underdeveloped, with little agency or growth beyond being a passive victim, reducing opportunities for emotional depth and family dynamics.
Analysis: The screenplay 'Robert Will Comply' effectively establishes a compelling premise that critiques societal issues like crime, justice, and compliance through a relatable family narrative. It is clear and engaging, with strong character arcs and thematic depth, but could be enhanced by adding more nuance to avoid stereotypes and deepen emotional layers for greater audience resonance.
Key Strengths
- The premise's strong hook in the opening scene immediately establishes the central conflict of crime and inadequate response, drawing viewers in with relatable fears and setting up an intriguing narrative arc.
Analysis: The screenplay 'Robert Will Comply' features a well-structured three-act narrative that effectively builds tension and explores themes of compliance and vigilantism, with strong character arcs driving the plot. Strengths include clear pacing in escalating conflicts and thematic integration, while areas for improvement involve refining repetitive elements to enhance engagement and ensuring a more satisfying resolution for a short film format.
Key Strengths
- The use of a montage in scene 1 effectively establishes backstory, themes, and tone, providing efficient exposition that immerses the audience quickly and sets up the narrative arc without slowing the pace.
Areas to Improve
- Repetitive depictions of 911 calls and crime reports across multiple scenes disrupt pacing and reduce tension by making the initial conflicts feel formulaic rather than escalating organically.
Analysis: The screenplay 'Robert Will Comply' effectively conveys its themes of compliance, vigilantism, and the failures of a bureaucratic justice system through a tightly woven narrative that highlights personal frustration and family dynamics. Strengths include clear thematic integration and emotional resonance, but it could benefit from deeper nuance to avoid occasional didacticism, enhancing its overall impact and audience engagement.
Key Strengths
- The screenplay's strong emotional core, particularly in Robert's arc, effectively conveys the theme of personal versus systemic failure, deepening audience empathy and highlighting the human cost of compliance.
- The use of irony, such as the 'SAFER COMMUNITIES' sign in the holding cell, powerfully underscores the message of bureaucratic hypocrisy, adding intellectual depth and resonance.
Analysis: The screenplay 'Robert Will Comply' excels in using vivid, atmospheric visual imagery to convey themes of frustration and non-compliance in a crime-ridden urban setting, with innovative elements like the defensive device trap and montage sequences standing out for their creativity and emotional resonance.
Key Strengths
- The opening scene effectively uses vivid contrasts between the chaotic freeway and the eerie stillness of the dead-end street to immediately immerse the audience in the story's themes of urban decay and isolation, setting a strong visual tone.
- The defensive trap sequence is highly creative and impactful, with a dynamic chain of events that visually amplifies the emotional tension and Robert's character arc, making it a standout moment for visual storytelling.
Analysis: The screenplay 'Robert Will Comply' effectively builds emotional tension and frustration through relatable characters and escalating conflicts, creating a strong sense of investment in the family's struggles. However, opportunities exist to enhance emotional depth by adding nuance to character arcs and introducing greater emotional variety, which could make the audience's journey more resonant and memorable.
Key Strengths
- The screenplay excels in building escalating emotional tension through a series of vivid, relatable incidents that heighten the audience's investment in the characters' safety and frustration with the system. This is exemplified in Robert's defiant courtroom speech, which crystallizes the emotional journey and evokes a powerful sense of catharsis and solidarity.
Areas to Improve
- The emotional depth of secondary characters, particularly Abby, is underdeveloped, with her fear depicted but not explored in depth, which could leave audiences feeling disconnected from her perspective and reduce overall empathy. Adding more internal or relational moments could address this.
Analysis: The screenplay effectively builds conflict and stakes around systemic failures and personal protection, creating strong narrative tension that propels the story and engages the audience. However, opportunities exist to deepen emotional stakes and refine conflict escalation for greater impact, ensuring a more immersive and satisfying experience.
Key Strengths
- The screenplay excels in establishing clear, escalating conflicts that mirror real-world frustrations, drawing viewers in with relatable scenarios and building tension through systemic failures.
- Key scenes like the courtroom confrontation effectively heighten stakes by personalizing the conflict, with Robert's defiant speech creating a powerful emotional climax that underscores his arc and maintains audience engagement.
Areas to Improve
- While conflicts are clear, they sometimes rely heavily on external events without sufficient internal character exploration, which could dilute emotional depth and reduce the audience's investment in the characters' psychological struggles.
Analysis: The screenplay 'Robert Will Comply' demonstrates strong originality and creativity by innovatively blending a personal vigilante story with social commentary on crime and bureaucracy, highlighted by the protagonist's engineering-driven defensive device and ironic narrative twists that challenge compliance norms.
Expand to see detailed analysis
View Complete AnalysisTop Takeaway from This Section
Screenplay Story Analysis
Note: This is the overall critique. For scene by scene critique click here
Top Takeaways from This Section
-
Character Robert Harrison
Description Robert's sudden decision to build a defensive device appears driven by plot requirements rather than organic character development, as his shift from compliant to vigilant is not sufficiently built up with internal conflict or gradual escalation.
( Scene 5 (INT. GARAGE – NIGHT) ) -
Character The Man
Description The Man's behavior shifts abruptly from suspiciously following Abby to casually claiming he was just asking for directions, which feels unjustified and more like a plot device to heighten tension without consistent characterization.
( Scene 3 (EXT. DEAD-END STREET – SAME) )
-
Description The police response times are inconsistent; slow and inadequate for reported crimes in scenes 1 and 4, but immediate and aggressive in scene 6, which disrupts the story's coherence and undermines the theme of systemic failure.
( Scene 1 (EXT. DEAD-END STREET – CONTINUOUS) Scene 4 (INT. HARRISON KITCHEN – NIGHT) Scene 6 (EXT. HARRISON PORCH – LATE NIGHT) ) -
Description The introduction of a civil filing by Robert against the state in scene 8 lacks any prior mention or setup, creating a logical gap that affects the story's flow and makes the event feel unearned.
( Scene 8 (INT. COURTROOM – DAY) )
-
Description Robert, as an aerospace engineer, quickly designs and builds a complex defensive device in one night without showing access to materials or time, which strains believability and could be a minor plot hole.
( Scene 5 (INT. GARAGE – NIGHT) ) -
Description The police arrest Robert without investigating the porch pirate's potential criminal history or the Harrison family's prior complaints, creating a significant gap in logical procedure that affects the narrative's credibility.
( Scene 7 (EXT. DEAD-END STREET – MINUTES LATER) )
-
Description Robert's sarcastic joke to the 911 dispatcher about a 'frequent caller plan' feels unnatural and contrived, as it prioritizes humor over authentic emotional response in a high-stress situation.
( Scene 4 (INT. HARRISON KITCHEN – NIGHT) ) -
Description The prosecutor's line 'Robert will comply' directly mirrors the film's title, making the dialogue feel scripted and less authentic, as it serves the theme more than the character's natural voice.
( Scene 8 (INT. COURTROOM – DAY) )
-
Element Action
( Scene 1 (INT. HARRISON LIVING ROOM – SAME) Scene 4 (INT. HARRISON KITCHEN – NIGHT) )
Suggestion The repeated action of calling 911 and receiving inadequate responses should be consolidated into a single scene or referenced briefly to avoid redundancy and improve narrative pacing. -
Element Theme
Suggestion The frequent repetition of the theme of crime and police inefficiency across multiple scenes could be streamlined by reducing the number of similar incidents or integrating them into fewer, more impactful sequences.
Characters in the screenplay, and their arcs:
| Character | Arc | Critique | Suggestions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Harrison | Robert's character arc begins with him as a meticulous and protective father, facing the challenges of a new environment with frustration and determination. As he becomes aware of the threats to his family's safety, he takes matters into his own hands by creating a non-lethal defensive device. This decision marks the beginning of his moral conflict as he grapples with the implications of his actions. Throughout the short, Robert's journey leads him to confront the legal and ethical boundaries of his protective instincts. By the end, he evolves from a man driven solely by fear and frustration to one who embraces a more nuanced understanding of protection, ultimately finding a balance between safeguarding his family and respecting the law. | While Robert's character arc is compelling, it may benefit from a clearer emotional progression. The internal conflict between his protective instincts and the legal system is a strong foundation, but the screenplay could delve deeper into his emotional turmoil. The stakes could be heightened by introducing a specific incident that forces Robert to confront his beliefs more dramatically. Additionally, the resolution of his arc could be more impactful if it included a moment of vulnerability or a significant choice that highlights his growth. | To improve Robert's character arc in the short screenplay, consider incorporating a pivotal moment where he must choose between an immediate, aggressive action to protect his family and a more measured, lawful approach that could lead to a longer-term solution. This choice could serve as a climax that encapsulates his internal struggle. Additionally, adding a secondary character, such as a friend or family member, who challenges his views on protection and legality could provide a contrasting perspective that enriches his journey. Finally, ensure that the resolution of his arc is not just about the outcome of his actions but also about his emotional growth, perhaps through a reflective moment that showcases his newfound understanding of what it means to truly protect his family. |
| Lisa | Lisa's character arc follows her journey from a fearful and anxious mother to a more empowered and assertive protector of her family. At the beginning of the short, she is overwhelmed by the dangers of their new environment, struggling to cope with her fears. As the story unfolds, she confronts these fears head-on, using her humor and determination to navigate the challenges they face. By the climax, Lisa transforms into a fierce advocate for her family's safety, demonstrating her resilience and ability to adapt. Ultimately, she emerges as a stronger figure, having learned to balance her protective instincts with the need to confront and overcome the threats they encounter. | While Lisa's character arc is compelling, it may feel rushed given the short format. The transition from fear to empowerment could benefit from more gradual development, allowing the audience to fully appreciate her transformation. Additionally, some moments of vulnerability could be expanded to deepen her emotional journey, making her eventual strength feel more earned and relatable. The use of humor as a coping mechanism is effective, but it could be woven more consistently throughout the narrative to create a stronger connection to her character's resilience. | To improve Lisa's character arc within the constraints of a short screenplay, consider focusing on a single pivotal moment that catalyzes her transformation. This could be a specific incident that forces her to confront her fears directly, allowing for a more impactful change. Additionally, incorporating brief flashbacks or memories that highlight her past strengths or vulnerabilities could provide context for her character development. Lastly, ensure that her humor is not just a coping mechanism but also a tool for connection with her family, reinforcing her role as a unifying force in the face of adversity. |
| Lisa Harrison | Lisa's character arc begins with her as a concerned and anxious mother, overwhelmed by the dangers surrounding her and the inadequacies of the authorities. As the story progresses, she transforms into a more assertive and proactive figure, taking decisive actions to protect her daughter and confront the threats they face. By the end of the short, Lisa emerges as a symbol of resilience and strength, having not only safeguarded her family but also found her voice in advocating for their safety. This journey reflects her growth from fear to empowerment, ultimately reinforcing her role as a protector and a leader within her family. | While Lisa's character is well-defined and her motivations are clear, the arc could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of her internal conflicts. The screenplay, being a short, may limit the depth of her transformation, but it is crucial to show moments of vulnerability that allow the audience to connect with her on a deeper level. Additionally, her relationship with Robert could be further developed to highlight how their dynamics evolve through the challenges they face together. | To improve Lisa's character arc within the constraints of a short screenplay, consider incorporating a pivotal moment that forces her to confront her fears directly, perhaps through a choice that puts her at risk for the sake of Abby. This could serve as a catalyst for her transformation. Additionally, including a brief flashback or a moment of reflection could provide insight into her past experiences that shape her protective instincts. Lastly, enhancing her interactions with Robert to show how they support each other could add emotional depth and illustrate the impact of their shared struggles. |
Top Takeaway from This Section
Theme Analysis Overview
Identified Themes
| Theme | Theme Details | Theme Explanation | Primary Theme Support | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Erosion of Safety and Trust in Systems
90%
|
This theme is evident from the initial 911 call with a delayed response, the unhelpful dispatcher, the firearm registration issues, Abby's stalking, Lisa's mugging, and Robert's eventual wrongful arrest. The authorities consistently fail to provide security and justice, leading the family to believe the system is inadequate.
|
The screenplay powerfully illustrates how the breakdown of effective law enforcement and a slow, bureaucratic legal system leaves individuals feeling unsafe and unprotected. This loss of faith in established institutions is a central driving force for the characters' actions and emotional arcs. |
This is the core theme that directly supports the primary theme by demonstrating the systemic failures that necessitate vigilantism.
|
||||||||||||
Strengthening Erosion of Safety and Trust in Systems
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Vigilantism as a Response to Inaction
85%
|
Robert's transition from frustrated citizen to builder of defensive devices, culminating in the porch pirate trap and his defiant stance in court, directly showcases this theme. His voice-over 'Non-lethal. Targeted. Defensive.' and his final challenge to the law ('perhaps the law itself needs to comply') highlight his embrace of this path.
|
When conventional means of ensuring safety and justice fail, individuals may resort to taking matters into their own hands. This theme explores the moral and practical implications of resorting to self-appointed justice when the system proves ineffective. |
This theme is the direct consequence and manifestation of the 'Erosion of Safety and Trust in Systems,' making it a vital supporting element.
|
||||||||||||
|
Disillusionment with California/Urban Decay
75%
|
The opening montage showing the move from Nebraska to California, contrasted with crime footage and news reports, sets this tone. Lisa's repeated sarcastic remarks ('Welcome to California,' 'the weather is mostly smoky'), and the overall gritty, smoggy urban setting contribute to this theme.
|
The screenplay uses California, specifically Los Angeles, as a microcosm for a perceived decline in societal order and quality of life. The contrast between the idealized promise of a new life and the harsh realities of urban crime and inefficiency breeds disillusionment. |
This theme provides the setting and immediate catalyst for the family's problems, directly contributing to their feeling of insecurity and the need for Robert's drastic actions.
|
||||||||||||
|
Family Vulnerability and Protection
70%
|
Abby's fear during the stalking incident and her distress after Robert's arrest, coupled with Lisa's anxiety and Robert's protective actions (building the trap, defending himself in court), underscore this theme. Robert's final defiance is framed as a father protecting his child.
|
The screenplay highlights the innate human drive to protect loved ones, especially children, when they are perceived to be in danger. This theme explores the lengths to which parents will go to ensure their family's safety, even if it means breaking the law. |
The fear and vulnerability of the family are the emotional core that motivates Robert's descent into vigilantism, thereby strengthening the primary theme.
|
||||||||||||
|
The Irony of Justice and Compliance
60%
|
The 'Safer Communities Through Smart Justice' sign in the holding cell, the news reports of low crime rates juxtaposed with the Harrison's experiences, and DA Lopez's demand for 'compliance' while Robert argues for a different kind of justice all embody this theme. Robert's sarcastic laugh and defiant question about the law complying are key moments.
|
This theme explores the disconnect between the proclaimed ideals of justice and the often-ineffective or hypocritical reality. It questions what 'justice' truly means and who gets to define it, especially when the system itself seems to be failing. |
This theme critically examines the 'system' that the primary theme argues has failed, highlighting the irony and ultimately the inadequacy of current legal frameworks in addressing the issues presented.
|
||||||||||||
Screenwriting Resources on Themes
Articles
| Site | Description |
|---|---|
| Studio Binder | Movie Themes: Examples of Common Themes for Screenwriters |
| Coverfly | Improving your Screenplay's theme |
| John August | Writing from Theme |
YouTube Videos
| Title | Description |
|---|---|
| Story, Plot, Genre, Theme - Screenwriting Basics | Screenwriting basics - beginner video |
| What is theme | Discussion on ways to layer theme into a screenplay. |
| Thematic Mistakes You're Making in Your Script | Common Theme mistakes and Philosophical Conflicts |
Top Takeaway from This Section
Emotional Analysis
Emotional Variety
Critique
- The screenplay maintains strong emotional consistency but lacks sufficient variety, with frustration, anxiety, and disillusionment dominating 80% of scenes. Scene 1 establishes these core emotions effectively, but subsequent scenes (2-4) recycle similar emotional patterns without introducing contrasting emotions to provide relief or complexity.
- Positive emotions are nearly absent throughout the screenplay, with joy intensity consistently at 0-2 across all scenes. The only brief positive moment occurs in Scene 8 with satisfaction/vindication (intensity 4-5) during Robert's courtroom speech, but this comes too late to balance the overwhelming negativity.
- The emotional palette becomes increasingly monochromatic as the story progresses, with scenes 3-7 all featuring high frustration (8-10), anxiety (7-9), and disillusionment (7-9) without meaningful emotional variation to maintain audience engagement.
Suggestions
- Introduce brief moments of family bonding or small victories in Scenes 2-4 to provide emotional contrast. For example, show Abby successfully navigating her walk home safely one day, or Robert and Lisa sharing a moment of connection despite their circumstances.
- In Scene 5, incorporate flashbacks or visual cues showing Robert's engineering passion and pride in his work at Northrop Grumman to contrast with his current desperate actions, adding complexity to his emotional journey.
- Add a scene between 4 and 5 showing the family attempting normal activities (dinner, movie night) that are interrupted by their anxiety, demonstrating their struggle to maintain normalcy amidst fear.
Emotional Intensity Distribution
Critique
- Emotional intensity builds too linearly without sufficient valleys, creating emotional fatigue by Scene 4. The frustration intensity remains at 8-10 from Scene 2 through Scene 8, without meaningful relief for the audience.
- Scene 5 represents a missed opportunity for an emotional valley - while suspense is high (9), the scene maintains intense apprehension (9) and anxiety (7) rather than providing a contemplative moment that could deepen character connection.
- The climax in Scene 8 reaches appropriate intensity levels, but the journey there lacks the necessary emotional rhythm, with Scenes 3-7 all operating at similar high-intensity levels (7-9 across multiple emotions) without strategic pacing.
Suggestions
- Reduce frustration intensity in Scene 2 from 9 to 6-7 by showing Robert making progress with the registration system initially, then encountering the delay, creating a more nuanced emotional arc.
- Transform Scene 5 into a more contemplative moment by showing Robert's internal conflict more explicitly - include visual cues of hesitation, memories of his daughter's fear, and moments where he questions his path before committing.
- Create a clearer emotional valley between Scenes 6 and 7 by adding a brief domestic scene showing the family's attempt to process what happened before the police arrive, allowing for varied emotional tones.
Empathy For Characters
Critique
- Empathy for Robert peaks effectively in Scene 8 (intensity 10) but builds unevenly throughout. Scene 5 shows understanding at 8 but sympathy drops to 6, indicating the audience understands his motivation but doesn't fully emotionally connect with his vigilante turn.
- Lisa's character suffers from limited emotional dimensionality - her primary emotions are stress and frustration, with few moments showing her internal experience beyond reacting to external threats. Scene 4 shows her as victim but doesn't explore her emotional processing.
- Abby functions primarily as an emotional trigger rather than a fully realized character. Her fear serves to motivate Robert's actions, but we see little of her internal world or how these traumatic events affect her beyond immediate reactions.
Suggestions
- In Scene 3, add a moment where Lisa shares a childhood memory with Abby about feeling safe in Nebraska, contrasting their current reality and deepening audience understanding of her protective instincts.
- Show Robert's internal conflict more explicitly in Scene 5 through voice-over or visual storytelling that connects his engineering skills to his desire to protect rather than harm, maintaining empathy during his morally ambiguous actions.
- Develop Abby's character by showing her attempting to adapt - perhaps drawing pictures of their old home or expressing confusion about why California is different, making her more than just a frightened child.
Emotional Impact Of Key Scenes
Critique
- Scene 6's trap activation delivers strong surprise (8) and shock (8) but the emotional impact is diluted by the immediate shift to consequences rather than allowing the audience to process the moral complexity of Robert's actions.
- Scene 8's courtroom confrontation achieves strong emotional impact but could be more powerful with better setup - Robert's transformation from passive frustration to active defiance needs more gradual development in preceding scenes.
- Scene 4's mugging generates appropriate fear and frustration, but the emotional impact is somewhat predictable given the established pattern of victimization, reducing the surprise element that could make it more memorable.
Suggestions
- In Scene 6, extend the moment between the trap activation and Lisa's confrontation, allowing the audience to sit with the moral implications and Robert's reaction to seeing his device work as intended.
- Build toward Scene 8's defiance more gradually by showing small acts of resistance in Scenes 2-4 - perhaps Robert researching laws, having quiet conversations with Lisa about their options, or showing subtle changes in his demeanor.
- Enhance Scene 4's emotional impact by showing Lisa's internal experience during the mugging - her thoughts about Abby, her realization of vulnerability, and the emotional aftermath beyond the physical injury.
Complex Emotional Layers
Critique
- Many scenes rely on primary emotions without sufficient sub-emotional complexity. Scene 2 shows high frustration (9) but lacks the nuanced sub-emotions like resentment, determination, or conflicted loyalty that would enrich Robert's experience.
- Scene 7's holding cell moment uses irony effectively but misses opportunities for more complex emotional layers - Robert's experience could include elements of pride in protecting his family, fear of consequences, and determination to fight back.
- The family dynamics in Scenes 2-4 show stress and fear but lack the complex interplay of emotions that real families experience - where love, protection, frustration, and hope coexist during crisis.
Suggestions
- In Scene 2, show Robert's frustration with the registration system layered with professional pride in his technical understanding of the requirements, and concern about what the delays mean for his family's safety.
- During Scene 7's arrest, incorporate visual cues showing Robert's internal conflict - glances toward his house where his family watches, subtle signs of satisfaction that his trap worked mixed with fear of consequences.
- Develop Lisa's emotional complexity in Scene 3 by showing her anger at the system layered with gratitude for reaching Abby in time, and determination to find solutions despite her frustration.
Additional Critique
Emotional Arc and Character Transformation
Critiques
- Robert's emotional journey from frustration to defiance follows a logical path but lacks the nuanced emotional beats that would make his transformation more compelling and believable.
- The family's collective emotional arc shows consistent deterioration without meaningful moments of resilience or adaptation that would make their struggle more emotionally engaging and realistic.
- The emotional payoff in Scene 8, while powerful, would be more satisfying with clearer emotional milestones throughout the screenplay marking Robert's gradual shift from compliance to defiance.
Suggestions
- Create specific emotional turning points: Scene 3 could show Robert's first thoughts about taking action, Scene 4 could include a quiet moment where he researches self-defense laws, building toward his decision in Scene 5.
- Show the family developing coping mechanisms or small victories amidst their struggles - perhaps Abby learning safety skills, or Lisa finding community support, adding emotional texture to their experience.
- Use visual motifs to track Robert's emotional transformation - perhaps his posture, eye contact, or interaction with technology changes gradually across scenes, reinforcing his emotional journey.
Supporting Characters' Emotional Function
Critiques
- Secondary characters primarily serve as emotional triggers or obstacles rather than having their own emotional complexity, reducing the richness of the emotional landscape.
- The 911 dispatchers and police officers are portrayed as uniformly unhelpful, missing opportunities for emotional complexity through encounters with sympathetic individuals within the system.
- The porch pirate in Scene 6 is purely antagonistic without any emotional complexity that could create moral ambiguity and deepen the audience's engagement with the ethical questions raised.
Suggestions
- In Scene 1 or 4, include a 911 dispatcher who expresses sympathy but explains systemic limitations, creating more nuanced frustration rather than simple anger at individuals.
- Give the porch pirate in Scene 6 a moment of vulnerability or humanity before the trap activates - perhaps he looks at a photo or hesitates, creating moral complexity about Robert's actions.
- Include a neighbor character who represents different responses to the same environment - perhaps someone who has adapted successfully or chosen different coping strategies, providing emotional contrast.
Environmental and Thematic Emotional Resonance
Critiques
- The California setting primarily generates negative emotions (disillusionment, frustration) without exploring the complexity of why people stay or find meaning there, limiting emotional depth.
- The contrast between technological advancement (Robert's engineering skills) and social deterioration creates intellectual tension but lacks emotional exploration of this dichotomy.
- The theme of compliance vs. protection is explored intellectually but could generate more emotional complexity by showing characters wrestling with the moral dimensions more explicitly.
Suggestions
- In Scene 2, show Robert appreciating some aspect of California (natural beauty, diversity, professional opportunity) before the frustrations mount, creating more nuanced disillusionment.
- Use Robert's engineering background more emotionally - show how his desire to build and create conflicts with his need to destroy or harm through his defensive device.
- Include conversations between Robert and Lisa where they explicitly discuss the moral dimensions of his actions, allowing the audience to engage emotionally with the ethical questions.
Top Takeaway from This Section
| Goals and Philosophical Conflict | |
|---|---|
| internal Goals | Throughout the script, Robert's internal goals evolve from an initial desire for safety and security for his family to a more complex need for justice and protection of his loved ones amidst a threatening environment. Initially, he seeks to navigate life in California and provide stability, but after becoming increasingly frustrated with bureaucratic systems and facing personal trauma, he shifts towards taking assertive action to protect his family, culminating in a moral conflict regarding his responsibilities as a father and the implications of vigilantism. |
| External Goals | Robert's external goals progress from responding to immediate threats, such as calling the police and attempting to secure his property, to taking drastic measures to protect his family, including the creation of a defensive device. These actions lead to significant legal consequences as he grapples with the justice system after being arrested. |
| Philosophical Conflict | The overarching philosophical conflict centers on the tension between individual morality and societal law: the belief in personal responsibility and self-defense against the backdrop of a justice system that often fails to protect vulnerable citizens. This conflict is embodied in Robert's journey as he grapples with the moral implications of vigilantism versus compliance with the law. |
Character Development Contribution: Robert's journey through fear, frustration, and defiance leads to significant character growth, illustrating his transformation from a compliant citizen to an assertive father willing to confront the legal system, reflecting personal resilience and a quest for justice.
Narrative Structure Contribution: The evolving goals and conflicts serve as the backbone of the narrative structure, leading to escalating tension that drives the plot forward, creating a consequential arc that culminates in a dramatic courtroom scene that questions the nature of justice and morality.
Thematic Depth Contribution: The interplay of goals and conflicts enhances the screenplay's thematic depth, exploring critical issues of safety, justice, and the limits of individual action within societal frameworks, ultimately prompting audiences to reflect on the complexities of morality in contemporary society.
Screenwriting Resources on Goals and Philosophical Conflict
Articles
| Site | Description |
|---|---|
| Creative Screenwriting | How Important Is A Character’s Goal? |
| Studio Binder | What is Conflict in a Story? A Quick Reminder of the Purpose of Conflict |
YouTube Videos
| Title | Description |
|---|---|
| How I Build a Story's Philosophical Conflict | How do you build philosophical conflict into your story? Where do you start? And how do you develop it into your characters and their external actions. Today I’m going to break this all down and make it fully clear in this episode. |
| Endings: The Good, the Bad, and the Insanely Great | By Michael Arndt: I put this lecture together in 2006, when I started work at Pixar on Toy Story 3. It looks at how to write an "insanely great" ending, using Star Wars, The Graduate, and Little Miss Sunshine as examples. 90 minutes |
| Tips for Writing Effective Character Goals | By Jessica Brody (Save the Cat!): Writing character goals is one of the most important jobs of any novelist. But are your character's goals...mushy? |
| Compelled to Read | Story Content | Character Development | Scene Elements | Audience Engagement | Technical Aspects | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Click for Full Analysis | Page | Tone | Overall | Scene Impact | Concept | Plot | Originality | Characters | Character Changes | Internal Goal | External Goal | Conflict | Opposition | High stakes | Story forward | Twist | Emotional Impact | Dialogue | Engagement | Pacing | Formatting | Structure | |
| 1 - Urban Shadows Improve | 1 | Tense, Anxious, Foreboding | 8.2 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | |
| 2 - Tensions and Fears in a New Home Improve | 3 | Anxious, Stressed, Worried, Sarcastic | 8.2 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7.5 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8.5 | 8 | 8 | |
| 3 - Confrontation and Frustration Improve | 6 | Tense, Anxious, Frustrated, Fearful | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7.5 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8.5 | 8 | 8 | |
| 4 - A Night of Fear and Frustration Improve | 8 | Tense, Frustrated, Anxious | 8.5 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 6 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | |
| 5 - The Calm Before the Storm Improve | 9 | Tense, Anxious, Frustrated, Defensive | 8.5 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | |
| 6 - The Trap Unleashed Improve | 10 | Intense, Suspenseful, Emotional | 9.2 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | |
| 7 - Injustice on a Dead-End Street Improve | 12 | Tense, Frustrated, Anxious, Defensive | 8.7 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7.5 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8.5 | 8 | 8 | |
| 8 - Defiance in the Courtroom Improve | 13 | Tense, Defiant, Emotional, Confrontational | 9.2 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | |
Summary of Scene Level Analysis
Here are insights from the scene-level analysis, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and actionable suggestions.
Some points may appear in both strengths and weaknesses due to scene variety.
Tip: Click on criteria in the top row for detailed summaries.
Scene Strengths
- Effective tension-building
- Intense emotional impact
- Compelling character development
- Realistic character reactions
- Innovative narrative direction
Scene Weaknesses
- Limited character development in specific scenes
- Limited resolution to immediate conflicts
- Reliance on external threats for conflict
- Potential for predictability in outcomes
- Excessive focus on technology over character depth
Suggestions
- Deepen character backstories to enhance emotional stakes and development throughout the screenplay.
- Provide more immediate resolution or closure to conflicts to create a satisfying narrative arc.
- Add complexity to conflict by integrating internal struggles alongside external threats.
- Consider introducing unexpected twists to prevent predictability in character actions and plot outcomes.
- Balance the technological elements with character-driven moments to ensure character depth and development are not overshadowed.
Scene 1 - Urban Shadows
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
This scene masterfully sets up immediate tension and a sense of unease. The stark contrast between the supposed safety of California and the reality of crime is established through the visual of the shadow figure and the absurdly long police response time. The figure's defiant gesture at Robert leaves the audience wondering about his intentions and the potential for future escalation. The montage effectively amplifies this frustration, highlighting the discrepancy between official narratives and the lived experience of the characters.
The opening scene immediately hooks the reader by presenting a relatable family thrust into a terrifying and frustrating situation. The overwhelming sense of helplessness in the face of rising crime and unresponsive authorities establishes a powerful conflict. The indication of 'ACT I' and the title 'ROBERT WILL COMPLY' at the end of the montage hint at a character arc and a thematic exploration that promises further development and potential rebellion against the system.
Scene 2 - Tensions and Fears in a New Home
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
This scene effectively ratchets up the tension by introducing direct threats to the family's safety and highlighting the systemic failures that leave them vulnerable. Abby's near-encounter with the man on the street and Robert's continued bureaucratic runaround with the firearm registration create immediate stakes. The scene ends with a lingering sense of dread and unresolved issues, particularly the helplessness felt by both Robert and Lisa, compelling the reader to want to see how they will cope and if the situation will escalate.
The screenplay maintains a high level of compulsion. The initial setup in Scene 1, emphasizing the stark contrast between perceived safety and the reality of crime, coupled with Robert's 'will comply' mantra, sets a strong foundation. Scene 2 builds on this by showcasing specific instances of vulnerability: the bureaucratic dismissal of firearm registration, Abby's near-miss with a stranger, and Robert's workplace mirroring the general unease. These events directly challenge the 'safer communities' narrative and amplify Robert's growing frustration, creating a clear trajectory towards potential drastic action.
Scene 3 - Confrontation and Frustration
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
This scene significantly ratchets up the tension and personal stakes for the Harrison family. The direct confrontation with Abby and her subsequent fear, coupled with Lisa's inability to get meaningful assistance from the police, creates a powerful sense of helplessness and rising anger. The visual of Abby clinging to a pillow and Robert's silent, haunted expression leaves the reader with a strong emotional residue and a burning question: what will Robert do next to protect his family when the system fails them? The scene ends on a note of unresolved fear and injustice, compelling the reader to see how this situation will escalate.
Scene 3 brilliantly builds upon the established themes of escalating crime and inadequate official response from the previous scenes. Robert's mounting frustration and the family's vulnerability are now directly impacting their child, making the threat much more visceral. The montage in Act I hinted at this disconnect between official narratives and reality, and this scene powerfully demonstrates it through Lisa's failed attempt to report the incident. The implication that Robert is becoming more desperate and that his 'compliance' is being severely tested is a strong hook for the subsequent scenes, especially given the 'ROBERT WILL COMPLY' title from Act I.
Scene 4 - A Night of Fear and Frustration
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
This scene delivers a significant escalation of the ongoing conflict regarding safety and law enforcement's perceived ineffectiveness. The violent purse-snatching and the bystander apathy immediately create a sense of urgency and outrage. Robert's bitter joke to the 911 dispatcher and the dispatcher's dismissive voice-over further amplify the family's frustration and isolation. The most compelling element, however, is the final beat: 'Something flips inside him.' This powerfully suggests a turning point for Robert, implying a shift from passive worry to active, possibly drastic, measures, which directly compels the reader to want to see what he does next.
The screenplay has expertly built a case for the Harrison family's growing desperation and disillusionment with California. The initial scene established the unreliability of emergency services, followed by escalating personal threats to Abby and now Lisa. Robert's repeated attempts to navigate official channels (firearm registration, 911 calls) have been met with bureaucratic delays and dismissiveness. This scene, with its direct attack on Lisa and the final 'something flips inside him' moment, brings the simmering tension to a boiling point. It strongly suggests that Robert is about to take the 'Robert will comply' mantra and twist it into something more proactive, making the reader eager to see how this will unfold in the next act.
Scene 5 - The Calm Before the Storm
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
This scene is a masterclass in escalating tension and compelling the reader to see what happens next. It directly follows Robert's internal shift after the repeated failures of the authorities to protect his family. The visual of him meticulously building a 'defensive device' is immediately captivating, especially with the detailed breakdown of its non-lethal, yet potent, components. The shift from frustration and helplessness to focused, chilling determination creates a powerful character moment. The voice-over narration defining its purpose and Robert's 'calm and chilling focus' while arming it leaves the reader on the edge of their seat, desperate to witness the device in action and its consequences.
The script has maintained an extremely high level of engagement by consistently raising the stakes and deepening Robert's emotional arc. Scene 1 established the family's disillusionment with California's perceived safety. Scene 2 and 3 showcased escalating threats to Abby and the family's helplessness. Scene 4 culminated in a direct victimization of Lisa and Robert's breaking point. This scene, Scene 5, is the direct payoff for all that built-up frustration and fear. Robert's decision to take matters into his own hands, driven by the failures of the system and personal trauma, is a massive turning point. The 'ROBERT WILL COMPLY' tagline from Act I is now being directly challenged, creating immense curiosity about how this will unfold and what 'compliance' truly means in this context. The transition to Act II here perfectly signals a shift into more active, potentially dangerous territory.
Scene 6 - The Trap Unleashed
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
This scene is incredibly compelling and immediately makes the reader want to know what happens next. The payoff from Robert's construction in the previous scene is delivered with immediate, visceral action. The porch pirate's incapacitation is dramatic and visually striking, raising the stakes significantly. The addition of neighbors filming turns a private act of defense into a public spectacle. Crucially, Lisa's horrified reaction and the approaching sirens introduce immediate conflict and an uncertain future for Robert, leaving the reader desperate to see the fallout.
The script maintains a very high level of compulsion. Scene 6 is a pivotal turning point, escalating the conflict from personal frustration to potential criminal action. The unresolved tension from the earlier scenes – the ineffective police response, the increasing crime, and Robert's growing desperation – culminates in this bold, extralegal act. The introduction of the trap and its immediate, dramatic consequences create a powerful hook, ensuring the reader is deeply invested in how this will resolve.
Scene 7 - Injustice on a Dead-End Street
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
This scene is highly compelling due to its immediate aftermath and the drastic consequences for Robert. The rapid arrival of multiple police units and the dramatic confrontation with the porch pirate create intense immediate conflict. Robert's arrest, Lisa's futile attempts to defend him, and Abby's distress all amplify the emotional stakes. The irony of the "Safer Communities Through Smart Justice" sign in the holding cell is a powerful, thought-provoking moment that leaves the reader desperate to know what happens next. The scene masterfully sets up the next major plot point: Robert's legal battle and the family's struggle.
The script has built significant momentum towards this dramatic turning point. The repeated instances of crime and the perceived inaction of authorities have culminated in Robert's desperate act and subsequent arrest. This scene doesn't just resolve the immediate conflict of the porch pirate; it ignites a much larger legal and societal conflict. The juxtaposition of Robert's 'non-lethal' device and the system's reaction, combined with the earlier montage and dialogues about crime rates versus personal safety, creates a powerful narrative hook that makes the reader invested in seeing how this larger battle unfolds. The introduction of the 'The People of California vs. Robert Harrison' case in the next scene will be a direct consequence of this arrest, ensuring high engagement.
Scene 8 - Defiance in the Courtroom
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
This scene is an incredibly compelling climax and sets up the next phase of the story perfectly. The courtroom drama is heightened by Robert's defiant speech, directly challenging the legal system that has failed him. The judge's ruling, Lopez's smug satisfaction, and Robert's defiant gaze towards Abby all create immense narrative tension. The ending with 'ROBERT WILL COMPLY' and 'COMING SOON – THE FEATURE FILM' is a direct invitation to the reader to continue, promising a larger story. The scene ends with several open questions: will Robert be able to post bail? What are the implications of his defiance? How will Lopez and the state respond? And most importantly, what does Robert's internal 'war' entail? These questions, combined with the explicit indication of a feature film, create a massive desire to know what happens next.
The script has built an incredibly strong momentum towards this final act. The ongoing themes of the perceived breakdown of law and order in California, the state's bureaucratic inaction, and the individual's struggle against it have all converged here. Robert's transformation from a frustrated engineer to a defiant challenger of the system is complete, and the explicit framing as the end of Act III and a setup for a feature film signals that this is not the end of the narrative, but a significant turning point that demands further exploration. The unresolved conflict with the state, embodied by Lopez's "Robert will comply," creates a powerful hook for a continuation.
- Physical environment: The screenplay depicts a dualistic physical environment. One facet is the gritty, decaying urban landscape of Los Angeles, characterized by smog, graffiti, tents, broken glass, and a general sense of decay and danger. This urban environment is juxtaposed with more controlled, seemingly safer suburban neighborhoods. However, even these suburban areas are presented as isolated (dead-end streets) and prone to specific threats like porch pirates. There's also a stark contrast between the harshness of the outside world and the perceived safety of domestic spaces like homes and garages, though even these become arenas for conflict or the creation of defensive measures.
- Culture: The culture portrayed is one of escalating fear and a growing sense of disillusionment, particularly with the state's ability to provide safety and justice. There's a prevalent theme of apathy and inaction from bystanders in public spaces, contrasted with a rising tide of vigilantism driven by frustration. The concept of 'compliance' is a central cultural touchstone, presented by the state as a virtue and by characters like Robert as a point of contention and rebellion. There's also a cultural undertone of convenience and a reliance on technology for both daily life and, ironically, for defense.
- Society: The societal structure is depicted as strained and largely ineffective in providing basic safety and security. Limited resources and overwhelmed emergency services lead to delayed responses, creating a vacuum that citizens feel compelled to fill themselves. There's a stark divide between the perceived safety of 'smart justice' and the lived reality of crime and fear. Law enforcement appears reactive and bureaucratic, sometimes siding with accusers over victims due to a lack of evidence or a strict adherence to protocol. The legal system is presented as a complex, bureaucratic entity that can be manipulated, leading to a sense of injustice.
- Technology: Technology plays a significant role, ranging from everyday conveniences like laptops and phones to advanced defensive systems. The reliance on 911 and online registration portals highlights a society integrated with digital services, but also susceptible to their failures and bureaucratic delays. The most impactful technological development is Robert's self-made defensive devices, which represent a deliberate subversion of traditional security and a manifestation of his distrust in established systems. Technology is also a tool for surveillance, both by criminals (porch pirates scanning for cameras) and by citizens (witnesses filming incidents).
- Characters influence: The decaying urban environment and societal breakdown directly influence the Harrison family's experience, leading to anxiety and a sense of being unprotected in their new home. The ineffectiveness of law enforcement forces Robert to question his role as a law-abiding citizen and ultimately drives him to create his own solutions. Lisa's experiences as a victim of crime amplify her fears and her concern for her family's safety, leading her to confront Robert's extreme measures. Abby's experiences, witnessing her parents' struggles and encountering danger, shape her into a fearful child, but her emotional connection to Robert at the end suggests a potential for resilience. The characters' actions are shaped by a desperate need for security and justice in a world that seems to offer neither.
- Narrative contribution: The world elements serve as the engine for the narrative. The gritty urban environment and the sense of danger establish the initial conflict and the family's vulnerability. The societal issues of crime and overwhelmed services create the circumstances for Robert's frustration and his turn to vigilantism. The technological advancements, particularly Robert's homemade defenses, drive the plot forward into escalating confrontations and legal battles. The courtroom drama highlights the clash between individual perceived justice and state-sanctioned law, forming the climax of the story.
- Thematic depth contribution: The world-building deeply contributes to the screenplay's thematic depth by exploring the tension between law and justice, compliance and defiance, and security versus freedom. The contrast between the 'smart justice' rhetoric and the reality of the streets, coupled with Robert's actions, forces the audience to question the effectiveness and fairness of established systems. The narrative grapples with the moral implications of vigilantism, the breakdown of trust in authorities, and the primal instinct to protect one's family in a dangerous world. The smog-filled skies and decaying urban landscape serve as a potent metaphor for the moral and societal decay that the characters are navigating.
| Voice Analysis | |
|---|---|
| Summary: | The writer's voice is characterized by a potent blend of visceral realism and a sharp, unflinching examination of escalating tension and moral compromise. It manifests through concise, impactful dialogue that crackles with suppressed frustration and simmering anger. Scene direction is lean and purposeful, favoring atmospheric details that amplify unease and the palpable sense of threat. There's a consistent emphasis on the contrast between ordinary settings and extraordinary, often alarming, circumstances, underscoring the vulnerability of ordinary individuals thrust into extraordinary situations. The narrative builds with deliberate pacing, escalating stakes, and a keen focus on character reactions that reveal deeper emotional states and burgeoning resolve. |
| Voice Contribution | The writer's voice contributes significantly to the screenplay's mood by establishing a pervasive sense of anxiety and impending danger that permeates even mundane settings. It deepens the themes of vulnerability, resilience, and the erosion of societal trust by portraying characters grappling with the inadequacy of conventional systems and the desperate need for self-protection. The dialogue and direction work in tandem to create a gritty authenticity, making the characters' struggles and moral dilemmas feel intensely personal and profoundly resonant. This voice elevates the script from a mere procedural to a compelling character study on the fringes of societal breakdown. |
| Best Representation Scene | 5 - The Calm Before the Storm |
| Best Scene Explanation | Scene 5 best showcases the author's unique voice due to its masterful encapsulation of the transition from external threat to internal action, driven by a palpable shift in character. The dialogue, limited to Robert's chilling voice-over, is concise and impactful, revealing his calculated intent and the 'non-lethal, targeted, defensive' nature of his creation. The scene direction is precise and atmospheric, focusing on the meticulous, almost surgical, assembly of the device in the dim garage, which heightens the suspense and ominous tone. This scene perfectly blends the gritty realism of the family's vulnerability with the burgeoning moral ambiguity of Robert's response, demonstrating the writer's ability to build tension through action and implication rather than overt exposition. |
Style and Similarities
The writing style across the screenplay is characterized by its gritty realism, particularly in urban and unforgiving settings, and a strong emphasis on sharp, tension-building dialogue. The narratives often delve into complex character dynamics, moral ambiguity, and the exploration of societal issues through personal struggles and confrontational situations. There's a consistent thread of suspense, driven by both external threats and internal conflicts, often punctuated by unexpected twists and intense, dialogue-heavy encounters.
Style Similarities:
| Writer | Explanation |
|---|---|
| David Mamet | David Mamet's influence is prevalent throughout multiple scenes, evident in the focus on sharp, realistic dialogue that drives tension and conflict, realistic human interactions, subtle emotional shifts, moral ambiguity, and intense confrontations with power dynamics. |
| David Ayer | David Ayer's style is reflected in the gritty realism of urban life, harsh environments, personal conflicts, and intense character dynamics, especially within law enforcement contexts and the exploration of moral ambiguity. |
| Taylor Sheridan | Taylor Sheridan's thematic and stylistic elements appear in depictions of characters facing external threats and internal struggles in unforgiving settings, as well as a focus on justice, truth, and complex interpersonal relationships in crime narratives. |
| Aaron Sorkin | Aaron Sorkin's contribution is seen in fast-paced, dialogue-driven scenes that reveal character dynamics and motivations, sharp dialogue, and the exploration of moral and ethical dilemmas within institutional settings. |
Other Similarities: The screenplay masterfully blends elements of raw, character-driven drama with suspenseful plotting. The dialogue is a key tool for building tension and revealing character, suggesting a strong theatrical foundation. While grounded in realism, there are hints of complex narrative structures and moral quandaries that suggest a sophisticated approach to storytelling, potentially incorporating elements of both gritty crime dramas and intellectually stimulating thrillers.
Top Correlations and patterns found in the scenes:
| Pattern | Explanation |
|---|---|
| The 'Anxious' Tone as a Foundation for High Scores | Scenes labeled with 'Anxious' (Scenes 1-5, 7) consistently receive high scores across most categories, averaging around 8.7. This suggests that the author effectively utilizes anxiety to drive engagement, particularly in Concept, Plot, Dialogue, and Emotional Impact. When the narrative introduces tension and worry, the audience is likely to be more invested, leading to higher marks in these crucial areas. |
| Peak Performance in Confrontational and Intense Moments | The highest overall grades and scores for 'Conflict', 'High Stakes', and 'Move Story Forward' are achieved in scenes with more intense tones like 'Intense', 'Suspenseful', and 'Confrontational' (Scenes 6 and 8). Specifically, Scene 8, with its 'Confrontational' tone, scores a perfect 10 for Conflict and an average of 9.4 across all categories. This indicates that the author excels at escalating dramatic stakes and driving the plot when characters are in direct opposition or facing extreme pressure. |
| Dialogue Quality Surges with Increased Conflict and Emotionality | Dialogue scores consistently hover around 8, but spike to 9 in scenes with more pronounced 'Emotional' and 'Confrontational' tones (Scenes 6 and 8). This suggests that the author's dialogue becomes significantly more compelling and effective when characters are experiencing heightened emotions or are engaged in direct confrontation. The 'sarcastic' tone in Scene 2 also resulted in a high dialogue score (9), hinting that wit and sharp exchanges also resonate well. |
| Character Changes Mirror Escalating Stakes | The 'Character Changes' score, while generally solid, shows a noticeable increase from 7-8 in the earlier 'Anxious' scenes to 8-9 in the more intense and confrontational scenes (Scenes 4-8). This implies that the author is most effective at showcasing character development and transformation when those characters are placed under significant pressure or are experiencing pivotal moments of conflict and emotional release. The perfect 9 for Character Changes in Scene 8 aligns with its peak emotional and confrontational tone. |
| The Power of a Focused, High-Stakes Narrative | The very best scores (averaging 9.1 for Overall Grade and 8.9 for Move Story Forward) are concentrated in scenes where the tone is consistently 'Tense' and the stakes are clearly elevated (Scenes 4-8). While early scenes build anxiety effectively, the sustained high performance comes when the tension is coupled with clear plot progression and a sense of urgency, demonstrating the author's ability to maintain momentum and audience engagement when the narrative is focused and high-stakes. |
| Defensiveness as a Driver for Engagement | The 'Defensive' tone appears in Scenes 5 and 7, both of which receive high scores for 'Emotional Impact' (9) and 'Overall Grade' (9). This suggests that when characters are in a defensive posture, it often creates a scenario that is emotionally resonant and engaging for the reader/viewer, leading to higher overall quality assessments for those scenes. This might indicate an opportunity to explore defensiveness as a powerful tool for creating compelling character moments. |
Writer's Craft Overall Analysis
The screenplay demonstrates a strong foundation in establishing conflict, building tension, and conveying character emotions. The writer shows a consistent ability to create immersive and engaging scenes that effectively set up narrative arcs and explore thematic elements. There's a clear talent for crafting sharp dialogue and impactful emotional beats. The pacing often feels deliberate and effective in drawing the audience in, particularly in moments of suspense and moral complexity. The narrative direction is focused, ensuring that key plot points and character motivations are communicated clearly.
Key Improvement Areas
Suggestions
| Type | Suggestion | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Book | Read 'Story: Substance, Structure, Style, and the Principles of Screenwriting' by Robert McKee. | McKee's work provides a deep dive into the principles of storytelling, character archetypes, and thematic resonance, which will help the writer build even more robust internal character lives and thematic depth beyond immediate conflict. |
| Screenplay Study | Study screenplays known for their complex character motivations and subtle dialogue, such as 'Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind' by Charlie Kaufman or 'Marriage Story' by Noah Baumbach. | Analyzing how these screenplays explore internal struggles, build relationships through nuanced conversations, and balance emotional depth with narrative progression will directly address the key improvement areas of character depth and dialogue nuance. |
| Video Analysis | Watch videos on the 'Hero's Journey' and character archetypes in storytelling. | Understanding established narrative structures and character frameworks can provide tools to further develop characters' internal arcs and ensure their motivations are consistently compelling throughout the screenplay. |
| Exercise | Write a scene where two characters have a significant argument, but neither directly states their core grievance. Instead, their conflict should be revealed through their body language, subtext in their dialogue, and reactions to each other's indirect statements.Practice In SceneProv | This exercise directly targets the improvement of dialogue nuance and subtext, encouraging the writer to convey character emotions and conflicts through more subtle means, thus enriching character interactions. |
| Exercise | Take an existing scene and rewrite it with the goal of increasing the tension by introducing a specific, unexpected obstacle or a ticking clock element. Focus on how the characters react to this new pressure.Practice In SceneProv | This exercise hones the skill of pacing and suspense escalation by forcing the writer to actively manipulate the scene's dynamics and observe the impact of external pressures on character behavior. |
| Exercise | Choose one of your characters and write a series of journal entries or internal monologues from their perspective, exploring their deepest fears, desires, and past traumas that may not be overtly apparent in the screenplay.Practice In SceneProv | This exercise focuses on building character depth and internal conflict by encouraging the writer to delve into the unseen aspects of a character's psyche, which can then be subtly woven into their actions and dialogue in the screenplay. |
Here are different Tropes found in the screenplay
| Trope | Trope Details | Trope Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Vigilante Justice | Robert builds a defensive device to protect his family after feeling helpless against crime. | This trope involves a character taking the law into their own hands to seek justice, often due to a perceived failure of the legal system. An example is the film 'Death Wish' where the protagonist becomes a vigilante after his family is attacked. |
| The Everyman | Robert is portrayed as an ordinary aerospace engineer facing extraordinary circumstances. | This trope features a relatable protagonist who is thrust into a challenging situation, often highlighting their struggles. An example is 'The Pursuit of Happyness' where Chris Gardner faces numerous obstacles while trying to provide for his son. |
| Family in Peril | The Harrison family faces threats from crime, putting their safety at risk. | This trope involves a family being endangered, often leading to a desperate fight for survival. A classic example is 'Home Alone' where a young boy defends his home from burglars. |
| Sarcastic Humor | Characters use sarcasm to cope with their stressful situations, such as Lisa's remark about California. | This trope involves characters using sarcasm as a coping mechanism in tense situations. An example is 'The Office' where characters often use sarcasm to deal with workplace absurdities. |
| The Call for Help | Robert repeatedly calls 911 for assistance but receives inadequate responses. | This trope highlights the frustration of characters seeking help from authorities who are unable or unwilling to assist. An example is 'The Purge' where characters call for help but find no one is coming. |
| The Unreliable Narrator | Robert's perspective on safety and crime is challenged by the contrasting news reports. | This trope involves a narrator whose credibility is compromised, leading to a skewed perception of events. An example is 'Fight Club' where the protagonist's understanding of reality is deeply flawed. |
| The Law vs. The Vigilante | Robert's actions lead to a confrontation with law enforcement after he sets a trap. | This trope explores the conflict between legal authority and those who take justice into their own hands. An example is 'Batman' where the titular character often clashes with the police. |
| The Innocent Child | Abby, the daughter, represents innocence and is affected by the family's struggles. | This trope features a child who embodies purity and vulnerability, often used to evoke sympathy. An example is 'The Lion King' where young Simba's innocence is central to the story. |
| The Irony of Compliance | Robert's plea of 'not guilty' highlights the irony of his situation in a state focused on compliance. | This trope emphasizes the contradiction between societal expectations and individual actions. An example is 'The Matrix' where characters grapple with the concept of choice versus control. |
Memorable lines in the script:
| Scene Number | Line |
|---|---|
| 7 | PORCH PIRATE: He tried to kill me! He booby-trapped his house! |
| 8 | ROBERT: ...then maybe the law’s the one that needs to comply. |
| 6 | PORCH PIRATE: I’M BLIND! HELP! HELP ME! |
| 2 | Lisa: You said California was good for us. Better money. |
| 1 | ROBERT: Yes—there’s a guy checking cars again. Fourth time this week. 1249 East Amber Court. |
Logline Analysis
Top Performing Loglines
Creative Executive's Take
This logline effectively captures the essence of the story by highlighting the father's transformation from a concerned citizen to a vigilante due to police indifference. It emphasizes the societal implications of his actions, making it commercially appealing as it taps into current themes of safety and justice. The phrase 'who gets to define criminality' adds a provocative question that invites audiences to reflect on the justice system, enhancing its marketability.
Strengths
This logline clearly outlines the protagonist's background and the moral dilemma he faces, making it relatable and engaging.
Weaknesses
The phrase 'turns him into the state’s newest example' could be more specific to enhance clarity.
Suggested Rewrites
Detailed Scores
| Criterion | Score | Reason | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hook | 9 | The moral dilemma is intriguing and relevant. | "It raises questions about justice and personal safety." |
| Stakes | 9 | The stakes are high, involving personal safety and legal repercussions. | "The conflict with the justice system adds tension." |
| Brevity | 8 | The logline is a bit lengthy and could be tightened. | "Some phrases could be more concise." |
| Clarity | 9 | Generally clear, but some phrases could be simplified. | "The term 'newest example' is vague." |
| Conflict | 9 | There is a clear conflict between personal safety and legal compliance. | "The protagonist's fear versus the justice system creates tension." |
| Protagonist goal | 10 | The father's goal to protect his family is explicit. | "His actions are directly tied to his family's safety." |
| Factual alignment | 10 | Aligns well with the script's themes of crime and justice. | "Reflects the protagonist's journey and societal issues." |
Creative Executive's Take
This logline succinctly encapsulates the protagonist's journey and the moral dilemma he faces. The use of 'meticulous aerospace engineer' establishes a relatable character, while 'non-lethal ambush' intrigues potential viewers with the promise of tension and conflict. The phrase 'forcing him to decide whether to comply' introduces a compelling internal struggle that resonates with audiences, making it both factually accurate and commercially appealing.
Strengths
This logline effectively captures the protagonist's motivation and the societal implications of his actions, creating a compelling narrative hook.
Weaknesses
The phrasing is somewhat complex, which may hinder immediate understanding for some audiences.
Suggested Rewrites
Detailed Scores
| Criterion | Score | Reason | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hook | 10 | The societal question posed is intriguing and thought-provoking. | "It invites the audience to consider deeper themes of justice." |
| Stakes | 10 | The stakes are high, involving public outrage and legal consequences. | "The mention of 'politicized prosecution' raises the stakes significantly." |
| Brevity | 8 | The logline is a bit lengthy, which could be streamlined. | "It could be more concise without losing meaning." |
| Clarity | 8 | The logline is clear but slightly convoluted. | "The phrase 'who gets to define criminality' may confuse some readers." |
| Conflict | 9 | There is a strong conflict between personal safety and legal definitions. | "The tension between law enforcement and the father's actions is evident." |
| Protagonist goal | 9 | The father's goal is clear: to protect his family. | "His engineering skills are directly tied to his actions." |
| Factual alignment | 10 | The logline aligns well with the themes presented in the script. | "It reflects the narrative's exploration of crime and justice." |
Creative Executive's Take
This logline effectively conveys the protagonist's disillusionment and the stakes involved in his actions. By mentioning 'rising crime and indifferent authorities,' it taps into contemporary societal fears, making it relevant and engaging. The phrase 'dramatic courtroom confrontation' promises a thrilling climax, appealing to audiences who enjoy legal dramas and moral quandaries, thus enhancing its commercial viability.
Strengths
This logline succinctly captures the protagonist's motivation and the conflict he faces, making it relatable and engaging.
Weaknesses
The phrase 'challenges the very notion of justice' could be more specific to enhance clarity.
Suggested Rewrites
Detailed Scores
| Criterion | Score | Reason | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hook | 8 | The legal battle is intriguing but could be more compelling. | "It hints at deeper themes but lacks immediate impact." |
| Stakes | 9 | The stakes are high, involving personal safety and legal repercussions. | "The legal battle adds significant tension." |
| Brevity | 9 | The logline is concise and to the point. | "It effectively communicates the main ideas without excess." |
| Clarity | 9 | Generally clear, but could be more direct in some areas. | "The term 'notion of justice' is somewhat vague." |
| Conflict | 9 | There is a clear conflict between personal safety and legal compliance. | "The protagonist's actions lead to a legal confrontation." |
| Protagonist goal | 10 | The father's goal to protect his family is explicit. | "His actions are directly tied to his family's safety." |
| Factual alignment | 10 | Aligns well with the script's themes of crime and justice. | "Reflects the protagonist's journey and societal issues." |
Creative Executive's Take
This logline presents a clear conflict and stakes, focusing on the father's desperate measures to protect his family. The term 'non-lethal security system' suggests innovation and creativity, which can attract viewers interested in technology and DIY solutions. The mention of a 'legal battle' adds tension and drama, making it a strong contender for audiences looking for thrillers with moral complexity.
Strengths
This logline effectively conveys the protagonist's disillusionment and the consequences of his actions, creating a strong narrative arc.
Weaknesses
The phrase 'challenges the very definition of compliance' could be more impactful with a clearer connection to the protagonist's journey.
Suggested Rewrites
Detailed Scores
| Criterion | Score | Reason | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hook | 8 | The courtroom confrontation is intriguing but could be more compelling. | "It hints at deeper themes but lacks immediate impact." |
| Stakes | 9 | The stakes involve personal safety and legal consequences. | "The courtroom confrontation heightens the stakes." |
| Brevity | 8 | The logline is a bit lengthy and could be streamlined. | "Some phrases could be condensed." |
| Clarity | 9 | Clear overall, but some phrases could be more direct. | "The term 'definition of compliance' is somewhat abstract." |
| Conflict | 9 | There is a strong conflict between personal action and legal repercussions. | "The protagonist's actions lead to a legal battle." |
| Protagonist goal | 9 | The protagonist's goal is clear: to protect his family. | "His actions stem from frustration with authorities." |
| Factual alignment | 10 | Aligns well with the script's themes of crime and justice. | "Reflects the protagonist's journey and societal issues." |
Creative Executive's Take
This logline highlights the protagonist's internal conflict and the consequences of his actions, making it relatable and engaging. The phrase 'the wrong side of the law he tried to uphold' creates a compelling irony that can draw in viewers. It effectively captures the essence of the story while addressing broader themes of justice and personal responsibility, enhancing its appeal.
Strengths
This logline effectively highlights the protagonist's intelligence and the irony of his situation, creating a compelling narrative.
Weaknesses
The phrase 'on the wrong side of the law' is somewhat clichéd and could be more original.
Suggested Rewrites
Detailed Scores
| Criterion | Score | Reason | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hook | 8 | The irony of the situation is intriguing but could be more compelling. | "It hints at deeper themes but lacks immediate impact." |
| Stakes | 8 | The stakes are implied but could be more explicitly stated. | "The consequences of his actions are not fully explored." |
| Brevity | 9 | The logline is concise and to the point. | "It effectively communicates the main ideas without excess." |
| Clarity | 9 | Clear and straightforward, but could use more specificity. | "The phrase 'on the wrong side of the law' is common." |
| Conflict | 9 | There is a strong conflict between personal action and legal repercussions. | "The protagonist's actions lead to legal trouble." |
| Protagonist goal | 9 | The father's goal to protect his family is clear. | "His actions stem from a desire for safety." |
| Factual alignment | 10 | Aligns well with the script's themes of crime and justice. | "Reflects the protagonist's journey and societal issues." |
Other Loglines
- A family's attempt to feel safe in a new state fractures when the father weaponizes his engineering skills against petty thieves—transforming a vigilante stunt into a courtroom spectacle that tests the meaning of compliance.
- In a near-future-feeling Los Angeles, a displaced man’s DIY defense becomes a media and legal battleground; the trial that follows asks whether civil obedience or personal protection is the true civic duty.
- A short, topical thriller: an engineer's carefully designed defenses against porch theft lead to an arrest and a courtroom showdown where the state's rhetoric about 'safer communities' collides with the messy reality of survival.
- When his family becomes the target of escalating crime in Los Angeles, a father's faith in the system crumbles, forcing him to become a vigilante and face the full might of the law he once believed in.
- An aerospace engineer's move to California for a better life turns into a nightmare of crime and bureaucratic apathy, culminating in a bold act of defiance that puts him at odds with the state.
- In a state that claims safety, a father's desperate attempt to protect his family with a homemade defense system backfires, igniting a legal battle that questions who is truly the lawbreaker.
- Seeking safety and prosperity, a family finds only fear and neglect, pushing one man to break the law in order to uphold his family's security, only to be judged by the very system that failed him.
- Forced to comply with a legal system that fails to protect his family, a father takes matters into his own hands, setting off a chain of events that pits him against the authorities in a high-stakes confrontation.
- In a California community plagued by crime, a father resorts to unconventional measures to safeguard his family, sparking a conflict that questions the boundaries between vigilantism and self-defense.
- A father's quest to shield his family from the rising tide of crime in California leads him to create a non-lethal security system, igniting a clash with the law that forces him to confront the limits of compliance.
- Driven by a desire to protect his loved ones in a lawless California neighborhood, a father's actions to deter thieves land him in a legal battle that challenges the very foundations of the justice system.
- A aerospace engineer in crime-ridden California builds a homemade defense system after police fail to protect his family, leading to a dramatic confrontation with the law.
- When bureaucratic inefficiency allows threats to escalate, a compliant family man turns vigilante, challenging the state's definition of justice in a tense urban thriller.
- In a state that demands compliance, one father's desperate measures to safeguard his loved ones expose the flaws in a system more focused on control than safety.
- A family's move to California turns nightmarish with rising crime, pushing the patriarch to extreme non-lethal defenses and a courtroom battle over vigilantism.
- Exploring the conflict between personal protection and legal mandates, a man's stand against urban decay questions who truly enforces compliance in society.
- An aerospace engineer's family becomes the target of repeated crimes in a failing system, forcing him to build his own justice when the authorities won't respond.
- A father's desperate measures to protect his family from neighborhood crime spark a legal battle that questions who really needs to comply with justice.
- In a state where crime statistics don't match reality, one man's homemade security system becomes the test case for a broken justice system.
- The system told him to wait. The criminals told him he was vulnerable. His family told him they were scared. So Robert stopped complying.
Help & FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
After that, the high-level menu will offer insights into the story, themes, and characters.
The scene-by-scene analysis will demonstrate how each scene performs across various criteria, summarized in the column headings.
Click on any scene title to view the full analysis, including critiques and suggestions for improvement.
'Other Analyses' provides various insights into your writing and different perspectives, although it might not lead to significant rewrites of your script.
You can play it for free. If you have scripts analyzed, the AI might recommend exercises from SceneProv to help you improve your writing. Go to the craft tab to see what it recommended.
Let the AI take a turn when you're blocked or you want to riff on a scene. Each scene you create in SceneProv gets graded at the end.
- The email might have gone to your spam folder or is hidden in an email thread.
- The process might still be ongoing. Register/Login with the email you used during upload and look at the status. It sometimes takes as long as a couple hours. If it's been longer than that email us at [email protected]
Feature Request
Got an idea to improve our service? We'd love to hear it!
Scene by Scene Emotions
suspense Analysis
Executive Summary
Suspense is masterfully employed in 'Robert Will Comply,' escalating from a low-level unease in Scene 1 to a high-stakes confrontation by the end. The screenplay effectively uses foreshadowing, escalating threats against the family, and the slow, bureaucratic response of authorities to build tension. Robert's increasing desperation and eventual vigilante action are the primary drivers of suspense, culminating in a climactic courtroom scene that promises further conflict.
Usage Analysis
Critique
Suggestions
Questions for AI
fear Analysis
Executive Summary
Fear is a pervasive emotional undercurrent in 'Robert Will Comply,' driving the narrative from the initial unease of living in a perceived unsafe environment to direct threats against the family and ultimately Robert's own legal jeopardy. The screenplay effectively uses the fear of crime, the fear of helplessness, and the fear of consequences to develop characters and escalate the plot.
Usage Analysis
Critique
Suggestions
Questions for AI
joy Analysis
Executive Summary
Joy in 'Robert Will Comply' is almost entirely absent, existing only as a faint echo of the family's past or a fleeting, ironic contrast to their present misery. The screenplay strategically uses its absence to highlight the bleak reality of their new life in California, emphasizing their disillusionment and the oppressive circumstances they face. Any hint of joy would undermine the film's thematic core.
Usage Analysis
Critique
Suggestions
Questions for AI
sadness Analysis
Executive Summary
Sadness pervades 'Robert Will Comply,' manifesting as a deep-seated disillusionment, helplessness, and the erosion of hope. It's not typically expressed through overt crying but through quiet desperation, haunted expressions, and the melancholy of unfulfilled promises. The screenplay uses sadness to underscore the characters' struggles against a system that fails them.
Usage Analysis
Critique
Suggestions
Questions for AI
surprise Analysis
Executive Summary
Surprise in 'Robert Will Comply' is used strategically to punctuate escalating tension and highlight the unexpected consequences of the characters' actions and the system's failures. The screenplay doesn't rely on cheap jump scares but on impactful reveals and twists that keep the audience engaged, from the shocking inefficiency of the 911 system to Robert's audacious defiance in court.
Usage Analysis
Critique
Suggestions
Questions for AI
empathy Analysis
Executive Summary
Empathy is central to 'Robert Will Comply,' skillfully evoked through the relatable struggles of the Harrison family. The screenplay fosters empathy by presenting them as an ordinary family facing extraordinary, and increasingly dangerous, circumstances in a new environment. Their vulnerability, frustration with an indifferent system, and ultimate desperation resonate deeply, making the audience connect with their plight and question their own responses in similar situations.
Usage Analysis
Critique
Suggestions
Questions for AI